Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Take note of this fuck up Kiwi's. Never mix up the names of your homework and homework folder or else you'll accidentally share what you jerk off to.
At least my question as to how his battery went from 99% to 4% in two screenshots in a previous filing is answered.

Gotta do the motion to complete the motion, eh?

(The fact that he obviously stores screenshots of instathots in a world of instantaneously available infinite Internet porn is the first serious argument I've seen that he is actually a fucking mentally deficient retard.)
 
Too bad we don't have a genuine PDF direct from niggreee - I see "Adobe Acrobat (32-bit) 25 Paper Capture Plug-in; modified using iText® Core 7.2.3 (production version) ©2000-2022 iText Group NV, Administrative Office of the United States Courts" which doesn't sound like what he'd be using.
Presumably that's the tool that stamps the information onto the header. You see something similar but different on the filings from Mr. Hardin. I suppose it's theoretically possible that he sent a doc directly. Would be interesting if he CCed Mr. Hardin and he received a clean(heh) copy with better metadata.
 
Presumably that's the tool that stamps the information onto the header. You see something similar but different on the filings from Mr. Hardin. I suppose it's theoretically possible that he sent a doc directly. Would be interesting if he CCed Mr. Hardin and he received a clean(heh) copy with better metadata.
Yeah, it's actually proof that Hardin has never leaked to the farms that I don't think we can find one.

1749499117350.webp
1749499130386.webp

C'mon, Greee, just hit the "add" and create the contact! You can even rename him "Asshole Shitlawyer" for your own amusement. I swear it'll never appear in court screenshots!

(I hate to mention it, but he'll never take advice, his best bet is to file an immediate motion accusing the clerk of adding porn to his filing)
 
Last edited:
So I'm just catching up since the subpoena (what treasures could be in the twenty five pages since friday? I can only imagine). ECF 330 is another banger from Hardin and several people have already clipped the footnote about why rusty might be distracted.

1749498651356.webp
But this bit... why even bring up that he didn't bother review the transcript? If the sanctions are appropriate regardless then all this is is the jumping off point for "I'm just a poor pro se person retard yah' honur who's tryin' his best and this isn't my job so it's excusable neglect that I didn't check the transcript and the kiwifarms are stalking me with this supposed pro hac vice 'attorney' and what does a stay of discovery have to do with a COPYRIGHT case anyway (and so on and so forth)".

Why not something like "he maliciously lied to the clerk, he was at the hearing where we said discovery was stayed 4 times¹, sanctions are appropriate regardless"

¹footnote about whores and emails
 
How does this happen?
Gift from Milk Gods

I suspect he has a clipboard image stack and pasted everything in his stack instead of the last image. He probably has an app so he can capture a lot of screenshots and paste them all. It's way more efficient if he knew how to use it properly. The battery icon seems to show random clippings. Bonus is we see also get to see his twitter and instagram avatars.
 

Attachments

  • greer2.webp
    greer2.webp
    13.9 KB · Views: 11
  • greer.webp
    greer.webp
    100.8 KB · Views: 12
Too bad we don't have a genuine PDF direct from niggreee - I see "Adobe Acrobat (32-bit) 25 Paper Capture Plug-in; modified using iText® Core 7.2.3 (production version) ©2000-2022 iText Group NV, Administrative Office of the United States Courts" which doesn't sound like what he'd be using.

Presumably that's the tool that stamps the information onto the header. You see something similar but different on the filings from Mr. Hardin. I suppose it's theoretically possible that he sent a doc directly. Would be interesting if he CCed Mr. Hardin and he received a clean(heh) copy with better metadata.
I assume they're different because Mr. Hardin has ECF access and can file directly; whereas Shitlips emails the Clerk and they have to file it. Those headers are probably inserted by the systems as an extra form of watermarking/timestamping/whatever-ing when documents are entered into the system.

Take note of this fuck up Kiwi's. Never mix up the names of your homework and homework folder or else you'll accidentally share what you jerk off to.
I believe that's called the Vaush rule.
 
