Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    462
There’s a way out. It’s to withdraw the suit. He won’t do that of course, that would make too much sense. Can’t wait him see this through, lose, and be on the hook for legal fees and all of the fees that Hardin is going to go after him for to pay for wasting everyone’s time while he tries to play pretend lawyer.

He cannot withdraw the suit at this point unless (a) Null and Hardin agree (they will not) or (b) on terms the Court considers proper, which would probably be onerous.

e. actually, since he added 2 new defendants, he would also need their agreement, in addition to Null’s, to dismiss by agreement. So that’s not an option, because he doesn’t even know who they are.
 
Last edited:
I remember that, but I also remember that Greer motioned to have his deadline for the application extended until the 10th and Hardin actually supported to motion to extend the deadline.

I do not remember the court granting it but I was sure he would since it was unopposed
Docket Entry 297:
Modification of Docket: Error: Docket Text Order had the wrong dates. Correction: Dates have been corrected per Law Clerk. re 296 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief,,. DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting in part and denying in part 294 Motion for modification of the May 6th verbal order. The court HEREBY ORDERS Mr. Greer to produce a copy of the restraining order filed against Mr. Moon in 2018 in Utah to Defendants on or before June 3, 2025.June 13, 2025. Defendants shall file a status report with the court regarding Mr. Greer's production on or before June 10, 2025 June 20, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 05/ 19/2025. (docket text order; no attached document). (lc) Modified on 5/19/2025-dates corrected per law clerk(JCB, LC) (jrj) (Entered: 05/19/2025)
 
He cannot withdraw the suit at this point unless (a) Null and Hardin agree (they will not) or (b) on terms the Court considers proper, which would probably be onerous.
Good point. I guess that would be predicated on Null and Hardin being up for a solution which at this point, I’m thinking they’re ready to take this to the end. Because it’d be funnier that way.
 
On an unrelated note, I'm annoyed he waited until so late in the afternoon to reply... mostly because it reduces the chances we get to see Hardin reply today, let alone the Court rule. Eternal legal blueballs.
I wonder if Hardin has premonitions of this stupidity (or gets copies before the clerk files them) because this is pretty expected (except for the silly attempt to demand the SPO apply).
Docket Entry 297:
this is really confusing without strikeouts or the red
 
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets
He can't withdraw now without permission from null.
He had one off-ramp and he chose not to take it for whatever reason. All that happens now is even more sanctions(I hope). He should have taken the exit and whatever sanctions were already in-flight and called it a day.

I need more mixed travel metaphors in my postings.
 
This filing is so golden.
Screenshot_20250602_143136_Files by Google (1).webp
LOL, the court wasn't aware? The court has no skin in that game. They are only compelling you to produce a document you spoke into existence. Damn that phone storage!!!
Screenshot_20250602_143427_Files by Google (1).webp
Oh, great excuse here. He was busy with Hardin's brilliant legal tactics of using Russ's words against him, and Russ deemed that a priority over replying to things like this. Is there a point to where a court will stop an IFP plaintiff from continuing because they're too damn retarded?
Screenshot_20250602_143427_Files by Google (2).webp
LOL. And they made a decision. The decision to produce documents. Whoopsy!
Screenshot_20250602_143427_Files by Google (3).webp
Nigga, you used brought the document up in the first place. You spoke it into existence. This is how court works. You don't get to just say XYZ and expect the other side to not seek what advantages they can from the same XYZ.
Screenshot_20250602_143633_Files by Google (1).webp
So uhh, wouldn't this money need to be distinctly under the LLC and not Russ's? I'm not sure how all that works. Like if someone can claim to be poor as fuck (to the point of being able to claim IFP status) while dumping all their money into the LLC? I'm sure there's fine line as to not be blatantly commiting fraud, but business expenses are supposed to be drawn from the business and not the person.
 
I wonder if Hardin has premonitions of this stupidity (or gets copies before the clerk files them)

I don't think it's possible for Hardin to see these before the clerk files them, since Greer has a habit of not sending them to Hardin contemporaneously (and for this reason, the clerk should NOT be fucking around delaying entering Greer's filings into the docket because it prejudices Hardin/Null).
 
And Russell hitting out of the park with another one!
hurdle.webp
A document's relevancy to the case is not for you to decide, Russell. And it's not a hurdle, you just have to pay a little bit of money out of your hooker fund.

Wait, I can see why you'd consider that a tremendous hurdle.

clerk.webp
Maybe you shouldn't have given The Hardship reason to believe you lied about your IFP status, Russell. Telling the truth usually makes these things easier.

confident.webp
Unless said document contains your bank info, there's no reason for it to be confidential- unless you're trying to avoid giving Null more ammo against you. I wonder what those documents contain? Something you don't remember but could be damning- is that what you're afraid of?

depress.webp
"That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's see how it works out for Rusty."

restrain.webp
It's because you keep insisting you have one, YOU ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARD. Kiwi Farms has checked, multiple times, and confirmed no such order even exists. You are lying to the court about having one, and if you are lying about this and your IFP status, what else are you lying about?

reimburs.webp
I look forward to the day you are forced to reimburse Null every penny he's spent fighting this retardation.

muny1.webp
Free advice, Russ: a savings account is not a business account, so yes, you can be forced to dip into it.

drain.webp
No, they are not. However, it would be poetic justice, since you IN TWO SEPARATE POSTS stated your intention was to bankrupt Null.

shift.webp
Russell, you may not know this, but best Janny @Useful_Mistake has spent his own money to locate the document. He has not found it it was restricted only to be accessed by parties to the case- specifically, you. This is something you, and only you, have access to. The court has ordered you to get it. Therefore, you are the one who's going to pay for it.

Thanks for correcting my useless mistake, U_M

aeo.webp
I will not tell you what to do, Russ, since this is so simple you should've been able to figure it out. I can only assume you're malicious, in which case I hope Null extracts every penny you own, or you're retarded, in which case you should not be roaming Nevada freely. Besides, you sued "Kiwi Farms, a website," so the users are permitted to see and discuss the case.
 
Last edited:
Russell, you may not know this, but best Janny @Useful_Mistake has spent his own money to locate the document. He has not found it. This is something you, and only you, have access to. The court has ordered you to get it. Therefore, you are the one who's going to pay for it.
The application does exist, but it was denied, and then restricted only to be accessed by parties to the case, namely only Russ.
 
The application does exist, but it was denied, and then restricted only to be accessed by parties to the case, namely only Russ.
Ah, my bad. Still, my point stands: only Russ has access to it, and he was ordered to retrieve it. Therefore, he should be the one to pay fees for it.
 
This filing is starting really strong.
On May 6th, this Court ordered Plaintiff to give completely irrelevant documents to Defendants.
Just completely disrespect an order of the court that was made based on information you proffered.

Plaintiff asked for a modification to the Order, on 5-15-25, because both he and this Court were unaware that Plaintiff simply can’t login to a portal online and get the docs.
Where is it stated that a plaintiff shouldn't have to do any legwork to prove their claims?

retrieving the documents would be an $87.000 endeavor
Broke boy! 💅

Plaintiff would sincerely ask this Court to Order Defendants to pay for the cost of retrieving the documents before he pays to get the documents or that since this has turned into more cost than the Court realized it would, that the Court just retract its May 6th order and that the documents simply not be retrieved based on no relevancy.
Where the fuck has he gotten this idea that all costs need to be shouldered by the defence? Braindead.

Mr. Hardin has already demonstrated that he will publish documents if plaintiff fails to mark them confidential, even if common sense dictates they are confidential.
This annoying fucking faggot, oh my fuck.

plaintiff would ask that an order be entered that once Mr. Hardin receives the documents, that he not publish them anywhere or give them to Mr. Moon.
The Magistrate already ordered no publication, which you would be aware of if you weren't too busy pitching another whorehouse you have no right to open. He is free to discuss it with his client for obvious reasons.

May 6th Order Conflicts with July 15th, 2024 Order
Welcome to linear time and the developments associated with that.
First off, plaintiff never responded because the day Defendants filed their short form request, this Court issued its order sanctioning plaintiff and he lost track of their motion and never replied because he was busy filing objections. Plaintiff apologizes for that.
Tough fucking shit.
This Court should have respectfully seen that a 2018 application for a restraining order against Joshua Moon has no relevancy to this case
Nigger, you said it was relevant!

the documents are turning into more costs than this court realized
The court isn't incurring the cost. They don't give a shit.
Receiving and sending documents to Defendants will be $67.00. Plaintiff already spent $20.00. Reimbursement requested before documents are paid for
🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙
the Court was under the belief that plaintiff could simply pick up his documents or just download them since “they’re your documents.”
Nowhere did the Magistrate say it would be free. Nor should it be. You are the plaintiff. The burden is on you.
plaintiff would request an order that defendants reimburse plaintiff before he pays for the documents.
🌙🌙🌙🌙🌙

I'm actually bored of itemising all of the insane shit that's wrong with this.

TL;DR Shitlips is a broke boy that doesn't understand why the plaintiff especially should be covering their own goddamn production costs, particularly when they've been compelled to do so multiple times. :lossmanjack:
 
Last edited:
This might have happened and it just slipped my mind with all the insanity that continues to pile up in they l this case, but its also a minor thing Hardin might not have bothered with, but did Hardin ask how exactly Russell had no way to get the case file without involving snail mail so please pretty please judge don't make him do it, but also somehow magically knew when HARM FARMS STALKERS tried to get the document themselves? Like I said, it's s a minor thing, but I find it funny how ol' Gourd Head can't keep the case on his phone, doesn't know how to go about getting a copy, procrastinated on getting a copy, finds getting a copy an unreasonable burden and this needs an extension and also Null should pay for it, can't get a copy of it, but somehow knows immediately when someone else is trying to get access to it.
 
I wonder if Greer wasn't paying attention because he was distracted by scheduling his whore meeting when the judge went on his rant about how if this document ends up in public then there will be hell to pay and Mr. Hardin agreeing.

I see I'm late and gay, as always.
 
He had one off-ramp and he chose not to take it for whatever reason. All that happens now is even more sanctions(I hope). He should have taken the exit and whatever sanctions were already in-flight and called it a day.

I need more mixed travel metaphors in my postings.
I assume youre referring to him having to pay the filing fee. That wouldn't have saved him from further sanctions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill Evans 45
Ah, my bad. Still, my point stands: only Russ has access to it, and he was ordered to retrieve it. Therefore, he should be the one to pay fees for it.
He should have kept a copy.

It's an important document, it's his, and he shouldn't have deleted the copy he already had.

There is no rational reason anyone else should pay for his error (if the error is real, which I doubt).
 
What a fucking lazy, good for nothing retard.

Timeline here:

Judge says on May 6th, get the documents. Russ filed for an extension of time, judge says okay, June 3rd. But makes no mention of the costs, which Russ tried then to get the Defendants to pay.

May 29th Russ mails the first letter to even ask about getting the documents.

June 2nd Russ complains to the court, probably because he just today found out how much it was going to cost. If Russ had immediately paid up, there's still no way Hardin could possibly get the documents by the deadline. Maybe by the 10th when his status report is due. I don't think certified documents can be emailed.

The court (probably) didn't just assume he could download the documents, and they very will did actually know there would be a few. There's always a fee when dealing with the government or court system. That fee is always paid by the party requesting the documents, the court absolutely knew this. Even if for some reason they had absolutely no understanding of documents and fees, Russ already raised this issue with the court!! It wasn't explicitly denied, but no mention of this issue is the same as denial.

What a mong.

There's something he really doesn't want anyone to see on that application. I hope we do get to see it, because the meltdown would be glorious.
 
but did Hardin ask how exactly Russell had no way to get the case file without involving snail mail so please pretty please judge don't make him do it, but also somehow magically knew when HARM FARMS STALKERS tried to get the document themselves
Russell has explained that several times including in the last hearing.
 
Back