Dumb Shit on Wikipedia

I had been looking up some history stuff a while ago and ended up on the Japanese Wikipedia page for Mongoloid. I decided to check the English page and I had a small chuckle at how massively different the two pages are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid
The English page is like 90% finding different ways to say "This term is RACIST and DISCREDITED and OBSOLETE and DEBUNKED" over and over again. And there's this little section put in there just to make sure you know Wikipedia's approved view on things.

Current scientific consensus​

See also: Race and genetics

After discussing various criteria used in biology to define subspecies or races, Alan R. Templeton concludes in 2016: "[T]he answer to the question whether races exist in humans is clear and unambiguous: no."

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/モンゴロイド
Then you have the Japanese page which is goes a bit into where the term comes from and debate on whether some races outside Asia should be included, and then otherwise has a wealth of information about the genetic makeup and physical traits of Mongoloids, their migration history and branching racial tree, what kind of environments contributed to the natural selection of Mongoloid traits, and even a section on what races are racial mixes between a Mongoloid race and non-Mongoloid race.

The most it has similar to the English page is this one singular sentence that basically says "By the way, there's some people who opine that the Mongoloid concept is based on outdated racist views by Europeans and modern science doesn't support it." before going into all that information I mentioned.
なお、「モンゴロイド」という概念は、数世紀前のヨーロッパ人による主観的な人種差別に基づく古い分類であり、最新の科学的な根拠に基づいていない分類である、とする見方もある。
 
Because one was RACIST, duh. You know that.
Wait, wouldn’t it be the other way around then? (i.e. the BLM riots being listed as deathless)
I had been looking up some history stuff a while ago and ended up on the Japanese Wikipedia page for Mongoloid. I decided to check the English page and I had a small chuckle at how massively different the two pages are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid
The English page is like 90% finding different ways to say "This term is RACIST and DISCREDITED and OBSOLETE and DEBUNKED" over and over again. And there's this little section put in there just to make sure you know Wikipedia's approved view on things.


https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/モンゴロイド
Then you have the Japanese page which is goes a bit into where the term comes from and debate on whether some races outside Asia should be included, and then otherwise has a wealth of information about the genetic makeup and physical traits of Mongoloids, their migration history and branching racial tree, what kind of environments contributed to the natural selection of Mongoloid traits, and even a section on what races are racial mixes between a Mongoloid race and non-Mongoloid race.

The most it has similar to the English page is this one singular sentence that basically says "By the way, there's some people who opine that the Mongoloid concept is based on outdated racist views by Europeans and modern science doesn't support it." before going into all that information I mentioned.
Devo taught me everything I need to know about Mongoloids.
 
Last edited:
1750367670852.webp

1750367635017.webp

remember this when they say Chris-chan isn't encyclopedic in importance
 
Don't kill an innocent fucking tree for being molested by fags.
I'm not going to because I'm not unfortunate enough to live in the Democratic People's Fascist Republic of Bongistand, and Bong Political Prisoner kiwis shouldn't because, to my understanding, tree law is almost as fast a way to get slapped with hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal debt as it is here in the (comparatively) glorious and free United States of America. Just saying it'll be funny when it happens and we get a bunch of snaggle-toothed homos and troons seething and dilating on Twitter about how it's literally 9/11 for the Bri'ish Sausage Smuggler community.
Edit, but: I can't believe I just now noticed the phrase "Her Own Ejaculate" there. OF COURSE IT'S A FUCKING NASTY ASS TROON
 
Another fun thing I've noticed:
1750398275493.webp
1750398281825.webp


European nationalities used to have a collage of famous members of that ethnicity, but it was removed because it wasn't inclusive to the refugees. Since a Finnish passport makes you a Finn, collage of yt pipo isn't appropriate. But try any non-white ethnicity, no such problem.
 
