Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
I can’t wait to find out all the Superberry money was despoisted into a personal instead of a business account because he was too lazy to do it correctly, and that pierces the veil.
He uses the "Rekieta Law" branding and advertises "Rekieta Law" at the beginning of every stream so it would be absurd to think that these streams are run by "Rekieta Media." The use of branding and advertising is also a factor in piercing the veil.
 
He uses the "Rekieta Law" branding and advertises "Rekieta Law" at the beginning of every stream so it would be absurd to think that these streams are run by "Rekieta Media." The use of branding and advertising is also a factor in piercing the veil.
Nick's use of LLCs has been amateurishly stupid at the best of times. As dumb as his "this was never a law channel" blatant lies have been, the lies about his cardboard cut-out "corporations" actually have legal implications he's too stupid to understand.
 
@AnOminous @FuhrerMustang , I do wonder if that's what's making Nick freak out in the last couple days. Randazza "pulling out" would be unmistakably and undeniably interpreted as Rekieta's finances--his homestead-- is off the rails. And what can he do but ... what, attack Randazza? or do what every narcissist hates more than a bullet to head: admit the truth. Shit's broken.

Couldn't happen to a nicer fella.
 
It is technically impermissible in the State of Minnesota for a non-lawyer own a law firm. See MRPC Rule 5.4.

However, it's less clear to me whether Nick's "involuntary restricted" status instantly gets him into trouble there, or whether he'd have to be outright disbarred.
No, he doesn't have to be disbarred. But there are a couple things in play here:

1. Rule 5.4 says a lawyer can't practice in the form of a prof corp or firm in which a non-lawyer owns a fiduciary interest. But he's not authorized to practice, and not really the point of that Rule. However:

2. As involuntarily restricted, per the Board of CLE, he MAY NOT HAVE A FINANCIAL INTEREST IN A LAW FIRM THAT IS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION:
B. Restrictions Imposed. A lawyer on restricted or involuntary restricted status shall be subject to the following provisions and restrictions:

(1) The lawyer may not engage in the practice of law or represent any person or entity in any legal matter or proceedings within the State of Minnesota other than himself or herself, except as provided in Rule 14.

(2) The name of the lawyer may not appear on law firm letterhead without a qualification that the lawyer’s Minnesota license is restricted. A law firm name may continue to include the lawyer’s name if the name was included prior to the lawyer’s placement on restricted or involuntary restricted status. The lawyer may not be listed “of counsel” or otherwise be represented to clients or others as being able to undertake legal business.

(3) The lawyer may not have a financial interest in a law firm that is a professional corporation.
A "professional corporation," aka "professional firm" per MN statute ("firm" replaced "corporation" in the general law, but the scope is the same) can be of any legal corporate structure. That includes LLCs.
Subd. 5.

"Firm" includes a corporation, limited liability company, and limited liability partnership, wherever incorporated, organized, or registered.

Subd. 14.​

"Ownership interest" means:

(1) with respect to a professional firm that is a corporation, except a nonprofit corporation, shares in the corporation;

(2) with respect to a professional firm that is a limited liability company, a membership interest in the limited liability company; and

(3) with respect to a professional firm that is a limited liability partnership, a partnership interest.

Subd. 17.​

"Professional" means a natural person who is licensed by the laws of the state of Minnesota or similar laws of another state to furnish one or more of the categories of professional services listed in subdivision 19. Professional includes a natural person who is licensed or otherwise authorized to practice law under the laws of a foreign nation.

Subd. 18.​

"Professional firm" means both Minnesota professional firms and foreign professional firms.

