US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kino.
Only thing I take issue with is the electric tanks actually have utility. One of the ways guys in the trenches know some shit is coming your way is loud as fuck diesel engines coming at you. Electric/hybrid stuff wouldn't give that warning. Also in an armor-on-armor engagement, being able to kill your engine to listen for your opponents without losing any capabilities would be huge.

But we're like 10-20 years from that being viable and those are not the reason faggots are trying to force this shit down the militay's throats.

Additionally, complicated and expensive parts aren't good for battlefield longevity if things really got popped off.
Electric stuff is cool, but currently explode like tinderboxes. And yeah, there's an agenda behind it. The M1 Abrams and other vehicles in development can run off JP-8 and shoot Depleted Uranium like they always have. Military vehicles don't need to be Captain Planet pilled, they need to be highly reliable and efficient killing machines. Trump and Pete have made the correct decision purging that ideology from the military
 
Second, Both the Parthians and Romans were both too exhausted to respond appropriately.
Both empires were also dealing with internal issues and some desert wasteland border areas were not a priority. Initially concerned about provoking the other into another costly war, and reports showed the otherside getting hit as hard as they were, so the general response was "Let them run wild for a bit, when we're ready we'll organize a campaign to kick them out". The other key point is the latest dust up had depleted local treasuries and depleted local mercenary organizations. When the Arabs showed up, the usual response of "just hire some dudes to chase away the attackers" wasn't an option.
If Mohammed had tried his shit earlier, it wouldn't have worked. He knew he could away with it because his trading contacts told him exactly how fucked the local empires were and there was an opportunity.

Third, because they coopted local rulers and populations. Mohammed's message of religious and ethnic tolerance was very attractive for cities that had been getting traded back and forth and having pogroms. All of the most impressive early Muslim victories involved some level of deception, or a disaffected local using the Arabs as a way to settle scores. They were doing hit-and-run like they'd been doing for generations, just getting local rulers to swear alliegance instead of fucking back off into the desert.

Fourth, the Caliphate was already starting to flounder until military leadership was taken over by non-Arab muslim converts who had no patience for Typical Arab Behavior. There was also alot of hiring mercenaries that went on.

And as @FILTH Tourist points out, in the early rush the there was a lot more to gain for the average fighter, namely a share loot and spoils, plus the opportunity to rise in station if you were a good soldier/leader. That shifted as the number of muslims increased and eventually all merit-based compensation dried up, and those at the top were interested in remaining at the top.
Constantinople could not have held Egypt even without Islam.
 
I wonder how they managed to even expand out in the early caliphate days in the first place. Even with the exhausted empires they went up against surely they would've been not much at all?
To add to what others have said about them following good intelligence to strike when the iron was hot, there were a lot of great Arab commanders and military leaders during the Rashidun Caliphate who rose up the ranks through merit. Unfortunately, they all assassinated one another and then engaged in a huge civil war called the First Fitna. When the dust settled, the guy who emerged as the victor was a 'literally who' called Mu'awiyah I who was the governor of Syria. He didn't really have a stellar military career, but was an adept administrator and great leader who was very familiar with fighting the Byzantines. Part of the reason that the Byzantine front ground to a halt while Persia fell was because Mu'awiyah's troops were reduced to a sixth of their original strength by a plague, and he still managed to hold the Byzantines off. He did things like take advantage of the resentment of local Aramaic-speaking Christians towards the Greek-speaking Christians of Byzantium - he basically kept the bureaucracy of the Empire in place but staffed it with Syriac Christians who understood how the local governing structure worked, and these Christians remained loyal to Mu'awiyah because he gave them great opportunity for personal advancement, giving Syria much more stability. He also recognized that the situation had changed, and that the Arabs needed to both consolidate their gains and focus on building a navy. He launched a bunch of land raids into Anatolia but focused immense resources into building a navy to harass Byzantine shipping.

