The Schizo Conspiracy Thread - The conspiracies that will get you laughed out of your friend groups and subreddits

Okay for the past few days the voices in my head - be they spirit guides, schizo symptoms, whatever - keep bringing up California. Just, out of nowhere I'll be thinking of it or will hear the word 'California' as if someone is in the room with me, but I'm alone.
I've tried listening for other words to explain it. Nothing is actually said about California, just either the word or images from there.
I have no real connections to it, other than I am American and I probably have a distant cousin or two over there.
If it's the Universe talking to me, I wish it would be more specific about stuff.
If it's a weird autistic ghost obsessed with that state I wish it'd go haunt someone else for a while.

If anything happens to our 31st state, I call dibs on any glory to be had for predicting things, I guess.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NoBueno
Book from 1777

Nickelodeon
 
The Elite Underground



 
NoBueno said:
Book from 1777
View attachment 7450049
Click to expand...
Nice of that guy to not actually show any of the contents of the book.
Like, yeah, Tartary is mentioned. There's a whole chapter about european and asian Tartary. Guess what? It's just a term for the vast area of now eastern Russia/northern China that was mostly inhabited by peoples collectively known as Tatars.
The book describes exactly that, which is probably why he doesn't actually show anything about it. Yes, Tartary was real (still is, kinda, there's still the Tatarstan autonomous republic in the Russian Federation and Tatars are still a recognised people). No, it wasn't an advanced civilisation buried by a mudflood or whatever, it was basically Turk peoples and Mongols. Why yes, Tartary was once the most powerful empire in the world, it's true. But that fact wasn't buried in history or a mudflood, I think Ghengis Khan and Timur are fairly well known even today.

As for the "problems with the globes", it's again telling he doesn't actually read aloud the actual contents and problems. It's a lot less weird than he makes it out to be, it's mainly instructions on how to use a globe and how the translation from flat map projections to globes work. It's a comprehensive textbook for becoming a geographer. I also like how he's fascinated that an 18th century book contains maps with "parts unknown". Well no shit my nigger.
If anyone wants to read this totally rare and mystical book that escaped the mudflood burial of true Tatary history, it's here:
It's a pretty nice 18th century geography textbook, btw.
 
Meriasek said:
If anyone wants to read this totally rare and mystical book that escaped the mudflood burial of true Tatary history, it's here:
https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_the-new-universal-geogra_salmon-thomas_1782/page/n9/mode/2up It's a pretty nice 18th century geography textbook, btw.
Click to expand...
9iusdfh4.webp
I'm so glad we know the real truth now
idsjfh4.webp
 
NoBueno said:
View attachment 7452298
I'm so glad we know the real truth now
View attachment 7452294
Click to expand...
Ok? What are you trying to tell me here? Thar within six years of their inception, the Illuminati forced a new revision of a geography textbook that apparently left most things untouched but changed the Tartary descriptions from "hyper advanced civilisation" to "nomadic steppe people"?
You know you can actually use your own words to communicate, not just screenshots and short form videos, right?
 
Meriasek said:
Ok? What are you trying to tell me here? Thar within six years of their inception, the Illuminati forced a new revision of a geography textbook that apparently left most things untouched but changed the Tartary descriptions from "hyper advanced civilisation" to "nomadic steppe people"?
You know you can actually use your own words to communicate, not just screenshots and short form videos, right?
Click to expand...
I think the truth lies in between what the media pushes. Genghis Khan and the "Mongol Hordes" are demonized today. But on the other hand as the conspiracy theorists push, maybe it was not an ultra advanced society with Jetsons flying cars. Divide and conquer, hide the truth. Are you just testing my responses?
 
NoBueno said:
I think the truth lies in between what the media pushes. Genghis Khan and the "Mongol Hordes" are demonized today. But on the other hand as the conspiracy theorists push, maybe it was not an ultra advanced society with Jetsons flying cars. Divide and conquer, hide the truth. Are you just testing my responses?
Click to expand...
Ghengis Kahn and the Mongols aren't demonized today at all, although they were so significantly in the past. Ever noticed Tatar vs Tartar? Some suggest that "Tartar" was used as a reference to the greek Tartaros, implying that the Mongol hordes came from Hell itself. Deservedly so, they were not exactly nice people.
But today's research does see them a bit more openly, and even back then people acknowledged that their methods of travel and communication were impressive. Keeping up communications over such a vast empire that barely had roads was a feat.
No, not testing anything, I just want to understand what the hell you're talking about. Communication requires some coherence, and just spamming inane shit ain't helping.
 
Meriasek said:
Ghengis Kahn and the Mongols aren't demonized today at all, although they were so significantly in the past. Ever noticed Tatar vs Tartar? Some suggest that "Tartar" was used as a reference to the greek Tartaros, implying that the Mongol hordes came from Hell itself. Deservedly so, they were not exactly nice people.
But today's research does see them a bit more openly, and even back then people acknowledged that their methods of travel and communication were impressive. Keeping up communications over such a vast empire that barely had roads was a feat.
No, not testing anything, I just want to understand what the hell you're talking about. Communication requires some coherence, and just spamming inane shit ain't helping.
Click to expand...
I suppose this for other peoples reading benefit, since you already know. I already explained. Why should I believe anything "they" say? When everything I investigate ends up in a rabbit-hole of deception? I guess many would resist, even angrily so, since it underpins their very mental fabric of their reality, their mental state would fall into nothingness if there is nothing to hang on to. They'd be crushed. A risk of mental collapse
 
Last edited:
NoBueno said:
I suppose this for other peoples reading benefit, since you already know. I already explained. Why should I believe anything "they" say? When everything I investigate ends up in a rabbit-hole of deception? I suppose this for other peoples reading benefit, since you already know. I suppose many would resist, even angrily so, since it underpins their very mental fabric of reality, their mental state would fall into nothingness if there is nothing to hang on to. They'd be crushed. A risk of mental collapse
Click to expand...
But... There wasn't even any deception here. You didn't investigate anything, you posted a short video of a guy flipping through an old book spouting shit about it that is very easily disproven. Where's the deception? Who's the "they" that's decepting you? Shouldn't you consider that the guy who made the video is the one decepting you? Since he claims stuff about the book that, once you actually investigate yourself, turns out to be false or misrepresented?
Like, he flips through the "problems" with globes. He alludes that these are problems because previously everyone just used flat maps, but that's quite obviously wrong and can be easily seen even in the short sections where he actually shows the book. Or just read for yourself in the book I posted, they're identical.
There's a whole previous sections about how the Earth and planets are spherical and rotate around the sun. The "artificial globe" very explicitly refers to model globes, as the text states.
He's like, "they talk so casually about Tartary", and "Tartary is real", while not actually showing the sections about Tartary and what it actually says about Tartary. Of course Tartary is/was real. But not in the way the Mudflood people think it was. It wasn't some hyperadvanced civilisation that used ether energy or whatever and ruled the world for millenia, it was basically Mongols and Turks. The true thing is that Tartars did once have a vast empire, but none of that is buried, secret, or forgotten. It's the Mongols.
I ask again, where is the conspiracy, where is the deception? Who is decepting you here?
Think about who is quite openly feeding you misinformation here. Investigate. I posted the book above. Or magnify the sections visible in the little video. Read for yourself. And question all sides, not just the ones the short videos tell you to question.
 
Meriasek said:
But... There wasn't even any deception here. You didn't investigate anything, you posted a short video of a guy flipping through an old book spouting shit about it that is very easily disproven. Where's the deception? Who's the "they" that's decepting you? Shouldn't you consider that the guy who made the video is the one decepting you? Since he claims stuff about the book that, once you actually investigate yourself, turns out to be false or misrepresented?
Click to expand...
It's not about me. It's not about me positing positions. It's about making other people think of possibilities. You think I really post here for my own benefit? (well maybe to shock people sometimes;mischief) But it's mostly in hopes of getting others to think. I'm nobody, it doesn't matter exactly what I believe, because as I get new information this evolves as well. And I hope that is the case with others.
 
NoBueno said:
It's not about me. It's not about me positing positions. It's about making other people think of possibilities. You think I really post here for my own benefit? (well maybe to shock people sometimes;mischief) But it's mostly in hopes of getting others to think. I'm nobody, it doesn't matter exactly what I believe, because as I get new information this evolves as well. And I hope that is the case with others.
Click to expand...
So it's you who deceives others by posting easily disproven lies and arguing in favour of them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: name68126988 and YHWH's Strongest Soldier
NoBueno said:
It's not about me. It's not about me positing positions. It's about making other people think of possibilities. You think I really post here for my own benefit? (well maybe to shock people sometimes;mischief) But it's mostly in hopes of getting others to think. I'm nobody, it doesn't matter exactly what I believe, because as I get new information this evolves as well. And I hope that is the case with others.
Click to expand...
Nigger, you're not a person. You're a hollow puppet for small media influencers and LLMs to spread their lies for money. Nobody is shocked by it and spreading the lowest form of content only makes people despise you.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cnidarian
Meriasek said:
So it's you who deceives others by posting easily disproven lies and arguing in favour of them.
Click to expand...
Easily disproven by Snopes and such? Sure. If you want to believe Snopes and the like. I'm not stopping you, rate me dumb or whatever. You are allowed to choose your own frequency
 
NoBueno said:
Easily disproven by Snopes and such? Sure. If you want to believe Snopes and the like. I'm not stopping you, rate me dumb or whatever.
Click to expand...
No, by reading the actual primary sources like @Meriasek shared with you.

If you want to actually engage in proper schizobabble, there's plenty of online repositories* with works on theology and alchemy dating back centuries. They're all digitized for your convenience but you don't read because you're too fucking lazy. Put some actual effort into your posts.

*List of libraries that I know:
- Embassy of the Free Mind/Ritman's
- The Hermetic Library
- Esoterica Archives
 
NoBueno said:
Easily disproven by Snopes and such? Sure. If you want to believe Snopes and the like. I'm not stopping you, rate me dumb or whatever. You are allowed to choose your own frequency
Click to expand...
Did I refer to Snopes anywhere? I posted the actual book this guy was reading from. You can read what he just glosses over for yourself and see what it's all about.
NoBueno said:
View attachment 7452701
Click to expand...
I mean, it's the actual book this guy in the video was flipping through. It's as primary source as it gets for this. You can see for yourself whether this guy is telling the truth or not. Why do you refuse to do that? Should I record a short video myself debunking it so the information gets into your brain?
 
Meriasek said:
Did I refer to Snopes anywhere? I posted the actual book this guy was reading from. You can read what he just glosses over for yourself and see what it's all about.

I mean, it's the actual book this guy in the video was flipping through. It's as primary source as it gets for this. You can see for yourself whether this guy is telling the truth or not. Why do you refuse to do that? Should I record a short video myself debunking it so the information gets into your brain?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure where people get the idea of because something is in a book it must have been carried by Moses down from the mountain inscribed as a Tablet by God, instead of simply being written by a person. This view is very interesting to me. Like a book is more authoritative than a blog. Is it because it's physical and can be held? Because a publisher signed off on it? A publisher is just a corporation. Just like the corporations that run the websites. You believe everything on websites right? They are just the digital version of the Newspapers and Publishers
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatalTater
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back