Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[Noom Boom]

I feel like the catalyst for coomer shit wasn't the meds, but him getting divorced from mel, since it liberated him to do more degen shit in his apartment. If I remember correctly thats when a fuckton of women were being flown out and visible through his background on stream.

I agree with this. It was a joke in the thread at the time that Melina was the only thing keeping Destiny grounded and now that she was out, shit was going to go off the rails. This theory seems to have played out. I believe this is for two reasons.

1. Destiny probably did have "love" (or whatever the closest thing to love that he can feel) for Melina and he never learned how to process that loss. This lead him to try and drown out the feelings by keeping himself as occupied with as many people as possible and latching onto the first viable partner that he could find (Layna).
2. Melina was the closest thing to a moral code that Destiny had to abide by. It was she who demanded he not fuck truly dangerous people that might break into their home. It was she who limited his escapades to when they both had partners lined up. When Melina left, Destiny was untethered.

So I completely reject the narrative that ADHD, medication, or anything related to that had any effect on this situation.

A. G. Peak Thank you for your docket update. I have been offline for several months and am therefore behind on the court case. My thoughts had been that the Destiny sent one video of Pixie to Rose and that was prior to the enactment of the Florida law under which Pixie is suing Destiny, therefore, this case should be quickly dismissed. I was confused on why it was not. This clears a few things up.

- Pixie is suing over multiple videos, some of which she is arguing were sent after the enactment of the Florida law. Factual disagreement it seems, Pixie will either be able to prove this or not, but the judge seems to believe there is sufficient probability that this is the case that they are allowing the suit to continue.
- For the videos that were shared before the law, they should still be allowed in the case as the links to access the videos were still active and available after the law went into effect. Interesting perspective, if you send someone a video link on day 1, are you "sharing" that video link as long as the link is active and the recipient has access to it? This is probably not defined in the law and will require genuine thought by the judge on what "sharing" means. Could go either way.
- Pixie claims, via witness testimony, that Destiny sent those same videos again after the law was enacted. I guess this is where Destiny is saying that the witnesses should have to present themselves to the court, but this also seems to be a factual matter. Either Pixie can present sufficient evidence that the videos sent to Rose before the enactment of the law were also sent to someone afterward, or she cannot.
- If Pixie can prove enough of the above to have the court rule that Destiny can be held liable under the Florida law for her videos, this is where Destiny is arguing that there was "implied consent". I think Destiny loses on this one, the law seems to pretty clearly lay out what is needed for "consent" and I don't believe Destiny has enough to support that.

I can now understand why the suit is getting so messy. I also disagree with some people saying that Pixie's lawyers are dropping the ball. I don't know if their actual filings are bad or not, but their arguments seem to be solid.

 

[Bill The Fucker]

Pixie claims, via witness testimony, that Destiny sent those same videos again after the law was enacted. I guess this is where Destiny is saying that the witnesses should have to present themselves to the court, but this also seems to be a factual matter. Either Pixie can present sufficient evidence that the videos sent to Rose before the enactment of the law were also sent to someone afterward, or she cannot.

There's a very real chance that Destiny gets clapped by this law, just to be completely unable to counter sue Pixie thanks to the same technicality he's currently trying to skate by on. Please god make it so.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

I'm not particularly eager to be dragged into this so I've done it. My expectation is that if we did get dragged in she would get her court order regardless and there's literally no point fighting it. Destiny really really really wants me dragged in though.

Now, Josh, you should have funded the take it down act to the Supreme Court. It should be rolled on constitutional. It's a god awful piece of legislation.
My opinion about revenge porn is the simple fact of the matter is, if you are dumb enough to film yourself getting dicked down by some one and keep it inevitable availability to that person who would do that and you're dating someone who would do that, you kind of deserve it. Shows a lack of judgment.
I'm tired of the state hafting to fix peoples low IQ mistakes.

But I get why you did it. You know, I find funny about to take it down, act It's not going to do anything. People. are just going to have explicit. mega folders filled with that type of stuff.

