I'd paste more, but it would likely be too much, I encourage reading it if only to understand the leftist thought process regarding this
In Leftism it's common to argue that the current systems operate under the parameters of benefiting those at the top of society. Any and all actions committed by the state is done in service of it, and if they do enact change as a result of clamouring from the bottom, it's only to help maintain their position. Marx's entire thesis/justification for Communism can be boiled down to "the people at the top want to maintain their positions at the top".
The reason why these riots are
definitely the result of the police instigating shit themselves (or were told to from the "top") is because it'll somehow benefit them or their masters, which is at bare minimum an indirect acknowledgement that these riots don't help the left at all, but I digress. The reason the cops would want to instigate these riots is that, in theory, it may allow them to receive greater authority/powers to come down harder on dissent; justify more authoritative action by the government; kill the arguments and support for illegals nationwide; or at bare minimum inflate police funding
which could be going to vulnerable POCs instead ;(.
That's also the reason why it's so easy for the Left to subvert, because their conspiracy theories
appear to make sense when taken at face value but they rely on the Marxist idea of group monoliths I.E. entire social groups/factions/classes all acting for the same ends, through the same means, with no schisms or
real concessions to those below. What people get wrong about Marx is that he didn't profess ideas which went against human nature, he acknowledged them in fact — people ultimately want to do what's best for themselves. But how he (and the rest of the Left) apply this acknowledge, is that only
they are capable of selflessness, and thus are the only ones capable of creating a fair and equal society.
Fun Fact/History lesson:
Marx's manifesto (1848 ) was proven entirely wrong in less than 5 years after it was published.
February 1848: Communist manifesto published.
May 1849: Socialists come 2nd place overall in French National Assembly elections.
June 1849: Socialists call for an uprising and attempt to seize power. It was crushed, and all the parties representatives kicked from government.
May 1850: A pissed off Conservative-Republican bloc voted on a law restricting universal male suffrage (433 votes to 241) excluding a third of French voters (3 million of 9 million). Louis Napoleon, then president of the assembly, was pissed off by this and requested the law be changed, which failed (355 to 348 )
December of 1851: Louis Napoléon couped his government (he was still president so this was a self-coup), re-enacted universal suffrage, and put it to a vote whether his coup was accepted by the French people. It won 7.4 million votes to 640 thousand.
This pissed Marx off to such a degree, that he wrote an entirely new essay (The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoléon) on
why this happened ("Why would they vote against their own interests?!?!" <- first example of this, unironically) and created an entirely
new class of people who would do such a thing:
Lumpenproletariat. All to not completely invalidate his manifesto.
