Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
4. Skunks can get big enough to fight and kill small dogs & cats
As someone who has lived in the country all my life, I've yet to meet anyone who has lost a pet to a predatory skunk. Dog sprayed? Yes, and then you bathe them. Fought and killed by an animal that typically weighs between six to ten pounds? Never.

The point is that as a matter of courtesy and not getting off on describing the action, spoilering cruelty towards animals is appropriate.
 
1749690924671.webp

Miracles happen and they got to the point. And it is so far kino. :)
 
He loves fat pedophiles. Can't say im shocked. He would love a pedophile before his own wife and kids
All jokes aside do you think there's a possibility that Nick, I don't want to say pimped but pimped out his daughter in some way or even "showed her off" to this fat pedo? Nick seems very cavalier about people talking/joking about fucking his daughter. I know if anyone talked around/ about my children like that I at a minimum would never associate with them.
 
Last edited:
Could also work on training the dogs to keep away from skunks, or fence in the property better so fewer get in, etc etc.

Or you could just shoot animals that are just chilling and doing their business, I guess.
It's the dogs garden, why should they have to accommodate invaders? Thats like saying "why'd you shoot that nigger that broke into your property to rob you? He was chilling and doing his business".
 
I have been saying the 70 pages was a gayop or a cope nothingburger but it looks like I was probably wrong. Here's a loose timeline, sorry if I get something wrong but this timeline can't be looser than skelly's anus after Aaron's one-sided consent accident.
- 70 pages was circulating
- Skeleton starts to attack his nanny. He made up all kinds of insane claims like feeding alcohol and betting on energy drinks.
- The Keanu crashout happens
- Gabbie Hoffman receives a tip of some kind and starts to gather deets
- Releases Pedo of the healer compilation
It's his preemptive strike again. Bitching at the nanny likely had no relation to the bodycam footage. He was trying to harass a witness of child abuse into silence.
This makes more sense to me. I'll believe it when I see it.
I never thought of it that way. Now that you say that, there's also the Dickers Dropbox scenario. ReviewTechUSA got spooked that Kino Casino were advertising a big scoop on him, so he told on himself about how he had his ex's family photos in his Dropbox and tried to spin it in the best way possible. KC later admitted that they had nothing and planned to vamp because they had no content for that night, and then suddenly had Dicker's cope stream where he admits to the contents of his Dropbox to stream about.

It's possible that Nick heard that allegations were being passed around, guessed what the big scoop was supposed to be like Dickers did, and then decided to try to smear and discredit the nanny in response without knowing exactly beyond vague rumors was being said.

The nanny and people connected to her heard about Nick's defamation of her after that, and she may have been prompted to come forward on her own.

After checking the timeline, Gabe's initial tweet about Nick as well as the initial rumor about Nick getting physical with one of his sons came on May 29 and 30, nearly two weeks after Nick started going after the nanny on May 17. It also appears that this specific rumor was new and not something circulating beforehand, as one of the streamers previously repeating rumors said they had not heard that.

This would definitely be the most hilarious explanation for what happened, Nick thinking he's outsmarting everyone failing again.

I'm going to wait until firm confirmation the 70 pages is real (and not "I heard...") before concluding they're real and substantive to any relevant topic.
 
All jokes aside do you think there's a possibility that Nick, I don't want to say pimped but pimped out his daughter in some way or even "showed her off" to this fat pedo? Nick seems very cavalier about people talking/joking about fucking his daughter. I know if anyone talked around my children like that I at a minimum would never associate with them.
I'm not confident that this isn't the case, which is mind-boggling.
 
The problem with Rekieta is he murders and tortures the animals for fun.
Not that he's wiping the nuisances out in a quick manner.

Dude went with a hammer and played whack a mole on racoons.
And drowned a skunk slowly.
The poor skunk would have bolted the second the trap gate opened and not sprayed.

Racoons are an absolute menace and I hate them with a passion as they'll piss, shit, and ruin a property like no tomorrow. And their poo is filled with tons of harmful bacterias that can make you sick.
They are impossible to get rid of without trapping / killing.
But if you're not gonna drive 10 miles to relocate them assuming you can find a place.
You need to give them a quick death. Rackets does none of this. He just gleefully went after them in a trapped space for a little him time.
 
So he got Elissa confused for Thomas Roiloup/ShittyWebcomics on that one?
No.

If you look at that video on YouTube, you will see that Tommy uploaded it in 2024.

What he's mad at is Claire's criticism from 2023, and her drawing much wider attention to what he said about Kayla. Nevertheless, he's blaming @elb, because he's a lying sack of shit who has it out for her, whereas Claire decided to leave all this Sektur shit behind after she got hacked and swatted.

For those who didn't know, Thomas has been alogging Nick since the late 2010s. He declared a blood feud against him after he came on and debated EVS about comicsgate (using the term loosely, Roiloup didn't really have much of an argument and just sperged for an hour or so). He claimed Rekieta snaked him and has been running around declaring that he's been right all along. More realistically, he showed up to the party about 4 years too early.
Basically, yeah.