 

[Code Cave]

Okay, Pxie's latest filing is pretty interesting. When responding to Destiny's claims that he sent the video before the law was applicable, they argue:

1 - The original complaint includes someone saying Destiny sent the video of Pxie months before the lawsuit dropped. This person has deleted their account, Destiny thinks it was someone from KF trolling Pxie.
(to be fair @disastercabbage did sign up and say he sent a different video of Pxie to their friend: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/steven-bonnell-ii-destiny-destiny-gg.29205/post-20356177 so it might actually be linked to them?)

2 - Sharing it via Discord and Google Drive makes the link accessible when the law was applied as they are "live links":


(Again, very familiar points they're making! )

3 - The Abby testimony. Destiny didn't meet Abby until 2023, when the statute was already law. The leaks didn't happen until November 2024, so the fact that Abby has messages saying she has a video of Pxie means she seen it before the leaks AND when the law was applied.

They also take shots at Destiny for trying to stop Null from taking the videos down:

Defendant claims that removing these videos is arbitrary relief, even though he contradictorily claims that he has tried to have them removed to no avail and continues to victimize himself

He's not going to like that line!

From Destiny's filing - Destiny is upset that Pxie can use people on the internet to help her, but he can't:

I wonder if he's annoyed because the autists he has left couldn't find Rose for him?

Also, pretty funny that Pxie's lawyers fucked up telling the time again (bottom up):

"Joan, it's 10am"

edit:
JSTLK responds:

 

[Guyspleasedontfight]

Destiny bros……..the walls are closing in……..how do we sweep this up?

 

[WebFelching]

Destiny bros……..the walls are closing in……..how do we sweep this up?

At this point all we have left is "Let him rape"

 

[darkfate_fgg]

Code Cave 1 - The original complaint includes someone saying Destiny sent the video of Pxie months before the lawsuit dropped. This person has deleted their account, Destiny thinks it was someone from KF trolling Pxie.
(to be fair @disastercabbage did sign up and say he sent a different video of Pxie to their friend: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/steven-bonnell-ii-destiny-destiny-gg.29205/post-20356177 so it might actually be linked to them?)

2 - Sharing it via Discord and Google Drive makes the link accessible when the law was applied as they are "live links":


(Again, very familiar points they're making! )

3 - The Abby testimony. Destiny didn't meet Abby until 2023, when the statute was already law. The leaks didn't happen until November 2024, so the fact that Abby has messages saying she has a video of Pxie means she seen it before the leaks AND when the law was applied.

That's what I described here as, in my eyes, strong circumstantial evidence.

The plaintiff recently filed crucial evidence corroborating the accusations stated in the complaint, establishing federal CARDII applicability. Additional witnesses are prepared to testify once the protective order is granted. Potentially three further cases are in the pipeline (four if Chaeriy files a civil suit alongside a potential criminal one).

Yet this meth fiend jerks off over insignificant testimony for a preliminary injunction. If the PI gets denied, so what? He’s distracting his lobotomized worshippers and feeding them talking points to fuel their harassment and intimidation campaigns against witnesses. Don’t fall for the low-grade magician’s bullshit.

The second fairy tale he’s spinning involves delegitimizing the abbymc evidence. The text message, alongside the affidavit, presents strong circumstantial evidence that the alleged behavior occurred within CARDII’s scope and reflects his typical conduct. Compare this to lil’ Stevie’s “totally convincing” story that Abby hallucinated receiving those videos, conflating them with the rape archive she supposedly discovered on his PC.

“[...] he just SENT me another one let’s see who he is fucking this time” [sic]. Obviously, she’d confuse the two right as she typed it. And his star witness? The pajigger Darius. Good luck putting that crack nigga on the stand, you scum fuck.

Abby might’ve snooped through his stuff and there might be texts confirming this — but who cares? There’s no nexus discrediting her evidence.

Finally, the abbymc evidence exists electronically. I doubt Pxie’s counsel is stupid enough to rely solely on screenshots (if so, they deserve to lose and get countersued!). Unlike the fudge-packing molestation victim, they will be able to establish proper evidential foundation regarding authenticity and integrity for that piece of evidence. Meanwhile, our cock-sucking junior dev juggles JSON and HTML files, busy doctoring all those incriminating message threads, while on a Vyvanse bender. Hope they object the shit out of his “evidence.”

