US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Only someone who has never been to China or Israel could say something so stupid.
China cheats (obviously) and I doubt they even claim a full standard deviation. Only one small group of Jews scores significantly higher than average and their average is like 106? I'm pretty sure Israel as a nation is about average.
 
I don't get the struggle snuggle. People are really mad that I am supporting my boy Trump that I voted for in the US POLITICS thread. You can call the take retarded, but I'm supporting my president that I helped put in. Sorry I didn't vote for the 4th wignat Reich.
Because this isn't Jerk Off the President General. And you don't have to support everything a president does even if you voted for him. If you do, you're retarded. Like, giga-nigger, bug chasing tranny retarded.

So how will the re-crowned Prince of Iran magically fix his country?
 
Here is an article on the current status of the Big Beautiful Bill in case anyone is wondering whatever happened with that.

Senate Republicans' changes to 'big beautiful bill' tee up clash with House

Senate Republicans are considering adjustments to the bill that's a cornerstone of President Trump's second-term agenda, with new provisions that could set up a collision course in the House.

The Senate Finance Committee released the highly-anticipated legislative text Monday, which tackles issues like Medicaid and clean energy tax credits.

"This bill prevents an over-$4 trillion tax hike and makes the successful 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent, enabling families and businesses to save and plan for the future," said Chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho., in a statement.

Senate Democrats blasted the proposal, but their criticism is essentially moot, since Republicans are using a budget tool called reconciliation that would enable them to pass the bill along party lines.

Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement that "the biggest winners here are wealthy corporations who would get hundreds of billions of dollars in additional tax breaks."

The Finance Committee plan was unveiled a day before the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released a long-awaited alternate estimate for a version of the bill that passed the House in May. The updated figure, which includes projections for both economic growth and added costs from interest accrued on the nation's debt, estimates the House bill would add roughly $2.8 trillion to the deficit over a decade— more than originally projected.

House GOP leaders narrowly overcame internal divisions to pass that bill with some members concerned about the impact on the debt and deficit. The new score, combined with the Senate changes, could threaten the delicate coalition leaders amassed to pass the bill in the first place.

Both chambers have narrow majorities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune can only lose three GOP senators. Adding to the challenge is Senate Republicans' self-imposed deadline to pass the bill by July 4. If the Senate passes the bill, it will return to the House for a vote.

Rep. Jason Smith, who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, displayed a degree of optimism in a statement Monday night.

He said despite the work that remains to be done, "we will thread that needle to respect the needs of both bodies in the days ahead."

Let's take a look at some of the changes between the House and Senate versions and where some of the potential clashes could surface.

SALT still on the table​

A major point of contention during the House negotiations was state and local tax deductions, referred to as SALT. The 2017 tax cuts capped SALT deductions at $10,000. Blue-state Republicans negotiated a plan to lift the cap to $40,000 for married couples with incomes up to $500,000.

There are no Republicans in the Senate who represent high-tax, primarily Democratic states like California and New York, and various GOP senators vowed the House's SALT efforts would be reined in by the upper chamber.

The Senate's language maintains the current $10,000 cap — but senators have said it's a placeholder figure as negotiations continue. Assigning it a value in the text enables the CBO to begin scoring the Senate bill.

But placeholder or not — this will remain a sticking point for the SALT caucus in the House.

New York Rep. Mike Lawler posted on social media that he will "not accept a penny less" than the negotiated $40,000 cap.

"If the Senate reduces the SALT number, I will vote NO and the bill will fail in the House," he wrote.

Lawler added he's working with the leadership in both chambers and the White House and is "confident the deal as previously negotiated will be in the final bill."

Debt limit​

The Senate version would boost the debt limit by $5 trillion, up from the House's $4 trillion figure. Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul has already said he opposes this.

Congress has to act by late summer to adjust the debt limit, or risk defaulting on the nation's debt.

Taxes​

The Senate text permanently extends the 2017 tax cuts, a major priority for President Trump.

Trump also campaigned on no taxes on tips or overtime.

The House-passed bill listed no stated cap on tips or overtime deductions for those earning less than $160,000 a year.

Meanwhile, the Senate text includes deductions of up to $25,000 for tips on income through 2028, phased out for incomes over $150,000 for an individual and $300,000 for a married couple.

