Men, Where Have You Gone? Please Come Back. - Female pornographer laments men staying at home, playing vidya and wanking.

Troy and I were having dinner at Mama Delia, one of the quieter spots. The sidewalk patio held five tables: three two-tops, including ours, and a pair pulled together for a group of eight women. At those tables, Troy was the only man.
The scene was beautiful — low lights, shared plates, shoulders angled in. The kind of evening people wait for all winter. Still, I found myself watching the crowd as it moved past us: women walking in pairs or alone, dressed with care. At table after table at the nearby restaurants, there was a noticeable absence of men — at least of men seated in what looked like dates.
Troy and I have known each other for almost 20 years. We met at Playboy, of all places, back when we were both learning how desire gets packaged, sold and sometimes misunderstood. We stayed close friends, bonded not just by our opinions, but by the effort it takes to stay in someone’s life.
That night, we made the effort. Still, what I saw unfolding around us felt like something else entirely: a collective shift I couldn’t unsee.
It started to become clear the previous April, when a man who had been pursuing me canceled a dinner at the last minute. There was a scheduling mix-up with his son’s game. I understood. I’m a hockey mom; I get it. Still, I went. I wore what I would have worn anyway. I took the table. I ordered well. And I watched the room.

Only two tables nearby seemed to hold actual dates. The rest were groups of women, or women alone, each one occupying her space with quiet confidence. No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing.
That night marked something. Not a heartbreak, but an unveiling. A sense that what I’d been experiencing wasn’t just personal misalignment. It was something broader. Cultural. A slow vanishing of presence.

About grieving what’s not meeting us. And about refusing to dress it up as personal failure when it’s actually a collective reality.
So here’s what I’ll say: You are missed. Not just by me, but by the world you once helped shape.
We remember you. The version of you that lingered at the table. That laughed from the chest. That asked questions and waited for the answers. That touched without taking. That listened — really listened — when a woman spoke.
You are not gone, but your presence is thinning. In restaurants, in friendships, in the slow rituals of romantic emergence.
You’ve retreated — not into malice, but into something softer and harder all at once: Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair.
Maybe no one taught you how to stay. Maybe you tried once, and it hurt. Maybe the world told you your role was to provide, to perform, to protect — and never to feel.

But here’s what’s real: We never needed you to be perfect. We needed you to be with us. Not above. Not muted. Not masked. Just with.
And you can still come back. Not by becoming someone else, but by remembering what connection feels like when it’s honest and slow. When it’s earned and messy and sacred.
We’re still here, those of us who are willing to cocreate something true. We are not impossible to please. We’re not asking for performances.
We are asking for presence. For courage. For breath and eye contact and the ability to say, “I’m here. I don’t know how to do this perfectly, but I want to try.”

Come back. Not with flowers or fireworks, but with willingness. With your whole, beautiful, imperfect heart.
We’re still here. And we haven’t stopped hoping.
As for me, I’ll keep showing up. Not because I’m waiting. Because I know what it feels like when someone finally arrives.

Oops, forgot my heckin Archive.
 
I recently experienced a flicker of possibility. With James. We met on Raya, the dating app.
1750512781308.webp

Is this woman fucking retarded?
 
These articles are always the same: thot rides the carousel until the bitter end and when the rides end, there’s nobody there, let alone a man with the dark triad and three sixes, to put a ring on it and now they have the sads as a result. There’s never a real solution because these same women kept riding the carousel hoping they’d find Mr. Big, Christian Grey, or whatever cliche they diddle their twats to.

The average man doesn’t ask for much: someone who is nice sometimes, won’t cheat on them, and will occasionally suck his dick or make him a sandwich. Cohencidentally (since the author is a Jewess) millennial girls were the first generation to reject all that and make that part of their identity. My sympathy for (((Rachel Drucker))) is at zero. I’m sure there was a nice Jewish boy who is an accountant who would’ve treated her well while she was getting shtupped by a different man every few weeks. Must suck to suck!

I don't think society is ready for the insanity that is going to happen when a majority of millennial women reach 40+ and are no longer desirable by men.

Our social and political landscape is going to be a hellish shitshow.
The oldest cohort of millennials are now 44.
 
