Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

The problem is these types of absolute knowledge can't really be achieved. But if I absolutely knew somehow for certain what was best for her, that's the ideal and that's what I'd want for her even if it meant I could never see her again or be her friend. But since I don't know the future its easy to justify myself as being the best for her due to ignorance about what would happen alternatively.
Tl;dr: "I will continue to stalk her and make her life miserable, inevitably fueling her hatred towards me, for the remainder of her life or until a form of Stockholm Syndrome sets in."
 
Not my plan. I plan on getting a degree in language. That way I could get a job with high profile groups such as the UN or other groups.

Not with the glistening snail-trails of crazy you've left on the internet, you won't. A restraining order? A detailed record of your obsession with a woman who has emphatically rejected you? Your utter lack of empathy, or theory of mind? Your diminished executive function? Yeah, good luck with that.

If she gave me one last chance and it was fair, then I would leave her alone for ever if she asks me to.

Define "fair." What, exactly, would pass muster for you as a fair chance?

I ask this because you betrayed and intentionally humiliated her, treated her abysmally, and ruined her relationships with others. And yet she still gave you multiple chances, and tried to salvage the friendship, despite clear evidence that you are not a good person. But eventually, your controlling, selfish behavior led her to give up and cut ties with you.

And you're still whining about how you didn't get a fair chance, and deserve another try? Dude--no. By your own account of events, you've long since used up your allowance of "fair" chances, and then some--any reasonable person can see that. And that's before we get to the creepy-stalker behavior that drove her to get a restraining order, or your threats to use her children to manipulate her into reconciliation by getting their birth fathers involved, somehow.

Her husband doesn't sound like a great catch, but you? You're poison. You might never raise a hand against her, but your controlling, possessive, empathy-deficient self is downright toxic. And I wouldn't put it past you to move the goalposts so you could keep claiming that any future refusals on her part still didn't represent a "fair chance." After reading this thread, I think your only definition of a "fair chance" is one that ends with her capitulation.

Why the Bible? Surely as a Jew you'd be focused on translating the Torah or the Tanakh?

He's not a Jew; just a fundie-lite Christian who adopts whatever Jewish trappings appeal to him.
 
Andy, you clearly don't know the difference between "love" and just being pitifully desperate due to a lack of any other available options - women can smell desperation a mile away, and yes, it stinks.

Replace "Tamar" with any of 1 billion other two-bit hookers who you thought you might have a fraction of a chance of a pity fuck with, and you'd feel just the same way about any of them.

Your "love" for her is less akin to a food connoisseur appreciating a gourmet meal, and more like a starving man in the desert who is so hungry that even his own shit is starting to look tasty. You're just so desperate and sex-starved you don't know the difference.

Even Chris Chan wasn't this desperate over Megan Schroeder, so when even a guy who recycles his own semen and "spoons" with his mom looks more sane than you do, that should tell you somethig - but it probably won't.
 
Not with the glistening snail-trails of crazy you've left on the internet, you won't. A restraining order? A detailed record of your obsession with a woman who has emphatically rejected you? Your utter lack of empathy, or theory of mind? Your diminished executive function? Yeah, good luck with that.



Define "fair." What, exactly, would pass muster for you as a fair chance?

I ask this because you betrayed and intentionally humiliated her, treated her abysmally, and ruined her relationships with others. And yet she still gave you multiple chances, and tried to salvage the friendship, despite clear evidence that you are not a good person. But eventually, your controlling, selfish behavior led her to give up and cut ties with you.

And you're still whining about how you didn't get a fair chance, and deserve another try? Dude--no. By your own account of events, you've long since used up your allowance of "fair" chances, and then some--any reasonable person can see that. And that's before we get to the creepy-stalker behavior that drove her to get a restraining order, or your threats to use her children to manipulate her into reconciliation by getting their birth fathers involved, somehow.

Her husband doesn't sound like a great catch, but you? You're poison. You might never raise a hand against her, but your controlling, possessive, empathy-deficient self is downright toxic. And I wouldn't put it past you to move the goalposts so you could keep claiming that any future refusals on her part still didn't represent a "fair chance." After reading this thread, I think your only definition of a "fair chance" is one that ends with her capitulation.



He's not a Jew; just a fundie-lite Christian who adopts whatever Jewish trappings appeal to him.

Fair is answer all my questions. And if she agrees to answer my questions, then in advance we would determine a set number of questions that once reached if she still doesn't want to be my friend I will comply. When I explained what I did I told it from her perspective in many details. if I had told it from my perspective, there would have been much more explanation as to motivations behind what I did. Instead, i simply removed the motivations and gave you the actions done, which makes what I did look worse than it was. But if you understood the underlying intentions, it puts it in a better light even if its still a bad light.
 
what are your thoughts on women in general?
I think every human and animal has a spirit/soul, and that its only their bodies that differ. So in regards to women, I think they have the same type of mind/spirit/soul/consciousness as men. They just have different bodies than men. Thats it. I believe they are intellectually and spiritually on the same field as men. Women can't be equal to men in every category. But when it comes to physical strength and certain physical attributes and emotional or hormonal states, I think men and women are at a different disposition naturally but that anyone can adjust their dispositions by their choices.
 
I think every human and animal has a spirit/soul, and that its only their bodies that differ. So in regards to women, I think they have the same type of mind/spirit/soul/consciousness as men. They just have different bodies than men. Thats it. I believe they are intellectually and spiritually on the same field as men. Women can't be equal to men in every category. But when it comes to physical strength and certain physical attributes and emotional or hormonal states, I think men and women are at a different disposition naturally but that anyone can adjust their dispositions by their choices.
Since you think that only the body differs, are you supportive of LGBT people? How do you explain transgender people?
 
Andy, you clearly don't know the difference between "love" and just being pitifully desperate due to a lack of any other available options - women can smell desperation a mile away, and yes, it stinks.

Replace "Tamar" with any of 1 billion other two-bit hookers who you thought you might have a fraction of a chance of a pity fuck with, and you'd feel just the same way about any of them.

Your "love" for her is less akin to a food connoisseur appreciating a gourmet meal, and more like a starving man in the desert who is so hungry that even his own shit is starting to look tasty. You're just so desperate and sex-starved you don't know the difference.

Even Chris Chan wasn't this desperate over Megan Schroeder, so when even a guy who recycles his own semen and "spoons" with his mom looks more sane than you do, that should tell you somethig - but it probably won't.
Wrong. You don't know me. You can't replace Tamar with any other woman. Its impossible. She is special and that makes me extremely attracted to her in a way you could never understand. I certainly could pursue other women. I dont' want to and find myself incapable of moving on from her to pursue anyone else. If I was desperate I could easily convince people to sleep with me. I am not sex starved because I masturbate on a regularly basis. I set my standard for women i'm interested in high. So I only aim for women that are unlikely to happen. I'm not interested in women that are easy or who are normal or subpar. But if a normal or subpar woman was to prove herself worthy enough to garner my interest then I'd consider her.
 
Andy, you clearly don't know the difference between "love" and just being pitifully desperate due to a lack of any other available options - women can smell desperation a mile away, and yes, it stinks.

Replace "Tamar" with any of 1 billion other two-bit hookers who you thought you might have a fraction of a chance of a pity fuck with, and you'd feel just the same way about any of them.

Your "love" for her is less akin to a food connoisseur appreciating a gourmet meal, and more like a starving man in the desert who is so hungry that even his own shit is starting to look tasty. You're just so desperate and sex-starved you don't know the difference.

Even Chris Chan wasn't this desperate over Megan Schroeder, so when even a guy who recycles his own semen and "spoons" with his mom looks more sane than you do, that should tell you somethig - but it probably won't.

I rated this "disagree" not to in any way defend this guy but because honestly this isn't how obsessive stalker psychology works.

I definitely don't disagree that this guy is ass ugly, unemployed and unemployable, lives with his parents, has no accomplishments to point to whatsoever, and would be lucky to get laid with almost anyone. But I'm sure he genuinely does believe that the object of his fixation is indeed a uniquely special person more worthy of his attention than anyone else. Not that that makes it any better.
 
Since you think that only the body differs, are you supportive of LGBT people? How do you explain transgender people?

I'm not supportive of LGBT. It is my position that everyone is born asexual and we choose based on our choices sexual orientation. Culture is largely responsible for shaping sexual interests. But there are so many influences and unique factors for each person that complicate why people are predisposed in certain directions. I am very confident that all sexual orientation is shaped by environment and experience rather than DNA. I'm pretty certain everyone is capable of being attracted to the same gender, to animals, to children, and to just about everything that exists. If something exists you can sexualize it into a fetish. There's a fetish for everything. i've seen too much evidence in my own life as well as in the lives of others that our sexual interests are learned either self learned through our own natural curiosity. Or through the example of others. And it is shaped by the choices of how we react to our own thoughts. If you develop a friendship with someone of the same gender, its probably very easy to extrapolate that into a crush for that person. As a friendship and crush are not all that different.

