Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Doug S]

Suddenly Ralph remembers the bet, it seems. Just like he drew it up!
View attachment 7428648
(L / A)

Trust me, someone had to remind him about that.

 

[Pelican Bones]

Ordered to

If you don't mind me asking, which court ordered it?

 

[AnOminous]

Not yet. He haven't suffered enough yet.

The dick in his mouth could always get harder.

I know it's tough waiting, but we don't even know what the dick he got in his mouth made him completely freak out on livestream and then suddenly cut out the stream.

But whatever it is. It gonna be FUUUUUUN.

This nigga is gonna be suffering some inevitable shit. He can't do DICK about it. He's gonna be LAUGHED AT.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

Who's dick did Nick suck for them to try and renege on releasing a fucking video of a guy nobody likes?

 

[AMHOLIO]

If somehow the footage reveals a crime commited by the cops or points to them taking more cocaine, this would be the most insane lolcow legal case ever. I am hoping it is just embarrassment since I rather not have Nick gloat about being right about conspiracy (while leaving his own self out of it even though he was more embarrassed), and I rather the cops not be such huge fuckups.

My last thought is feeling bad for the kids. They're already humiliated, I hope they don't get too much flack from their peers.

 

[Yung Bach]

Thirdly, somewhat reminiscent of the Floyd bodycam footage

The ghost of St. Floyd is kneeling on Rekieta’s motion lol

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

Sean just said people have gone to the courthouse and watched the bodycam video.

This would mean its 'in evidence' correct? You cant just view any bodycam footage by visiting a court house.

Its literally part of the record if they didnt need to FOIA it.

 

[DolphinMan]

At this point I think the drama around releasing the footage might be more exciting than the actual footage. That video has a lot to live up to!

 

[Balldo's Gate]

It doesn't take corruption to clarify or correct something that is incorrect. Looking only at the two or so pages from the transcript someone posted about 15 pages ago, everyone was wishy-washy and bumbling, but in context it's clear that the recordings were not being admitted into evidence at that time. The prosecutor said OK but I might use it later. If she didn't, she didn't. And as the motion mentioned, the Order didn't mention either of the recordings when it listed Exhibits. A motion from the state to correct the record they helped to confuse is appropriate.

The prosecutor wasn't the one presenting it as evidence at the omnibus hearing. Frank was the one who raised the issue regarding April's statement captured by the footage, uploading the footage as evidence, and the judge rejected it as premature. Frank claimed he found case law that suggested otherwise and said he wanted to make sure "that it was raised as early as possible."

The order doesn't mention either of the recordings, but it also doesn't mention the issue of April's statement which was mentioned in Frank's motion and the omnibus hearing.

Put it this way: if the case proceeded to trial and then an appeal on this issue, would Nick's lawyer for that appeal be willing to concede that Frank didn't raise the issue and didn't present evidence regarding it at this hearing?

 

[dustnight]

View attachment 7428594
(L/A)

He is so close to a full-on Patpost:

Enjoy
Prison
Child

Enjoy Josh acting like a baby

Don't worry Nick, we will!

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

What if we just feed the written accounts through AI and make our own bodycam footage?

 

[Mr.Bucket]

tell that to the people getting reported from the comment section

The only thing that is allowed in stallyn's comment section is bashing Aaron. They have more than balldo's gate level of delusional hatred of the guy.

I watch the clips on there because I prefer his clipping over Elisa's. But I stay far away from the comments.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

The dick in his mouth could always get harder.

In the world of Nicholas Robert Rekieta this is the definition of "fun time for all".

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

He also said that once something is in evidence they can't take it out

It wasn't admitted into evidence. They were uploaded to MNDES in anticipation of their being evidence, and you can request to have non-admitted materials removed. Frank White indicated he's put them there by saying he'd get rid of them*, so he should have requested deletion (account owner can request), but guess it wasn't important for that legal eagle. OR the stupid FAQ below is ambiguous, bc it references a deleting items in a "pre-hearing" status even after a hearing has occurred, so maybe it stays that status if not admitted.

* he's a terribly imprecise speaker

Does uploading my exhibits into MNDES automatically get the exhibits into evidence in my case?

No, you must first offer (ask the judicial officer to allow) your exhibits to be admitted as evidence at the time of the hearing or trial. The court will then determine whether the exhibits are admissible under the Rules of Evidence. See the “Exhibits” tab above for more information.​

What happens to the exhibits that I upload into MNDES and do not use?

Exhibits that you upload and do not offer to the court as evidence remain in MNDES until the retention period for all exhibits in the case is reached. You can request an exhibit in pre-hearing status be deleted any time before it is offered to the court during a hearing. To do so, , submit a deletion request from the portal. Court staff review deletion requests. Requests that are approved will process within 24 hours. If your request is denied, you will receive an email with a reason for the denial.​

https://www.mncourts.gov/Help-Topics/Evidence-and-Exhibits.aspx

upload of two complete bodycam MP4 files into MNDES as exhibits in support of a contested omnibus motion would have made those exhibits public, but for today's desperate ploy to undo that mistake by claiming that those exhibits were somehow withdrawn or made moot by comments uttered in the omnibus hearing.

The guidance references a "hearing," not a trial, and contemplates exactly the scenario of uploading but not being admitted into evidence.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nah, do not forget Barnes and Branca as well.

As I said “Nick and his tard fans.”

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

At this point I think the drama around releasing the footage might be more exciting than the actual footage. That video has a lot to live up to!

Nicks reaction to the video being released would be probably the apex of it. Because he'd have nothing left. This drama is juicy, but what its release would do to nick that's what I want to see.

 

[Steamboat Captain]

At this point I think the drama around releasing the footage might be more exciting than the actual footage. That video has a lot to live up to!

I'm already convinced that Nick's reaction (and that is his Balldo orbiters) is going to be 10X better than what we might see on that body cam.

 

[The Backwards Man]

Someone's not happy.
View attachment 7428287
archive

This is why you don't stick your dick in crazy, Jersh.

 

[Pedophobe]

What if we just feed the written accounts through AI and make our own bodycam footage?

AI won't be able to invent anything as horrific as the real thing.

 

[800 Chupacabras]

I can't tell if this is yet another devo reference

Has more of a Talking Heads cadence to me.