Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta

[Vibralldo]

True is a defense but yeah lawsuits are expensive.

Nick's gonna drain the oil trust by the end of his legal battles

 

[Fapcop]

How exactly do you sue anonymous web forum users? If that were the case this website couldn't exist. 50% of the threads here are alleged pedophiles.

Let’s not be retarded here gentlemen.

And let’s disregard both any actual child diddling AND anonymity.

It’s not defamation unless you’re either knowingly lying about it, or knowingly saying something you know isn’t true.

Saying: “In my personal opinion, based on the following facts I believe that Rekieta diddles kids” isn’t defamation.

 

[Heed Not]

Dude he can and probably will sue you for that.

Let me help him out:
According to the NIH, the children of SUD parents are three times more likely than baseline to be sexually abused. Combined with Nick's own previous joking statements about children and his association with people like Melton and Vito, and the Kandiyohi County Sheriff's office apparent (but speculated collusion) to suppress matters of public concern for Nick, I am at least three times more concerned that Nick abuses his kids in such a manner than I am for the average father in America. Particularly because Nick Rekeita's daughter tested positive for cocaine metabolites and he has insisted that this test result is the product of a stranger (in this case law enforcement) somehow managing to dose her in a way that allowed a test to conclude she ingested a non-neglible amount of controlled substance.
Despite this, I make no assertion that he sexually abuses his kids. I'm just more concerned such a claim will manifest at some point against Nick than I am concerned it will manifest for the typical individual.