The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Screenshot_20250610_130325.webp
Holy shit it's real :story:
 
My new flatmate is a Nepali woman, seems nice so far. I don't know if she's vegan or not.
I like to call this phenomenon everyone loves white men. So the idea that they're going to have a lot of sex with white women is laughable. Unless you are a multi millionaire, which most of these guys aren't, no white woman is going anywhere near your penis. And if they were just dating you for money, they're just going to date a white guy or an Arab guy, or hell even a Mexican before they date some jeep.
This is relatively rare compared to Indian women and white men, but it still happens. But it still only happens with certain types of indian men, usually super nerdy/smart types or frat bro types. In general, indian guys and girls aren't really that sexy. Some are attractive, sure but that's it
I knew an Indian chad once. Tall, sociable with a American Football scholarship.
But even he was a horrible bully and troll.
I was going to ask what self-respecting white guy would date and marry some poojeeta with your granny’s tablecloth on her head, but I don’t think a trade unionist has any notion of respect.
Socialists understand that racism is a tool to cause the working class to stay disunited. What they often miss (or deliberately ignore) is the elites love of immigration is to undermine and undercut our wages.
I can understand why Zarah married out though, the Pakistani community has "problems".
I hate Russia for interfering in America's elections.
Ed Sheeran made a Punjabi/Hindi inspired song. Thoughts?
His music is consistently great, but I'm just afraid of all the fans who'll be inspired to go to India.
When compared to muslim migrants, jeet migrants barely seem to reproduce. If their numbers sustain at all, it will be because of constant immigration of more, rather than the ones already here reproducing.
Pakistan's birthrate is declining more than "British" Pakistanis due to us subsidising their incestbaby farms.
 
Buddha was the original "clean your room and wash your balls" guy
Greatest thing i read all day :story:
This is as retarded as the video where a jeet gets turned into a pretzel by an elephant. Why the fuck would you antagonize a wild animal like that? Minds lower than literal beasts, almost unbelievable.
I stopped the video when it got to the toothbrush
Man, same. Absolutely vile and disgusting. You'd think every human has the natural sense of not putting animal waste in his mouth but here comes India again. They really live in a "up is down, black is white" world, it's baffling.
 
Last edited:
illegal.webp

This gave me a chuckle.

Absolutely zero islamists have hijacked the poll. Indians are just that repulsive.

I mean apropos of nothing, the only browns that should be here are the Cleveland Browns, but if you held a gun to my head and MADE me choose a brown.... yeah I'm going with beaners over poopjeets. Apparently a lot of people agree with me.

One will place a bomb on the street.

The other one will poop on the street.

Bomber in the streets
Pooper in the sheets
 
View attachment 7486813

This gave me a chuckle.

Absolutely zero islamists have hijacked the poll. Indians are just that repulsive.

I mean apropos of nothing, the only browns that should be here are the Cleveland Browns, but if you held a gun to my head and MADE me choose a brown.... yeah I'm going with beaners over poopjeets. Apparently a lot of people agree with me.



Bomber in the streets
Pooper in the sheets
Your average White American can relate more to Pablo, who came here illegally and doesn't speak any English than they could with Krishna who speaks fluent English and works in IT (This is not me being pro-illegal btw)
 
Poopjeets are in the news for their typical shenanigans (running over & killing a pedestrian) but this case is particularly shocking because of how cruelly they treated the victim.

Original article

2 men face deportation after fatal pedestrian hit-and-run in Surrey
Two pled guilty after dragging pedestrian under car more than a kilometer

The family of the victim killed in a 2024 pedestrian collision say the two men charged in connection with his death treated him “like a piece of garbage, dumping him on the side of the road.”Victim impact statements were read in court on Thursday, May 22 during a sentencing hearing for Gaganpreet Singh and Jagdeep Singh. The two pleaded guilty in Surrey provincial court on Jan. 6 and Feb. 7, respectively, to the dangerous operation of a conveyance, failing to stop after hitting a person, and interfering with a dead body.

