this is retard talk. subhumans constantly try to flood into europe, irrespective of whatever meme war the burgers and the jews are or aren't waging at the time.
the fault for it lies exclusively with the traitorous european leaders who not only refuse to reject the subhumans, but who actively use state resources to pay for their stay, thus incentivizing more of them to come.
Anti-ICE protesters PUSHED BACK outside Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark.Protests blocked cars from entering or leaving after nine detainees escaped the facility.
About 50 inmates at Delaney Hall pushed down the wall of a dormitory room when meals were hours late, temporarily taking control of the facility, according to reports.
I really don't want to fed post but this is literally an insurrection. When a group is displaying violence and goes as far as to attack a government facility for the cause of "liberating" there allies how can that be anything less then war?
While I agree that the others were great successes, Libya was one of the dumbest geopolitical moves in the last few centuries, and its ramifications are still being felt today. That debacle is reason #1 why the Iranians will never kill their nuclear program. We had a successful formula for dissuading nuclear proliferation and eliminated chemical weapons: sanctions & glowie ops were the stick, and the carrot was 'we will integrate you into the West economically and allow you to prosper if you give up your nukes/chemical weapons.' Libya's leader agreed to this and we then proceeded to have him horrifically murdered and his nation turned into a failed state. It precipitated a lot of the migrant crises in Europe, and our ability to curtail Iranian and Nork nuclear programs were absolutely gutted. If you offer someone the carrot and the stick and tell them to give you their gun, they give you their gun, and then you yank back the carrot and beat them to death with the stick, the next guy you pull that trick on is just going to aim his gun at you because he very understandably doesn't trust you.
Hillary Clinton poisoned the next several decades of Middle East FP because she though she was some kind of Marvel superhero girlboss taking out 'the bad guy'.
They're a parasite species that lives off a host. Once one of it's golems falls, they will soon find out they aren't as self sufficient, or good enough at defending themselves, as they think and desperately try to find another host...only to find that the west has already fallen and nobody is left, unless you count China. While it is true that arabs might not be as technologically advanced(ie haven't stolen national secrets or forced it's host nation to donate/sell it to them), there is a whole lot more of them, so they can play the long game and simply chip away at Israel. Moreover, they will just get bolder with time if America and Europe isn't strong enough to intervene in their business anymore, only accelerating the procedure.
I haven't seen you deny you're not a mindless, soulless golem either. Maybe tea parties at BP are more your speed than this thread.
Wait until you find out what kind of civilization used to be in Asia Minor before Islam showed up.
Yeah, yeah, cherry-picked photos, but the real issue is that for over a thousand years, Islamic civilizations have brief periods where they seem to be getting somewhere, but then they have a religious convulsion that destroys everything. The fundamental issue is that Islam is not just a doctrine about the afterlife with some moral principles and purity rites, but an entire system of government, social organization, and even finance, with which compliance is incompatible with anything above a Bronze Age lifestyle.
Hey, instant respect added
If more of the regular doomposters here were willing to just admit "oop I was wrong" instead of just scurrying away until they got a chance to pop back up and whine about how "we're all screwed for real this time guys"
We'd all be in a better place
We can't ban that, that'd be "racist" and would also stop our H-1B slaves from being able to buy houses and "immigrant entrepreneurs" from buying commercial property with taxpayer dollars.
Seriously, lobbyists have added amendments to state bans on noncitizens owning property to exempt temporary visa holders, which makes them toothless.
While I agree that the others were great successes, Libya was one of the dumbest geopolitical moves in the last few centuries, and its ramifications are still being felt today.
I agree the surrounding political intentions were pointless, but it was an example of a military success with a clear focused objective: "Go in, do what you need to, leave". My point is such things are still possible as long as we're honest with ourselves about what we're doing.
