- Joined
- Jan 12, 2023
As usual, women committing a fraction of the offense are guilty of twice the crime.View attachment 7533626
this is regarding Neil Gaiman btw.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As usual, women committing a fraction of the offense are guilty of twice the crime.View attachment 7533626
this is regarding Neil Gaiman btw.
Good. Rape is awesome now, since it's just words. Let's just rape everyone all the time! RAPE RULES! Because it's just words anyway! Thanks KNEEL GAY MAN!Dear god, we've gone from "words are violence" to now "words are rape." I should have seen it coming.
Good. Rape is awesome now, since it's just words. Let's just rape everyone all the time! RAPE RULES! Because it's just words anyway! Thanks KNEEL GAY MAN!
Despite being only 1.3% of rapists, women commit 52% of trans genocideAs usual, women committing a fraction of the offense are guilty of twice the crime.
Oops, that'd be the magic vagina powers. Sorry, I forgot and left mine on again.Despite being only 1.3% of rapists, women commit 52% of trans genocide
You'd think he's old and established enough that he doesn't need to worry about work opportunities. Other (less popular) writers or actors have spoken in support of Rowling and still get work. Maybe he just is that spineless and desperate to be liked, but I also can believe that there are some scandals lurking about.
"A bit of Fry and Laurie" was funny - he co-wrote that, but it was ages ago.
"Jeeves & Wooster" was fine. Same with QI.
They can't accuse Rowling of actually having raped someone so they say that she has committed verbal rape. Though to be fair, maybe troons actually think that the feeling of dread and humiliation they get after being insulted by Rowling on Twitter feels just as bad as actually being raped by Neil Gayman. After all, misgendering can be violence but actual violence that trannies commit against women is just fine.View attachment 7533626
this is regarding Neil Gaiman btw.
He was good in the various Blackadder series too."A bit of Fry and Laurie" was funny - he co-wrote that, but it was ages ago.
"Jeeves & Wooster" was fine. Same with QI.
Now, he sort of pops up, from time to time, and lends his "national treasure" character to things that are currently popular, or fashionable.
He needs to play the tranny game, if he wants to keep getting those gigs. Definitely spineless, and desperate to be liked - as you said.
He wrote a couple of books as well, most recently retellings of Greek myths or something (didn't read them) and he narrates audiobooks."A bit of Fry and Laurie" was funny - he co-wrote that, but it was ages ago.
"Jeeves & Wooster" was fine. Same with QI.
Now, he sort of pops up, from time to time, and lends his "national treasure" character to things that are currently popular, or fashionable.
He needs to play the tranny game, if he wants to keep getting those gigs. Definitely spineless, and desperate to be liked - as you said.
Its pretty sad, because he read the audiobooks, he and JKR actually had a working relationship, and given the way he is and she is, probably had some good rapport. No doubt he is still cashing those audiobook royalty cheques. I enjoy him too much for anything to really dampen my consumption of his work, but its a pity because there are a lot of roles in the show he could fit well, though in my mind he is forever 40, so he has probably aged out of most of the best roles for him (Cornelius Fudge, Nearly Headless Nick, perhaps dumbledores brother is an option?). In the coming 7 years much could change in the cultural landscape and he could still be one of the later characters in the series."A bit of Fry and Laurie" was funny - he co-wrote that, but it was ages ago.
"Jeeves & Wooster" was fine. Same with QI.
Now, he sort of pops up, from time to time, and lends his "national treasure" character to things that are currently popular, or fashionable.
He needs to play the tranny game, if he wants to keep getting those gigs. Definitely spineless, and desperate to be liked - as you said.
Can you give examples of when he has outed himself as you say? It wouldn’t surprise me either, especially as it seems every week another person working at the BBC is guilty of something, but without proof it comes across as gay bashing. I’ve seen GCs point to his husband being 28 as evidence, like what?? If he is hiding something and it’s ever revealed, people would be angry about it - look at Hugh Edwards.Of course, you're all skipping over what an obvious pederast he is and how he's outed himself many times through his plays, books and tv appearances. Can't stand the pompous twat. He is truly the meme of the "what an idiot thinks a smart person is" I wonder if there will be a Savile style reveal when he finally croaks or if it'll get swept under the rug due to him being a gay jew and his victims being all boys.
Alright Stephen your sock account is fooling no one.Can you give examples of when he has outed himself as you say? It wouldn’t surprise me either, especially as it seems every week another person working at the BBC is guilty of something, but without proof it comes across as gay bashing. I’ve seen GCs point to his husband being 28 as evidence, like what?? If he is hiding something and it’s ever revealed, people would be angry about it - look at Hugh Edwards.
Don't be silly, in these farms we believe that women can say pretty much whatever the fuck they want. And national treasure sir Fry finds that to be deeply problematic. I dare say, the ladies here have been radicalized and are a lost cause to us.Alright Stephen your sock account is fooling no one.
Well, if his writing counts, we can start here:Can you give examples of when he has outed himself as you say? It wouldn’t surprise me either, especially as it seems every week another person working at the BBC is guilty of something, but without proof it comes across as gay bashing. I’ve seen GCs point to his husband being 28 as evidence, like what?? If he is hiding something and it’s ever revealed, people would be angry about it - look at Hugh Edwards.
He squealed like a hit dog over Operation Yewtree and he's constantly ranting about how men who complain about sex abuse are self pitying fantasists. Do the math.Can you give examples of when he has outed himself as you say? It wouldn’t surprise me either, especially as it seems every week another person working at the BBC is guilty of something, but without proof it comes across as gay bashing. I’ve seen GCs point to his husband being 28 as evidence, like what?? If he is hiding something and it’s ever revealed, people would be angry about it - look at Hugh Edwards.
Believe it or not I didn't know about any of that. I didn't know a lot of things about him, actually. Including his work, his much younger partner, his words about women, his political views and other things. I fell for that image of "national treasure", his excellent voice acting (imo) and that gentleman British thing I guess. Ugh. Not much of a fan anymore, let's say.Of course, you're all skipping over what an obvious pederast he is and how he's outed himself many times through his plays, books and tv appearances. Can't stand the pompous twat. He is truly the meme of the "what an idiot thinks a smart person is" I wonder if there will be a Savile style reveal when he finally croaks or if it'll get swept under the rug due to him being a gay jew and his victims being all boys.
"Cultural rapist". Wow. That's a first for me.View attachment 7533626
this is regarding Neil Gaiman btw.
WTF? Now I hate this evil fucker!ranting about how men who complain about sex abuse are self pitying fantasists.