oh no im late for school
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2021
"if only you knew how much coke i've really done"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"if only you knew how much coke i've really done"
I believe that acting without allowing someone whose rights were affected to respond would constitute a sufficient denial of due process to guarantee plenary (de novo) review, that is, the appeals court would be forced to try the issue itself since it had never been tried.I might be wrong, but I am not sure if just flat out wrong or only slightly retarded wrong. @AnOminous @waffle @Potentially Criminal would likely be able to correct me.
The worst thing Nick could do at this point is attempt a defemation case against Mama K. Not only would this open up avenues for her to introduce the bodycam for her defense, but if the County refused to produce the bodycam for her, she could then sue them for costs i f she lost the defamation suit.
In other words, the more Nick runs his mouth about defamation, the more likely the County courts will not delete the footage to cover their own asses.
Someone Owes Nick 6K
Okay, I'm only interpreting this based on the clips you shared. But Rekieta mentions this $6,000 amount twice. First, he refers to how the frivolous nature of the lawsuit entitles him to $6,000. Then, in a second instance, he again discusses the "frivolous lawsuit" that has been filed, indicating that he expects to incur attorney fees for this matter, and again mentions the $6,000 figure.In this clip below, I feel like he might be implying that he wants to sue Josh. Could be his salty and defiant reaction to the chat.
This is why I think Nick is a perfect example of why first time offenders don't deserve defacto light sentences. Nick is worse than remorseless, Nick views himself as the victim of his own crimes. He seems to see being caught with a dirty house with cocaine, loose guns and unsupervised kids as an injustice committed upon him. He talks on and on about how he had fun, without an ounce of concern for his kids.Yep. Nick regularly says "sure, I do cocaine and wife swap, but so does everyone else, and yet I'm the only one getting punished for it!" so it isn't just for the bullying, Nick thinks EVERY negative trait he has is common and he's being singled out because he was briefly popular on YouTube.
The Blockland forum posts don't show that. It was the fabricated irc log.Honestly, I think that Nick showed some people Null’s old blockland forum posts and has been using that to paint everyone here as pedophiles.
To the extent dentists still use it, it's via a mask with nasal plugs, and oxygen is simultaneously administered. As dope fiends use it, though, it's mostly oral.Nitrous is something you inhale through your mouth right? Or am I misthinking (as a myopic non-junkie) and it can be/is inhaled in the nose?
He has to keep suing people until he finds his lolsuit/Maddox.In summary, Rekieta appears to believe that his current criminal case, combined with the ongoing civil case involving Montagraph, isn't enough. He must also take legal action against the State, Aaron Imholte, and now @Null / Harding.
Maybe he's $6k behind on his mortgage, car payments, etcOkay, I'm only interpreting this based on the clips you shared. But Rekieta mentions this $6,000 amount twice. First, he refers to how the frivolous nature of the lawsuit entitles him to $6,000. Then, in a second instance, he again discusses the "frivolous lawsuit" that has been filed, indicating that he expects to incur attorney fees for this matter, and again mentions the $6,000 figure.
He also stated in another one of your clips that the next step is intervening in Mr. Harding's lawsuit against the State. His interpretation is that he qualifies as an interested party who should have been notified and included in the proceedings.
So, either Rekieta believes that the effort he's already expended to "defend his privacy" in the criminal case is worth $6,000 and intends to respond accordingly, or he believes that his involvement in this new lawsuit is worth at least $6,000, and he plans to fight and potentially countersue Harding over it.
In summary, Rekieta appears to believe that his current criminal case, combined with the ongoing civil case involving Montagraph, isn't enough. He must also take legal action against the State, Aaron Imholte, and now @Null / Harding.
And some people think Rekieta is a cow without any lols to give, huh...
Nick's Mandatory 80 Hour Community Service Countdown:https://www.calendarr.com/united-states/countdown/1-aug/ 68 days 16 hours 15 mins 16 seconds as of right now. 0/80 hours of community service completed.