I'm not supportive of masturbation either but I do it anyways. I don't make it a practice to hate lgbt people. I believe that all marriage rights for both homosexual and heterosexual should probably be taken away. as in, eliminate the laws of marriage altogether. I believe marriage is consent between a man and woman with the intention to be in a lifelong partnership. I don't think people of the same gender should enter such a relationship, but I think if two people declare themselves married to each other, then they are married even if they are the same gender.

I can tell you I am not gay, nor am I bi, but I'm absolutely certain I could become bi. I think due to my sexual history it would be extremely difficult to stop being sexually attracted to women. But i suppose it is possible. Its easier to become bi than to stop being attracted to a sex you are attracted to I believe.
 
I'm pretty certain everyone is capable of being attracted to the same gender, to animals, to children, and to just about everything that exists. If something exists you can sexualize it into a fetish. There's a fetish for everything. i've seen too much evidence in my own life

So what you are saying is that you are a repressed gay furry pedo?
 
I rated this "disagree" not to in any way defend this guy but because honestly this isn't how obsessive stalker psychology works.

I definitely don't disagree that this guy is ass ugly, unemployed and unemployable, lives with his parents, has no accomplishments to point to whatsoever, and would be lucky to get laid with almost anyone. But I'm sure he genuinely does believe that the object of his fixation is indeed a uniquely special person more worthy of his attention than anyone else. Not that that makes it any better.
You took the ugliest pictures of me. Invalid. Everyone can have ugly pictures even the most beautiful people have ugly pictures.

I'm lucky to not get laid because I don't want to deal with child support after a woman leaves me.

I am not unemployable. I choose to live unemployed. Because its a far superior life than the people who have to work every day at a lame job. The freedom to do whatever I want and all the time in the world. Makes me at a far greater advantage than most of the working class. I have no limits to what I can do and want to do. The world is open to me. But the person with the job and debt and all kinds of responsibilities to tend to, they are stuck and trapped. I am free. I have chosen to live at this time a free life. Makes me superior to you by far.
 
I'm not supportive of LGBT. It is my position that everyone is born asexual and we choose based on our choices sexual orientation. Culture is largely responsible for shaping sexual interests. But there are so many influences and unique factors for each person that complicate why people are predisposed in certain directions. I am very confident that all sexual orientation is shaped by environment and experience rather than DNA. I'm pretty certain everyone is capable of being attracted to the same gender, to animals, to children, and to just about everything that exists. If something exists you can sexualize it into a fetish. There's a fetish for everything. i've seen too much evidence in my own life as well as in the lives of others that our sexual interests are learned either self learned through our own natural curiosity. Or through the example of others. And it is shaped by the choices of how we react to our own thoughts. If you develop a friendship with someone of the same gender, its probably very easy to extrapolate that into a crush for that person. As a friendship and crush are not all that different.

I'm not supportive of masturbation either but I do it anyways. I don't make it a practice to hate lgbt people. I believe that all marriage rights for both homosexual and heterosexual should probably be taken away. as in, eliminate the laws of marriage altogether. I believe marriage is consent between a man and woman with the intention to be in a lifelong partnership. I don't think people of the same gender should enter such a relationship, but I think if two people declare themselves married to each other, then they are married even if they are the same gender.

I can tell you I am not gay, nor am I bi, but I'm absolutely certain I could become bi. I think due to my sexual history it would be extremely difficult to stop being sexually attracted to women. But i suppose it is possible. Its easier to become bi than to stop being attracted to a sex you are attracted to I believe.
So is it possible that in the future Tamar is replaced by a guy? Also, if you think sexual attraction is shaped by enviroments and experiences couldn't you tailor your sexual preferences into something that doesn't involve Tamar and maybe no woman at all?
 
So what you are saying is that you are a repressed gay furry pedo?

No I'm not gay. Nor am I pedo. But I believe every person is capable of becoming gay or attracted to children. How else do you think pedophiles happen? They aren't born attracted to children. Probably a lot of pedophiles become pedophiles because they watch child pornography. Or they get aroused when a child is in the room and then that gives them a "thought" and then they make a bad decision to act impuslively on the thought. And the more you repeat the same action the easier it is to do it again and again. and after doing it a few times, it becomes part of that person's deeply rooted sexual identity. This will happen for any fetish or any sexual inclination. I'm certain of it.
 
Back