He founded the Ummayyad Caliphate, and their strategy was to pretty much fuel a never-ending war against Byzantium right next to their heartland, to become strong enough at sea to control and throttle shipping lanes and harass distant enemies, and to kick around people in North Africa, slowly but steadily expanding to the West and eventually into Iberia. They did this by largely converting the Berbers to Islam and turning them against the prosperous Byzantine-controlled coastal cities and towns.

At this point land expansion was pointless. Where were you going to expand? Iberia was deadlocked. Anatolia was deadlocked. South was the Sahara. East was India, north was the Caucasus and Central Asia/Afghanistan, all nasty areas to invade because of, respectively, a population of unruly, demented cockroach people and very difficult terrain. So the Islamic Caliphates became administrative states, focusing on trade and holding together a vast and disparate empire, and their land armies largely atrophied. Eventually, steppe people swept in and took over. When Islam spread from there on out it was largely through trade along the Silk Road or into Africa, as trade and religious proselytization could reach into those rugged, remote areas where armies could not be deployed. This is how you saw Islam spread down the Silk Road, to Indonesia & Malaysia, and into pockets of Africa and India.
 
Last edited:
To add to what others have said about them following good intelligence to strike when the iron was hot, there were a lot of great Arab commanders and military leaders during the Rashidun Caliphate who rose up the ranks through merit. Unfortunately, they all assassinated one another and then engaged in a huge civil war called the First Fitna. When the dust settled, the guy who emerged as the victor was a 'literally who' called Mu'awiyah I who was the governor of Syria. He didn't really have a stellar military career, but was an adept administrator and great leader who was very familiar with fighting the Byzantines. Part of the reason that the Byzantine front ground to a halt while Persia fell was because Mu'awiyah's troops were reduced to a sixth of their original strength by a plague, and he still managed to hold the Byzantines off. He did things like take advantage of the resentment of local Aramaic-speaking Christians towards the Greek-speaking Christians of Byzantium - he basically kept the bureaucracy of the Empire in place but staffed it with Syriac Christians who understood how the local governing structure worked, and these Christians remained loyal to Mu'awiyah because he gave them great opportunity for personal advancement, giving Syria much more stability. He also recognized that the situation had changed, and that the Arabs needed to both consolidate their gains and focus on building a navy. He launched a bunch of land raids into Anatolia but focused immense resources into building a navy to harass Byzantine shipping.
The modern Arab is really degraded here.
 
I wonder how they managed to even expand out in the early caliphate days in the first place. Even with the exhausted empires they went up against surely they would've been not much at all?
So the sassanids were peak exhaustioned, corrupt, dysfunctional and they didn’t face a whole fuckton of pushback in the Sahara. When they crossed the strait of Gibraltar, they landed in peak dark age Europe where there was no organization above the level of like, a county, and a guy rich enough to run a county saw what way the wind was blowing and practiced risk management

Anyways
IMG_8221.webp
Recession, rescission, what’s the difference, am I right?

MTG is either too dumb to breathe or subversive
 
I’m not saying anything if you dont
View attachment 7450696
Far be it from me to doubt Right Angle News, but China relies on the USA to feed more that 20% of it's population. If true though, I would support preemptive nuclear strikes on every leadership position, shipyard and military base under their control, including dual use ports in other countries stupid enough to let the Chinks get a toe in.
 
They're trying so hard to make fetch a thing.

The Hill: "Why TACO trade gets under Trump’s skin" (archive)
President Trump has fielded questions from the Oval Office in recent weeks about Elon Musk’s drug use, sensitive matters of diplomacy and the ethics of accepting a Qatari jet as a gift to be used as Air Force One.

He’s chafed at some of those questions, but few set him off like the one he received about the concept of the Wall Street TACO trade, an acronym that stands for “Trump Always Chickens Out.”

“Don’t ever say what you said,” Trump snapped at a reporter last week when first asked about the trend. “That’s a nasty question. To me, that’s the nastiest question.”

The TACO trend has struck a particular nerve with the president, who built his brand on his business acumen and presents himself as a master dealmaker.

The TACO acronym has caught on in political circles in recent weeks, though the term was coined by a Financial Times columnist. The acronym is reference to traders on Wall Street becoming less reactive to Trump’s tariff announcements based on the pattern that he will ultimately pull them back or kick them down the road.

