Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

I have another question now @tamarlover. Two actually.

First off, where you get your information from, huh?

Follow-up question:
Do you think that you can front when revelation comes?

What do you mean where do I get my information from? where do I get my information about Tamar? or where do I get my information about my strange beliefs or conclusions about things in our world?

i also don't know what you mean when you speak of "front when revelation comes"
 
Doing this doesn't ruin my life. It makes me into a stronger and better person.

Normally I would say having a person's name and image attached to a thread detailing their stalking behaviour, and said person posting in said thread admitting to said behaviour, would be life-ruining. But in your case it's not like you had prospects regardless. So hey, I don't know about it improving you, but you're probably right about it not being life-ruining.
 
What do you mean where do I get my information from? where do I get my information about Tamar? or where do I get my information about my strange beliefs or conclusions about things in our world?

i also don't know what you mean when you speak of "front when revelation comes"

LOL, you never disappoint! I'm fucking dying, omg!

It might be funnier if I didn't help you out here, but it's a pop-culture reference. See if you can figure it out.
 
for someone who speaks endlessly about 'doing the right thing', andrew, you certainly pass up every single opportunity youre given to actually do so, which segues into a question for you; do your religious beliefs define much on the topic of redemption?

i would like to think that most people, religious or not, do believe in the topic of redemption to some extent. what redemption means for you though isnt quite clear to me. is what youre doing righteous beyond your intentions, or is it purely done out of lust?
 
Andrew PM 01.png
 
Even though I think most of all you are creeps and sick fucks who deserve horrible things happening to you, at the same time, I am partially glad to have met you because you remove all desire to make new videos and post them for her to see. Which ultimately is a good thing. So while you are jerks and morally wrong for doing that, I cannot help but appreciate that a little bit for helping my situation. Also I have made a friend so I'm glad for that too. But you guys still deserve to be flogged. I would gladly personally flog each one of you who disrespected me and cherish every scream. But hood lolcow deserves a special treatment. Unfortunately the law only allows forty floggings maximum. But I would personally give him the maximum. And then post the video for everyone's enjoyment. Unfortunately thats not the world we live in. But that would be ideal.

Hey dipshit, do you know why the ancient Romans allowed for only up to forty lashings maximum when punishing people with floggings? Because thirty-nine lashes was as far as you could get before killing the man. Receiving forty lashes was an ancient equivalent of the death penalty.

So you are saying that not only would you personally subject all of us to brutal and potentially fatal beatings for the crime of "disrespecting" you in your ideal version of the world, but you would would cherish the moment, and would even go so far with hood LOLCOW as to continue ripping into his back with the whip until he has certainly died.

Listen cocksucker, if you didn't want us to think you weren't violent before well you certainly aren't doing yourself any favors by wishing death on us. And don't even try to give me shit about how you didn't know stuff like this. Because all that will prove is that your knowledge of religions and the vital understanding of ancient cultures and practices surrounding the formation of ideologies which you claim to take your worldview from, is extraordinarily pitiful. You have no credibility for leadership within any sort of religious institution let alone in the creation of your own, and as you have already shown now and many times before, your mental and emotional stability would be unacceptable in a functioning religious environment.

I thought you might have had a shred of intelligence within you before and may have even had potential to take heed some of the more important things we had to tell you, but now I see that you aren't even knowledgeable about your passions, you refuse to take away anything from this discussion that you don't want to hear, and would prefer to have us flogged for exposing you as the laughingstock you are.

Yeah, no. Eat shit, and fuck you.
 
Once again, ignorant Fareal, you don't have to meet someone in person to know them. She wasn't a complete stranger, idiot.

for someone who speaks endlessly about 'doing the right thing', andrew, you certainly pass up every single opportunity youre given to actually do so, which segues into a question for you; do your religious beliefs define much on the topic of redemption?

i would like to think that most people, religious or not, do believe in the topic of redemption to some extent. what redemption means for you though isnt quite clear to me. is what youre doing righteous beyond your intentions, or is it purely done out of lust?

What I am doing is only partially out of lust. A large portion of it is for a righteous intention. But I didn't know the proper way to do it and she gets me angry and upset and frustrated so I sometimes lashed out at her at that wasn't right of me especially at the latter portion of 2016. I think we become redeemed by ceasing from doing any intentional wrongs. My beliefs say we must be 100% sinless to be saved from eternal punishment and even the smallest intentional sin is enough to make us lose our salvation if we ever had it. I believe I am Tamar's best chance of becoming sinless and overcoming the sins in her life that she is currently unaware of. I will help her see her flaws.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What I am doing is only partially out of lust. A large portion of it is for a righteous intention. But I didn't know the proper way to do it and she gets me angry and upset and frustrated so I sometimes lashed out at her at that wasn't right of me especially at the latter portion of 2016. I think we become redeemed by ceasing from doing any intentional wrongs. My beliefs say we must be 100% sinless to be saved from eternal punishment and even the smallest intentional sin is enough to make us lose our salvation if we ever had it. I believe I am Tamar's best chance of becoming sinless and overcoming the sins in her life that she is currently unaware of. I will help her see her flaws.