But this bit... why even bring up that he didn't bother review the transcript?

It reinforces the fact that Greer has repeatedly demonstrated a flat-out refusal to review easily-accessed court materials, like the SPO, the orders issued by the judge that are in the docket, the Utah 2018 case materials, the transcript of the hearing, etc. It's not stupidity, confusion, failure to understand, or excusable neglect at all: It's willful recalcitrance, over and over and over.
 
If anything, Hardin's requests gave them a worse view of the Farms itself, not Greer. The big batch of emails showed the county attorney apparently taking the Mother Jones article at face value.

View attachment 7479225

I know Josh is crushed that Humboldt County will never open its arms to him and his business endeavors. But that's a sacrifice Hardin had to make in pursuit of a vigorous defense.
I'm not sure he was referring to us when he wrote "I hope these places are a thing of the past". To me it sounds more like he meant brothels.
 
It reinforces the fact that Greer has repeatedly demonstrated a flat-out refusal to review easily-accessed court materials, like the SPO, the orders issued by the judge that are in the docket, the Utah 2018 case materials, the transcript of the hearing, etc. It's not stupidity, confusion, failure to understand, or excusable neglect at all: It's willful recalcitrance, over and over and over.
My favorite part is that not even a week after Hardin files a motion about Greee not bothering to read the transcript, Russ files a motion that he didn't read the transcript.
 
I assume they're different because Mr. Hardin has ECF access and can file directly; whereas Shitlips emails the Clerk and they have to file it. Those headers are probably inserted by the systems as an extra form of watermarking/timestamping/whatever-ing when documents are entered into the system.

After the subpoena screwup and retraction, the clerk is going to be extra pleased to learn he uploaded multiple MBs of e-thots as another Russtard episode. Popcorn to see if they force a withdrawal and refile to get rid of Greee hidden pornstash.
 
You don't need an analyzer, you can just move the images in the pdf, as shown below.


No l33t hack4r skillz required, any boomer with Adobe can reveal the Russhole goon archive.

oh my god
now we have to go back and check all of russ's shit to see if he did that before

should be easy to identify ones that have it, the pdf is nearly 3MB whereas the one after it is 1/10 the size
 
The fact that he obviously stores screenshots of instathots in a world of instantaneously available infinite Internet porn is the first serious argument I've seen that he is actually a fucking mentally deficient retard.
I don’t know, that part makes sense to me. Some of these nudes or lewds can be ephemeral posts, so you’d want to capture them while they were publicly available and save them to critique later. Some people just delete their posts if they don’t get enough interaction, too. You also wouldn’t want to post the critique straight to her post itself, because you don’t want her to know that you actually think her things have a cottage cheese consistency and her labia hang too low outside her bikini, then she wouldn’t keep posting these pics. It doesn’t matter that she would have the copyright to the post, because you’re just saving a copy of it to use later for legitimate business purposes. And it shouldn’t matter that he just reposted it publicly in a court docket, because he had a legitimate critical reason to keep and publish that material that otherwise wasn’t his to post!

… hang on a sec… that’s kind of like finding an overly emotionally sensitive gimp’s song on the internet, snagging his dogshit song before he deletes it for not getting enough attention, posting it to a forum whose sole purpose is criticizing the song, and doing it somewhere where the OP gimp won’t even see you making fun of it unless he’s specifically looking for it. Almost like there’s a reason for there to be a fair-use defense in copyright abuse claims!
 
After the subpoena screwup and retraction, the clerk is going to be extra pleased to learn he uploaded multiple MBs of e-thots as another Russtard episode. Popcorn to see if they force a withdrawal and refile to get rid of Greee hidden pornstash.
I'm sort of wondering if Mr. Hardin will simply send Greee a Rule 11 notice, since there doesn't appear to be a better rule for "uploading porn to the docket", and make him explain to the clerk why it needs to be removed, assuming Greee can figure out what he did wrong. Since, sadly, this is something which can be corrected if the plaintiff isn't retarded.
 
Back