OP only posted half of the article…

Here’s the rest:

I spent over a decade behind the curtain of digital desire. As the custodian of records for Playboy and its affiliated hardcore properties, including sites like Spice TV, I was responsible for some of the most infringed-upon adult content in the world. I worked closely with copyright attorneys and marketing teams to understand exactly what it took to get a man to pay for content he could easily find for free.
We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless.
In that world, there’s no need for conversation. No effort. No curiosity. No reciprocity. No one’s feelings to consider, no vulnerability to navigate. Just a closed loop of consumption.
What struck me most wasn’t the extremity of the content; it was the emotional vacancy behind it. The drift. The way many men had quietly withdrawn from intimacy and vulnerability. Not with violence or resistance, but with indifference.
They weren’t sitting across from someone on a Saturday night, trying to connect. They were scrolling. Dabbling. Disappearing behind firewalls, filters and curated personas. And while they disappeared, women continued to gather. To tend. To notice who wasn’t arriving — and to show up anyway.

I’m 54. I’ve been dating since the mid-80s, been married, been a mother, gotten divorced, had many relationships long and short. I remember when part of heterosexual male culture involved showing up with a woman to signal something — status, success, desirability. Women were once signifiers of value, even to other men. It wasn’t always healthy, but it meant that men had to show up and put in some effort.
That dynamic has quietly collapsed. We have moved into an era where many men no longer seek women to impress other men or to connect across difference. They perform elsewhere. Alone. They’ve filtered us out.
I recently experienced a flicker of possibility. With James. We met on Raya, the dating app. There was something mutual from the start — wordplay, emotional precision, a tone that felt attuned. It was brief, but it caught light. I remember saying to him, “Even fleeting connections matter, when they’re mutual and lit from the inside.” I meant it.
There was just enough spark to wonder what might unfold. Enough curiosity to imagine a doorway. But he didn’t step through it. Not with a plan. Not with presence. He hovered — flirting, retreating, offering warmth but no direction.
Sexual tension and a spark aren’t reason enough to sit still and hope there’s substance behind the shimmer. So I named what I felt. I texted him clearly, with care, not simply to declare attraction but to extend a real invitation to explore what was possible. I didn’t chase. I invited, leaving the door open. If he ever wanted to cross the threshold — not just to take, but to meet — I was willing. I wanted. I still do.
He never replied. He still follows my Instagram stories — one of those small gestures of passive engagement that so many of us now mistake for closeness. It looks like interest. It feels like silence.

There are thousands of Jameses. I have known dozens. The arc varies, but the undertow is familiar.
What I won’t entertain is directionless orbiting. That thing so many men now seem to mistake for connection: the perpetual maybe. The emoji check-ins. The casual “seeing where it goes” without ever going anywhere. We call it a situationship. But mostly, it’s avoidance. An abdication of ownership — of feeling, of behavior, of sex that isn’t a means to an end, but is communion.
There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever.
This idea that vulnerability is a threat instead of an invitation has created a culture of hesitation, of men circling intimacy but never entering it. And the result is thousands of tiny silos. Everyone performing closeness, but no one making a move that binds. Isolation. Loneliness. A hunger for contact that has nowhere to land.
Maybe we’re between paradigms, mourning what’s fallen, not yet fluent in what comes next. The infrastructures of intimacy — slowness, curiosity, accountability — have been eroded by haste, convenience and a kind of sanctioned emotional retreat.



As for my commentary: yet another flowery article written by a used up hussy lamenting the fact that a sizable portion of young men have determined that the women available to them are not worth any effort and removed attention.
 
Last edited:
I don't think society is ready for the insanity that is going to happen when a majority of millennial women reach 40+ and are no longer desirable by men.
One of the primary complaints women seem to have in regards to men on social media is them dating women younger than them, particularly if they broke up with or divorced the man and then he starts dating someone younger than them.

I wonder if women will successfully advocate for and institute an relationship age-gap law, so people cant be more than 5 years age difference from their partner. I think this is how society is likely to adjust to having a large number of women in their late 30s/40s/50s who are single.
 
One of the primary complaints women seem to have in regards to men on social media is them dating women younger than them, particularly if they broke up with or divorced the man and then he starts dating someone younger than them.

I wonder if women will successfully advocate for and institute an relationship age-gap law, so people cant be more than 5 years age difference from their partner. I think this is how society is likely to adjust to having a large number of women in their late 30s/40s/50s who are single.
Probably. They have an informal rule already that you're not supposed to fuck anyone younger than half your age plus seven. I could easily see some vagshit politician codifying that.
 
There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever.
“I’m an indiscriminate slut who was just out for dick then breakfast then dick again before he vanished like mist in June, never to be seen again. And after twenty years of this I am ready to settle down… but there are no good men who will stay for longer than a night.”
 
He never replied. He still follows my Instagram stories — one of those small gestures of passive engagement that so many of us now mistake for closeness. It looks like interest. It feels like silence
It doesn't feel like silence, it is silence. A man you never met but spoke to briefly on a dating app is mindlessly viewing autoplaying Instagram stories, and the algorithm shows you yours. I honestly think Instagram should include the option to disable viewer information because there's so many people who seem to think "they watched my Instagram story despite repeatedly demonstrating they have no interest in me" means something.
 
I wonder if women will successfully advocate for and institute an relationship age-gap law, so people cant be more than 5 years age difference from their partner. I think this is how society is likely to adjust to having a large number of women in their late 30s/40s/50s who are single.
Even something as draconian as this would do nothing to change the rapidly growing cohort of men who've just checked out entirely. I'm not sure there's any practical way for the law to force a person to engage with the opposite sex.
 
It's a cringe article, but I kind of like it. Men and women do need each other. Don't fall for the gender war bullshit. It's nice to see a woman just saying nice things and desiring a male presence.
Well the thing is that this article is a form of bait. While you're correct that men and women do need each other, don't be fooled by the author's prose, she was only ever in it for male attention and validation, which she can no longer procure in sufficient quantities. As a result, she writes an article to bait men into paying attention to her again. Woe to the man who falls into this trap.

I wonder if women will successfully advocate for and institute an relationship age-gap law, so people cant be more than 5 years age difference from their partner. I think this is how society is likely to adjust to having a large number of women in their late 30s/40s/50s who are single.
Doing so will only make the problem worse because it highlights how the sort of women who have this problem tend to treat men as an exploitable resource to be squeezed dry rather than a beloved companion.
*Taps sign:*
Men are easy, just be nice to them. Note: Many women fail this simple task.

I've been on first dates with the 20-something year old version of the sort of woman who writes this article, needless to say my conclusion was "I would rather die alone than spend another 5 minutes with you". (I even said that one time, the resulting tantrum would have made brilliant television.) They're a dime a dozen on the internet, which is why its a bad place to search for your future spouse - don't go fishing in the sewer.
 
Last edited:
Why do I get a parallel to the days after 911 where you would have mud slimes doing bombings, and liberals would just not get it. You would show them videos of people in the middle east stating plainly who they are and why they are angry and the libs would be like, "It's a mystery."
Men have been telling women for decades the filth women and their jew-masters have been doing to them has collapsed society and they are still like, "Well it can't be women's fault."
These articles are so insulting and lame I kinda want to tell her men have an organization she can check into concerning men's displeasure with the sexual marketplace. It's called lemonparty.org.
 
It's a cringe article, but I kind of like it. Men and women do need each other. Don't fall for the gender war bullshit. It's nice to see a woman just saying nice things and desiring a male presence.
It's not the Gender War is bullshit. It's that American modern women have become vapid and insufferable. Women were all taught to compete for the best man possible and now that the internet opened endless possibilities for that to happen, they no longer have to settle for the "average" guy. As a result, the average guy has become invisible to them.

The inverse of this also happened. Guys no longer have to settle for mediocre, bitchy women with baggage. If you're a nagging, demanding, high maintenance woman, there's a million other women out there that aren't those things and half of them are just as pretty as you or prettier. I don't have to settle for the fucking shrew in my small town that's a single mom just because she's available. I can meet someone else three towns over, maybe an hour or two away, coordinate a move in together if things work. The Small Town Shrew can die in a fire for all I care. Just like the average guy became invisible to young beautiful women, the old baggage ridden woman has become invisible to men.

There's no difference between the 35+ year old single women screeching about Where Are All The Good Men and the "incels" you mock complaining about women. They're the same fucking people who have the same problem. The sexual marketplace and dating has changed and people who once had at least some opportunities, now have none. The only difference is men adapted to this environment by either accepting their powerlessness or changing themselves to have power. Women who do the same have become labeled as "Pick Me" Girls and get bullied into submission by other women. Why? Because the idea of a woman who is pleasant to be around is an existential threat to powerless women. They can't and won't change because change is invalidating and admitting they were wrong and the modern feminist woman is incapable of that kind of ego death.

It is not easy for 35+ year old women to accept they have squandered their youth and ruined their lives as a result. Some do, and to them I hope the best. You should expect a lot more of these articles in the future though. This ride isn't stopping.
 
There’s an elephant in the room here that has nothing to do with gender, and that’s the millennial aspect.

Millennials, male and female, struggle to communicate, are quick to take offense, slow to accept blame, and have statistically abysmal rates of parents who demonstrated what the nuts and bolts of successful LTRs actually looked like. I think Zoomers and Gen X seem to be a lot more realistic in their expectations and their own self assessments.

Tons of my friends are unmarriageable for reasons that have nothing to do with cock carousels, anime, or any of these other terminally-online bugaboos. They’re just intractable people. If you’re a millennial who recognizes this about yourself and you can fix it, you’re 10000% ahead of the rest of the generation.
 
Tons of my friends are unmarriageable for reasons that have nothing to do with cock carousels, anime, or any of these other terminally-online bugaboos. They’re just intractable people.
Trust me, I know. I've seen how Millenials are. I had to explain to a 28 year old woman that waiting until she is 40 to have children is stupid. She wouldn't accept it and refused to because that meant she already pissed away half her time. She was unironically convinced that she would be popping out kids at 45 just fine and that she would have no trouble finding her Christian Grey. She was also 220lbs and unattractive as a 28 year old. I really don't understand where she got off.
 
I don't think society is ready for the insanity that is going to happen when a majority of millennial women reach 40+ and are no longer desirable by men.

Our social and political landscape is going to be a hellish shitshow.
Wait til AI girlfriends and AI gene regenerative womb with ability to take your sperm DNA and spit out an offspring.

Women essentially becomes worthless.
 
Wait til AI girlfriends and AI gene regenerative womb with ability to take your sperm DNA and spit out an offspring.

Women essentially becomes worthless.
I've been saying it for years. Women will not accept AI men. They aren't like men. What women want is very difficult for AI to understand. They have emotional intuition that men do not. They will never accept AI boyfriends in the long run. AI is not capable of defying it's user in the way women want to be defied. They're just not compatible.
 
I've been saying it for years. Women will not accept AI men. They aren't like men. What women want is very difficult for AI to understand. They have emotional intuition that men do not. They will never accept AI boyfriends in the long run. AI is not capable of defying it's user in the way women want to be defied. They're just not compatible.
Women want subservient slave. Emotionally, physically and financially. There is no sugarcoating it. They will do anything to create a safe space that denies reality.
 
Doing so will only make the problem worse because it highlights how the sort of women who have this problem tend to treat men as an exploitable resource to be squeezed dry rather than a beloved companion.
Agreed, I do not think it would fix the problem or that it's a good idea, but it is something I could see happening.

I wouldn't be surprised to see people pushing for that to be law within the next few years. I think it might even pass, women are pretty good at collectively shaming men for finding younger women appealing and no one wants to be seen as a creep. "Date someone your own age" would be a difficult statement to argue against.
 
Women want subservient slave. Emotionally, physically and financially. There is no sugarcoating it.
If this were true, the romance novel section of Walmart wouldn’t be chock full of six zillion variations of “I Was the [Dark Triad]’s First Choice.”

Assholes do treat their partners in relationships like this. If that partner was you, God bless.
 
If this were true, the romance novel section of Walmart wouldn’t be chock full of six zillion variations of “I Was the [Dark Triad]’s First Choice.”

Assholes do treat their partners in relationships like this. If that partner was you, God bless.
This is a silly perspective. Women want dominating and powerful men. That's why they go after the top 10% despite being the low 80% themselves in the free market of sexuality.

The concept of owning or possessing a powerful men is the ultimate fantasy for women. Ultimately, they want a total control for safety yet they also want someone who will dominate them to prove their worth.

Hence the female hypocrisy.
 
Back