💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.4%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 279 39.6%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.3%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 174 24.7%
  • Total voters
    705
Null said:
Yes.

There's more coming. They're both very indignant about the whole thing. Hardin is a foia attorney at heart and this is basically his passion in law.
Click to expand...
The entire situation is just fucking bizarre. It has to be a completely bespoke legal situation. the lawyers I work with would be knocking down the door and screaming at these people to cut this shit out, apologize, and immediately establish a timeline to hand the records over. No rational person would engage in this shit if they weren't being directly ordered to make retarded legal decisions by political leadership.
 
I have a feeling between this, the Monty case, and the Greer case (which Nick is oh so hoping the Farms loses just to spite Null), Nick is gonna learn to REALLY hate Hardin.

And that's beautiful. :story:
 
indomitable snowman said:
Jack Murphy is many things, but at least he didn't give his children cocaine.
Click to expand...
Nick's definitely in the top tier of despicable lolcows on here

Only beaten by confirmed pedophiles like Nick Bates and Amos Yee

I'd argue he's worse than Chris Chan because Chris didn't have any children he beat and forced to live in a hoarder hell house
 
Null said:
The fire rises
Click to expand...

apologies for the dumb question but if wentzell signed off on removing it as evidence then why would he be motivated to sign off on putting back in? is it assumed that he would make some argument and refuse to sign off and an appeals judge will see this and bring down the hammer? or is there a chance he would sign off on it? i'm assuming he knows about the situation and so there's nothing in the motion that would be news to wentzell re: Hardin trying to get the bodycam. unless he's clueless about the context and was just deferring to the prosecutor/sherriff's office.
 
James done did it said:
The entire situation is just fucking bizarre. It has to be a completely bespoke legal situation. the lawyers I work with would be knocking down the door and screaming at these people to cut this shit out, apologize, and immediately establish a timeline to hand the records over. No rational person would engage in this shit if they weren't being directly ordered to make retarded legal decisions by political leadership.
Click to expand...
I was discussing this, and at this point my input is not relevant. I don't think I'm a party to any of this anymore. It's Hardin and Bromke now and they call the shots. The Zugzwang they're setting up is probably something that almost never happens in litigation history, because most cases are between two parties, and in this instance the antagonist is that government. I'm actually really excited because it's going up make a great story. I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up on big YouTube channels eventually.
 
Firefox_Screenshot_2025-05-31T05-03-28.743Z.webp
 
Coon Cheese said:
but we haven't got conformation of the Balldo or the vibroaldo. We need 4k footage to see the Balldo
Click to expand...
that may as well be an alien relic to a rural county sheriff. it's just an ambiguous piece of material. they cannot comprehend what purpose or demonic power it serves by viewing it. it's an irrational object that they don't even recognize. it would need an frame-by-frame inspection by the top alog soldiers to spot.

which leaves the question; what else is going on in that house that is not standard trailer park crack head shit that only the top lolcow degenerate has going on?
 
D_Tractor said:
View attachment 7433773
Click to expand...
https://mn.gov/admin/data-practices/data/types/body-camera/

For reference. Now that the appeal is in it should be retained under a litigation hold and will (or should, absent the unwritten "josh is the nigger of the world" law) result in a nasty settlement if deleted. But absent that litigation hold, yeah, it could be deleted legally. Or illegally. Like I previously said, the reality is unless you're directly covering up your own crimes nobody ever actually faces personal liability for records issues, across the country it's just a pile-on charge. Muh prosecutorial discretion and such.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom