- Joined
- Apr 4, 2021
But plaintiff has a yob! He's honestly really truly [insert your favorite weasel words here] trying, but he has a good excuse!
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2020
I can not wait for the eventual motion where the judge replies "while the court sympathizes with Mr. Greer, his depression is not a relevant factor to this case." He'll explode so hard his face might even twitch.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
"i dont want to pay the 90 dollars because my savings account is for business only!"
fucking lol
really looking forward to the judges response to this
fucking lol
really looking forward to the judges response to this
- Joined
- May 22, 2019
I hope it's just a docket order that says "lol...lmao even. Denied"
Judge should not entertain this bullshit any longer than it takes to tell this faggot "no." The Court has enough actual shit to rule on in this case alone that it shouldn't waste time explaining to the retard (again) that he's wrong, he's been ordered to produce the documents, and no amount of delay, excuses, or a case of the Mondays is going to change that.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
I feel the judge would be a hella lot more lenient if the amounts had a few more zeros
As it is, the court spent a significant portion of this amount filing the stupid motion, and the judge reading it no doubt cost even more.
Jacknife
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
Literally HOW?
How can this document be embarrassing then any of his filings?
Even that last filing it probably more embarrassing than this application which is probably just some plightsperging
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Has it even been confirmed that the metadata shows that has anything to do with Null? What if it's against Taylor Swift, the well-known copyright offender?
- Joined
- May 22, 2019
She's about as responsible as anyone on here is, so maybe you're on to something.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Oh wow! Both Hardin and the Judge's response to this one will be magnificent.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
"In regards to the costs, we graciously and without admitting any necessity, fault, or duty, allow Plaintiff to reduce the sanctions still owed by $3.50"
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
Null and Hardin requested this application as part of inquiry into past legal matters of Plaintiff. Russell has attributed the loss of his ability to market his music to other sources in publicly-accessible filings, meaning KF would not be responsible for damages (if any). He has also possibly known of alleged harms by KF for long enough that he filed this case too late, which is what this application might show. Also goes to prove he’s a vexatious litigant trying every means possible to silence legitimate criticism.
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2023
Petition to have this affixed to the bottom of every page in this thread, see precedent 'You're gonna carry that gunt'.
Greer is such a retard. If they stamped it 'Attorneys Eyes Only', they wouldn't be able to send it to him direct as he is not an attorney! QED.
Congratulations on compounding the evidence for your IFP fraud Russell.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
If it weren't, well, Russel Greer, the King of the Coomers, I'd assume ID LLC was a plot to try and conceal financials from the court. It would be a stupid idea, but it'd be in the realm of sovcit tier fucking retardation that King Coomer almost, but not quite, could aspire to: "Oh sorry Ya Honor, I'm just a poor pooor weeetard. I gots no money, see? ID LLC? Why would you care about a business I've been working with? Besides, I -- I mean they -- don't have to reveal their books to ya, that's private."
But no, it's mostly for him to pretend to be a
It's to protect Domestic Abuse cases and the like, I'd imagine? You don't want Jimmy Joe Bob to find out Annie Marie filed for a protective order after her 6th month with a black eye in a row.
"Mr. Policeman Teacher Sir, that mean ol' Josh and the Kiwi Gang made fun of me, and when I tried to trick a whore into sucking me my penis, someone sent her things that I actually have said and done and she told me no, and that made me sad, and whorefolk shouldn't be allowed to tell you no if you offer them good money to have you your penis sucked, and my pee pee stopped workin' for a while after they kept laughin' at me, and the pimp I usually go to showed me a picture of muh thread before telling me not to contact his whores no more. Mr. Policeman Teacher Sir, I has a human right to pay good money to whores to get me my penis sucked, and Mean ol' Josh and the Kiwi Gang tellin' people what I did without giving me a chance to EXPLAIN is causing me harm cause it's makin' the whorefolk run away. I respectfully request that ya' make him stop talkin' about me unless he can be nice to me."
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Nah, it's simpler than that. Hardin asked for it because Greer said it was easily accessible, and he'd readily provide it, and that it materially proves the facts of his case.
Unknown God
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
Maybe I'm just being a stickler but doesn't this violate the "don't help Greer you faggots" rule? He still technically has another day to get the document so why give him tips?
- Joined
- May 14, 2024
Irene and 22 others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2023
Greer doesn't want to pay the $67 (which should only be around $10 if he wasn't a fucking idiot) because he's got $1,000 sanctions bill that the court slapped on him to pay in a little over a week. He doesn't want to pay that either, and I fully expect a similar motion submitted to the court around this time next week begging for them to reconsider the thing that was already considered and did not go in his favor.
I can't wait to see Hardin's response. The judge will probably just issue a denial as text into the docket as he's done with some of Greer's other recent motions. Hopefully he doesn't do so before Hardin can respond though because I really want to see him tear Greer apart, really show him the business as it were.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Does Hardin REALLY have to respond to all that shit Greer just wrote? Its all pure lunacy. Greer can't be bothered to just go to the court house and have them print out what he needs? The defense has to pay for the Plaintiffs own production costs? The court should have seen that the documents he brought up in his own motion are actually not relevant, despite him saying they are? Come on Greer.
I feel like at this point Hardin could just respond with "Plaintiff talks like a fag and his shit is all retarded", and that will do the job.
I feel like at this point Hardin could just respond with "Plaintiff talks like a fag and his shit is all retarded", and that will do the job.
goblin enby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
Greer is the gift that keeps on giving, but I'm getting increasingly agitated at how many times he's bringing up the "irrelevancy" of this information when the beginning of this entire saga was him bringing it up and saying it's relevant.
Bennett even mentioned it in the original order all the way back in fucking February too.
The sanctions for this should be huge, let alone the Steve Taylor bullshit that also needs to be ruled on. It already doesn't make sense to me that he got ordered to produce it by 24th February, didn't do it, then got ordered to produce it a second time without any penalty for the first non-compliance.
Bennett even mentioned it in the original order all the way back in fucking February too.
The sanctions for this should be huge, let alone the Steve Taylor bullshit that also needs to be ruled on. It already doesn't make sense to me that he got ordered to produce it by 24th February, didn't do it, then got ordered to produce it a second time without any penalty for the first non-compliance.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Honestly, I'm almost on the side of Mr. Hardin simply ignoring it and filing his status report at 12:01AM on the 4th saying "Greer has not provided a copy of the requested document."