US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WSJ Stupid Question said:
Can the ‘Abundance Agenda’ Save the Democrats?
The only thing that is going to save the Democrats is their decaying election fraud apparatus. Once that is gone they are gone.

They have revealed themselves to be tyrannical communistic child butchers who would rather you be raped and murdered than say no to a parasite infested brown person.

Kind of hard to bounce back from that when your best and brightest are a closet homosexual named Corey Booker, a failed bartender who does not understand broccoli, a bucktoothed retard from Texas, and whatever the fuck Hakeem Jefferies is...

The power brokers of the party are dying and the only thing waiting to replace them is low IQ eunuchs and stupid women.
 
The "abundance" agenda is literally the WEF's "live in the pod and eat bugs" plan. I'm not exaggerating, the book advocates for removing all zoning laws and building apartments everywhere to house immigrants.
It'd be nice if they built more housing in cities, most of America is an underdeveloped and underpopulated dump, particularly the urban parts. Zoning laws ought to be removed, the kinds of businesses that crop up in cities are depressing and often quite low quality and variety. You ever live in Chicago or New York or LA? Lots of these cities needs to be bulldozed and rebuilt, and a lot of existing power brokers and investors and property owners fucking need to take a haircut on it for the good of the nation. And why should you have to move to the sticks to live well anyway? A comprehensive redevelopment of cities would require a demolition of existing urban governance. This would redound to any freedom-loving person's benefit. It would be wise to fund a large and empowered new beaux-arts movement. That's how Paris became Paris, the place people want to go to, where their dreams of it exceed reality, not the present expensive thing in the center of a sea of banlieus. America deserves big, big plans to transform urban life, which, frankly, is extremely necessary. The degrading conditions of cities don't affect those already shitty, but it makes life worse for the rest of us.

Unless Republicans have an agenda for cities that completely transforms them, and it really has to be something better than "fewer spics and niggers" to be good politics, then they'll stay the party of the poor working class, old retards, and the rump faction of dissident/disaffected/based academics, instead of the party of people who get money and work in high-flying industries.
 
Post the archive next time faggot.

Archive
Yeah you know, somehow I don’t see this is something the federalist is going to DFE and I’m not operating from a place of trying to cuck Margot Cleveland out of clicks on her work, so I gave it a tl;dr just in case anyone wanted to know what it said without clicking, or so they can screen it as uninteresting.

Spoilers were very much included, specifically as to how it raises the question whether this affected the referenced investigations. The answer is “we don’t know yet.”
 
Kind of hard to bounce back from that when your best and brightest are a closet homosexual named Corey Booker, a failed bartender who does not understand broccoli, a bucktoothed retard from Texas, and whatever the fuck Hakeem Jefferies is...

The power brokers of the party are dying and the only thing waiting to replace them is low IQ eunuchs and stupid women.
Politicians are not clever people. The smartness contest in DC is not the power contest. Every successful pol has a shadow reputation of how they're venal, retarded, and useless.
 
It'd be nice if they built more housing in cities, most of America is an underdeveloped and underpopulated dump, particularly the urban parts. Zoning laws ought to be removed, the kinds of businesses that crop up in cities are depressing and often quite low quality and variety. You ever live in Chicago or New York or LA? Lots of these cities needs to be bulldozed and rebuilt, and a lot of existing power brokers and investors and property owners fucking need to take a haircut on it for the good of the nation. And why should you have to move to the sticks to live well anyway? A comprehensive redevelopment of cities would require a demolition of existing urban governance. This would redound to any freedom-loving person's benefit. It would be wise to fund a large and empowered new beaux-arts movement. That's how Paris became Paris, the place people want to go to, where their dreams of it exceed reality, not the present expensive thing in the center of a sea of banlieus. America deserves big, big plans to transform urban life, which, frankly, is extremely necessary. The degrading conditions of cities don't affect those already shitty, but it makes life worse for the rest of us.

Unless Republicans have an agenda for cities that completely transforms them, and it really has to be something better than "fewer spics and niggers" to be good politics, then they'll stay the party of the poor working class, old retards, and the rump faction of dissident/disaffected/based academics, instead of the party of people who get money and work in high-flying industries.
It’s tough because stricter law enforcement must be a part of the solution but you have to also make further inroads with African American voters as well or you never make it into office in the city.

“No tax on tips” is the sort of policy that seems like a good model. It offers something that benefits the working class and makes their lives better but isn’t a pure handout. I think American workers should have more vacation time too. Work should be rewarding. Side with the workers. Side with the economy. Side with America. Side with families. Side with the truth. Be against people who aren’t on those sides. I think this is what anyone reachable wants.
 
This is true, but don't forget that after Moses left to go get the Commandments, the Jews he led out of Egypt ditched God to worship a golden bull.