If my wife goes missing and they find a message from me to a friend, saying "I killed her yesterday," I don't think the court would dismiss this as insignificant evidence, even in the absence of physical, direct evidence like the body or murder weapon. A jury might evaluate it as not strong enough to convict in a later trial, but it would be admissible evidence.

That's why he is always gossiping about all the other irrelevant, retarded shit, but goes surprisingly quiet and deflects when confronted with those crucial details.

What I also found interesting is that plaintiff's counsel seems to be questioning the veracity of his claim that the message was sent before Oct. '24 by stating he hasn't provided any logs so far. So my guess is they will question the foundation of his evidence in the form of his epic JSON/HTML exports. It will be interesting what they will get out of the subpoenas (Discord/Google/etc.) in discovery.

Finally, the abbymc evidence exists electronically. I doubt Pxie’s counsel is stupid enough to rely solely on screenshots (if so, they deserve to lose and get countersued!). Unlike the fudge-packing molestation victim, they will be able to establish proper evidential foundation regarding authenticity and integrity for that piece of evidence. Meanwhile, our cock-sucking junior dev juggles JSON and HTML files, busy doctoring all those incriminating message threads, while on a Vyvanse bender. Hope they object the shit out of his “evidence.”

And I thought the little Cumsquire from Whorevard was some kind of natural-born legal genius; he has read so many Supreme Court decisions on live stream. So sad!

 

[Stratos Sphere]

Is there a way they can check who accessed the google drive links and when they accessed them? If they subpoena google of course.

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

Anyway, Pxie's lawyers should really hammer the prolonged distribution + shite editable log format angle. Esteban refuses to agree to allow his shit taken from the backend. I am no lawyer but if his consent is needed for that (also funny how it cant be "implicit") he is probably trying to get doctored shit admitted as fact. He should be forced to either allow the subpeona or conceede that the logs may be damning to him.

They actually did it

https://youtu.be/lcFMUfjj3PY?feature=shared

 

[darkfate_fgg]

Is there a way they can check who accessed the google drive links and when they accessed them? If they subpoena google of course.

They already did, but I don't know what they can retrieve.

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

If my wife goes missing and they find a message from me to a friend, saying "I killed her yesterday," I don't think the court would dismiss this as insignificant evidence, even in the absence of physical, direct evidence like the body or murder weapon. A jury might evaluate it as not strong enough to convict in a later trial, but it would be admissible evidence.

Not to mention that this is a civil case. While it may not be enough to convict in a criminal case it might be enough for them to say "yeah, it seems like he did it" here.

 

[darkfate_fgg]

Not to mention that this is a civil case. While it may not be enough to convict in a criminal case it might be enough for them to say "yeah, it seems like he did it" here.

Yep, let's hope the jury will be made up solely by female, Gen-Z Hasan-watching feminists!

 

[Universal Balance]

Ooooh Excellent Strategy from Pxie’s Lawyers. Perfect for Steven *chefs kiss*. I don’t want to elaborate because fuck that drooling retard, figure it out yourself Steven, but it’s going to be like unravelling a tangled ball of yarn for you. Pride month celebrations are going strong.

I imagine that Pxie’s lawyers already notified google and discord of their intent to subpaeona. I imagine google has a pretty favourable policy for retrieval, given that they have a commercial use for the data. However given that Discord is infested with furry age playing degenerates, I imagine their policies might not be as favourable.

However, if the feds are working quietly in the background. Then:

Lulw, Pepelaugh, Omegalul, Based Based, Trueeeeee.

Fight hard Steven, you’ve made it so that you’re fucked whether you win or lose, but I want to watch you suffer.

 

[Lonely khan]

still absolutely amazed that the "Destiny is the victim" narrative has stuck in his community

Anyone who stayed after the lav drama was primed to be a cultist. To me that was the normie cull.

He had a his whole subreddit bitching about how stupid and annoying lav was, he started banning them for criticizing her and especially implying he was trying to fuck her.

When it ended with the outing that Steven was sexting anafrills while calling her an unhinged stalker I only think cultist would have stayed. Anyone with a moral pulse would have said "yeah that's pretty fucked up".

