Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
It probably shows way more cocaine than they recorded, and the cocaine that disappeared miraculously lowered the amount to a lesser charge. All done as a favor by the Sheriff at the bequest of Bob and Celeste, they are probably a family friend which would also explain why he would be willing to defy a court order for their benefit. Wouldn’t surprise me if that missing cocaine went right to April at Bob and Celeste’s house as part of her payment to stay quiet and they would make her charges go away.
Is Candy Yoshi county a den of corrupt evil pigs who frame people just for dissenting from the government? Do they really just break into random YouTube streamers' homes and throw around drugs and frame them?
Candy Yoshi's sherrif's department seems like it's comprised a whole bunch of dope thieving scoundrels and it is in the public interest to see it proved one way or the other if you want to know the truth about it.
 
LOL I always knew the bodycam footage would never come out and you people kept getting your hopes up. Several posts in here always made it sound like it was a sure thing when it clearly was most likely NOT going to happen based on the wording of the law. Tons of Kiwis screaming at the sky and counting their chickens before they hatched though. Add it to the pile of six gorillion pages that MNPR still has and whatever other clout chasing garbage @Potentially Criminal and Meme Copium have claimed exists.

Rackets won.

edit: give me your shitty stickers if it makes you feel better, the facts of the matter are what they are and won't change because you got misled
The finest connoisseur of Balldo goo
 
Kandiyohi was ordered by a judge to release the footage and now they're in damage control. The sheriff outright said he did not intend to comply with the judge's order until a local big law firm sent him a letter, and they have the clout in the state to actually intimidate.

We then asked the Department of Administration to rule and they also issued an opinion that the sheriff should comply. He said he would decide that to do on the 2nd.

Now, the prosecutor is jumping in to help. Seems like the county conspiracy does exist, but not to hurt that poor little crackhead.
This situation seems really bizarre. Isn't it highly unusual to try to alter the record what, 9 months, after the hearing took place?

If the case went to trial and then Nick appealed on the issue of April's statement as recorded by the body cam, would he really concede that he never offered the body camera footage as evidence in this hearing? It doesn't seem right to be able to raise an issue and then only after a plea deal and sentencing when the issue is no longer relevant say "Nvm. Forget we ever said that."
 
Now, the prosecutor is jumping in to help. Seems like the county conspiracy does exist, but not to hurt that poor little crackhead.

What I don't understand is why the county is willing to help him?
It could be a few different reasons, and it might not have anything to do with Nick

In the judicial system, the prosecutors / DAs and police always cover each other's backs. They have qualified immunity so they rarely suffer any consequences for their actions, even malfeasance.

And it sure seems like there is malfeasance here.

If the police don't want the bodycams released (for whatever reason, large or small), the police may have asked the DA to file this motion to give the sheriff legal cover to deny the release.

The police involved might not want their faces and interactions up on the Internet. Or their officers to look bad. Maybe they didn't follow some procedure properly. Maybe they don't want to be seen on camera scaring children. Or maybe the police don't want the attention.

It also might have something to do with Kiwi Farms specifically, in that the police don't want their bodycams up on this web site.

It's the government, and absent any force or FOIA or sunshine law to the contrary, they tend towards secrecy and protecting themselves and the bureaucracy.

Here, the personal interests of Nick Rekieta (and his crack house), and the county sheriff's office might actually overlap in that they both want to keep this footage from the public.

The fact the sheriff's office is conspiring with the DA shouldn't surprise anyone. These two entities do stuff like this all the time in every jurisdiction across the country.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
 
The fact the sheriff's office is conspiring with the DA shouldn't surprise anyone. These two entities do stuff like this all the time in every jurisdiction across the country.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
It is right and good that every so often judges and LEOs are made to assume the compliance position.
 
1748568370687.webp
Apparently Gabe Hoffman has something to say about Nick.
Archive
 
Shoutout to our friends @AnOminous @John Andrews Stan and @Gobermental Supervisor
Lmao. I like him bitching about me in the only way he can. He rarely acknowledges me because he knows I know that I own his punk ass in any way imaginable and if it came up to a fistfight or a wordfight I'd own him in both.
 
Absolutely disgusting. It's his go to response for everybody now.

Suffice to say, nobody here believes that @AnOminous. *fist bump*

This situation seems really bizarre. Isn't it highly unusual to try to alter the record what, 9 months, after the hearing took place?
No fucking shit! They are trying to do an end run around an administrative law judge decision, based upon what Null just said.
 
Back