Business Chips Ahoy and Oreo maker Mondelez sues grocery chain Aldi over similar packaging


By Auzinea Bacon, CNN
Mon June 2, 2025

gettyimages-2217866753.webp
Packages of Chips Ahoy cookies are displayed next to Aldi Supermarket's Benton's brand cookies on May 30, 2025, in Burbank, California.

Snack brand giant Mondelez is suing grocery chain Aldi, alleging that the grocer’s store-brand snack packaging “blatantly copies” Mondelez.

The maker of Oreo, Triscuit and Chips Ahoy filed the lawsuit on May 27 against the German grocer, which has US headquarters in Illinois, in the federal court for the Northern District of Illinois. Chicago-based Mondelez said in the lawsuit that Aldi’s cookie and cracker packaging was “likely to deceive and confuse” customers.

Aldi did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.

The discount supermarket chain primarily sells store-brand versions for lower prices than popular name brands, such as those owned by Mondelez. Mondelez said in its filing that it previously contacted Aldi about “copycats” of the Oreo cookie design, Teddy Grahams, Belvita biscuits, Triscuit crackers and Tate’s Bake Shop cookies.

Aldi eventually “discontinued” and “changed certain of these infringing products,” Mondelez said.

Trademark lawyer Josh Gerben, who is not involved in this case, said the law is designed to protect consumers.

“I can go to the store and reasonably assume that I recognize the name, and that’s who I’m buying from,” Gerben said, but some customers “think that they might be buying something from the Oreo brand or Wheat Thins, but they’re actually getting a substitute.”

The lawsuit claims Aldi’s peanut butter creme-filled cookies, chocolate chip cookies and Thin Wheat crackers have packaging similar to Nutter Butter, Chips Ahoy and Wheat Thins, among other similarities.

ap25149818477376.webp
This combo of images shows, top row from left, Mondelez's products Nutter Butter, Chips Ahoy! and Oreo cookies; bottom row from left, shows Aldi’s products, Peanut Butter Creme, Chocolate Chip Cookies and Original Chocolate Sandwich Cookies with Vanilla.

Mondelez said in the lawsuit that “if not stopped,” Aldi’s packaging threatens to “irreparably harm” Mondelez and its brands.

Mondelez is seeking monetary damages as well as a court order to prevent Aldi from selling such products, according to the filing.

Mondelez did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.

This is not the first time Aldi has faced a lawsuit over its store-brand products looking overtly similar in name, color and design to other brands. Last December, an Australian federal court said Aldi was liable for copyright infringement over children’s snacks packaging that resembled Hampden Holdings’ Baby Bellies puffs packaging.

“You want to fly close enough to the sun because you want the benefit of something,” but not too close, Gerben said. He added that such lawsuits are a case-by-case analysis and there’s no “bright line test” that would decide Aldi’s liability.

Aldi has over 2,400 locations in the United States. In February, the chain announced plans to open 225 stores in 2025.



marketing.webp



I've often joked about how blatantly Aldi rips off the branding and naming used by other companies, so this isn't a surprise. It's not limited to cookies, it's everything from frozen foods, to drink powders, to "Bauhn" branded Chinese electronics. I hope they win and Mondelez is irreparably harmed.
 
If only there was a way for consumers to read the words on the packaging and not just grab something by color.

If only...

Maybe things are different in Germany but here in America we are literally brainwashed into recognizing these namebrands and if your mother brought the imposter home that meant times were tough.
My dad likes Hydrox better than Oreos and will have me order them for him. And outside of a very few things, I don't mind the store brand over the name brand. There are even a few things where I like the off brand better.

Fun Fact: Hydrox was first. Oreo is the imitator.
 
Last edited:
If only there was a way for consumers to read the words on the packaging and not just grab something by color.

If only...


My dad likes Hydrox better than Oreos and will have me order them for him. And outside of a very few things, I don't mind the store brand over the name brand. There are even a few things where I like the off brand better.
hydrox arent knock off or off brand oreos, they're the original thing.

i also feel like the store brand stuff is as good as the name brand save a few exceptions like ice cream and some jalepeno/spicy chips. I hope mondolez loses
 
I feel like so many generic brands do this, it's kind of stupid to get mad about it. It's not just the ones at Aldi - I've seen knockoff Head and Shoulders, and Herbal Essences at Acme.
Yeah, I can't see why this is suddenly an issue, stores have had knock off brands in the same aisle forever, in many chains.
 
My mother loves Aldi but I don't get it. Is it suppose to be cheaper knock-offs of regular brands you'd find at Walmart/Kroger's/Target/Publix/etc?
Every big store does this. Walmart, Kroger, Target, Publix, Sam's Club, Costco, et al. have generic/house brands that are cheaper. But Aldi more noticeably copies the names, colors, and fonts used by the name brand competitors. If you walk into an Aldi and look at everything (and they are smaller stores), I think you'll notice.

As far as quality goes, I think it's usually identical, and in some cases foods and goods are coming from the exact same factories, but they may be better or worse on a case-by-case basis.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/are-di...-to-feel-a-little-better.212745/post-20656332
 
As far as quality goes, I think it's usually identical, and in some cases foods and goods are coming from the exact same factories, but they may be better or worse on a case-by-case basis.
Probably does.

There's some company out there that makes ALL the "store" branded cookies, and one that makes all the sodas, and on and on and on.

I was pissed when the local grocery decided to rebrand as a "healthier" option and dropped the in-store soda brand that was 79 cents a 2 ltr bottle for equivalent quality to pepsi products. And I can't find it anywhere else because apparently they contracted with some Canadian company to do it who didn't service anyone else, it wasn't the same outfit that packaged Great Value stuff.
 
Aldi doesn't carry a lot of name brands to begin with, so it's easier to get confused than if you have the choice of the real product and the generic side by side like you do in most grocery stores. I think they do have Oreos though, at least they are on the website for my local store when I checked.

Stuff that doesn't taste like anything real to begin with can be easily faked. Every knockoff Oreo is fine, store brand soda is fine, it's just sugar. Things that are better when they are simple need to be avoided because you can taste where they went for cheaper quality ingredietns. Frozen pizza should just be bread, tomatoes, cheese, and seasoning. Aldi pizza is terrible.
 
I think they do have Oreos though, at least they are on the website for my local store when I checked.
The first photo shows Oreos and Chips Ahoy at Aldi with the Chips Ahoy knockoff.
Aldi pizza is terrible.
Their frozen pizzas are usually bad, and not even that cheap. I think their Take & Bake pizzas are better, and they get discounted occasionally either with stickers or price cut in half.
Are Hydrox still around? When I was a kid I thought they were store brand because of all the aggressive Oreo marketing.
In 2014, Leaf Brands registered the "Hydrox" trademark, which had been abandoned by former owner Kellogg's. Leaf began production of its version of Hydrox on September 4, 2015, at the company’s facility in Vernon, California. In 2017, the recipe was changed to remove artificial flavors that had been used for 50 years and the company obtained non-GMO certification.

Leaf Brands filed a complaint with the US Federal Trade Commission in 2018 against Mondelez International, maker of Oreo cookies, for hiding Hydrox cookies from customers on store shelves.
 
Trademark is also where some of the dumbest things happen... copyright is pretty cut and dry by comparison.

During the early years of arcade games? Companies tried to sue each other over trademark infringement because their game had an 8 way joystick and any other game that did too was merely copying their "unique" equipment. Or that a karate fighting game featured...... a guy in a white gi with a black belt, just like THEIRS!!!! OBVIOUS INFRINGEMENT!!!!!!!!
 
Back