US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haven't seen the Utah shooting video posted yet but a buddy just came in clutch with it
View attachment 7511808
OK.
1. We don't see from this video what preceded 5150's engagement of the antifa guy.
2. 5150 guys were pointing their guns at antifa guy (by Utah Law antifa guy could have legally shot them for that).
3. Antifa guy with rifle pointed down decides to run away from the 5150 guys who were pointing guns at him.
4. As Antifa guy ramps up his speed to get away, it looks like his rifle goes lateral to the pavement. This may be what made the 5150 guys decide to shoot, because he was unavoidably pointing his rifle into the marchers, even if it was accidently and not his intent.
5. Both sides are guilty of pointing their guns at people.
6. Antifa guy needed training on how to safely run with his rifle.
7. Both sides are too incompetent to carry guns.
8. 5150 succeeded in killing one illegal immigrant and jailing one antifa. Complete success!

Edit: So you are telling me, that if you join 5150 in a leftist city, you can shoot at and kill antifa, and if you accidently kill any other leftist or illegal immigrants, the police will charge the antifa guy you were aiming for in the first place!?!?!? And as a bonus, all of the leftist will spread your cover story for you as the official narrative, and tell all of the other leftist to not video record and/or destroy video of you killing the leftist and tell them not to cooperate with the police? I think 5150 just got 100,000 Republicans stronger.
 
Last edited:
OK.
1. We don't see from this video what preceded 5150's engagement of the antifa guy.
2. 5150 guys were pointing their guns at antifa guy (by Utah Law antifa guy could have legally shot them for that).
3. Antifa guy with rifle pointed down decides to run away from the 5150 guys who were pointing guns at him.
4. As Antifa guy ramps up his speed to get away, it looks like his rifle goes lateral to the pavement. This may be what made the 5150 guys decide to shoot, because he was unavoidably pointing his rifle into the marchers, even if it was accidently and not his intent.
5. Both sides are guilty of pointing their guns at people.
6. Antifa guy needed training on how to safely run with his rifle.
7. Both sides are too incompetent to carry guns.
8. 5150 succeeded in killing one illegal immigrant and jailing one antifa. Complete success!
From what I see, he starts running because they fire at him. He was walking calmly, barrel down, when they were already aiming at him and appear to start firing. He wouldn't have reason to run otherwise, he wasn't looking at the shooters at all.
 
Why do I sense the author of this article wears thick-rimmed glasses?
View attachment 7511900
Source | Archive
I mean the parade was pretty low key, it was more of a series of museum exhibits walking by while the announcer gives brief explanations on what they are showing. It wasn't this massive show of force, because it wasn't supposed to be.
 
Can we get more drivers just plowing through idiots that deliberately jump in front of them?
I am against drivers targeting gatherings for the purpose of vehicular homicide, but protestors putting themselves in harms way for a photo op or to stop cars so their cohorts can attack it? Fair game imo.
I've long argued that attempting to stop someone's vehicle and surround it when you have no legal right to be in the street in the first place is wrongful imprisonment. Acting to free yourself from being wrongfully imprisoned allows a certain level of violence in self defense. But this is L.A., and that guy is going to be hit with an attempted murder charge by their communist DA.
 
I've long argued that attempting to stop someone's vehicle and surround it when you have no legal right to be in the street in the first place is wrongful imprisonment. Acting to free yourself from being wrongfully imprisoned allows a certain level of violence in self defense. But this is L.A., and that guy is going to be hit with an attempted murder charge by their communist DA.
That DA got replaced by a republican independent who promised to be tougher on crime. I think the driver is fine.
 
You said the shapeshifter part out loud
View attachment 7510849
>LiveLeak

Sometimes I like to check on the accounts in these compilations to see if they still exist.

The first faggot still has an account and still posts occasionally, only difference is he has a daughter that he involves in his liberal retardation now. Used to write for huffpost but nothing for 8 years now.


1750091032215.webp

40k tweets, what a legacy. Still a PhD candidate.
1750091115604.webp

"I'm such a good parent, I taught my daughter to let criminals go if she gets on a jury."
1750091471048.webp
 
Why do I sense the author of this article wears thick-rimmed glasses?
View attachment 7511900
Source | Archive
rex-huppke-wikipedia.webp

>LiveLeak

Sometimes I like to check on the accounts in these compilations to see if they still exist.