The president initially threatened tariffs on Mexico and Canada in early February but ultimately delayed imposing them.

Trump imposed sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of nations on April 2 but announced one week later there would be a 90-day reprieve where the tariffs were lowered to 10 percent.

More recently, he threatened a 50 percent tariff on goods from the European Union, only to announce within days they would be postponed amid negotiations.

But the simple TACO acronym has clearly gotten under Trump’s skin, and Democrats and other opponents of Trump have seized upon it because it undercuts his persona as a savvy businessman whose every move is that of a dealmaker outwitting his opponents.

While Trump allies see the president’s reversals as a sign of necessary flexibility and part of a grand plan, the TACO acronym suggests Trump gets rattled at the first sign of trouble.

The Drudge Report poked fun at Trump over the phrase late last week, with a front page that covered the president in Mexican food.

Democrats, seeking to further irk the president, parked a taco truck outside the Republican National Committee’s headquarters Tuesday that was wrapped with an image of Trump in a chicken suit. Reports said it ran out of the free tacos it was providing in an hour.

The White House has presented Trump as a master negotiator while brushing off the criticism from Democrats and traders. But it’s hard to argue the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariff regime isn’t itself an issue.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked Tuesday about business leaders who want to see certainty but haven’t gotten it with Trump’s tariff approach.

“You also have U.S. business leaders begging to meet with this president and begging to come to the White House to talk to him because they know that he is a negotiator in chief, that he is making good deals on behalf of the American worker,” Leavitt responded.

One lingering question is whether Trump’s distaste for the “TACO” moniker might influence his decision-making moving forward.

The president’s views on tariffs on trade imbalances are deeply held, and he is not going to back off his aggressive use of tariffs any time soon. That was made clear last Friday night, when he announced he was doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from 25 percent to 50 percent.

“Rest assured,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday, “tariffs are not going away.”

That decision came after the courts handed Trump a couple of losses on tariffs, ruling his use of one law to justify the trade regime was illegal. Trump responded by using a different law to double the steel and aluminum tariffs.

There are multiple key deadlines approaching that will further test whether Trump is all bluster or whether he’s willing to follow through on threats that could have major economic consequences.

The 90-day extension Trump granted the country-specific tariffs is set to expire July 8, and investors will be closely monitoring whether the president is willing to extend the pause or whether higher tariff rates on imports will be reinstated.

Trump also delayed his 50 percent tariff threat against the European Union until July 9 after talking with the president of the European Commission.

It means July 8 and 9 will be either a sequel to “Liberation Day” or a TACO day to remember.

Trump’s ‘peacemaker’ image proves elusive

President Trump promised to settle the war in Ukraine before he even took office and has positioned himself as a “peacemaker” seeking to put out fires around the globe.

But nearly five months into his term, he’s finding it more difficult than he had hoped as negotiations drag on in Ukraine and the Middle East and a nuclear deal with Iran proves elusive.

“I think Trump is fishing around for something that he can call a peace deal,” said one former diplomat.

The former diplomat noted the Good Friday Agreement, a major diplomatic success, took years to successfully negotiate to halt decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

Trump promised to swiftly end the war in Ukraine throughout the 2024 campaign. The conflict began in 2022 when Russian forces invaded Ukraine.

While Trump has spoken with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky multiple times about ending the conflict and officials from both countries have met for direct talks, it’s not clear the two sides are any closer to a ceasefire.

Russia has made clear it’s not interested in a pause in fighting, and Ukraine in recent days launched a drone attack to target bombers in Russian territory.

“I would just like to remind everybody how far we have come in just four months,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. “It was inconceivable last year at this time for Russia and Ukraine to be engaged in direct talks. And it’s because of this president’s insistence and determination to get this war to an end that those two countries sat down yesterday.”

Any significant changes to the situation may still be, as Trump likes to say, two weeks away.

In the Middle East, Israel continues to target Hamas in Gaza, where tens of thousands of people have died in an Israeli military campaign and watchdog groups have said a humanitarian crisis is unfolding.