If the dissident right was smart (a big fucking if, I know), they’d start trying to nudge the June 14th protests into an anti-sandwar/anti-Zionist movement. Use social media to push the idea that Trump is trying to start a foreign war to distract from his own failed domestic policies. Tie it back to the ‘No Kings’ slogan by pushing the theory that Israel is trying to start a regime change in Iran to impose a puppet Shah. Start doing some sloganeering of their own to draw attention to the Zionist Occupied Government and Don’s true masters. (‘I’m not dyin for Zion’, ‘Resist King ZOG’, ‘Zionists Outta Government’). The Leftists are already primed for some anti-ZOG action, they just need a bit of a push. Get the Neocons and the far-left to fight and further the breakdown of the Zionist system.
(But we all know the Dis-Right are ZOGCogs who will Stand With Israel because King Donny told them to).
There ain’t no political solution. It’s gotta ACCELERATE before it gets any better.
Leftist circles encourage insularism and since they were the ones who organised it, the chance of subverting it are improbable at the organisational level and impossible at the local level. The nudging would only be possible from the outside and tantamount to yanking it out of their hands, at which point organisers can just go around the blatant attempt to co-opt and emphasise the original message of "Trump bad, immigrants good!" and Palestine flags were always going to get waved at these events anyway. The organisers themselves are Neoliberal billionaires and outside of the tech bros (Musk, maybe Zuckerberg) there's not really an equivalent on the right — the right in present are too organic/populist and not ideologically inclined for subversion.
The political solution to the issue of Israel will only occur if all of Israel's enemies are dead/gone/powerless (which seems to be America, Israel and AIPAC's route at present), when the population itself is antagonistic enough against supporting Israel and the old politicians steering the ship for pro-Israeli interests finally die off or get ousted, or if AIPAC disappears giving no financial incentive for politicians and parties in the US to support Israel (at which point the split loyalties of dual-citizens and mono-Americans will be clear).
Main issue is these all take time, which accelerationist rhetoric attempts to ameliorate for the impatient. The main issue is that acceleration seems like a good idea up until the moment it isn't, since the consequences - whether they arrive quickly or hit suddenly in the future - will still hit all the same, all that may differ is the intensity of blowback. Trying a quick and harsh fix for something that was ultimately made a problem as the result of decisions made many decades (or even a century) prior is the equivalent of using morphine to quell the pain of a burst appendix, but not actually removing the appendix itself, when what you need is surgery or else you risk dying.
Other problems, such Marxist infiltration in schools and such (which is leads to the retarded youth, trannies and breadtube arguably), are relatively easier to implement solutions but will only pay dividends in the future, just as early Marxist subversion is beginning to pay dividends in the present. It can be done out in the open and with finesse.
For instance, you could solve the issue of Marxist infiltration in universities if you're more selective about which degrees and shit are eligible for loans, since the university hosting "Queer/Feminist Theory 101" still gets paid at the end of the day so there's no risk to them financially on hosting such classes, because even if federal funding is slashed they can just increase the cost of classes themselves to make up for it, and the income is assured through the loans. For younger kids, you need to set a hard curriculum emphasising the core subjects of English, maths and science, whilst the focus on foundational subjects like history, religious, art and so on, must have less flexibility to be decided on by individual teachers (who were educated at subverted universities) via curriculums decided at the state level (this could be done federally, but 10th amendment + changing governments leave it open to alteration). That's just how I would do it.
Invoking Godwin's law:
Hitler's solution to fixing the German economy was legitimately his "quick fix" to what was ultimately something that needed long-term consideration. He wanted to balance out rural and urban populations, but to achieve the former he needed more farmland. How to do this? Chapter 4, Munich, 4.3: Acquisition of New Land
The principle of acquiring new territory on which to settle the
surplus population has many advantages to recommend it,
especially if we look to the future.
In the first place, it’s impossible to overestimate the need to
maintain a healthy peasant class, as the basis of the national
community. Many of our present evils have their origin
exclusively in the imbalance between urban and rural populations.
(Has some measure of truth to it, comparing how cities vote compared to rural areas)
With this guaranteed, industry and commerce would recede
from their present unhealthy position of dominance, and would
take their due place in the economy, adjusting the balance between
supply and demand. They would no longer constitute the basis of
national subsistence, but would be supporting institutions. By
fulfilling their proper role–to adjust the balance between national
production and consumption–they allow the nation to be more or
less free from foreign countries. This ensures the freedom and
independence of the nation, especially in times of difficulty.
Such a territorial policy, however, cannot be fulfilled in the
Cameroons, but rather exclusively here in Europe. One must
calmly and squarely face the truth that it certainly cannot be
Divine Will to give 50 times as much land to one nation as to
another. In the present case, one mustn’t allow existing political
borders to distract attention from what should exist on the basis of
eternal justice. If this earth has sufficient room for all, then we
should have that share of the land that is absolutely necessary for
our existence.
But people will not do this willingly. Then the right of selfpreservation comes into effect. And when attempts to settle the
difficulty in an amicable way fail, then the fist must take by force.
If our ancestors had based their political decisions on pacifist
nonsense like our present generation does, we wouldn’t possess
more than one-third of our present territory. And likely there
would be no German nation to worry about its future in Europe.
No–we owe the two Ostmarks of the Reich to the natural
determination of our forefathers in their struggle for existence.
(A problem he earlier acknowledges was decades in the making is something he believed can be fixed rather quickly through acquisition of new land.)
Many contemporary European nations are like pyramids
standing on their peaks. Their European territory is ridiculously
small when compared. with the enormous overhead weight of
their colonies, foreign trade, etc.
One may say: apex in Europe, and the base all over the worldquite different from the USA, which has its base on the American
continent and touches the rest of the world only through its apex.
This accounts for the incomparable inner strength of the USA and
the corresponding weakness of most of the colonial European
powers
England is no proof to the contrary, because a quick glance at
the British Empire overlooks the whole Anglo-Saxon world.
England cannot be · compared with any other state in Europe,
since it forms a vast community of language and culture together
with the USA.
Therefore the only possibility that Germany had to conduct a
sound territorial policy was to acquire new territory in Europe
itself. Colonies cannot serve this purpose, since they aren't suited
for large-scale European settlement.
(But Hitler-solutions to American problems don't compute, as even Hitler acknowledged the singular, unique nature of America and even uses America as precedent for why his solution to fix the economy would work because it's what America already does)
TLDR: Israel and its support will die in America, it's just going to take a couple of decades unfortunately, even at the current rate of dwindling support amongst the population and the drifting away from globalism.
Looks like we're finally coming full circle
It took me way longer to find this image than I would have liked, but at least all these overstuffed niggers and spics leeching off our healthcare are getting exactly what they deserve.
We can't ban that, that'd be "racist" and would also stop our H-1B slaves from being able to buy houses and "immigrant entrepreneurs" from buying commercial property with taxpayer dollars.
Seriously, lobbyists have added amendments to state bans on noncitizens owning property to exempt temporary visa holders.
Honestly this is why I think there should be something like double property taxes on single-family homes for non-citizens (if you are here without citizenship, rent), and extra property taxes for each additional property owned for everybody. Not something that would cripple someone for having a lake house and a beach house, but once you get to four+ properties in your name it should get pretty steep and increase exponentially.
Also a complete ban on corporate ownership of single-family homes. If you want to be a landlord fine, do it under your own name. Homes should not be investments for hedge funds or pension funds.
>“Israel is filling our beautiful white nations with imported browns! Total brown death!”
>Israel kills a bunch of browns
>”NOOOOOOOO HOW DARE YOOOO! BROWNS ARE OUR GREATEST ARYAN BROTHERS FIGHTING AGAINST THE ZOG MENACE!”
Incomprehensible. In my opinion, anything that gets rid of browns is based.