You are helping her see your flaws.
 
Hey dipshit, do you know why the ancient Romans allowed for only up to forty lashings maximum when punishing people with floggings? Because thirty-nine lashes was as far as you could get before killing the man. Receiving forty lashes was an ancient equivalent of the death penalty.

So you are saying that not only would you personally subject all of us to brutal and potentially fatal beatings for the crime of "disrespecting" you in your ideal version of the world, but you would would cherish the moment, and would even go so far with hood LOLCOW as to continue ripping into his back with the whip until he has certainly died.

Listen cocksucker, if you didn't want us to think you weren't violent before well you certainly aren't doing yourself any favors by wishing death on us. And don't even try to give me shit about how you didn't know stuff like this. Because all that will prove is that your knowledge of religions and the vital understanding of ancient cultures and practices surrounding the formation of ideologies which you claim to take your worldview from, is extraordinarily pitiful. You have no credibility for leadership within any sort of religious institution let alone in the creation of your own, and as you have already shown now and many times before, your mental and emotional stability would be unacceptable in a functioning religious environment.

I thought you might have had a shred of intelligence within you before and may have even had potential to take heed some of the more important things we had to tell you, but now I see that you aren't even knowledgeable about your passions, you refuse to take away anything from this discussion that you don't want to hear, and would prefer to have us flogged for exposing you as the laughingstock you are.

Yeah, no. Eat shit, and fuck you.

fact is, whipping someone 40 times will only seriously danger them if you try to permanently injure them. I do not believe permanent injuries like that are acceptable. You can whip someone not that hard 40 times. you don't whip someone as hard as you can or that it kills them or permanently injures them. that would be immoral.

"During the American Revolutionary War, the American Congress raised the legal limit on lashes from 39 to 100 for soldiers who were convicted by courts-martial."

"There were protests in Egypt this week after an Egyptian doctor was sentenced to 15 years in prison and 1,500 lashes by the Saudi Arabian government for prescribing medicine to a princess that "drove her to addiction." The wife of the convicted doctor worried publicly that the sentence would kill him. How many lashes can one man stand? It depends on how you're lashed. It's very unlikely that the doctor will die from his sentence if it is administered in the usual Saudi Arabian way—i.e., broken up into weekly bouts of 50 lashings each."

There are also ancient law codes of ancient mesopatamia which have 100 lashes. You are overreacting once again trying to make me look like I am a worse person. Demonization.

"In colloquial usage, the term demonization is used metaphorically to refer to propaganda or moral panic directed against any individual or group."
 
You said earlier that you don't know if you're autistic. Have you looked over some of the symptoms and compared them to your own behavior?

-Rigid thinking; unable to accept alternative ideas (unable to accept Tamar's rejection)
-Difficulty understand normal social rules and boundaries (not understanding why stalking is bad, harassing Tamar, violating restraining order)
-Likes routines and setting up plans (14 year plan)
-Obsessiveness; fixation on certain interests (Tamar, religious obsession, 32 stalker types)

Perhaps you're right: you're just very smart™ . You're the one who's right, everyone else is wrong. More plausibly, however, I think your just experiencing symptoms of a untreated autism spectrum disorder. I think your parents failed you by not putting you through therapy, and now you don't have the skills to cope with the real word and rejection. I think you need to accept this and humble yourself. You can dig up as many obscure bible passages and "muh 32 stalker types" as you want to justify why Tamar should be with you, but to everyone else it just sounds ridiculous. Your autism prevents you from understanding why.
 
OK, so you won't ever have children, god willing, but just FYI, the main reason the buttocks are used as a site to apply force punitively is that there is no risk of harming internal organs. The "sides and back" you think are somehow kinder to apply force to would both leave open the possibility of causing organ damage and other complications. This is why Singapore uses the buttocks for all caning.

I guess what I'm saying is, you're telling us in public that if you ever did get the chance to be a father, you'd discipline your children with methods that could cause them to become critically ill or die. You keep digging this hole deeper. What next, do we get to find out that you believe in corrective rape under certain circumstances?
 
fact is, whipping someone 40 times will only seriously danger them if you try to permanently injure them. I do not believe permanent injuries like that are acceptable. You can whip someone not that hard 40 times. you don't whip someone as hard as you can or that it kills them or permanently injures them. that would be immoral.

"During the American Revolutionary War, the American Congress raised the legal limit on lashes from 39 to 100 for soldiers who were convicted by courts-martial."

"There were protests in Egypt this week after an Egyptian doctor was sentenced to 15 years in prison and 1,500 lashes by the Saudi Arabian government for prescribing medicine to a princess that "drove her to addiction." The wife of the convicted doctor worried publicly that the sentence would kill him. How many lashes can one man stand? It depends on how you're lashed. It's very unlikely that the doctor will die from his sentence if it is administered in the usual Saudi Arabian way—i.e., broken up into weekly bouts of 50 lashings each."

There are also ancient law codes of ancient mesopatamia which have 100 lashes. You are overreacting once again trying to make me look like I am a worse person. Demonization.

"In colloquial usage, the term demonization is used metaphorically to refer to propaganda or moral panic directed against any individual or group."