I never thought Tommy's old arguments against Rekieta were very compelling, and I still don't see them as very compelling. So much of his beef with Nick is wrapped up in how he didn't like how his debate with EVS went on Rekieta's channel.

Meanwhile, I left his orbit in late 2020 because I didn't like the company Nick was increasingly gravitating towards. Especially his association with, and defense of, Ralph and other degenerate people in Juju's camp. My own arguments were not seen as compelling either at the time, and I caught plenty of shit for them.

Truthfully, the things that the vast majority of people are now livid at Rekieta over occurred only within the last two years. The most damning thing being the CPS shit. If we're all being completely honest here, absolutely everything else is a drop in the bucket compared to an 8 year old girl testing positive for cocaine. That was the biggest bombshell ever. For everybody. It's the single most damaging thing to him.

Gabe might have something to say about that, but I think he's gonna have to drop docs, and the 8 year old is still a tough act to follow.

EDIT: Elaboration.
 
Last edited:
Too often they cut into a clip to make a superficial comment and go into a tangent about something that isn't even the focus of discussion.

I think this has to be what I find so irritating. When they maintain focus -- as they did in some of the interviews, with Aaron and with Mama K, they're actually great. PPP is a good interviewer, very empathetic and good at putting his guests at ease and getting the best out of them.

But often they're just all over the place. Warsky yapping nonsense. Ten to twelve minutes is about as much as I can take.
 
I've seen people criticize Gabe for picking Keanu over (say) KC, but it shouldn't really matter in terms of exposure because, if it's good content it'll be clipped, and Keanu should be fine with that.
It might be only speculation. I feel pretty strongly that Gabe picked her almost solely, because he knows Nick will get ass mad about a woman rejoicing in his failure. The cherry on top would be for Gabe's show to produce some clips that Aaron laughs about on his show.

Keno Casino will inevitably cover it, but a woman and Aaron laughing at him will really hurt his ego. I wouldn't doubt that he fastens his Baldo extra tight after Keanu and Aaron mock him.
 
too busy to stream court today, enough free time to try to control the narrative in some random women's livestream chat

well gotta have priorities i guess, just too bad the wife and children aren't at the top of that list
ignored would be better than abused, but we all know that skelly is a REALLY SMART GUY so he can do 2 things at once and his brain isn't swiss cheese.
 
He does, but not in those words. He says that he currently does not have a law license. I'd say He's mentioned that in 70% of his Read streams.

Recently he's been opening with, "Hey what's up guys. Welcome to lawsplaining the interwebs I'm your host Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law, a small law firm in central Minnesota and actually criminal law firm." (From the most recent stream.)
Nick's referring to himself as a lawyer or his defunct LLC as any kind of law firm is misleading at best, and effectively a lie. It is, and he is, a fraud.

I have heard him start a stream fairly recently referring to himself as a lawyer, which he cannot claim at this time, and referring to his "law firm," which doesn't exist.

He has a J.D., and he can add those letters to his name. But he can't hold himself out as a lawyer (use "Esq.", call himself a lawyer or imply he is one, refer to himself as a "Minnesota lawyer," or that he owns a law firm, etc.), whether to give specific legal advice or just to imply the caché of it. And marketing himself under "Rekieta Law" and saying he's "Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law, a law firm" is absolutely violating professional responsibility rules. He's a liar, and he is deliberately spitting in the eye of the Minnesota Bar* and the profession itself.

* Which, unlike Nick thinks, is not the Minnesota State Bar Association, which is a voluntary association and not required for practice in the state. (Nick has confused them before, because he is a dumb idiot.)

It probably just didn't feel threatened by them. Skunks are only really an issue if they feel threatened or trapped, which is a problem when you have fast moving pets with no concept of personal space, like dogs on your property, my uncle doesn't like killing them because they're mostly harmless, he used to trap them, until one of his dog got to the cage before he did & got blasted right in the face, he doesn't want it to happen again, so better just to put them down before the dogs find them.
Moot point. They keep the dog locked in the bathroom.
 
All jokes aside do you think there's a possibility that Nick, I don't want to say pimped but pimped out his daughter in some way or even "showed her off" to this fat pedo? Nick seems very cavalier about people talking/joking about fucking his daughter. I know if anyone talked around my children like that I at a minimum would never associate with them.
Vickers grift of letting them ride with her at Disney world
 
And drowned a skunk slowly.
The poor skunk would have bolted the second the trap gate opened and not sprayed.
Wouldn't be surprised if it turned out that was actually a raccoon he repeatedly drowned in the cage and he punched up the story by switching out for a skunk to make it more palatable for normies.
 
There's a certain level of back injury where someone is willing/desperate enough to try literally anything that might have a chance of working, and then there's bringing a perfectly healthy child in to see a chiropractor. Two very different things.
Not necessarily.

>AAAND HERE COMES YOUR FATHER , up from his weird little streaming lair and HIGH ON YOUR ADDERALL and what’s this OH MY GOD HE’S GOT A STEEL CHAIR


IMG_8905.gif
 
Back