I know that sexting someone while calling her an unhinged stalker wasn't illegal, but it's one of the scummier things I've seen out of ecelebs. IMO if you still were team destiny after that, I'm pretty sure his current sex crimes don't phase you.

 

[SocDem_Incel]

When it ended with the outing that Steven was sexting anafrills while calling her an unhinged stalker I only think cultist would have stayed.

im pretty sure most people in dgg just don't know the Ana story. two months ago i went through her KF thread, the max report and available vids that weren't DMCA'd but prior to that I basically had no idea what happened with destiny and ana. Also the nice thing for destiny is that since he hooks up with terrible people it's pretty easy for them to highlight their flaws and let the audience do a both sides thing and say "they both did fucked up shit".

 

[SerialScheme]

He uses the idea of rolling around in the mud a lot to downplay his behavior.

One thing to note though, he very rarely turns his audience against the women on his stream. I've seen figures like JSTLK mistakenly claim this about Ana and Lav. In most cases, he actually defends these women against dgg's wishes quite a bit, often to a point that intensely frustrates his audience. He will do this for as long as he's using them. He does, however, pay close attention to his audience's grievances and then when the time is right he goes all in, flipping sides. This is extremely therapeutic for dgg and they get to feel like they were right all along and that Destiny always comes around to the right conclusion eventually. This also creates an extremely hostile environment for the women because dggers essentially felt locked in a cage, with a crazy e-girl rattling it non stop, taunting them, for however long (sometimes months) and finally their owner has let them loose.

dgg despised Lav and Ana both way before Destiny started fighting with them. He defended Lav for a significant amount of time, Ana fell apart a bit faster. He doesn't need to turn his chat against anyone, because he's throwing insane weirdos who any sane person would hate onto his platform and plus he has cultivated a core community of nuanced incels (center left edition). He does though, eventually, take advantage of his chat's biases when it becomes useful.

He has turned dgg against pxie though completely because he had to. Even the people who found her annoying still generally felt like she was a good person. It's actually one of the craziest people for him to do this shit to because of how positively his community perceived her. He even heavily contributed to this positive perception. She was the go-to example as someone who hadn't fucked him over behind the scenes or acted snakey. He said this like 100 times over the years.

 

[GarlicFragment]

They already did, but I don't know what they can retrieve.

Destiny also has an obligation to preserve evidence:

So, just like Destiny should preserve Discord logs, he should preserve the activity logs for Google Drive. Google has a service tailored for litigation and eDiscovery, that he could have used as a Google Workspace user. Retention time for Drive log events is 6 months, so he should have the data dating back 6 months from January 23, 2025.

 

[Code Cave]

Retention time for Drive log events is 6 months, so he should have the data dating back 6 months from January 23, 2025.

He keeps saying Pxie's lawyers haven't actually asked for any logs yet, so if they do and he sends them something retarded it'll probably end up in a filing. I don't think they've asked for his logs because it will show him sending the video before the CARDII date tbh. I also think this is why Pxie probably isn't interested in finding "Rose", but what do I know.

It's interesting to see retarded footsoldiers take something and run with it. Destiny complained about Pxie naming Melina in her filings. Footsies have now turned this into Pxie doxing Melina:

https://archive.ph/iwiRx | https://old.reddit.com/r/Daliban/comments/1l5v6gy/plaintiff_pov/
Obviously, Melina is very relevant to the pattern of behavior he's demonstrated. The reason they didn't use an online alias is because her screen name is her actual name:

Thanks for the doxx, Pxie!

 

[do ut des]

Not to mention that this is a civil case. While it may not be enough to convict in a criminal case it might be enough for them to say "yeah, it seems like he did it" here.

This. Civil cases only need a 50.1% (more likely than not) propability that something happened, while criminal cases need a roughly 95-99.9% (beyond a reasonable doubt) propability.

 

[Deleted_User]

Note: There is construction noise in the background, and because Destiny is such an audio genius you can hear all of it. I'll spoiler the videos so the post isn't too huge.

That isnt construction work, that's just his butt plug vibrating against his chair