Well, you have quotes and links and things. I'm convinced!
 
Well, you have quotes and links and things. I'm convinced!

It doesn't take quotes to prove the most basic concept (i provided quotes just in case you simpletons couldn't understand the obvious common sense things). As an example, if you ever seen someone who has been spanked lightly, they only get a little red. Whereas someone who has been spanked hard, they are all bruised. You can spank someone lightly 1,000 times and it can hurt but not cause the person to be bruised or seriously injured. Or you can spank someone only 20 times really hard and cause the person to be horribly bruised and bleeding. It goes the same with flogging someone. You can flog them forty times lightly and not be causing much damage at all (Duh you idiot). Or you can flog them extremely hard as hard as you can possibly swing, and cause them permanent damage and major bleeding and sores all over the body. Not all flogging is the same. So to say that I want to flog you is saying I want to kill you is stupid. I would not want to permanently injure any of you. But to make you cry in pain would be sufficient.

You said earlier that you don't know if you're autistic. Have you looked over some of the symptoms and compared them to your own behavior?

-Rigid thinking; unable to accept alternative ideas (unable to accept Tamar's rejection)
-Difficulty understand normal social rules and boundaries (not understanding why stalking is bad, harassing Tamar, violating restraining order)
-Likes routines and setting up plans (14 year plan)
-Obsessiveness; fixation on certain interests (Tamar, religious obsession, 32 stalker types)

Perhaps you're right: you're just very smart™ . You're the one who's right, everyone else is wrong. More plausibly, however, I think your just experiencing symptoms of a untreated autism spectrum disorder. I think your parents failed you by not putting you through therapy, and now you don't have the skills to cope with the real word and rejection. I think you need to accept this and humble yourself. You can dig up as many obscure bible passages and "muh 32 stalker types" as you want to justify why Tamar should be with you, but to everyone else it just sounds ridiculous. Your autism prevents you from understanding why.

They didn't fail me because they put me through therapy as a child and the therapist experts told them it was no longer needed. I only started getting "unhinged" as some might call it, after my first semester of college. My parents are not to blame for my actions. I understand the normal rules and boundaries, I just disagree with some of those rules and boundaries. Extreme fixation however has been consistent for me from early childhood, but its only a problem if I fixate extremely on something not good for me to fixate on. You say i am unable to accept alternate ideas, but thats not true. My journey is a testimony to that. Why do you think I only became like this with Tamar and none of the other women I was extremely attracted to? For the others, I was able to accept that they didn't want to be with me. My ex I was unable to accept that for about 1 year. Then after she remarried and divorced someone else, I knew I could never be with her ever again. Also when I realized my ex was literally insane, and that there's no way I could reason with her, I gave up on wanting to be with my ex. Rather than saying unable to accept alternative ideas the truth is if I am unwilling to accept some alternatives that I don't want to accept.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't take quotes to prove the most basic concept (i provided quotes just in case you simpletons couldn't understand the obvious common sense things). As an example, if you ever seen someone who has been spanked lightly, they only get a little red. Whereas someone who has been spanked hard, they are all bruised. You can spank someone lightly 1,000 times and it can hurt but not cause the person to be bruised or seriously injured. Or you can spank someone only 20 times really hard and cause the person to be horribly bruised and bleeding. It goes the same with flogging someone. You can flog them forty times lightly and not be causing much damage at all (Duh you idiot). Or you can flog them extremely hard as hard as you can possibly swing, and cause them permanent damage and major bleeding and sores all over the body. Not all flogging is the same. So to say that I want to flog you is saying I want to kill you is stupid. I would not want to permanently injure any of you. But to make you cry in pain would be sufficient.

Clearly you are the only person in this thread with any common sense. The rest of are not only stupid, we have no concept of physical pain. Explain more things to us. Teach us your ways. We, too, wish to reach Enlightenment while living with our parents and posting stalking how-to videos on YouTube.
 
@tamarlover you mentioned vigilante action being performed, what if the person is falsely accused?, and you can get in trouble for not reporting a crime, what will you do about that?
 
They didn't fail me because they put me through therapy as a child and the therapist experts told them it was no longer needed. I only started getting "unhinged" as some might call it, after my first semester of college. My parents are not to blame for my actions. I understand the normal rules and boundaries, I just disagree with some of those rules and boundaries. Extreme fixation however has been consistent for me from early childhood, but its only a problem if I fixate extremely on something not good for me to fixate on. You say i am unable to accept alternate ideas, but thats not true. My journey is a testimony to that. Why do you think I only became like this with Tamar and none of the other women I was extremely attracted to? For the others, I was able to accept that they didn't want to be with me. My ex I was unable to accept that for about 1 year. Then after she remarried and divorced someone else, I knew I could never be with her ever again. Also when I realized my ex was literally insane, and that there's no way I could reason with her, I gave up on wanting to be with my ex. Rather than saying unable to accept alternative ideas the truth is if I am unwilling to accept some alternatives that I don't want to accept.
What would it take for Tamar to be considered insane and unreasonable? How are people close to you reacting to your presence here?
 
Back