It includes up to a $12,500 deduction on overtime pay for individuals or $25,000 for joint filers through 2028, to be phased out when an individual's gross income exceeds $150,000 or a couple's joint income exceeds $300,000.

It also includes a $10,000 deduction for a qualified passenger vehicle loan, to phase out when the taxpayer's adjusted gross income exceeds $100,000 or $200,00 for a couple.

The Senate version makes various business tax breaks permanent, increases a tax deduction for seniors to $6,000 and lowers the child tax credit. Under the House version, the child tax credit is listed as $2,500 per child; the Senate version is $2,200 per child. Neither version would benefit low earning families with no tax liability.

The Senate version also creates school choice tax credits and establishes savings accounts for newborns.

Green energy rollbacks​

Like the House version, the Senate language significantly rolls back the clean energy credits signed into law by former President Joe Biden. However, it does so with more flexibility.

The Senate proposal includes language friendly to the geothermal, nuclear and hydropower industries. It would phase out incentives for wind and solar in the Inflation Reduction Act at a slower pace than the House version, enabling more projects to access the credits before they finish their work.

The House bill includes a provision requiring projects start construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment to qualify for the credits, something that concerned a group of Senate Republicans. The Senate language gives projects more time to start construction.

The Senate proposal has provisions more friendly for companies on transferability, a concern among businesses who eyed the more restrictive House version. This will allow project sponsors to transfer their credits to a third party.

Texas GOP Rep. Chip Roy has said he won't vote for these Inflation Reduction Act centered provisions.

Medicaid​

The Senate bill would match some elements of the House version by implementing work requirements for the popular joint federal-state health care program for Americans with disabilities, the elderly and low-income people.

The Senate's provision would require "nonpregnant, nondisabled, childless adults, aged 19-64, to complete a minimum of 80 hours" of work, community service or other qualifying activities in order to qualify for Medicaid.

There would be several exemptions, including for veterans with a "disability rated as total," individuals who are medically frail, young people in foster care through the age of 26, among other groups.

The proposal also increases the frequency of eligibility verifications and boosts requirements for eligibility documentation.

"The Republican Senate Finance cuts to Medicaid are deeper and more devastating than even the Republican House's disaster of a bill," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement.

Some Republican senators are also raising concerns about a provision that would incrementally lower provider tax in states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to 3.5% by 2031, down from the current 6%. The cap would be phased in by lowering it 0.5 % annually starting in 2027.

Critics of the provider tax say it's a loophole that drives expenditures — supporters say it's a critical form of funding for hospitals, particularly rural hospitals.

"I'm an optimist — that we're all going to be able to come together and we'll get, you know, some fiscal sanity and we'll also make sure that states like mine that didn't expand Medicaid are not treated unfairly," said Florida Sen. Rick Scott.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who remains on the fence on the bill, said he was taken aback by the changes to provider tax.

He argued it would hurt rural hospitals in his state.

"It just baffles me. I'd invite them to come explain that to the people of Missouri," he said after a Senate Republican meeting over the plan's latest changes.
 
I don't get the struggle snuggle. People are really mad that I am supporting my boy Trump that I voted for in the US POLITICS thread. You can call the take retarded, but I'm supporting my president that I helped put in. Sorry I didn't vote for the 4th wignat Reich.
Not everyone calling you a retard hates Jews they are also calling you a retard because you are excited about America getting into military conflicts and are having fantasies about a regime change that only exists in your fantasies.
 
View attachment 7525298

Also, I saw an article on The Hill about the feds seizing a bunch of crypto assets because of "pig butchering scams." Can someone explain what this is to me? I don't know shit about crypto.
It's a scam where the victim is encouraged to make increasing financial contributions over a long period of time. Somewhat common on social media but especially on dating apps. Catfishing, investment fraud, social engineering and romance scams are used. The "pig butchering" part in the name comes from an analogy comparing the initial phase of gaining the victims' trust to the fattening of pigs before slaughtering them.

They're very profitable and very ruthless. It came from China and lots of the perpetrators are in Southeast Asia. Criminal syndicates are involved and quite a few of them will hold people hostage to make them become scammers.
 
