Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Pity, I was looking forward to a visit from Raylan Givens. I hear he's quite the shitposter.

I've just finished re-reading the novels. Elmore Leonard really was a master when it came to cowboy stories and crime fiction and the Givens books combine both genres.

The TV dramatizations were fantastic as well. If you haven't watched them, I strongly recommend. The first two seasons are a real treat.
 
iota, I’m a bit confused about this. Mr. Hardin said this would happen in his email to Mr. Greer, but I couldn’t find any info in the SPO about automatic ‘de-designation’. Can you help me out?

The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
 
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
Ah. Yes, reviewing the prior SPO, this explanation checks out. Thank you!
 
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
I'm fairly certain the rather overt criminality that was the nature of the communication Shitlips sent puts it outside the SPO as well.
 
I'm fairly certain the rather overt criminality that was the nature of the communication Shitlips sent puts it outside the SPO as well.
The SPO doesn't remotely apply anyway, even if it were a settlement offer in good faith.
2025-06-02_10-19.webp
Even if it did apply it should be obvious that a lawyer can't answer a settlement offer without being able to show it to his client.
 
"The jury finds that the weather was quite pleasant today."
How Beautifully Blue the sky
The glass is rising very high
Continue fine I hope it may
And yet it rained but yesterday
Tomorrow it may pour again
I hear the country wants some rain
Yet people say
I know not why
That we shall have a warm July.....
 
In hindsight, Josh's decision to not appeal the transfer of the case back to Utah from Florida was a mistake. [...]
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that is only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
 
Last edited:
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
The main reason it got sent back to Florida is that they did not want to deal with that shit and they knew they could get away with it despite being procedurally in the wrong.
 
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
First, SIR, it's TardGuard™ thank you very much, don't make this an abuse of trademark case, too.

Second, the TardGuard™ really only applies to about half of the courtshit - those where the "harmed" party is (in theory) the court itself, so it can be lenient - I'm talking missing deadlines, filing badly, IPF®, etc.

The other half is stuff that harms the case or the defendants (and even here they minimize but cannot remove) - especially once in discovery, TardGuard™ is about as effective as perfume as bear spray.

The court apparently operates under a legal fiction that everything BEFORE discovery is "free" (or mostly so) for both parties, and so financial harm is minimized, but once discovery starts, the court admits that shit costs money, yo.
 
I cannot believe he is so deliberately misunderstanding that he himself needs to mark the documents before he himself produces them to Hardin.

Also, did you know he’s depressed and anxious and that excuses any deadline he’s ever missed?

e. “He has a savings account but that is reserved for business” my brother in Slaanesh how is this lawsuit not about your entertainment business
 
Back