Kino Casino - Read Kiwifarms with abortionist A-a-andy Warski and lardy PPP. A lolcow drama show. 2/28/2019, never forget.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Johnny Somali and iDubbbz slop videos are basically money printers.
View attachment 7486315View attachment 7486317
(15 Minutes of Shame doesn't monetise his videos but you get the point.)
Idubbbz I get, even if think you're a little dented not to be kind of over the whole thing by now, but Johnny Somali? Huh? I guess I get wanting to see a truly awful piece of shit face justice for once, but is his situation really that complex you need to watch a million videos on it? He's a crass nigger, being a public nuisance in countries he doesn't belong in, who's getting dicked by the long arm of Korean law, is there really that much more to it than that?
 
1749650940768.webp
It did not help PPP eat less. :(
 
What’s with Tardski’s joke about Black Mirror? Can someone explain?
Looks like a rare moment of self awareness
 
  • Like
Reactions: Douglas Mortimer
What’s with Tardski’s joke about Black Mirror? Can someone explain?
Looks like a rare moment of self awareness
The newest season of Black Mirror really seeped into Andy's consciousness for a few weeks after release, and he was relating practically everything they reacted to back to it over like a 2-3 week period, regardless of how little whatever he was referencing had to do with the clip at hand, until PPP got fed up and bullied him out of it, so he's been playing it off like he's been in on the joke the whole time.
 
And when someone confronts you, you say "yes it was censored... BUT it's still basically the same thing", as if it's as clear and unambiguous as PPP showing his pink starfish.

Let me put it to you this way, if PPP censored his pink starfish before turning on a livestream, people would call you fucking stupid for saying he livestreamed his pink starfish.

Quick question: do you consider loli/shota hentai to be CP? Because most hentai censors out genitalia, and I would assume the same applies to loli and shota porn.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: All becomes gunt
Quick question: do you consider loli/shota hentai to be CP? Because most hentai censors out genitalia, and I would assume the same applies to loli and shota porn.
I have to say i am very curious as per the answer to this question. Because according to the person you are asking, aka @Wodanaz , this is ok because a 14 yo girl censored it before it was shown on stream. And personally i'd like to add a question of my own to this person and to everyone else that shares this belief. What would you call it then ? What would you call these pictures in that livestream on 2/28/2019 BY ANDY WARSKI ?
 
do you consider loli/shota hentai to be CP?
no but only pedos jerk off to it, so the difference is negligible and defending it is retarded.
Because most hentai censors out genitalia
that's because americans took over japan after nuking, and forced puritan laws on them. soulless bug japs complied by censoring porn but still allow it which seems contradictory.
and before you ask, having a market for porn is different from trying to be a retarded vigilante. intentions matter which is why we don't crucify everyone for doing something bad every time.
What would you call it then
everyone already saw you call it censored before it was shown so if you wanna go back to court, we can ask ourselves how something can be censored and also shown at the same time. like the pink starfish example.
 
no but only pedos jerk off to it, so the difference is negligible and defending it is retarded.

that's because americans took over japan after nuking, and forced puritan laws on them. soulless bug japs complied by censoring porn but still allow it which seems contradictory.
and before you ask, having a market for porn is different from trying to be a retarded vigilante. intentions matter which is why we don't crucify everyone for doing something bad every time.

everyone already saw you call it censored before it was shown so if you wanna go back to court, we can ask ourselves how something can be censored and also shown at the same time. like the pink starfish example.
That doesn't answer any of the two questions. Stop trying to skirt around them and answer the questions that we posed to you. They are very simple questions.

Edit: Also as an addendum, the pink starfish example that you are posing is still retarded, because if he censored his anus it would still be a displaying of the starfish albeit censored. Right now the most generous way to interpret your word salad above would be to say that you have a double standard when it comes to what Andy Warski is portraying and the rest of the world. See how you cannot have both ? If anything since these were real girls i'd argue this is slightly more reprehensible and disgusting. So if you agree that loli/hentai is CP albeit the censorship on the genitalia then you would agree that ANDY WARSKI LIVESTREAMED CP ON 2/28/2019. He didn't censor the full picture, he just censored the sensitive areas. You can't have both.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't answer any of the two questions. Stop trying to skirt around them and answer the question that we posed to you. They are very simple questions.
I don't know what kind of retard shit it was because I don't do coke.
considering that you say it's still streaming CP even though it's censored, I can say it's okay that he was doing whatever retarded shit he was doing, because he censored it before streaming it. If you go out of your way to interpret the situation negatively then there will always be someone who goes out of their way to interpret it positively. That's kind of the point of litigation.
 
I don't know what kind of retard shit it was because I don't do coke.
considering that you say it's still streaming CP even though it's censored, I can say it's okay that he was doing whatever retarded shit he was doing, because he censored it before streaming it. If you go out of your way to interpret the situation negatively then there will always be someone who goes out of their way to interpret it positively. That's kind of the point of litigation.
So it was ok according to you just because he censored the sensitive areas, actually not him, but the 14 yo girl that he was grooming. So your final answer to this was, just to make sure, what he did was ok because the pictures that he showed had censored the sensitive areas before been shown to the world ? And that's your final answer ?
 
Back