He obviously constructs imaginary castles whorehouses in the air to justify his past actions (this whole fucking thing is about a literal book he wrote to do so) but I think he believes in them - and since he needed it to be true that the stay didn't affect inquiring from Null about the Does, he believed it to be so.
Since I am retarded, I had to go back and re-read the transcript again to see if there was something we were all missing. It's actually even better than I remembered.
First, the judge clearly spells it out from the very beginning, literally the very first thing he says when the topic of the motion to stay comes up, is this:
"I'm not going to grant it until everybody is served, I'm granting it until the MTD is decided". Right at the start it is clearly spelled out.
Then, Hardin follows that up with:
Twice now it's plain as day what's going on. So what does faglips bring to the table?
"I'm a fucking retard that can't ever figure out how to serve anybody, so if you stay discovery, I'll just issue a subpoena." Christ.
The judge then tells him a third time.
Again, no mystery about what's transpiring. No room for "whoops, I misunderstood because you were confusing". It could not be any clearer.
They then mooooove onnnnn to the IFP stuff, but the judge gets it in there one final time during the summary.
ONE exception, but that exception was most certainly not "discovery to find the John Does" as fuckface claims. As has been said many times here and in his main thread, he literally only hears what he wants to hear. Then he rewrites history in that lumpy head so he can later make completely false claims with pure confidence. It would be fascinating if it wasn't so predictable at this point.
Edit - Fuck me, why are my thumbnails so... un-thumbnailish?... sorry, attempting to fix.
Meh, resizing doesn't do shit on my end. Dunno.