US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What you're seeing is a major difference between Whites and Blacks. Whites will store brown fat around our internal organs, which is different from white fat. (don't get the brown and white labels mixed here. white fat is essentially the fat you have if you're a fat ass.) Brown fat's entire purpose is to warm our vital organs, something Blacks almost lack entirely and Hispanics exhibit based on however much white admixture they posses.
Aren't you describing visceral fat? I've read that isn't a good kind to have, and it's so difficult to get rid of that fasting is the only reliable way to lower it.
 
IMG_7406.webp
From this research paper: https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bjso.12665
I'm not surprised considering Classical Liberals would be considered Conservatives, by Modern Liberal standards.
What kind of diverse thought? Using this site as an example, the talking points from the Right I see collude with each other are freedom of speech from antisemitism, foreign interventionism, vaccination with health vs. forced state law, American culture being centered on race or ideals, etc.
 
I have a sneaking suspicion that, with USAID shut down, foreign money is behind some of these protests, including the upcoming mass riots planned for the 14th.

We know for a fact that Walton heiress is behind a handful of these protests. I'm sure there are others as well.
I think I bookmarked it but someone posted screenshots of all the orgs that are supporting the No Kings (but Criminals are Welcome) "protests". I wouldn't be surprised if most of them were 501cs that are taking their tax savings and paying encouraging people to show up.

The absolute state of Massie: We can't spend money on deportation and border control because it will bankrupt the country, so I'll vote against government cuts that will save us money.
 
What you're seeing is a major difference between Whites and Blacks. Whites will store brown fat around our internal organs, which is different from white fat. (don't get the brown and white labels mixed here. white fat is essentially the fat you have if you're a fat ass.) Brown fat's entire purpose is to warm our vital organs, something Blacks almost lack entirely and Hispanics exhibit based on however much white admixture they posses.
Indians/South Asians also process fat and metabolize calories differently.

Racial differences are of course deeper than just the ol’ boomer refrain of “We all bleed red”.

Racial differences encompass IQ, mental illness, circulatory problems, genetic differences and even alcoholism.

If you ever wondered why American natives are all drunks, one contributing factor is the way they metabolize alcohol differently.

IMG_0080.webp
 
Aren't you describing visceral fat? I've read that isn't a good kind to have, and it's so difficult to get rid of that fasting is the only reliable way to lower it.
Brown fat is considered healthy. It's a sign of a high RMR which not only allows Whites and Asians to process things like sugar-coated carbs (bread and rice mostly) while being detrimental to Blacks and ethnic Hispanics who don't possess that ability. It also makes warmer on the inside on average, making it more viable to live in colder climates.
 
I think I bookmarked it but someone posted screenshots of all the orgs that are supporting the No Kings (but Criminals are Welcome) "protests". I wouldn't be surprised if most of them were 501cs that are taking their tax savings and paying encouraging people to show up.
I know most of y’all are probably against inheritance taxes but… Are they really that bad?

There are literally countless of these foundations and rich heiresses like the Soros’ the Walton’s, the Ford’s and the Gates, who spend billions trying to subvert society.
 
Gawsh, being white rules. Excuse me, nigger. I'll be eating my sugar coated rice and I can burn it off with a slight cardio session. Oh, what's that? You want to drink your hennesy but your get blasted off three sips? Lmao, retard. I drank 4 beers, a shot, and had an ice cream but I can still power jog a few miles and then operate heavy machinery while looking stone cold sober. It's ironic really, you can't enjoy the great things in life and you also will likely die in a jail cell due to your ape brain not letting you be able to process hypotheticals two seconds into the future. And if you don't get in a prison cell? It's a sickle cell. Lmao, lol! WHITES RULES!

Oh, right, I guess we do sunburn. Oh well, everything is a trade.
 
Racial differences encompass IQ, mental illness, circulatory problems, genetic differences and even alcoholism.
Yeah I didn't even get into the IQ side of it really, but yes that is a big factor as well. I can empathize with non-White kids frustration with an admittedly White schooling system and way of learning. Again, raising coyotes as lapdogs. This white liberal obsession with domesticating browns is equally as frustrating for them as it is for us.
 
KWF408.webp


I saw this and I really resonated with it, as a lot of 80's/90's kids do. It reminds me a lot of the reaction people had during the Gamestop stock hold, I remember the one 4chan post about a kid who saw his dad's business fall apart during the '08 crisis and he succumbed to alcoholism and death while the banks got away with less than a slap. Same situation here, and it also doesn't take years to learn how to roof, faggot.
 
