Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Do you guys remember a Lolicon by the name of fictionffects.

I think he Is now called hougonparadox or something but i'm mentioning him in this thread because there Is something interesting about him.

He has admitted that he Is a father to a 6 year old boy and even showed pictures of His wife.
Do you have any links to share?
 
Do you guys remember a Lolicon by the name of fictionffects.

I think he Is now called hougonparadox or something but i'm mentioning him in this thread because there Is something interesting about him.

He has admitted that he Is a father to a 6 year old boy and even showed pictures of His wife.
Sounds like Louis Testone Jr./Rev's future. This is not fucking funny or amusing, makes me MATRL.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: The Foxtrot
Considering how many of these future child molesters work around schools with small children, some with disabilities….

THE ANSWER IS YES. THEY WOULD MOLEST A DOWN SYNDROME CHILD.
We need to protect our dear feeder
7432837-8025aff4b052d48e2190aa15de0e5039.webp
:o
 
It really is fascinating how this game is splitting the lolicon pedophile market. The gooner brain-rot freaks seem to be struggling with their porn-sick fantasies not measuring up, whereas the outright pedophiles are taking the bait. While this should be a moment of self-reflection, most will simply brush aside this rift as "trolling," before doubling down on their shameless actions.
 
While this should be a moment of self-reflection, most will simply brush aside this rift as "trolling," before doubling down on their shameless actions.
I genuinely hope not. Call me optimistic but I think they're pushing too far with this one. You could convince some retards with the "just drawings" argument but with this it's entirely different.
 
I genuinely hope not. Call me optimistic but I think they're pushing too far with this one. You could convince some retards with the "just drawings" argument but with this it's entirely different.
How do you feel so? For the types of people willing to consume AI or CSAM, what suddenly makes the "Let's suddenly practice moderation, as if we became Eastern Christian monks."
 
How do you feel so? For the types of people willing to consume AI or CSAM, what suddenly makes the "Let's suddenly practice moderation, as if we became Eastern Christian monks."
That is a lot to unpack, I do think there are people who unironically buy the "it's just drawings" argument without being into lolicon themselves but there are pedophiles that mask themselves in this. Personally I chose to practice moderation in the case that this game is genuinely honest in being a pure game.
I also acknowledge pedophiles hide in many communities & use any opportunity to latch onto anyone that fits their narrative, so plenty of pedos are gonna flock to this game because it's something popular from Capcom & also has a child in it so they will flock to it to try to make it pedo related immediately after release to claim it's their own & anyone that has a problem with lolicon has a problem with this game inherently.
I also notice there are people who have a problem with the lolicons trying to take over this game not just in the Steam forums but on Twitter in their own "lolicon" community.
If their are lolicon supporters that say they have a problem with this game being supported by lolicons for obvious pedo reasons I want to believe the tides are turning on this pedo shit.
 
Whatever is "weird" about the game is entirely in his head, which says a lot about him. So far Pragmata seems normal and there's no reason to think that'll change despite fan reactions to the girl.

Plus modern Capcom doesn't really sexualize female characters in general anymore since they're woke, which happens to be a boon in this case, so it's not something to worry about them slipping in.

If their are lolicon supporters that say they have a problem with this game being supported by lolicons for obvious pedo reasons I want to believe the tides are turning on this pedo shit.
It looks like there's some genuine rejection of those lusting after the Pragmata girl, but it's not exactly a brave position to hold.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gatcha Gonna Getcha
The rejection of the Pragmata girl by certain lolicons isn’t some principled stand—it’s a calculated effort to preserve a fragile narrative. A sign of a community trying to preserve its own delusion. When they reject certain characters or depictions by saying “she’s not a loli” or “she looks too realistic,” they’re not reacting to the presence of child-coded sexuality out of ethical concern. They’re reacting to how visible the connection to real children becomes when their usual excuses start to crumble.

They want to believe — or want you to believe — that loli is some wholly fictional, stylized concept that has nothing to do with real-world children. But that’s a lie that falls apart under even the slightest historical or aesthetic scrutiny. The entire genre of loli has always been rooted in the sexualization of childlike traits. It exists because of real children, not in spite of them. The big eyes, the small frames, the high-pitched voices, the schoolgirl uniforms — these aren’t abstract, alien design choices. They’re intentional mimicry of real-life cues of youth and innocence, twisted for sexual consumption. So when lolicons start talking about how lolis are “too unrealistic to be comparable to real kids,” what they’re really doing is trying to create just enough visual distance to pretend they’re not attracted to what they’re actually attracted to.

This is where we see the clearest divide within the lolicon community, and it’s one that says everything about how dishonest the culture around it is. First, there are the open pedophiles — the ones who fully admit their attraction to children and argue that there’s “nothing wrong with it” as long as they don’t act on it. They don’t bother with euphemisms. They openly say they’re just using loli as a legal, consequence-free substitute for real children. Their argument is horrifying, but at least it’s transparent.

Then you have the plausible deniability crowd — the ones who desperately cling to the idea that what they’re consuming is completely separate from reality. They say things like, “I’m not into kids, I’m into 2D,” or “These characters aren’t real, so it’s fine,” and they pretend that the stylization of the characters erases the fact that those characters are child-coded. But their panic becomes obvious when anything threatens the fantasy they’ve built. If a character looks or behaves too much like a real child, they rush to disown it, not because it challenges their morality, but because it threatens the only excuse they have left. Their rejection isn’t ethical — it’s strategic.