The first faggot still has an account and still posts occasionally, only difference is he has a daughter that he involves in his liberal retardation now. Used to write for huffpost but nothing for 8 years now.


View attachment 7511954

40k tweets, what a legacy. Still a PhD candidate.
View attachment 7511959

"I'm such a good parent, I taught my daughter to let criminals go if she gets on a jury."
View attachment 7511988
Children rebel against their parents. When the millennials rebelled against their Fox-News-Watching parents they did shit like join OWS and vote for gay marriage. I look forward to the Alpha-SS.
 
You scoff but dude had a degree in nuclear science. Thank god peanuts and politics kept him away from any reactors.
I'd rather have Carter running a reactor than the White House, and if you knew more about it you probably would, too.

Dude was a Rickover Acolyte, hand picked by ole Hymie G. his damn self as a "nuc." He should have stayed in the Navy. Fuck the peanut farm, Jimmy!

Rickover didn't take slouches. He was a bastard, but he knew his shit, and only chose people who met his standards. You didn't want retards running the "tea kettle."
 
G7 2025: World leaders confront war, trade tensions in Alberta
Straight Arrow News (archive.ph)
William Jackson and Craig Nigrelli
16 Jun 2025 16:31:30 UTC

Full story​

Leaders from the Group of Seven nations opened their annual summit Monday, June 16, in Kananaskis, Alberta, amid rising tensions over global trade and ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting the summit, which includes leaders from the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Japan.

The summit comes as President Donald Trump ramps up tariffs and takes a go-it-alone approach to foreign policy. Leaders are tackling trade tensions, surging oil prices and the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

How is Trump’s presence shaping the summit?​

Trump arrived in Calgary on Sunday, June 15, and is scheduled to hold bilateral meetings with Canadian Prime Minister Carney, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Leaders are wary of a repeat of the 2018 G7 summit in Quebec. At that summit, Trump withdrew U.S. support for a joint statement after departing the meeting. To avoid similar fallout this year, Canada has opted against issuing a joint statement and is instead preparing a chair’s summary and six topic-specific declarations to reduce the risk of disagreement.

According to Reuters, Trump’s tariff policies, including a 10% baseline tax on most imports and targeted tariffs on allies like Japan and Canada, are contributing to strained relationships within the bloc.

What are the key geopolitical issues?​

The summit takes place just days after Israeli airstrikes on Iran, which triggered a surge in global oil prices. French President Emmanuel Macron said June 15 that the U.S. could help restart diplomacy with Iran due to its influence over Israeli military decisions.

Meanwhile, Trump’s recent call with Russian President Vladimir Putin has drawn concern from European diplomats, some of whom criticized the idea of Russia playing a mediation role.

Zelenskyy and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte will attend Tuesday’s session as European officials urge the U.S. to take a stronger stance against Russian aggression.

Is the G7’s future at risk?​

There’s growing uncertainty about the long-term relevance of the G7. The Trump administration has sent mixed signals about whether the president will attend the G20 summit in South Africa later this year.

Analysts warn that weakening consensus and unilateral policies may erode the G7’s role as a unified forum for democracies. Additionally, reluctance to endorse shared commitments could further diminish this role.

Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), Devan Markham (Morning Digital Editor), and Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Synthesized coverage insights across 177 media outlets

Context corner​

Historically, G7 summits have aimed to coordinate responses to global economic and security challenges among leading industrial democracies. The context for this year's summit includes sharp memories of the 2018 event, disrupted by Trump’s abrupt exit and withdrawal of support for a joint statement, which set a precedent for the current cautious, segmented approach to consensus.

Debunking​

There are claims, particularly from U.S. and Canadian officials, suggesting ongoing productive trade negotiations and the likelihood of new deals. However, sources consistently report that no significant trade agreements have yet been finalized, and that leaders remain uncertain about the resolution of tariff disputes, indicating these are ongoing rather than settled matters.

Policy impact​

Tariff policies enacted by leading nations have direct consequences for sectors such as steel, automotive and agriculture. Canadian exporters and manufacturers are particularly affected by the unpredictability of U.S. trade measures. Additional security or energy agreements could alter investment climates and influence government spending on defense, infrastructure and climate mitigation.
 
Back