The Trump administration’s latest peace proposal, which it said Israel supported, landed with a dud when officials said the Hamas response was “totally unacceptable.”

And on Iran, Trump has for weeks teased the possibility of a nuclear agreement coming together and talked up the idea of Tehran prospering economically.

But Axios on Monday reported that the proposal from the Trump administration would allow for low-level uranium enrichment by Iran, something that would undercut public comments from the president and his top aides.

“Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!” Trump posted Tuesday on Truth Social.
The Democrats are backsliding hardcore here, turning their party once again into the "anti-Trump" party. On occasion they start to bitch and moan about Vance, or Mike Johnson, or Rand Paul, or Thomas Massie, but then it goes right back to the guy who will exit political life in 2028. They spent all of 2016 to 2024 talking about how bad Trump was that they effectively had no political platform to offer besides "not Trump." Now they're going to extend that until 2028?

I guess it makes sense: the Democrats are so hellbent on destroying everything about Western society, it follows logically that they would eventually turn the gun on themselves.
 
Hey, that's me!

Serious question, if people are in the country illegally, I assume they have next to nopaperwork or traceable identity. How is the country able to locate them then? I'd figured they'd be in hiding.
Serious answer, there's no such thing as an undocumented person inside of the United States. You can practice opsec, you like many others here do. Illegals don't practice it as good but who can blame the sub 70 IQ people. It's very difficult to exist in the US without leaving some kind of digital trail. Say you came into the US no papers. You will need forged ID to get access to a bank, to work a job, to apply for gibsmedats, to get a communications device. All of this is visible and monitored by the federal government.

That forged ID and fraudulent filings gets tied to a bunch of shit that all throws red flags when hitting federal systems. The government becomes/is aware of you. The only next question is weather they want to do anything about it. The previous administration could have if they wanted to buy didn't. The current administration is collaborating within multiple departments to find these people. The IRS is sharing information with the DHS and FBI, and the same goes the other way around. This means it's easy to build a profile on a person who's been living here 'undocumented' and find them. That's before we even get to satellite observation on the border and constant phone GPS tracking and observation.

It's not that we couldn't find these 'undocumented' people before, we could have. It's that we've been enabling them for some time. If you want proof of this I encourage you to look at the Haitians being dumped into Ohio around 1-2 years back. People did on the ground interviews with the local DMVs because the Haitians were getting into so many accidents with stationary objects. They were getting drivers licenses without having been in the country for a week, not even having citizenship nor visa. The DMVs response was "we cannot tell you how we're granting them drivers licenses. Go away". But I'm done ranting. If you want to know more do your own research. Theses people shouldn't be in America and should have been ejected long ago. We know who they are, they know we know. It's only a matter of time now.
 
But something about elon just weirds me out. I don't think he's dumb and i think he has good insight but he's clearly got mental issues and main character syndrome and i will never forgive him for pushing the indian shit with that dude who said whites are incompotent because we fucked in high school.
Aside from the autism, he's not American and has spent most of his professional life maneuvering people out of their assets via underhanded tricks and scams.
 
Do these people not know what a TacoBell is?

You can literally walk into one and see pictures of Tacos that look 100x better than whatever the fuck THIS is supposed to be
That thing is in a restaurant takeout container so he definitely didn’t cook it himself. It was probably made by one of the illegals that they tell us we need to cook our food.
 
Hey, that's me!

Serious question, if people are in the country illegally, I assume they have next to nopaperwork or traceable identity. How is the country able to locate them then? I'd figured they'd be in hiding.
Their trace will grow over time. Unless you live like a hermit. exclusively living off of cash under the table, and walking everywhere, you will leave behind a paperwork. Driver licenses, traffic fines or violations, bank accounts, car payments, insurance, internet and cell, etc. If you drop an anchor baby or three, you'll apply for insurance coverage from the government, requiring you to file your taxes.

They are not hard to find, at all. As long as they didn't stir up shit and get pulled over for driving without insurance or something equally or more retarded, no one bothers them.
 
Last edited:
Back