Subd. 19.​

"Professional services" means services of the type required or permitted to be furnished by a professional under a license, registration, or certificate issued by the state of Minnesota to practice medicine and surgery under sections 147.01 to 147.22, as a physician assistant pursuant to sections 147A.01 to 147A.27, chiropractic under sections 148.01 to 148.105, registered nursing under sections 148.171 to 148.285, optometry under sections 148.52 to 148.62, psychology under sections 148.88 to 148.98, social work under chapter 148E, marriage and family therapy under sections 148B.29 to 148B.39, professional counseling under sections 148B.50 to 148B.593, dentistry and dental hygiene under sections 150A.01 to 150A.12, pharmacy under sections 151.01 to 151.40, podiatric medicine under sections 153.01 to 153.25, veterinary medicine under sections 156.001 to 156.14, architecture, engineering, surveying, landscape architecture, geoscience, and certified interior design under sections 326.02 to 326.15, accountancy under chapter 326A, or law under sections 481.01 to 481.17, or under a license or certificate issued by another state under similar laws. Professional services includes services of the type required to be furnished by a professional pursuant to a license or other authority to practice law under the laws of a foreign nation.
Corporations for law practice must register as "professional firms."

Now, of course the LLC is terminated (2/2023), though Nick still often references "Rekieta Law LLC." Note that admin termination is NOT dissolution, and an admin term LLC can be reinstated. So, Nick is in violation of the Board of CLE rules.

("Rekieta Law," as an Assumed Name, has also expired (2/2021).)

2. A lawyer not authorized to practice may not represent or imply that they are.

Rule 5.5​

(b)​

A lawyer who is not admitted to practice in Minnesota shall not:

(1) except as authorized by these rules or other law, establish an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of Minnesota law; or

(2) hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice Minnesota law.
[1] A lawyer may practice law only in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is authorized to practice.
[4] Other than as authorized by law or this rule, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice generally in this jurisdiction violates paragraph (b)(1) if the lawyer establishes an office or other systematic and continuous presence in this jurisdiction for the practice of law. Presence may be systematic and continuous even if the lawyer is not physically present here. Such a lawyer must not hold out to the public or otherwise represent that the lawyer is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction. See also Rules 7.1 and 7.5(b).
[7] Paragraphs (c) and (d) apply to lawyers who are admitted to practice law in any United States jurisdiction, which includes the District of Columbia, and any state, territory, or commonwealth of the United States. The word "admitted" in paragraph (c)contemplates that the lawyer is authorized to practice in the jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted and excludes a lawyer who while technically admitted is not authorized to practice because, for example, the lawyer is on inactive status.
* yes, the Comment above refers to practice from one jurisdiction vs another. However, it is clear the concept of "admitted" in a jurisdiction subsumes being authorized to practice law in that jurisdiction, and statuses other than active and in good standing are not OK to practice. That's the point.

Yet Nick constantly calls himself a Minnesota Lawyer and owner of a law firm. Both are impermissible per the above, on multiple bases. He even let his own lawyer say exactly this in the "hey, new statute!" motion in the Montagraph case earlier this month:
2.4. Defendants’ Programming

Defendant Rekieta is a Minnesota attorney. Id. at ¶ 3. He practices law under Rekieta Law, LLC. See Rekieta Law, LLC Articles of Organization, attached as Exhibit 32. It is a professional firm, providing Rekieta’s licensed services under Minn. Rev. Stat. § 319B.06, and, per the statute, it provides no other services. See Rekieta Dec. at ¶ 4.
He even provided the articles! For an administratively terminated firm that is I permissibly owned by a lawyer not authorized to practice law, for the practice of law! Haven't looked at the exhibits to that motion, but that looks like KNOWING deception, to a Court, by both of them.
 
Nick's use of LLCs has been amateurishly stupid at the best of times. As dumb as his "this was never a law channel" blatant lies have been, the lies about his cardboard cut-out "corporations" actually have legal implications he's too stupid to understand.
I honestly think Nick just enjoys wasting his money and other people's time. He seems to have an infinite amount of both.
 
Yet Nick constantly calls himself a Minnesota Lawyer and owner of a law firm. Both are impermissible per the above, on multiple bases. He even let his own lawyer say exactly this in the "hey, new statute!" motion in the Montagraph case earlier this month:
Is this why he is sweating the most recent ethical investigation so much?
 
I just want to remind everyone that Aaron somehow romanced Nick and Kayla at the same time.

Aaron claimed he and Kayla were in love. And we have verbal ebidence from xitter that Nick is still in love with Aaron, though that love is now tainted by bitter feelings of abandonment.

How did he do it? Silver tongue and golden dong? I've never had an ex pine for me this badly. Aaron may be kinda dumb and a loser, but being a washed former radio host must confer retard charisma.

Anytime Nick brings up Aaron in any context, I can't help but chortle.
 
He even provided the articles! For an administratively terminated firm that is I permissibly owned by a lawyer not authorized to practice law, for the practice of law! Haven't looked at the exhibits to that motion, but that looks like KNOWING deception, to a Court, by both of them.
My general opinion is most of these rules are the sort of technical rules where paying a fee or doing a thing (like taking CLE) that alleviates the violation is treated nunc pro tunc, that is, as you know, as retroactively remedying the situation.

That said, he's seriously breakdancing back and forth over the line with his continued misrepresentations to the public that he actually is a lawyer at this point, because he isn't. The CLE shit would be relatively minor, but his obvious intention to continue portraying himself as a lawyer (including in legal filings) and, way worse, holding himself out as "practicing law" (literally admitting to a crime), while claiming a dissolved corporation that he isn't legally even allowed to have an ownership in, very well may be in discipline territory.

I do not believe anything Nick does, including constantly huffing nitrous oxide, constitutes "practicing law," but his own lawyer, Marc Randazza, is claiming that this man who is involuntarily prohibited from practicing law by a court order, is in fact actually doing that. Randazza is calling his client a criminal, because practicing law without being authorized to practice law is literally a crime (specifically Minn. Stat. § 481.02).

Maybe Randazza hates him more than we thought.
 
I honestly think Nick just enjoys wasting his money and other people's time. He seems to have an infinite amount of both.

The most evil philosophy I've ever read is: He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.

Nick can wreck so much much shit he can touch, and the systems around him aren't equipped to deal with it. The people around him aren't equipped. So until something or someone definitively steps on him until he fizzles out, he will continue wrecking relationships, systems, processes, norms, etc.

We really need to evolve our systems to deal with the worst cases: People whose dysfunction undermines civilization itself.
 
@AnOminous @FuhrerMustang , I do wonder if that's what's making Nick freak out in the last couple days. Randazza "pulling out" would be unmistakably and undeniably interpreted as Rekieta's finances--his homestead-- is off the rails. And what can he do but ... what, attack Randazza? or do what every narcissist hates more than a bullet to head: admit the truth. Shit's broken.

Couldn't happen to a nicer fella.
If that's what happens we will get a motion to withdraw and a Null sticky for it.
 
Screenshot_20250620-143607.webp
"You forgot to invite me to your event, ha ha! That was totally an accident on your part ha ha, right, Dick? Please acknowledge me, I destroyed my life trying to become you!"
 
I just want to remind everyone that Aaron somehow romanced Nick and Kayla at the same time.

Aaron claimed he and Kayla were in love. And we have verbal ebidence from xitter that Nick is still in love with Aaron, though that love is now tainted by bitter feelings of abandonment.

How did he do it? Silver tongue and golden dong? I've never had an ex pine for me this badly. Aaron may be kinda dumb and a loser, but being a washed former radio host must confer retard charisma.

Anytime Nick brings up Aaron in any context, I can't help but chortle.
I'm not convinced Aaron had a silver anything. Aaron just being an ordinary human guy was more affectionate and more attractive than anything that reptile Nick has ever mustered, and therein was the germ of what led to nudies for Aaron. And I think it's what truly burns Nick beyond the rest of it, that just by Aaron being an ordinary doofus, Kayla's adoration was earned. Something Nick cannot do. And Kayla may have never known it until she felt it with Aaron, being married to a lizard incapable of true affection for her entire adult life.

Nick, you're failure at everything, but perhaps worst, a failure as a lover to the one who took an oath to you. SUFFAH
 
I just realised it would be really easy to set up a bunch of twitter bots whose sole purpose is to waste Rugieta's time. Because he just responds to the dumbest shit.
You'd be surprised how easy it is to get fireworks going on twitter by merely pasting tweets onto your chatbot of choice, asking it to refute the statements in it and then pasting it back as a reply.

Now imagine that but on the other end you have a vulnerable narc melting down.
 
Back