They have and are. It takes a while to turn a nation of over one billion to a middleclass consumer society though, but the Chinese internal market is huuuge.
Yeah, like low domestic consumption isn’t the main problem they face
What you call “insistent oversupply”, most economist would just call a result of China being better at manufacturing than anyone else.
You’re not aware that they consistently violate the WTO rules and operate certain industries at a loss to displace the domestic manufacturers of targeted countries? Or of the use of pass throughs to circumvent trade agreements?
And good for them. How well did offshoring and getting rid of manufacturing turn out for Europe and America, unless you’re part of the financier class?
So you’re happy for them that Nixon and subsequent presidents gave them our manufacturing?
Is there corruption in China? Sure, like everywhere else including America. But Xi tamped down on a lot of it, and purged tens of thousands of corrupt CCP officials, including at the higher levels in the 2010’s.
Oh my god. You’re literally only informed by CCP posts on this shit, aren’t you?

I’m sure there was no corruption involved in the building that collapsed in Thailand, which turned out to be another tofu dreg

Shit I’m sure they just completely stopped tofu dreg construction entirely AFTER their top three builders became insolvent and they wouldn’t repay anything at all to foreign investors
And no, I’m not a communist or “pro China”. Just a realist who finds it a little funny that an American, whose elected political leaders literally all are millionaires, gets assblasted over what politicians in another country do.
Trump is a billionaire. So I’m supposed to hate him for that while simultaneously celebrating millionaire/billionaire CCP officials? What the actual fuck is wrong with you
 
Trump is ‘not all there,’ Newsom says amid Los Angeles fight
Politico (archive.ph)
By Ben Johansen
2025-06-12 10:22:00GMT
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is hitting Donald Trump with an attack the president and his base know all too well: the president’s mental acuity.

Trump and Newsom have squared off over the federalization and deployment of the National Guard to California in the wake of the anti-deportation protests — and some unrest — in Los Angeles. On an episode of “The Daily” posted Thursday, the Democrat gave a play-by-play of his conversations with Trump last weekend — ones that the two sides have offered conflicting accounts on.

They had a Saturday morning discussion, the two men say, in which Trump purports to have brought up the National Guard. But Newsom decried that account as false. “He lied, on my mother and dad’s grave,” Newsom said on The New York Times podcast. “I don’t mess around when I say this. He lied. Stone cold liar.”

Once Trump began fabricating parts of their conversation later that day, Newsom alleged, it started “to disturb me on a different level that maybe he actually believed he said those things,” he said.

“He’s not all there,” the governor added.

The new line of attack from Newsom, who is widely considered a top contender for president in 2028, comes after he told Fox LA earlier this week that Trump “is not the same person that I dealt with just four years ago, and he’s incapable now of even a train of thought. He’s making things up.”

Trump and his supporters repeatedly attacked then-President Joe Biden’s mental fitness throughout the 2024 campaign and the early months of Trump’s second administration.

The president has relentlessly criticized Newsom — including reviving his nickname of “Gavin Newscum” — in recent days.

“Los Angeles was safe and sound for the last two nights,” Trump posted Thursday on Truth Social. “Governor Gaven [sic] NewScum had totally lost control of the situation. He should be saying THANK YOU for saving his ass, instead of trying to justify his mistakes and incompetence!!!”
‘It’s a winner for him’: Dems work to turn LA debate from immigration to Trump’s executive powers
Politico (archive.ph)
By Dustin Gardiner and Natalie Fertig
2025-06-12 10:01:00GMT
SAN FRANCISCO — Gavin Newsom has rallied Democrats in his war with Donald Trump, casting it as a fight for the future of American democracy. But maybe not for long.

As the left watches the clashes in Los Angeles drag on — with images of burning vehicles and protesters brawling with law enforcement proliferating — Democrats are also beginning to fear the imagery could hurt them by highlighting Trump’s hardline positions on immigration that helped propel him to the White House.

“It’s a winner for him. Remember, for (Trump), it’s not California, it’s not Massachusetts, it’s not New York — it’s that slim margin in the battleground states that he’s playing for,” said Kevin de León, the former Democratic leader of the California state Senate. “He’s not going to pull back.”

For Democrats, it’s a concern rooted in Trump’s historic strength on immigration with voters not in Los Angeles, but watching on social media and TV in swing states and districts across the country.

“There’s a background and a history, and so that limits the sympathy of lots of fair-minded Americans watching this spectacle unfold,” said Will Marshall, founder of Progressive Policy Institute, a center-left think tank.