The hilarious thing is that all this happened within a relatively short period after they escaped from Egypt, so the Jews who did this knew for a fact that God was real because they saw Him directly intervene to free them from slavery with the plagues He sent against the Pharaoh and the parting of the Red Sea.
Disobedience to God and a resulting exodus East is a recurring theme in the old testament, particularly in Genesis.
From Adam and Eve, to demanding a king who ultimately is not obedient to God and is replaced (Saul and David).
It's a recurring theme.
They're given a set of rules or directions. They disobey. Exodus east, exile, loss of power and status, death. Rinse and repeat.
On smaller and larger scales.
 
“No tax on tips” is the sort of policy that seems like a good model.
Probably why Trump won Nevada last year.
They're given a set of rules or directions. They disobey. Exodus east, exile, loss of power and status, death. Rinse and repeat.
On smaller and larger scales.
Reminds me of the Jewish revolt in the second century when Hadrian brought the hammer down on them rather hard. Jews followed false messiah and massacred a bunch of Roman soldiers and Christians, Roman Emperor personally arrives afterward with a massive army and takes away their place and nation.
 
This is true, but don't forget that after Moses left to go get the Commandments, the Jews he led out of Egypt ditched God to worship a golden bull.

The hilarious thing is that all this happened within a relatively short period after they escaped from Egypt, so the Jews who did this knew for a fact that God was real because they saw Him directly intervene to free them from slavery with the plagues He sent against the Pharaoh and the parting of the Red Sea.



Indeed, if you'd met me 15 years ago, I had very stupid reddit-tier opinions on religion and politics; times change



If Trump does make a SCOTUS replacement for Thomas (assuming he steps down) before his term ends, hopefully, he gets better advice on a pick; he already called out the Federalist Society for screwing him over during the first term. They're the guys that advised Trump on ACB, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch, and I think they also played a hand in the federal judges he appointed, some of whom joined in with the lawfare against him.

Do you have any links to Trump calling out the Federalist Society? Seriously orange man trusted the wrong people the first time around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sammich
They’re just kicking the can down the road. Only difference being this time, they’re tossing some verbal bait as to not entirely piss us off. You got to be realistic about these things. With the courts and their “rulings,” it’s in the here and now. Doing something about the courts, well, that’s where the fun begins.
Kavanaugh literally said they're gonna do it in 2026 or 2027.
 
I fully understand the anti-COVID and flu shot stuff, those are money-making scams and you don't need a flu shot unless you're really immunocompromised (e.g. you're super old or you have AIDS), but I personally do not see a problem with vaccinations for stuff like polio, mumps, or Hep B. Hell, I wish they still gave out smallpox vaccines. Others in the thread are less sanguine about vaccines and I'm really not interested in debating it.
tell me why a newborn needs a hep vaccine at all.
 
"You didn't get into Harvard with a 1590 SAT score? That's because they can fill their class several times over just with kids who got 1600s. Try harder next time, dumbass."

The "1600" student:
View attachment 7444526
Source (Archive)
Hmmm...

Gonna need to see her titties. I mean OnlyFans. I mean titties. I mean admission application.

Phew. Close one.
 
If Trump does make a SCOTUS replacement for Thomas (assuming he steps down) before his term ends, hopefully, he gets better advice on a pick
The Supreme Court has been nothing except consistently useless these past few years. It's an antiquated system, not adequately surviving the modern era of politics. All that seems to ever come from SC rulings are various groups cheering because "Ha ha! They agreed with me this time!" and then nothing happens, because states just make up their own laws.
 
Even David Hogg understands that limousine, botoxed-disaster shitlib Nancy Pelosi made herself rich by leveraging her political power through insider trading. Unfortunately, he is only David Hogg, so his main priority is disarming law-abiding Americans so that they will be unable to defend ourselves if Swamp corruption degenerates into straightforward anarcho-tyranny:
https://x.com/Project_Veritas/status/1928111594720088540
https://xcancel.com/Project_Veritas/status/1928111594720088540
Archive
1748890402022.webp


Burning everything down as Squeegee Hogg says he wants to do is a characteristically nihilistic endgame of neoliberalism.
 

Attachments

  • mHkF4vFPcOFU4wC_.mp4
    25.9 MB
Do you have any links to Trump calling out the Federalist Society? Seriously orange man trusted the wrong people the first time around.


There's an archive from Politico. He calls out Leonard Leo, saying he's a sleazebag that hates America, while also criticizing the Federalists
 
Work should be rewarding. Side with the workers. Side with the economy. Side with America. Side with families. Side with the truth. Be against people who aren’t on those sides. I think this is what anyone reachable wants.
But the key point of weakness is that we’re without a unifying ethos of sorts. Thus, what you seek, and likewise what you’ll get in return will be more a political platitude than something perpetually beneficial (if proven fruitful).* A unifying ethos is the only thing the Left/Deep State have left. It’s the thing that obstructs whatever Trump offers from entering their otherwise “receptive” ears—the killer of the President’s more ambitious/aspirational policies. Hence why, as I’ve seen stated before, President Trump is more like the Gracchi brothers. Feel free to disagree, but this much is very obvious.

In short, if you’re going to offer such a policy, you do it in tandem with a new vision. Because in pursuing such a policy, you’re beckoning for a new republic.

*In the context of rebuilding major cities.
 
Back