Last edited:
That's not what I said. What I said is that most Ebonics are the result of natural language development. The most recent spree of completely unintelligible gobbledgook in the 21st century is the result of black people being terminally online and using Twitter too much. If that opinion makes you MATI then so be it. Enjoy your slapfight with WelperHelper.
And I'm saying, nigger, is that "unintelligible gobbledgook" goes back decades. Before the 21st century, before being "terminally online".

So I'll ask what I also asked to another Kiwi that's too chickenshit to answer: How old are you and where are you from?
 
If you think that genetics are destiny, then you should defer to Asians and Jews who - on average - score a full standard deviation higher than your average white person.
First off, "Asians" and jews as whole do not have higher-IQ's than Whites. A very specific group of Asians, East Asians, do have higher IQ's on average. In the context of the United States, this is even more evident. But guess what? The East Asians you are seeing in the US are a select group that would have already been selected for having a higher IQ through a number of proxies.

Jews in the West are even MORE selected for. As opposed to Mizrahi and Sephardic jews which have a lower average IQ than Whites, Ashkenazi jews are literally an elite slice that has been selected for through an intensive selection process. Why not make an accurate comparison and say, compare them to the top 5% of Whites in the US?


All of this glosses over the fact that IQ is really just a reflection of racial differences that shows a high degree of causation with differences in life outcomes. The races have multiple differences in behavior, thought processes and potential than even IQ alone would be able to reflect. Just because the mapping of the human genome hasn't caught up to what we have observed for centuries doesn't mean these differences aren't readily apparant and won't be ultimatelty found. So no, as a White person I wouldn't want to "defer" to East Asians whose genetic expression is say countries like China or North Korea when not occupied by the current globohomo West. Even Asian countries friendly to globohomo such as Singapore are still authoritarian ant colonies. Just because one country has a "higher IQ" than the rest doesn't mean I think one should dictate life for the other, particularily those of a differerent race.
 
If you think that genetics are destiny, then you should defer to Asians and Jews who - on average - score a full standard deviation higher than your average white person.
For *East Asians* like Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, it is true that they have a higher average intelligence, but also a much smaller percentage of genius-tier people. Basically the average East Asian is smarter, but as a group they lack the top innovator tier of intelligence.

For Jews, the intelligence claims mainly seem to be based on Ashkenazi Jews, who score very highly on verbal intelligence, which outweighs their average scores in most other categories. Israel's average IQ is lower than that of the U.S., but that is probably because Ashkenazim are outnumbered there by Mizrahim and Sepharidm.
 
Genuine question. If/when Israel asks for US boots on the ground and Trump gives in, will you guys stop supporting Trump, or is getting the US into another Iraq-style quagmire cool when Trump does it?
If no boots on the ground happens, will you wear a burger suit until the end of Trump's term?
 
Like you were right about the 25% increase in food prices due to tariffs?

It's two weeks short of three months, how did that prediction turn out?
I know you're proud of your retardation, but you do remember that the tariffs were paused, right?

If no boots on the ground happens, will you wear a burger suit until the end of Trump's term?
Lol why would I do that? If Kamala had won and she declared war on Iran, I'd have regretted my vote. I actually have convictions that aren't based on the whims of an insane, obese, senile, incontinent conman, though,
 
Here is an article on the current status of the Big Beautiful Bill in case anyone is wondering whatever happened with that.
Dicking around with the house SALT deal is at best petty and at worse the Senate's way of killing the BBB with out actually having to take the heat for killing it. The only way blue state republicans hold their house seats is if they bring home that prize. And if they don't there goes the house.

And capping the OT pay deduction at 12.5k is gay as fuck. The standard deduction for single filer is already 14.6k. So that might as well not even be in there now. And the no tax on tips is also capped and has a quick sunset date.
No tax on Tips and OT was the core populist selling point of the whole thing.
 
Genuine question. If/when Israel asks for US boots on the ground and Trump gives in, will you guys stop supporting Trump, or is getting the US into another Iraq-style quagmire cool when Trump does it?
Genuine question. If/when Isreal asks for US boots on the ground, and Trump tells them to fuck off, will you put on the burger suit, or are you going to go hide and cry like you did on Election night?
 
Back