In response, Democrats are scrambling to shift the debate away from deportations or immigration policy. Instead, they’re trying to make it about Trump’s use of executive power — and what they argue is the president’s sweeping and unconstitutional overreach. Framing the conflict as an existential fight for the balance of power in America, Newsom in a speech Tuesday night delivered an ominous warning, claiming Trump is marching toward authoritarianism. He also mocked the president’s plans to hold a military parade with thousands of soldiers Saturday on the streets of Washington, D.C. — saying Trump is forcing the military “to put on a vulgar display for his birthday, just as other failed dictators have done.”

“Democracy is under assault right before our eyes,” Newsom said. “The moment we’ve feared has arrived.”

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat who previously served in Congress, has similarly accused Trump of provoking violence by calling in the military. But Bass, too, was explicit in her concerns about the image her city was projecting. She has repeatedly urged residents to peacefully protest to avoid giving the Trump “administration what they want” — arguing the president is sowing chaos to justify his power grab.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson accused Newsom of trying to distract from upheaval on the streets of Los Angeles. “Gavin Newsom is desperately trying to turn the conversation away from the wall-to-wall coverage of how he enabled lawless, violent riots against American law enforcement in support of criminal illegal aliens,” she said in an email.

Democrats have some reason for optimism. A Quinnipiac University poll released on Wednesday found Trump’s approval rating on immigration dropping 5 percentage points from April, to 43 percent. And YouGov polling this week found a plurality of Americans — 45 percent — disapproved of deploying the National Guard to the Los Angeles area, while 38 percent approved.

Democrats are pushing to keep the focus on the president’s use of executive powers, with Newsom and state officials suing to stop Trump’s unilateral deployment of Marines and commandeering of the state’s National Guard troops. A U.S. District court hearing in San Francisco is scheduled for Thursday afternoon.

De León, the former state Senate leader, said the optics of Marines — wearing fatigues and trained for lethal combat — rolling into America’s second largest city has given Democrats an opening to force a broader debate over presidential powers.

“It shocks your senses — this act should send shivers down every American citizen’s spine, regardless of their political persuasion,” said De León, a former Los Angeles city councilmember who also authored California’s sanctuary law that limits police cooperation with immigration agents. “It’s so un-American. These are things that you think about in some Eastern European country during the Cold War, or in the Soviet Union.”

Newsom has also highlighted the lack of logistical preparation for the deployments, including reports that Guard troops arrived without sleeping arrangements or funding for fuel, water and food. He and Bass both assailed Trump over the Pentagon’s estimate that the deployments will cost $134 million, which they have called unnecessary and wasteful.

But as much as Democrats have forced Trump to play defense in the courts, the severity of civil unrest in Los Angeles, including burning cars and vandalism in pockets of downtown, have given many in the party heartburn.

“Gavin Newsom, take control of the situation,” former Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, a Democrat, told POLITICO. “The more the national brand is aligned with this level of instability, and defending people that are beating up cops, that national storyline, that national brand is not going to be good for candidates.”

In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, Trump said, “If our troops didn’t go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now.”

Some Democrats insist they aren’t thinking about the political calculation. Rep. Lou Correa, who represents nearby Orange County, flew home from Congress Monday night to deal with the havoc that immigration actions have wreaked in Santa Ana, a heavily Latino suburb that has been hit with ICE sweeps, including raids targeting day laborers at Home Depots.

“I don’t know what the message is of the Democratic Party, but I can tell you as a member of Congress, that my message is, essentially, these are hardworking individuals,” Correa said. “I mean, this is terror in our communities.”

Protests over escalating ICE sweeps are now spreading to other blue cities — including Austin, New York, Boston, Chicago and Portland.

In the Pacific Northwest, Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said his city is hoping to avoid the spectacle of Los Angeles by preparing its police force to tamp down unruly protesters. He said the city learned that lesson after it became a Republican target over its handling of 2020 racial justice protests, when Trump sent in Department of Homeland Security agents.

“The federal government coming here [in 2020 was] because we weren’t properly handling the force,” Wilson said. “But we’ve changed so much.”

When similar protests transpired in Seattle that year, then-Gov. Jay Inslee activated the Washington National Guard. Now, the city is preparing for the possibility that troops could be sent without the invite of newly-elected Gov. Bob Ferguson, another Democrat. House Armed Services Ranking Member Adam Smith (D-Wash.), whose district includes part of Seattle, cast a stark contrast between the 2020 protests in the Northwest and the current protests in Los Angeles or Seattle.

“Things were out of control in Seattle in 2020, there is no arguing that,” Smith said. “This is an entirely different thing. This is the president superseding local and state authority to bring the military in where they are not needed.”

