UK Vikings were not all white, pupils to be told - Charity’s guidance for tutors advises decolonisation of lessons to ditch ‘Eurocentric ideas’

Craig Simpson
31 May 2025 2:03pm BST

Vikings were “very diverse” and not all white, according to a guide to teaching schoolchildren.

Tutors placed in schools by The Brilliant Club, an educational charity, have been urged to ditch “Eurocentric” ideas in favour of a “decolonised narrative” that moves subjects away from a Western focus.

A guide produced by the charity suggests ditching the idea that the Vikings were a “homogenous community of blonde Scandinavians”.

Instead, tutors are told to consider teaching that “Vikings were not all white”.

The guidance, intended to make lessons more “relatable” for pupils, adds that Vikings were “a very diverse group of people” with “diverse religious beliefs” and urges the tutors to consider that “some Vikings became practising Muslims”.

This claim appears to rely on Islamic goods being found in the graves of some Vikings, who traded with the Islamic world.

1748801275905.webp
The Vikings sailed all over the world and traded with the Islamic world Credit: Bettmann

The last large-scale study of Viking DNA, conducted by the University of Cambridge in 2020, suggested that diversity in Scandinavian genetics came from other parts of Europe and what is now Russia.

The Brilliant Club runs a scholarship programme that places PhD students in more than 800 schools to tutor underprivileged pupils and help them get to university. Schools can apply to receive tutoring, and PhD students can apply for paid placements in Brilliant Club schools.

It has created two “decolonising your course” toolkits to help tutors with the courses they will deliver when working within schools. The guides present them with a preferred “decolonised” approach narrative which is contrasted with a “Eurocentric and colonised” version of history.

It states that there is an “imperative to provide material to students that they can relate to and connect with … part of this should be presenting them with courses where they can see themselves represented positively”.

The guidance also stresses that making courses more relatable is not simply about “adding token black figures into courses”.

‘Anglo-Saxon’ controversy​

Guidance for arts courses suggests tutors should not only teach Romanticism by referencing the great Romantic poets – including Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley and Byron – but find writers who are not just “upper-class white men”.

Tutors are also asked to consider the decolonised narrative of the spread of democracy across the world, which is defined as: “Parliamentary democratic rule, a form of Western democracy, was exported and enforced on colonial subjects for the purpose of exploitation and domination.”

The guide makes several other suggestions for tutors, including being aware of the controversial nature of the term “Anglo-Saxon”.

It states: “This was not the term the people then used to refer to themselves” and adds that the term has “a long history of being used in a racially charged manner”.

Alfred the Great was referred to as “Rex Angul-Saxonum”, the king of the Anglo-Saxons, in the 10th century.

‘Decolonising’ university curriculums​

Jane Austen was replaced on a Stirling University literature course to help the “decolonisation of the curriculum”. The author of Pride and Prejudice was replaced by Toni Morrison, a writer known for works about the African American experience, as the focus of an English module at the Scottish university.

A creative writing course at the University of Salford dismissed sonnets as “products of white western culture”. Although writing the traditional form employed by poets from Petrarch to Auden formed part of an assessment for the university course, “pre-established literary forms” were reviewed as part of a shakeup to “decolonise the curriculum”.

Cambridge music students were instructed to “decolonise the ear” and consider Mozart as “an imperial phenomenon”. Undergraduates studying for the course were taught to consider listening to sound in a “postcolonial” way, while a “music, power, empire” module explored how the classical repertoire was a middle-class and imperial phenomenon.

The Brilliant Club has said that it is not a leading expert on decolonising, but encourages tutors to reflect on inclusive and thoughtful teaching practices.

Its guidance to tutors is in line with other “decolonising” work, which seeks to move away from Western accounts of history and science, and away from artistic canons that are seen to privilege the creative work of Western figures.

William Shakespeare’s birthplace is one of a number of sites to be “decolonised”, and the practice can also include addressing imperial history and ideas of national identity that are seen to be potentially controversial.

In 2024, the University of Nottingham removed the term “Anglo-Saxon” from its leading course over fears that the ethnonym could play into “nationalist narratives”.

In 2023, it emerged that Cambridge taught students that Anglo-Saxons did not exist as a distinct ethnic group, as part of efforts to undermine “myths of nationalism”.

The terminology of “early medieval England” is the preferred replacement for “Anglo-Saxon” by academics concerned that the latter has become a phrase surrounding white identity used by racists, principally to describe those in the US descended from white early settlers.

Source (Archive)
 
Guidance for arts courses suggests tutors should not only teach Romanticism by referencing the great Romantic poets – including Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley and Byron – but find writers who are not just “upper-class white men”.
Would these be the same "upper class white men" who were the only one's who could afford to spend time writing poetry because everyone else was spending their time just surviving?

I note they place the onus on the teacher to "find writers" - presumably because there aren't any but they don't want to let the opportunity to subvert things go.

I hope these people get shown the door by any schools they approach rather than let them teach kids this nonsense.
 
