Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%

  • Total voters
    464
Unless our Magical Star Buddy is even stupider then we think, he has to see this as a bad sign. It's entirely possible one last plightsperg motion with some utterly bizarre "hail Mary" play in it will be filed, but not very likely. Possible tho.
That's not how Greee works. He identifies one issue, and slams it home, assuming it will solve everything. He's going to lock on to getting the sanctions dismissed or paid as his ticket out and to victory, mark my words.
 
I'm already thinking about which juggalo crip gang Josh should try and sell the debt to.

I think the funniest outcome would be to sell it to the women who are buying up and closing down whorehouses. As much as Greer would hate having to pay Null a single cent, the head tightening that would ensue from him knowing that not only is part of his pay check going towards getting him his penis sucked, but that it's going towards him never getting him his penis sucked ever again is some Greek-level shit up there with having to push a bolder up a hill for all eternity.

That's not how Greee works. He identifies one issue, and slams it home, assuming it will solve everything. He's going to lock on to getting the sanctions dismissed or paid as his ticket out and to victory, mark my words.

He's still going on about how Hardin violated the SPO even after both judges have told him that he's wrong and that Hardin did not violate the SPO on multiple occasions.
 
Am I missing something? I can see why Hardin wouldn't really want or need the extension, because there is more than enough to dismiss the case already, and any further motions for sanctions/fees can be filed after dismissal. But why would he move for an extension he does not want? Does that not just waste everyone's time?

You can think of it as a "stalking horse" motion. He didn't need the motion, or intend to actually get an extension, his actual intention was to essentially get the judges to wake the fuck up and address something.

It goes to show that some bad things are blessings in disguise. In the end, Null got to find out how much this community is willing to support him. Asked for 75k for legal expenses and promptly received 200k+. Later, asked for a years worth of site expenses and promptly got 2 years + tip. Everyone who donates expresses pride in having done so and there is a pervasive "if you need more, just ask" attitude.

As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to keep many people alive.
Genesis 50:20

If anyone had any doubt of the strength and resolve of this community that should have answered it. Hopefully this will act as a reminder for anyone else that wants to fuck with Null or KF that we have his back and we aren't going to let any tranny stinkditch or whiny asshole get the better of him or KF!

Hopefully this will remind them that we are not trapped on the Internet with them, they are in fact trapped on the Internet with us.
 
I think the funniest outcome would be to sell it to the women who are buying up and closing down whorehouses. As much as Greer would hate having to pay Null a single cent, the head tightening that would ensue from him knowing that not only is part of his pay check going towards getting him his penis sucked, but that it's going towards him never getting him his penis sucked ever again is some Greek-level shit up there with having to push a bolder up a hill for all eternity.



He's still going on about how Hardin violated the SPO even after both judges have told him that he's wrong and that Hardin did not violate the SPO on multiple occasions.
Sell any Gree debt to Taylor Swift. For a dollar. Have her Venmo it to Null
 
I don't think the judge is likely to open discovery into the IFP issue.

But does he have a choice? If someone likely committed a fraud upon the court don't they have an obligation to support an investigation into such since it has meaning for a number of things, including sanctions and potentially the awarding of other monies?
 
so I guess the logic is that somehow more people decided to go and download the stuff after Null posted the DMCA
I don't believe that argument has been made. Russtard couldn't even know if such an unlikely thing had happened.

The argument in his amended complaint is definitely "encouragement" of the thing that had allegedly happened in the past. He hilariously thinks this is a "reasonable inference".


1749748636271.webp
 
If Greer believes his tard shield has run out with the District judge, he'll likely rush over to his treasured 10th Appeals, without doing the necessary research first. He's got nothing to lose, and a sincere belief that they'll bail him out.
"Plaintiff sincerely believed the Court would wipe his ass just one more time, Your Honor!"

Crusty white boy gambling degenerates in Vegas would be a good one. Russ has no defense for someone that deep in their addiction.
Bossman x Greer cow-crossover coming soon to a theater near us?
 
He's still going on about how Hardin violated the SPO even after both judges have told him that he's wrong and that Hardin did not violate the SPO on multiple occasions.
Yes, but that's in support of whatever insane motion he currently has open (right now it's the "sanctions aren't for me, I'm a free man on the lamb". It is no longer a motion itself, it has upgraded to a plight and we know plights are forever.
 
Am I missing something? I can see why Hardin wouldn't really want or need the extension, because there is more than enough to dismiss the case already, and any further motions for sanctions/fees can be filed after dismissal. But why would he move for an extension he does not want? Does that not just waste everyone's time?
Tactical.

The Judges don't tend to respond until dozens of filings have flooded the docket, so Mr Hardin was waiting for them to actually tie up some loose ends in order for him to create the most efficient and effective response.
The last time Hardin requested an extension, the judge reacted immediately and granted it. This time around Hardin used the extension request to force the judge to look at the docket and issue some rulings. Granted or not, Hardin got what he wanted.
 
Would the magistrate typically hold another hearing after Hardin submits his reply at the end of the month or is this something that the judge is likely to rule on without scheduling a hearing first? I don't think it's necessary, but the last hearing was rather economical at getting issues before the court resolved, or at least moving things forward. When the judge can just point-blank ask Greer about something, it makes it much harder for him to squirm around and waste time through ridiculous motion practice. It does seem like he'd have an easier time with dismissing the case if Greer says or agrees to something that he doesn't really understand, which he's incredibly prone to do.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Napoleon III
I think Greer has run out of chances and another hearing won't be necessary.
He's refused everything the court has ordered him to pay or provide and there's really nothing left to litigate.
No witnesses, no payment of sanctions, no providing paperwork that he happily volunteered. No way.

That should be enough to end this once and for all. What can he even argue on appeal? Nothing.
 
Would the magistrate typically hold another hearing after Hardin submits his reply at the end of the month or is this something that the judge is likely to rule on without scheduling a hearing first?
He had originally scheduled a meeting for after discovery wraps up in June, but considering discovery failed, was stayed, then failed while stayed...

I don't actually think there's anything useful for Greer to clarify or answer at this point. He doesn't have any more answers due or pending. He's also in direct defiance on multiple orders. The judge can threaten him and get him to say "yes sir I'll behave", but what good will that do? It's actually cleaner to just recommend dismissal for 5 different reasons and let the appeals plight sperging begin.
 
Back