It's likely a reference to the money Null raised to pay for the release of the bodycam footage or what was being offered to April for the release - think the number was around 6k for either of those (I'd need to go back and check). It very much seems like a petty "you lost the dare Null, you owe me" kinda jab. Keeping with Nicks propensity for vague faggotry & brainrot, he could very well feel entitled to that money for the trouble he perceives it as having caused him.Okay, I'm only interpreting this based on the clips you shared. But Rekieta mentions this $6,000 amount twice. First, he refers to how the frivolous nature of the lawsuit entitles him to $6,000. Then, in a second instance, he again discusses the "frivolous lawsuit" that has been filed, indicating that he expects to incur attorney fees for this matter, and again mentions the $6,000 figure.
He also stated in another one of your clips that the next step is intervening in Mr. Harding's lawsuit against the State. His interpretation is that he qualifies as an interested party who should have been notified and included in the proceedings.
So, either Rekieta believes that the effort he's already expended to "defend his privacy" in the criminal case is worth $6,000 and intends to respond accordingly, or he believes that his involvement in this new lawsuit is worth at least $6,000, and he plans to fight and potentially countersue Harding over it.
In summary, Rekieta appears to believe that his current criminal case, combined with the ongoing civil case involving Montagraph, isn't enough. He must also take legal action against the State, Aaron Imholte, and now @Null / Harding.
And some people think Rekieta is a cow without any lols to give, huh...
He stated on twitter that he has the whole five years to do it. I don't know if that's true.
How can there be a mistake when frank white the lawyer (never to be confused with frank white king of NY) asked for it to be introduced into evidence himself there is no mistake as the defense intended to use malfeasance on behalf of law enforcement to exonerate the unjustly arrested Nicholas " Martin Luther King Jr" Rekieta. You cannot reverse the motion on record to exclude the evidence because Nick is already a victim of the Minnesota corrupt police (just like George Floyd RIP BIG FLOYD)I believe that acting without allowing someone whose rights were affected to respond would constitute a sufficient denial of due process to guarantee plenary (de novo) review, that is, the appeals court would be forced to try the issue itself since it had never been tried.
I'm not sure if that was cured by allowing a "limited intervention," in SJW's words, on that specific issue. In any event, it's still an issue of law, since the actual facts are fairly cut and dried. The only real factual dispute is whether designated them as public record was a mistake, a rather implausible claim considering the issue had been ruled on by SJW before finding them public record and making them available on a limited basis with absolutely no reference to any so-called "mistake."
Likely just vasodilation. Nitrous oxide (N2O) induces cyclic GMP to relax muscles. It lowers blood pressure in one of its legitimate uses. Basically there’s more blood flowing in his nose. It’s why viagra (inhibits an enzyme that breaks down cGMP) helps you get a boner, more blood flowing there.Nitrous is something you inhale through your mouth right? Or am I misthinking (as a myopic non-junkie) and it can be/is inhaled in the nose?
Or is he just that much of a pathetic junkie that he's inhaling it through his nose even though there's no benefit?
Don't associate people like Nick with people who actually work for a living like used car salesmen or userers.a formerly high functioning sociopath
That doesn't make any sense (so probably it's what he meant). That wasn't a dare, it was an offer.It's more likely a reference to the money Null raised to pay for the release of the bodycam footage or what was being offered to April for the release - think the number was around 6k for either of those (I'd need to go back and check). it very much seems like a "you lost the dare Null, you owe me" me kinda jab.
Nick claimed he had the full five years to do it. Still, it's stupid not to have done it instead of having his fake "job" where he begs for money while huffing nitrous. It would look good when they're deciding whether or not to throw him in jail for 28 more days.Nick's Mandatory 80 Hour Community Service Countdown:
I recall that he was considering showing brief edits, along with screencaps of the LEO touching his daughter's hair to supposedly explain the coke result. (Funny and weird that he hasn't shared those screencaps.)I haven't found the clip yet, but I'm pretty confident that I remember Nick early on saying he wished he could make the bodycam public to prove people wrong. Wouldn't that help the idea that even Nick wanted the video public, in the publichis own interest?
It was also the amount Josh bet with Ralph, right?That doesn't make any sense (so probably it's what he meant). That wasn't a dare, it was an offer.
Nick claimed he had the full five years to do it.