The charges stem from a collision on Jan. 27, 2024, when Surrey RCMP responded to a report of a pedestrian hit in the 13400-block of 105 Avenue around 1:45 a.m. The pedestrian had been dragged under the car for 1.3 km.

The two accused were in Surrey Provincial Court Thursday (May 22) for a sentencing hearing before Judge Mark Jette.

The Crown read two victim impact statements, one from the victim's wife and the other from his mother-in-law.The family of the victim asked for privacy and that their family member not be named.

Both statements described the kind of man the victim was. He was a loving husband and father to his two children; a strong, caring, Cree man who taught his children about their Indigenous culture and heritage. He was an intergenerational residential school survivor.

His family said he also had a strong work ethic and was proud of the projects he had worked on. “(The victim) was known and loved by many for his approachable nature, wit, and kind spirit,” his family said.

The victim impact statements noted the accused prolonged the harm to the family by continuing to drag the victim for 1.3 km after the collision. The family noted the worst part was the accused men's lack of apology and remorse. They also spoke about the impact of not being able to view their loved one's body due to the severity of his injuries and about being “unable to follow the cultural and spiritual protocols that come with death in our culture, which include having an open casket.”

The family asked the court not to just see the death of the victim but also the impact it has had on his family, community and culture.
“I ask that the justice system acknowledge the full weight of this harm and the magnitude of loss, and the urgent need for accountability and healing be reflected," a statement read.

Crown cites mitigating factors

Crown prosecutor Adam Janun noted several mitigating factors in this case, including that the two accused pleaded guilty, were young – both being 22 years old – and had no previous criminal record in Canada or in their home country of India.

What made this such a serious offence was not the initial collision, the Crown said, “although tragic" – it was how the accused responded after hitting the victim.

The Crown and defense counsel for Gaganpreet Singh presented a joint submission recommending he be sentenced to three years jail, a three-year driving prohibition, and a DNA order.

“The sentence breakdown is one year jail, consecutive on each count,” the Crown said.

The Crown argued that Jagdeep Singh should be sentenced to four years in jail followed by a three-year driving prohibition and a DNA order. The defense counsel for Jagdeep Singh was seeking a conditional sentencing order of two years, which would be served in the community.

Court hears about night of collision​

The circumstances of the offence and the agreed statement of facts were both filed with the court when the accused entered their guilty pleas.

The Crown noted two different “agreed statements of facts” because Jagdeep and Gaganpreet pled guilty on two dates.

The Crown told the court the events that took place in the early morning hours of Jan. 27 directly before, during and after the collision. Gaganpreet, Jagdeep and a friend made a quick stop at a pizza restaurant. After leaving the restaurant, Gaganpreet drove Jagdeep’s Mustang about 800 metres to the intersection of 105 Avenue and University Drive. Jagdeep was in the passenger seat, and a friend was in the back seat. The passenger in the back seat has not been charged.

Around the same time Gaganpreet was leaving the pizza place, a married couple driving north on University Drive noticed something lying in the road. The couple stopped the vehicle to see that it was a man and called out to him, but he did not respond. The witnesses then called 9-1-1 at 1:41 a.m.

Five seconds later, while the witness was on the phone with 9-1-1, Gaganpreet was driving the Mustang northbound on University Drive when he struck the victim, the Crown said.

Gaganpreet was going 79 km/h in a 50km/h zone at the time of the collision.

The witness noticed that the victim was no longer on the road and believed the victim must have been “dragged under the Mustang.”

Gaganpreet stopped the car after driving about 50 metres before continuing. He stopped again at the corner of University Drive and 105A Avenue. At this time, Jagdeep got out of the car and inspected the front and middle of it. Gaganpreet also got out and looked under the front of the vehicle. At that time, friends of Gaganpreet and Jagdeep pulled up next to them in a vehicle.

A few seconds later, the married couple who had witnessed the collision pulled up behind the Mustang.