And finally, there’s the third group, the most insidious: the lolicons who know they’re sexually attracted to children, who fully understand what their preferences reveal about them — but who deliberately wrap themselves in the plausible deniability rhetoric to blend in. They’ll perform outrage when a depiction is “too realistic,” or draw moral lines they don’t believe in, because they know the second the fantasy becomes too transparent, the spotlight might turn on them. These people aren’t confused. They aren’t deceiving themselves. They’re using plausible deniability not as a comfort, but as camouflage. They hide among the rest, using the ambiguity of fiction to protect a truth they’re too afraid or too self-serving to admit openly. They know exactly what they’re doing — and their dishonesty makes them the most dangerous kind of all.

So don't be fooled, this rejection and internal gatekeeping isn’t progress. It’s an ecosystem trying to preserve itself by setting up arbitrary limits just far enough away from the core truth that it can keep operating without scrutiny. The fact that they need that buffer at all is proof of what lies beneath: a sexual attraction to children, dressed up in fiction, denied in public, and hidden behind layers of stylization and technicality.
 
So don't be fooled, this rejection and internal gatekeeping isn’t progress. It’s an ecosystem trying to preserve itself by setting up arbitrary limits just far enough away from the core truth that it can keep operating without scrutiny. The fact that they need that buffer at all is proof of what lies beneath: a sexual attraction to children, dressed up in fiction, denied in public, and hidden behind layers of stylization and technicality.
Bravo, excellently put. It shows they are a bunch of sociopaths who should be put down as snakes and dogs as they are. They aren't dumb. They are evil. This saving face is also shown is also seen when they call us, who keep a close eye on their actions (and other "antis") as "temperature room retards" (shows they don't have emotional intelligence, thus, sociopaths as opposed to psychopaths) - naturally, they do this because they are afraid, so they attack us as a pre-emptive manner to defend themselves - They absolutely HATE being proven wrong!

Curiously, this is best summed up into something from this verse from The Bible (now that the likes of Rev claim to be "Christian"):

12 But I will keep on doing what I am doing, in order to undercut those who want an opportunity to be regarded as our equals in the things of which they boast. 13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. 15 It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their actions. 16 I repeat: Let no one take me for a fool. But if you do, then receive me as a fool, so that I too may boast a little. 17 In this confident boasting of mine, I am not speaking as the Lord would, but as a fool. 18 Since many are boasting according to the flesh, I too will boast. 19 For you gladly put up with fools, since you are so wise. 20 In fact, you even put up with anyone who enslaves you or exploits you or takes advantage of you or exalts himself or strikes you in the face. 21 To my shame I concede that we were too weak for that!

There will be plenty of weeping and gnashing of teeth.
 
Last edited:
How do you feel so? For the types of people willing to consume AI or CSAM, what suddenly makes the "Let's suddenly practice moderation, as if we became Eastern Christian monks."
Easy most pedophiles aren't actually busted with digital images of Lolli.

Not to defend these creeps, but completely mentally different disorder.

I think the original debate threat had someone going over the actual statistics but there's really very little link between the two things.

It's also a genuine waste of time for the government to go after the. inanimate objects because inanimate objects don't feel pain going after actual producers of CP is much more useful.
Also, I do love the people who say, you know, we should make all these things illegal. Yeah, that totally always works. Think of the children Yet people would use most of those laws to go after Kiwi farms.

Personally, if I ran a massive social media website, I would just ban it and move on with my day. Do I find this stuff existing? Disgusting? Yes Do I believe in banning porn Yes, all porn
However, I'm not going to ban certain drawling styles of people's Art. expression because I find something slightly distasteful, except when it comes to blasphemy. But I'm a bit hypocritical on that subject.
 
EDIT: MOST INFO BELOW WILL BE CORRECTED AND HAS BEEN GRACEFULLY PROVIDED BY @notorietus IN THE POST HERE

ENF_Lover is a French (🇫🇷) loli/shotacon xitter artist that caught wind of the Sharty (Thread, Archive) after showing his infant child porn he was working on.
1749338839930.webp
Combis Guillaume / ENF_Lover / GuidronE / raquiel / Guillaume
Socials:
Twitter (A)
Alt Twitter (A)
Pixiv (A)
Instagram (A)
Linktree (A)
NewGrounds (A)
Gumroad (A)
Ko-Fi (A)
Old Tumblr (A)
RedBubble (A)
SubscriberStar (A)
Baraag (A)
Itchio (A)
Patreon (DEAD)
Possible YouTube (A)
Discord ID: 558016281543180319
Email: enflovercom@gmail.com
Phone number: +33 6 17 80 85 70

Age: 43
Birthday: 1981-07-17 (or July 17th, 1981).

IRL Photos of him:
1749338921969.webp1749338947953.webp
That photo of his green shirt was taken by his wife BTW:
1749338968616.webp

He went to #MAGICMONACO in February, 2023 (That's where the photo of him and another woman was at and where the "Guillaume" is from on the paper)

Breaches:
1749339001973.webp

Archive of old discord messages he had: https://kemono.su/discord/server/567353181693280266/1153453892152074372

Lives somewhere near 161 Rte de Cannes, 06130 Grasse, France according to some of his reviews he left.

54 Rte de la Marigarde, 06130 Grasse, France another possible location because he made a review there.

^^^Unlikely, again see @Notorious's post linked at the top.

Google Reviews:
1749339021869.webp

Around the general area of where he might be:
1749339041458.webp

He has an Xbox account as evident from playing this game:
1749339058296.webp

'cord info:
1749339075360.webp

Apologies if this is a bit disjointed, I'm just copying off of what was posted in the Sharty thread.
 
Last edited:
Uhm, actually. Showing fetish porn to my baby child is educative and good parenting. How will he/she ever relate to his peers if he's not cripplingly addicted to porn by the time he enters kindergarten? You're all just a bunch of cave dwelling puritans that should have died along with the dinosaurs.
Blue Archive profile pic, checks out.
 
Back