California Democrats argue Trump’s deployment of the military wasn’t triggered by an ineffective law enforcement response in the Los Angeles area, but by a desire to expand his presidential powers — a threat that many Democrats, including presidential nominee Kamala Harris, warned about during the 2024 election.

“It’s as plain as day right now, and it’s scary,” said Brian Brokaw, a veteran Democratic consultant and Newsom adviser. “Now, what we are seeing is the practical manifestation.”

More CHIRLA propaganda:

Why Los Angeles protesters fly the Mexican flag
Politico (archive.ph)
By Lindsey Holden
2025-06-11 20:27:00GMT
Anyone looking at images of the Los Angeles immigration protests has almost certainly seen the Mexican flag flying somewhere in the frame.

Demonstrators have hoisted the red, white and green banner atop cars and while marching down streets and freeways. It’s spilled into the corners of CNN live shots and been splashed across social media.

To some, the flag — its bright colors standing out against dark smoke from burning cars and tear gas — is a powerful sign of resistance to President Donald Trump’s mass-deportation agenda. To others, it is ammunition for conservatives aiming to paint the unrest as a “migrant invasion.”

Case in point: a National Review headline calling the Mexican flag the “Confederate banner of the L.A. riots.”

Protesters’ prominent use of the flag evokes photos from more than 30 years ago, when thousands of demonstrators raised the same banner while fighting a ballot measure that sought to bar undocumented Californians from accessing public schools and other services.

That 1994 initiative, Proposition 187, was a turning point for Latino political power in the state. It served as an awakening for some California protesters who later became prominent leaders, including former Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León.

Angelica Salas, a prominent activist in the state and executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, noted protesters also hoisted the flag in 2006, during massive demonstrations against George W. Bush-era legislation to crack down on illegal immigration.

“When you attack the undocumented community, when you attack the immigrant community, there is a sense that — I mean, it’s a reality — the majority of the folks are Mexican,” she said.

Salas spoke with California Playbook about why the Mexican flag continues to be an important symbol for demonstrators.

On what the Mexican flag means to protesters …
It’s really about saying we’re American, Mexican American, and we’re not ashamed of being Mexican …There’s a very popular refrain amongst our community that you can’t just like our food and our culture — we also demand that you like the people.

Because it’s sort of a very, very strong sentiment that there’s a like for what we produce and [for] our culture and our foods and everything else, but not of the people. So there’s a sense of the deep level of discrimination against the Mexican people.

So when people carry the flag, it’s really a symbol of pride and a symbol of ‘We’re not going to be ashamed to claim our heritage, our Mexican heritage. We’re not going to be bullied to hide an aspect of who we are.’

On young protesters’ attachment to the flag …
When you see a lot of young people with their flags, it’s also claiming and [showing] support for their parents. So many of the young people who are marching are U.S. citizens, they’re second-, third-generation, maybe they are the first who were born in this country. Very much U.S. citizens by birth, but they want their parents to also know that they’re standing with them.

I feel like every time I ask a young person — whether they’re carrying a Mexican flag, a Salvadoran flag, a Guatemalan flag, or any other flag — it’s just about, ‘I want people to understand I’m proud of who I am. I’m not ashamed to be Mexican, and I’m certainly not ashamed of my parents. And I want them to know that I will not reject them.’ Because there’s a lot of pressure to reject the Mexican heritage.

On California’s connection to Mexico …
Thirty percent of the population is people of Mexican descent — 12 million individuals who live here. We are proudly a multigenerational community. That means that we have recent arrivals as well as people who are immigrants who’ve been here for many years.

And then [the] majority of the people actually are second-, third-, fourth-generation Mexican American. There’s a lot of pride in our deep roots in the region.
 
Yeah I didn't even get into the IQ side of it really, but yes that is a big factor as well. I can empathize with non-White kids frustration with an admittedly White schooling system and way of learning. Again, raising coyotes as lapdogs. This white liberal obsession with domesticating browns is equally as frustrating for them as it is for us.
Tbf, at least a part of it is their culcha and social circumstances.

But thing is… We’ve spent decades and likely trillions of dollars trying to pretend that all kids are the same and totally have the same odds of becoming a Nobel winning scientist.

And guess what. Literacy and graduation rates of non white kids haven’t really changed dramatically.

Would it really kill us to have a public school, system where less smart kids, many of them likely brown and black, would be steered towards trades and manufacturing starting at say… 6th grade?

Shit, we need plumbers and mechanics a lot more than pol.sci and grievance studies majors.
 
Back