The husband got out of the car and ran up to the Mustang to alert Gaganpreet and Jagdeep that the victim was stuck under their vehicle. The Crown alleges that this is when the accused “became aware that the victim was underneath the Mustang.” The Crown played the 9-1-1 call in court and stated that Sarah Grewal, the defence for Jagdeep, disagreed with the Crown’s submissions that their client had said to the witness, “No, no, he is sleeping,” when he was told about the victim under the car.

Grewal said, “He did say ‘no, no,’ but what he said afterwards, in my respectful submission, it was hard to make out what he was saying and my client denies saying that.”

Gaganpreet and Jagdeep then got back into the Mustang and sped away, running several red lights along the way. One of the witnesses followed the Mustang in her car for a short time and noted the Mustang had run several red lights and was travelling at about 60 to 70 km/h. The witness then decided to return to her husband’s location near 105 Avenue and University Drive.

This is when Gaganpreet tried to remove the victim's body from under the Mustang but was unsuccessful. He then drove into a cul-de-sac near 109 Avenue and 132 Street. The Crown stated that the victim was deceased by this time.

The Crown showed surveillance video from a home in the cul-de-sac.

Gaganpreet got out of the vehicle and knelt by the front, and Jagdeep also got out and held a flashlight to help Gaganpreet see underneath it.

The Crown alleges that the two discussed how to remove the victim's body and decided that Jagdeep would reverse the car while Gaganpreet tried to remove the body. It took several attempts to dislodge the victim before fleeing the scene at 1:47 a.m.

Then Jagdeep got into the driver's seat and Gaganpreet got into the front passenger seat and they drove away.

In response to the witness's 9-1-1 call, police were searching the area for the Mustang. At 1:48 a.m., a Surrey Police officer spotted the vehicle and “conducted a vehicle stop.” All three individuals in the car, including Gaganpreet and Jagdeep, were arrested for failing to remain at the scene of the collision. One of the officers noted that Gaganpreet’s clothing was wet and dirty and asked him why. He told the officer that he had just finished some construction work which was why his clothes were dirty.

Officers then located the victim’s body.

The victim died as a result of being hit or dragged by the Mustang, the Crown said. “I want to make that very clear, he was not dead before he was hit by the Mustang.”

Both of the accused spoke to the court and apologized for their actions and spoke, through a Punjabi interpreter, about the impact that night had on them and their families.

Deportation orders likely for both men​

The Crown noted that CBSA is seeking a deportation order for Jagdeep and said if he is given a conditional sentence he will likely be deported, which would be equivalent to his charges being stayed.

The Crown noted that Gaganpreet is not currently subject to the same deportation order as he received a new study permit before his old one expired, but it is likely the CBSA will seek a deportation order once he is sentenced.

Both the accused came to Canada at different times on student visas from Punjab, India, and both hope to apply for a work permit after studying with the hope of being a permanent resident and then citizen of Canada. Gaganpreet came in 2022 and recently received a diploma from Vancouver Community College. Jagdeep had studied for some time at Cambria College and Excel Career College in Surrey before moving to Victoria for work at the end of 2023. He had hoped to apply for a work permit after finishing his schooling.

Gagan Nahal, defence counsel for Gaganpreet, noted during submissions that his client had taken responsibility for his actions.

“He demonstrated some insight into his offending behaviours, more specifically, his associations, impulsivity and risk taking behaviours," Nahal said, adding his client had reported feelings of "regret, shame and remorse."

“In addition to the criminal consequences, Mr. Singh will also be facing collateral consequence of inadmissibility and deportation, which gives him status as a foreign national in Canada.”

Nahal noted his client was “well aware” that he could face deportation before he entered his guilty plea.

Sarah Grewal, the defence counsel for Jagdeep, told the court: “Mr. Singh is deeply remorseful what his actions have caused. He tells me that he suffers from depression due to his actions. He thinks about the victim on a daily basis, and for that reason, he has reconnected with his religion, and spends time at the Sikh temple.”

Grewal told the court what his client had told her and how it was different from Gaganpreet’s agreed statement of facts.

