Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
The conclusion is perfect. Greer did not provide what he ordered so please send him to the principals office for a further scolding. A nice final sentence of snark.
admitting... he would be "happy to provide them"... subsequent[ly]... providing them would make Mr.Greer the opposite of "happy"
1749051976185.webp
 

I'm mildly disappointed that when Hardin brought up Greer's inflated costs for the Utah document copies, he did not also point out that Greer was well aware of those costs weeks ago, and that Greer waited until the last minute before the deadline before filing his motion to reconsider.

1749052189115.webp

We all love you Mr. Hardin but I still don't think the court appreciates it when you get cute. Welp, Greer's reply to this will hopefully be forthcoming today.
 
Greer's refusal to have them mailed to Greer is the strangest thing about the whole scenario. He never explains why he thinks they should be certified and sent directly (like a school transcript?) - does he think Hardin would contest them as inauthentic? That would be a harsh claim and easy for the courts to check/verify (probably by literally walking out the door and over to the state courthouse).

1749052613082.webp

(I like the Green Pig and "We're all Fucked Bank")
 
Greer's refusal to have them mailed to Greer is the strangest thing about the whole scenario. He never explains why he thinks they should be certified and sent directly (
My assumption (pulled right out of my arse) is that he is afraid of somehow phonebooking himself, as several times he's refused to provide a suitable mailing address belonging to himself.
 
My assumption (pulled right out of my arse) is that he is afraid of somehow phonebooking himself, as several times he's refused to provide a suitable mailing address belonging to himself.
Then the faggot can drive. If a ruined foundation of a whorehouse is worth a 6 hour drive, and a failed attempt to turn a motel into a whorehouse is worth a 7 hour one, certainly this massive important case is worth a similar one.
 
I love how he repeatedly reminds the Court that they themselves said that if this happened, they would have to get together again and discuss terminating the shitshow. Once even mentioning that the Court brought up fee shifting, which he will certainly use to argue that it is warranted. I know we must keep our expectations under control especially when it comes to hitting the retard with fee shifting but hey, "the Court explicitly said it itself, your honor. Here, it's on the record" has to be a breddy gud argument.
 

I can hear the trauma lumps swelling from halfway across the continent.

Once again Mr. Hardin has torn the Bamboon's arguments to shreds (admittedly even Acerthorn could have done that) but also and more importantly called for the court to stand up and keep it's word, to 're convene' and decide if rule 37 case ending or other sanctions should be imposed for failing for the third time to comply with Discovery and produce a document he claimed he was 'happy' to do. 5 goddamn months ago.

The Hardship makes the obvious point that document costs were not only inflated, but to be borne by the parties who require them. Shitlips was dumb enough to delete his copy of the document that is now needed, ergo he gets another copy. Since he refuses to with a bunch of weaselly excuses, he is disrespecting the court as well as the defense.

All laid out in a polite manner that never sinks to Russhole's level of name calling and borderline libel. (Though he does get in a nice bit of snark. I don't think it's enough to irritate the judge though, @obsdj . Had it been full of rude dunks on Russ that would be another story but it's only the greasy goblin saying nasties in filings at this point.)

I can't wait for what comes next!
 
Last edited:
Meh. I would've preferred a simple status report and immediate, explicit motion for dismissal. I understand the need to reply to everything, however retarded, but I still think the judge would've gone along with ignoring Greer's motion and jumping straight to sanctions.

1749053106690.webp
1749053349194.webp

Wow, Buddy Boy just completely invalidating every lawsuit Greer has ever filed. Very rude.

1749053185705.webp

While this is true, the judge was the one saying to use this mechanism back on May 6th. I don't think he'll care to argue about it now. The SPO has become part of the tard shield.

The conclusion is perfect. Greer did not provide what he ordered so please send him to the principals office for a further scolding.
I still think it should be a standalone motion, to force a ruling (plus a deranged Response). Also, Hardin is hanging a lot on that first email and the word "happy". It's enough to point out Greer's 3 whiny motions and 5-7 months of non-compliance. If the judge is feeling in a shielding mood, he could just accept Greer's explanation about losing documents and not knowing when he sent the email.
 
The Hardship makes the obvious point that document costs were not only inflated, but to be borne by the parties who require them. Shitlips was dumb enough to delete his copy of the document that is now needed, ergo he gets another copy. Since he refuses to with a bunch of weaselly excuses, he is disrespecting the court as well as the defense.
Hardin implied a response that Greer could make, but he won't. Interesting to see him lay it out like that. It's not about giving free advice to Greer, but sometimes it is to prove that he's intentionally dicking around and not actually trying.
I still think it should be a standalone motion, to force a ruling (plus a deranged Response). And Hardin is really hanging way too much on that first email and the word "happy". It's enough to point out the 3 whiny motions and 5-7 months of non-compliance. If the judge is feeling in a shielding mood, he could just accept Greer's explanation about losing documents and not knowing when he sent the email.
This is a response to Greer's insane dribblings, and not technically the status update required by the court. As we've seen, people can get burned by unopposed motions, no matter how irrelevant or insane you may think them.

I suspect another notice early next week along the lines of "by the way, I haven't received shit".
1749053853386.webp
oh fuck oh fuck no i want dobson back but not this way noooooo
 
I do like Hardin hammering home "happy to provide them". Looks like thats repeated 6 times. Its one of Greer's most egregious lies in the case.
You misunderstood. Greer said that Happy, one of the Seven Dwarfs, would provide them. Clearly, this is Disney's fault.
1749059791046.webp
(AI, Happy providing docs to Greer, 2025, colorized)
I will point out I like this citation. Greer may be anxious and depressed but if he were anxious, depressed AND had head trauma then it still isn't enough.
Do we have caselaw that "trauma lumps" and "head trauma" are interchangeable?
Russ typed that out slobbering smug as can be thinking it'd terrify Hardin and make him drop Null as a client I bet.
Greer really does seem to think that Hardin actually gives a shit, and that lawyers would drop a paying client because they might lose the case. I suspect something similar has happened to Greer, but he doesn't understand why it worked against him and won't work for him.
 
Last edited:
Back