Not content to let Paki's rape thier women and troons to groom thier children Britains now let anti-white "scholars" groom and rape thier children's minds

Didn't you know niggets built Stonehenge?
Didn't you know Cheddar man had black skin?
Didn't didn't know that the King Arthur lengend is cis-normative fasco-religous propaganda? King Arthur was actually a brown former slave who rebelled against Anglo-Saxon colonialism?
Didn't you know that white people are evil and should all self delete? Well except me and my friends as we're good allies to the true people of this nation

GET FUCKED
 
In 2024, the University of Nottingham removed the term “Anglo-Saxon” from its leading course over fears that the ethnonym could play into “nationalist narratives”.

In 2023, it emerged that Cambridge taught students that Anglo-Saxons did not exist as a distinct ethnic group, as part of efforts to undermine “myths of nationalism”.
The whole "Hey ahmed, vikings liked basketball, stealing and rape, you can be just like them!" is just think of the keehds window-dressing. You don't want a lil niglet to feel blue now do you? The ultimate point is to eliminate from the mind of the natives any idea that there was ever a time where the Nigger was Not. It should go to show how flimsy and nakedly evil they know all this is, that their 1# mission to to eliminate even the historical reality of a world without muzzies and blacks, lest it revive in any manner the spirit of the whites.

We’ve got a very simple rule, which is: we don’t obey history. History is terrible, it’s appalling, it’s full of oppression and awfulness, so why should we obey it? If we’re writing a story set in the past, we make it aspirational, we make it what it should have been. We don’t put people of colour into historical settings and then have them face racism unless that’s what the story is about. Otherwise, we create a world where they belong, where they’re part of the story, because that’s the world we want to see."
-Russel T Davies, director of Dr. Who from 2005-2010, 2023-
 
Vikings were not all white
That makes no sense, they were created by Yakub.

Well actually
German-Chinese military cooperation in the 1920s-mid 1930s isn't well known but was fairly significant.. Hindsight being 20/20 it probably would have been better for Hitler to stick with China instead of Japan.
 
Give it a few years and we will be at "Not all Nazis were white"
They weren’t. There were Pajeet and African Nazi units.
IMG_1669.webp
Other populations known to have joined the Nazi side include Tibetans, Māoris, Pacific Islanders, various Asians, and Muslims.

‘Nazis were racists’ is a deliberate mis-representation of the Third Reich.
 
The vikings are literally famous for travelling all over the place trading and pillaging all kinds of shit from just about everybody they encountered. Not to mention they were balls deep in the slave trade. Being buried with shit from the middle east doesn't imply they were muslim or that they weren't europeans. It only shows they valued whatever they were buried with, that was likely bought or taken in a raid

These people are fucking idiots
 
They weren’t. There were Pajeet and African Nazi units.
View attachment 7440612
Other populations known to have joined the Nazi side include Tibetans, Māoris, Pacific Islanders, various Asians, and Muslims.

‘Nazis were racists’ is a deliberate mis-representation of the Third Reich.

Yup, the Arab/Muslim-Nazi friendship is well known. lasting well beyond WW2.. leading to a lot of the extremist and terrorist problems in the ME to this day.

Indeed.. They had races and "races" they viewed as enemies but not in the way a modern white supremacist or racist would today.. Just look how many went to south America to hide/live after the war.
 
They weren’t. There were Pajeet and African Nazi units.
View attachment 7440612
Other populations known to have joined the Nazi side include Tibetans, Māoris, Pacific Islanders, various Asians, and Muslims.

‘Nazis were racists’ is a deliberate mis-representation of the Third Reich.
Desire for manpower in a conflict makes people do pragmatic things. The 3rd Reich in World War 2 and their attempts to get everyone with a grudge against British, French and USSR to join them is a good example of this.
 
The last large-scale study of Viking DNA, conducted by the University of Cambridge in 2020, suggested that diversity in Scandinavian genetics came from other parts of Europe and what is now Russia.
Yes, because it's very well documented that the Vikings travelled up the Volga River. Then they took the best looking Russian women home with them.
 
Yup, the Arab/Muslim-Nazi friendship is well known.
Desire for manpower in a conflict makes people do pragmatic things.
National Socialism was a reactionary movement to oppose the rising power of globalist Marxist socialism. Hitler’s great concern was an untouchable international cabal of socialist authoritarians ruling the entire planet and overriding each nations’ ability to best represent the will and wants of its own people.

To that end he welcomed into his military people from other nations who also opposed Marxist socialism, in the hopes that they would return home after the USSR’s defeat and spread his anti-communist philosophy.

The reason Jews were targeted in 1930’s-1940’s Germany was because they were the primary vector for Marxist unrest and had established a parallel society that had learned to extract wealth from the German people without contributing back.

Jews and non-German citizens who believed and participated in National Socialist ideals held a multitude of positions within various reich ministries and even served in the Waffen-SS. The claim that Nazis were ‘racists’ may suit modern sensibilities, but it’s at best a gross distortion of the truth.
 
Last edited:
Back