“He did not realize that they had struck a body when initially that happened, and he had heard a loud noise, and he'd heard me thought maybe they hit a speed bump,” Grewal said. “Eventually, once they pulled over, then they eventually found out that there was someone under the vehicle.”

Grewal added that, “Now, after reflecting on his actions, he is deeply regretful, but he tells me that at that time he was in a high state of panic, and he agrees that he was not acting right, but it was also in a state of panic.”

The judge said he did not doubt that the two accused were panicking.

“It's too bad that one of them, even the third person who ultimately wasn't charged with anything at all, would not have found a bit of common sense to bring to the problem,” Jette said. Instead of focusing on how they could help the victim, they panicked and focused on themselves and how they could try and get out of that situation.

The Crown and defence counsel will be back in court Friday morning (May 23) to schedule a time for the sentencing hearing. It is expected to be in 45 to 60 days.


In summary:
> reckless 'preets decide to drive 79 in a 50 km/h zone
> run over an aboriginal man who was passed out in the road
> proceed to drag him for at least 1 km
> while stopped at a traffic light, witnesses inform the jeets that there was a MANGLED DEAD BODY TRAPPED UNDER THEIR CAR
> jeet says "no no no" (language barrier oopsy) and proceeds to speed off (through multiple red lights btw!)
> eventually they pull into a cul-de-sac, and are captured on home surveillance video trying to extricate the corpse by repeatedly REVERSING AND DRIVING FORWARDS OVER THE BODY
> eventually they dislodge the corpse, leave him on the curbside like the rest of their garbage, and flee the scene
> when pulled over by cops who question why their clothes are wet and dirty, the 'preets lie and say they were working at a construction site saaaar!
> they face a whopping 3 years in prison and 3 year driving ban

BUT BUT BUT THEY MERELY PANICKED, AND NOW THEY'VE APOLOGIZED, AND THEY'RE RECONNECTING WITH THEIR SIKH FAITH SO DON'T DEPORT THEM SAAR PLEASE DON'T REDEEM
 
Dude you don't understand how bad it was. She straight up solo'd an entire army of jeets and all it took was one Anglo boi tracking her from her last hunt to bring her down. Funniest part is he used the jeets as bait. Also fun fact, Jim Corbett (guy who killed the tigress and certified gigachad) became so disgusted with how the jeets were destroying the India's natural habitats that he straight up created conservationsim to counteract it.
Interestingly his parental grandparents moved to India in 1815 and he was born 60 years later as the product of various other white people who'd been born in India, and lived his whole life there... until 1947 and Indian independence; to quote his sister (who was being euphemistic)
After independence came in India and our British friends were leaving, we began to realize that it would be very difficult for us to remain especially as when the time came for one of to be taken, the contemplation of the other having to live on alone in Gurney House, our home for nearly all the years of our life and so full of life, could not be faced…
Apparently "my family has lived here for almost 150 years" didn't make someone "count" even if they'd contributed massively to the country with both killing man eating tigers and then kickstarting the conservationist movement.

Anyway, here's an unrelated rage inducing video
 
I think the only language that is off putting vocally to Hindi is Chinese. That's more so because of how theatrical it sounds.
Chinese languages sound like simple made up syllables sung in specific ways, whereas Hindi is just an unpleasant sounding Sanskrit that mixed with the Dravidian languages a whole lot. At least Japanese sounds cute and Finnish sounds soothing.
 
Your average White American can relate more to Pablo, who came here illegally and doesn't speak any English than they could with Krishna who speaks fluent English and works in IT (This is not me being pro-illegal btw)
more importantly, pablo is mostly consigned to menial labor that the upper middle class doesn't care about while the recent flood of indian immigrants has turned technology into an ethnic racket
 
It's amusing to me that poojeets are latching on to the mexican riots saying shit like "mexicans are ruining america" or "mexicans riot so white people hate on indians"

Like, ok, "Poodeep Hoogsheet", white people can talk and chew gum at the same time.

But don't worry. Once we get the beaners contained into mexico, you shitskins are next. Go ahead and throw your shitskin brothers under the bus.
 
Back