- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Wrong, it totally does. How he got the picture is directly relevant to whether or not there was an expectation of privacy.It doesnt matter how he got the picture. The crime is sharing the picture.
Well, duh, that's kind of part of pleading guilty, whatever his motives for it.He sent it to Geno live on stream lol. Aaron isn't even denying he did the crime
She still not only willingly posed for it (that would not make it legal if it were under circumstances that gave rise to an expectation of privacy), she literally posed for it in the same room as he was streaming to the entire Internet from at the same time. Where is the expectation of privacy? A fucking cat could have knocked over the webcam and exposed it to the world.
If I had to guess, the alleged violation is probably one of these. He has repeatedly subtly (and not so subtly) referred to Kayla indirectly. He got a violation on his other ex for doing exactly the same kind of shit and apparently didn't learn the lesson.Multiple instances of Aaron appearing to violate his conditions have been and are being discussed.
Courts have seen every kind of "clever" way of continuing to bother an ex with a restraining order imaginable and are more or less sick of every single one of them. Idiots do these things thinking they're pulling some one weird trick that lets you get away with it. They're always wrong.
Best case is it's over the @Third World Aristocrat video where he immediately turned it off when he recognized what was in it, because that was clearly inadvertent.
Last edited: