- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
As far as I know, he has never filed an update on his location or address after the homelessness arc, so he's entirely undercover.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
The status report isn't due until the 10th, this was just a (necessary) reply to Greer's idiot motion to reconsider.
And remember, there is already an open motion to dismiss before the court. Hardin requested extra time to reply to Greer's objection to said motion to dismiss, largely because there are all the other open matters that need resolving before Hardin makes any further arguments in support of that motion. For example, Greer still needs to pay the one sanction, there's the other motion for sanctions that remains open (ECF 234), this whole matter of the Utah documents is coming due, Hardin's next motion for sanctions will be filed soon, and so on.
The "happy" thing has been brought up more than enough times and Greer has already been ordered to produce the fucking material twice by the judge, I don't think it's helpful to keep harping on "happy" at this point.
I know what you're referring to, but it's too late to help him. The deadline was yesterday.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
So much for the trauma lumps gambit...
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
As was pointed out to me the judge hasn't ruled on Greer's motion, there may yet be more TardGuard(tm) in play.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2015
Hardin should be teaching ethics and civility hours for legal continuing education credits at this point. I have no idea how he can confine it to these coolly composed footnotes and not just slather it on thick in the text of the opposition, or even in an email that Russ would file to show that he really is a meanie poopoo head and he needs a restraining order NOW NOW NOW.
I do like how the exhibit also lists the eviction proceeding and the payday loan collection proceeding. Very clever way to show that to the Court.
e. @DavidS877 failure to rule means status quo was not changed, documents were still due yesterday. Of course, the Court can always come back and retroactively give Russ another 7 months, but I shouldn’t speak that into existence.
I do like how the exhibit also lists the eviction proceeding and the payday loan collection proceeding. Very clever way to show that to the Court.
e. @DavidS877 failure to rule means status quo was not changed, documents were still due yesterday. Of course, the Court can always come back and retroactively give Russ another 7 months, but I shouldn’t speak that into existence.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2022
Thank god Hardin reiterated what the court ordered because the court has been retarded this entire trial. It needs to be reminded of what it said before as attempts to tard-guard Greer have resulted in undermining its authority and has played a part in this case going on for so long from not enforcing rules.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
Greer asked for the order to be rescinded OR for defendants to be forced to pay for the copies, not for an extension of time. He's in violation. Of course TardGuard is like slime on a Nickelodeon show, you have to assume it's always hanging over your head no matter what, but in spite of the judge's obvious desire not to punish Greer for anything ever, he was quite explicit in the hearing on this matter. We shall no doubt see.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Seems like that would be an implicit extension. But true, I didn't read Greer's rantings nearly as closely as I read Mr. Hardin's or the Court's.
DiabeticSydePhil
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I think if nothing else the judge is genuinely irked by Russ's refusal to just do the thing he was told to do, vs all the fuck ups he makes just because he felt like it.
But the judges seem perfectly content to make shit up as they go, so who can say.
At a certain point if the Judge says he'll do something on the record and then doesnt, surely Hardin can file some form of protest?
But the judges seem perfectly content to make shit up as they go, so who can say.
At a certain point if the Judge says he'll do something on the record and then doesnt, surely Hardin can file some form of protest?
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022
I know you're not the praying type, but you better pray this gets dismissed before another dozen sanctions are slapped on, you fucking mongoloid. 
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
I don't know. I feel its worse than his eager (deceased) witness.
Irene and 22 others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2023
Supposing that in their decision the Supreme Court indicates that the 10th circuit were the biggest batch of mongs ever seen to have come up with such a retarded ruling and you'd have to be the kind of person that likes using their own shit as a crayon to consider it as good law, what effect does that have on this case? Would it provide a good enough reason for the judge(s) to dismiss without having to rule on any merits of the case or deal with issues of sanctions or other things that they may prefer to avoid?
I'd accept that he's incredibly lazy and cheap and doesn't want to pay for postage a second time, but I don't know if he has an address to send them to that wouldn't require him to make a long trip to pick up the documents. I think that when he was trying to get Null to pay some ~$200 fee amount that he (technically the attorneys that handled his appeal) was owed, he wanted it sent to his father's address. The other possibility is that he'd have to use the actual correct address that he was giving Hardin a runaround over which would reveal to the court that he was lying about that and give even more cause for sanctions.
In a world where Greer keeps calling this a copyright case and "eager" witness Steve is fucking dead, I don't even know if "happy to provide them" cracks the top five.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
Can't wait until the plightsperging where Hardin noooooticing that Greer frivolously uses stalking and harassment claims against supposed aggressors is actually, in itself, stalking and harassment.
Enjoy disbarment, Virginia qualified child.
Enjoy disbarment, Virginia qualified child.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Is there a reason Russell's exhibits are always in the same PDF as his filings and Hardin's never are?
Which is the correct way to do it?
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Mr. Hardin uploads them himself to CM/ECF so each attachment/exhibit is a distinct file, as it should be.
When the clerk gets Greer's drool covered email they just upload it, and it's likely being sent as a single file.
Mr. Hardin is correct.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
He still has never provided the court or defendant with a valid address for service. At any point throughout this case. He deliberately kept lying about it. While using his actual address in other (hooker related) cases.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
Late; he already believes, and has plead, that by merely obtaining public information that is, by law, available to the public about public matters involving a [limited purpose] public figure as part of the litigation/Discovery process Mr. Hardin is, in fact, "stalking" and "harassing" him.
Schizo Carmen Sandiego
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I remember Judge Bennett being fairly annoyed that Russ hadn't provided the documents. I honestly don't think he is going to tardguard over this.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
That one was actually excusable nigglet in a way, just stupidity. This is worse, because he's got a $87 solution and refuses to use it.
He obstinately refuses to admit he got the PMB wrong, even though it would have been a simple fix, and a PMB is valid for most kinds of service.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Hmmm? With regards to exhibit A. All of Greers "sealed" Las Vegas civil actions. I wonder how many of them Greer actually told Hardin about in response to the Discovery request?