Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
View attachment 7483758

Gosh, when you put it that way, it sounds really bad! Somebody should take a look at this docket, it sounds messy.

(If only someone could explain what's going on, this seems very uncharitable and not understanding.)


The Judge: ah but he is retarded, sanctioned for $100, which I will allow him to challenge me on paying multiple times for another year or so.
 
One nitpick here:

1749577976752.webp

That would have been the perfect place for a footnote, or even main paragraph mention, reminding the court that Greer is still lying about his physical address. Not strictly necessary, but it would really drive home how absolutely nothing Greer says can be trusted.

1749578103293.webp

So many lulz foreshadowed in a single word.
 
Yeah, the August 8 scheduling conference was set way back in December at ECF 206. You'll also note that it was specifically scheduled to be handled by the District Judge and not the Magistrate:
View attachment 7483712

The fact that it's now canceled, presumably at Barlow's direction, gives my shriveled, blackened "nothing ever happens" heart a faint beat of hope. 🌈
I take it more to mean the Clerks are now paying very close attention. They got dragged into Shitlip's lies. So the Clerks are starting to ask questions.
 
Yeah, the August 8 scheduling conference was set way back in December at ECF 206. You'll also note that it was specifically scheduled to be handled by the District Judge and not the Magistrate:
View attachment 7483712

The fact that it's now canceled, presumably at Barlow's direction, gives my shriveled, blackened "nothing ever happens" heart a faint beat of hope. 🌈
Sorry to tell you this, but it is likely that Nothing is happening. Barlow's clerk most likely cancelled the Scheduling Conference because June 10th is less than 60 days away from August 8th. 60 days is important, because that's how long a defendant gets to answer a complaint if they choose to waive summons, which is something that they would normally be expected to do in order to save costs. So even if Shitlips found the John Does, and they waived service asap, they would still have 60 days to file an answer or motion to dismiss. It does not make any sense to have a scheduling conference before then, so the Clerk likely cancelled it for that reason.

tl;dr Judge thought we'd be further along in December, because the Judge has learned nothing. Also, Nothing ever Happens.
 
I hope we get a filling with the whole conversation about paying today. I want to see the response email from Hardin saying "I prefer cheque, but you can also do x,y,z". Some might see it as overkill, but pushing in the judge's face that Rat Mouth is deliberately lying to the court and sending selectively clipped email convos never hurts in my book.
 
Hopefully we're not even finished with filings for today. Hardin has yet to make a specific response in opposition to ECF 333, Greer's fucky little motion to again reconsider the sanctions order. Hardin has touched upon it lightly in a couple of recent docs but he did say he "will oppose that latest motion in due course" and I'm really, really, really jonesing for him to make that oppo a blistering (BUT BRIEF) illustration of Greer's flagrant disrespect for the court and its officers. I want to see words like "contempt," "defiance," "mockery," and "malice." I'll even overlook "mendacity" if he's feeling cute, as long as he really hits Barlow between the eyes with what a flaming bag of shit Greer and his motions are.

1749577831731.webp
 
I hope we get a filling with the whole conversation about paying today. I want to see the response email from Hardin saying "I prefer cheque, but you can also do x,y,z". Some might see it as overkill, but pushing in the judges face that Rat Mouth is deliberately lying to the court and sending selectively clipped email convos never hurts in my book.
That probably was the entirety of it already filed. No way russ even inquired a about other ways to pay.
 
Hardin has yet to make a specific response in opposition to ECF 333, Greer's fucky little motion to again reconsider the sanctions order. Hardin has touched upon it lightly in a couple of recent docs but he did say he "will oppose that latest motion in due course"
Ignoring everything else, doesn't the Defense have some time period to respond to a motion, even one as fucky stupid as that?

They can respond quicker (and in fact, some motions get moved by both parties, saying "Judge we both think we should take Christmas off, plz approve") but they do get a set time, I believe.
 
Hardin’s filings today gave me a bit of vertigo. It’ll end one day and soon and so fast we’ll forget what the ruinous expense (for Null sadly) of making this particular retard go away has taught us all: a deep contempt for procedural dispute resolution technologies.
 
That would have been the perfect place for a footnote, or even main paragraph mention, reminding the court that Greer is still lying about his physical address. Not strictly necessary, but it would really drive home how absolutely nothing Greer says can be trusted.

Is that even relevant anymore? This case has been going on for so long that Greer was evicted (or moved out, I forget which) from that address. He's been including his (presumed) current address as a part of all of his filings lately.

address.webp

Hopefully they've got a better gate than the last place.
 
Last edited:
Ignoring everything else, doesn't the Defense have some time period to respond to a motion, even one as fucky stupid as that?

They can respond quicker (and in fact, some motions get moved by both parties, saying "Judge we both think we should take Christmas off, plz approve") but they do get a set time, I believe.
It's a motion, so typical motion deadlines in the District of Utah apply. But Shitlips filing his motion for reconsideration or filing any kind of motion for a stay does not affect the sanctions order that is already in place. He had to pay up at the deadline, nothing he filed would ever put that order on pause. He's currently in contempt of court, again.
 
Is that even relevant anymore? This case has been doing on for so long that Greer was evicted (or moved out, I forget which) from that address. He's been including his (presumed) current address as a part of all of his filings.

View attachment 7483867

Hopefully they've got a better gate than the last place.
That's the address he was evicted from.
 
That probably was the entirety of it already filed. No way russ even inquired a about other ways to pay.
"Here's the proof they only wanted a check!"

>read exhibit
>the word "check" is never mentioned


Never change, Russ.

Is that even relevant anymore?
Maybe not immediately, I think Hardin made a point during a hearing that Russ better be checking his email because he's done with the physical copies. But he has notified the court about it, and the matter stood unresolved. It's just another point of retardation everyone is politely ignoring to move the case along, just like Greer's servicing statements with the false dates. Now would be a good time to wave these petty lies in everyone's faces.

(Also as mentioned above, I think that address he used today is still wrong.)
 
Hardin’s filings today gave me a bit of vertigo. It’ll end one day and soon and so fast we’ll forget what the ruinous expense (for Null sadly) of making this particular retard go away has taught us all: a deep contempt for procedural dispute resolution technologies.
Sometimes I forget about this thread until someone (usually Josh on MATI) mentions it and I think "holy shit that's still going on." The DMCA is bad enough, but the various judges allowing this continue for years are arguably worse. It's really eye-opening how someone can completely jam you up on court for years with very little money or knowledge of the law. I understand them not wanting to be biased against someone who's clearly a bit slow but it's become very clear that his filings are a malicious attempt to harm Josh and his website.
 
Back