Edit, but: I can't believe I just now noticed the phrase "Her Own Ejaculate" there. OF COURSE IT'S A FUCKING NASTY ASS TROON
IDK, I think it's just some german/jewish enby pooner (those eyes are pretty womanly, although when they get that fat it's hard to guess correctly)
image-w856-1914142329.webpliz-rosenfeld-ifyouaskme-by-christa-holka-28may17-0130gi-web-formatkey-jpg-default-2434994841.webp
(Yep, woman. Also backrooms way before 4chan/the meme video)
Rosenfeld explicitly details their first cruising encounters in the backrooms of gay bars as (at the time) a visibly female bodied person, a voyeur, and the precarity of trying to pass in these spaces.
What's with pooners wanting to get gay guys to fuck them? Look at the date, it's not recent.
LizRosenfeld-URSAX-by-Christa-Holka-19Apr23-480.webpI+Live+In+A+House+With+A+Door07-995753036.webp
_J2A0007.webp
2fa1725b-736c-4c44-a2a4-80f52dd80b1e.webp
 
Last edited:
Everything about Chris-chan not being encyclopedic is just the neo-vagina dilators of Wikipedia chimping out at the concept that their community includes people who rape their own mom.
Their refusal to have an article for Chris-Chan long predates the motherfucking incident. For example, the Ruckersville article was protected from editing back in 2009 because people kept adding him to the article.

Indeed, even the talk page is full of redacted edits going back to 2009:
You can see from the edit summary that there was a section "Why can't CWC be in current citizens?" which has been purged from the page and its history.
 
Their refusal to have an article for Chris-Chan long predates the motherfucking incident. For example, the Ruckersville article was protected from editing back in 2009 because people kept adding him to the article.

Indeed, even the talk page is full of redacted edits going back to 2009:
You can see from the edit summary that there was a section "Why can't CWC be in current citizens?" which has been purged from the page and its history.
The earlier objections were for Chris lacking notability, which is more understandable.
Holy shit Acroterion is a power-tripping tranny janny.
 
Last edited:
European nationalities used to have a collage of famous members of that ethnicity, but it was removed because it wasn't inclusive to the refugees. Since a Finnish passport makes you a Finn, collage of yt pipo isn't appropriate. But try any non-white ethnicity, no such problem.

Wikipedia ended that practice because it generated endless friction from politispergs and fans of celebrities who were buttblasted that their heroes weren't being honored, especially on the Austrian people page. Not allowing infobox images for the ethnicities that Wikipedos are most likely to sperg about, and limiting all the others to a single illustration or photo, has been a good move.
 
Their refusal to have an article for Chris-Chan long predates the motherfucking incident. For example, the Ruckersville article was protected from editing back in 2009 because people kept adding him to the article.

Indeed, even the talk page is full of redacted edits going back to 2009:
You can see from the edit summary that there was a section "Why can't CWC be in current citizens?" which has been purged from the page and its history.
What would it take for Wikipedia to have a Chris Chan page? Would it take an invite to the White House? Him running for office? Him curing cancer?
 
What would it take for Wikipedia to have a Chris Chan page? Would it take an invite to the White House? Him running for office? Him curing cancer?
I've said it before and I'll say it again - if Chris somehow drunkenly stumbled his way into becoming POTUS (which isn't THAT unrealistic, given how he'd still be more competent and less easily manipulated the literal drooling senile ZOGbot we had in the oval office at this time last year), Wikipedoa's admins would delete the entire fucking site and run away with the pitybux they grift at the top of every page out of spite for the very idea of Chris being "notable".
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again - if Chris somehow drunkenly stumbled his way into becoming POTUS (which isn't THAT unrealistic, given how he'd still be more competent and less easily manipulated the literal drooling senile ZOGbot we had in the oval office at this time last year), Wikipedoa's admins would delete the entire fucking site and run away with the pitybux they grift at the top of every page out of spite for the very idea of Chris being "notable".
I want Chris Chan in the Oval Office now.
 
Back