Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.5%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 27.5%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 46 15.4%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 102 34.2%
  • Total voters
    298
Seafarer said:
Isn’t evidence in a criminal trial still legally required to be retained for some time even after the criminal case has concluded?
Click to expand...
This has been brought up ad nassium in the past 24 hours: they’ve already demonstrated a disregard for the law. Even if Null wins a noncompliance lawsuit against the county, restitution would merely be monetary, with no repercussions towards the sheriff or prosecutor and the footage still gone.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Jershua Coomer Troon, WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows, Peanut Butter Trails and 10 others
Dixieland Buckaroo said:
Another funny bit- did Nick's lawyer, Mr White, even need to put the footage into evidence? Obviously it wasn't used. Could this all have been moot if Nick had hired moderately competent counsel?
Click to expand...
Nick’s whole contention was that April wasn’t Mirandized. Because presumably he was too occupied whining about probable cause at the time to notice that she in fact was.
So he probably ordered the bodycam be put into the system to epically own the cops, and the lawyer didn’t bother to watch through it all to see that it proved the exact opposite.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dropa5pack, make_it_so, WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows and 8 others
Seafarer said:
Isn’t evidence in a criminal trial still legally required to be retained for some time even after the criminal case has concluded?
Click to expand...
That's a big part of this issue here. We had video that was entered into evidence for a criminal trial and now they're claiming it's not evidence anymore. If it's not evidence, retention practices say keep it 90 days (bodycam retention policy linked earlier in the thread). Absent ongoing litigation they'd be free to delete it at this point.

This is an extremely atypical scenario. I have never seen or heard of this happening, ever. Both because usually the justice system is more than happy to let the public see video that 100% vindicates their conduct, and because it's an utterly retarded legal stance.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: make_it_so, WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows, byuuWasTaken and 10 others
Seafarer said:
Isn’t evidence in a criminal trial still legally required to be retained for some time even after the criminal case has concluded?
Click to expand...
I would think they'd want to keep it until it's fully settled, in this case his probation is over, so 5 years just in case shit hits the fan and they bring back the charges.
But that doesn't mean anything. They'll still delete it "on accident" if they want.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Dropa5pack, byuuWasTaken, Peanut Butter Trails and 5 others
Lampon3 said:
View attachment 7434375

suffah
Click to expand...
1748701458570.webp
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Jershua Coomer Troon, Arkin O'Brien and 22 others
According to Twitter user @MiseryClips, Nick Rekieta deleted his vitriolic exchange between himself and Faren Fronczak, also known as "FaranBalanced".
1748701501407.webp
[ X / Archive ]

Checking RekietaLaw Twitter myself, this appears to be true. The noted tweets are missing, however some of their bickering remains.
It is rare for Nick to delete entire conversations, did Nick receive any form of threat from Faren?
Further salacious details to go public unless he complies?
GsRVH2AWIAAkEO6.webpGsRVG32XcAA9LOp.webpGsRVFvJW8AAPDeq.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Local Fed, Coo Coo Bird, beautiful person and 96 others
Sneed Force One said:
According to Twitter user @MiseryClips, Nick Rekieta deleted his vitriolic exchange between himself and Faren Fronczak, also known as "FaranBalanced".
View attachment 7434957
[ X / Archive ]

Checking @RekietaLaw Twitter myself, this appears to be true.
It is rare for Nick to delete entire conversations, did Nick receive any form of threat from Faren?
Further salacious details to go public unless he complies?
View attachment 7434965View attachment 7434966View attachment 7434967
Click to expand...
SAD! PATHETIC!
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Arkin O'Brien, Dropa5pack, Birdbonks and 29 others
Sneed Force One said:
It is rare for Nick to delete entire conversations, did Nick receive any form of threat from Faren?
Click to expand...

Nick was moving in the direction of trying to fight with her over who wanted to socialize with who. Its easy to speculate that she has things she could drop on that subject that Nick would not want dropped. Going back a long time, there was secondhand information that they were discussing swinging at one point and that Kayla was involved in the discussions.

It would have taken a significant threat to get Nick to totally back down like this after going so tough at her and picking a fight with her. Nick had been careful in the past to let this sleeping dog of a dispute alone. I'm sure that there are things there he doesn't want coming out.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Arkin O'Brien, Dropa5pack, often puzzled and 17 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back