US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, yeah, everyone I know to get information from is saying we're certainly staging troops. What comes of that? It's not perfectly clear, could be a contingency, but also could be preparing for an actual invasion
kiwi farmers thought I was joking about my nintendo marine uncle
 
  • Like
Reactions: Puff and AnaV
Newsom vs. Vance does seem like the clear 2028 contest right now. Of course, Newsom has no qualities besides his appearance, but we're in a two-party country with fake elections, so solid 50% chance he's President in 2029.
Tbf: It was always going to be Newsom vs Vance.

Especially when Newsom suddenly started compromising on trannies.

Vance is fucked now, because the only way he’ll get to keep the MAGA coalition together, would be to go out and admit that: “Yeah, Trump did some dumb things I disagreed with, but I’m a team player”.

Ironically he’ll be in the same position as Kamala when she ran.
 
No you fucking didn't, retard.


He literally called for regime change. It's a forever war now.
I can't believe that Trump was elected again with such logical, even-keeled voters on Team Right Side of History. Definitely not coming across as a pathetic handful of status quo histrionic faggots.
 
I genuinely can't tell if you're drunk or ESL
That's cute. Won't make me stop calling you a retarded nigger for saying that there'd be boot on the ground then posting a video refuting yourself.
Maybe you'll learn from this, or better yet you'll die of cancer.

Edit.: cancer is a bit rough. Replace with testicular torsion.
 
the problem with arguing against leftist shitheads is that the goalpost constantly moves which makes it a complete waste of time. hypothetically if war doesn't break out in a week the cope posters wouldnt admit they were wrong, they would just come up with another cope reply

kys nigger.
Bombing a country is an act of war. Or do you think Pearl Harbor was a happy little accident because it took a little time to put boots on the ground?
 
Spoiler: It's been a war zone for quite some time. Someone I know in the PNW admitted to me they purposely avoid the downtown city areas as much as possible because they're way too unsafe for the average person trying to mind their own business.
Highlighting for emphasis to model speech is a bad practice because it draws the eye to much. If you want someone to be able to find an important phrase or link or whatever in a paragraph just by quickly scanning over it, that's where it's good. Only do it for something that can stand and have meaning and importance on its own though. For what you're doing, you should just use bold or italics; there's no reason for my eye to be drawn to the word "been" without the context of your full statement.
 
that fits your definition of war
Jesus you are seeping my lifeforce with these cope replies.

We are not at war with the Yemeni government or the Houthis although we are hostile. That difference is that we aren't seeking to topple the Yemeni government. Our VP didn't go on NBC and say that we will regularly check the Houthis at the knees "for years to come". But both of those things were said TODAY by the President and VP, right after we bombed Iran. Do I have to explain everything to magatards like you're fucking 5? Lord of mercy.
 
There was also no war after Trump bombed Syria in 2017 for use of sarin gas. Heck, Obama was bombing Syria for a lot of his second term and it didn’t cause direct conflict with Syria. I could be wrong this time, but I’m going to need more confirmation than just fear mongering journos jumping to conclusions.
Those countries we're listing off that are regional threats to Israel literally cannot attack us in the United States. They're simply not threats to us. idk what a war with Iran will look like, maybe it's just we bomb them for the next decade or we send in troops in an actual invasion. But it won't mean Iran flying their jets over America. But sorry if I am misunderstanding what you mean by "direct conflict".
 
“Just make your own internet”
I found a PAC semi-resembling what I had in mind but it's depressing.
1750627586901.webp
Less than 3k donated.
1750627770304.webp
Close to 800k on fundraising. They spent more on getting people to donate to their PAC via calls and mail than they actually spent on the cause. They disappear after 2010.

There's a bunch of single-candidate PACs (like "Never Back Down" being a PAC for DeSantis) but there's nothing like AIPAC around. Never Back Down is one of the highest value PACs 2023-2024, which indicates a lot of Republicans are out there who'll throw money at a cause/individual they can behind, so where is it? Are Zionists the only people who are allowed to have a PAC that dictates policy so broadly and bipartisan?
You realize none of this shit matters now right? The right is completely and utterly fractured and all of this shit will be undone in the next administration.
I remember believing Sweden was utterly fucked forever. But then they started deporting people on mass and have actually starting un-cucking themselves. I was once utterly blackpilled on the state of my country, but then Southport happened, which was something I once thought possible because I was told by people online it was. I actually read every little thing I can nowadays about certain stuff and shit's never as bleak as you believe it to be. There are some people out there who profit from your investment/hysteria about shit, because so long as you're invested, you'll keep coming back for more.

Basically, as deep into "it's so over" as you are, there's always a possibility of coming back, usually because things aren't as bad as you believe them to be at a minimum. I think a lot of people don't realise how short of a span of time we actually reside in. Immediate gratification doesn't happen all that often in terms of politics. That goes for the other side to, which is why you shouldn't let your guard down. This is just based on the views of a britbong so it might not matter at all, but still.
 
That's cute. Won't make me stop calling you a retarded nigger for saying that there'd be boot on the ground then posting a video refuting yourself.
Maybe you'll learn from this, or better yet you'll die of cancer.

Will there be another "Special Military Operation" of any kind by the US in Iran anytime in the next 30 days?

Cast your votes, please, Kiwis.

Agree for yes, disagree for no.

edit: I think sperg outs for war are overblown but I'll say yes, we attack Iran again sometime in the next month.
 
there admittedly isnt a boots on ground war with iran right now, the question is why even do something to put the hypothetical out in the open? how does that translate to "putting america first", which was a huge part of trumps campaign? why is it so painful for some of you to admit trump is another jew puppet dog like the rest of them?
 
It's not a matter of Israel being unable to handle Iran. It's the fact that Israel doesn't have bunker busters or the B-2s to deliver them and B-2s are not something we're willing to give to foreign countries which means we have to deliver them ourselves
It's also because the IDF are a bunch of selfish cowards who never undertake any action if there is any risk of their soldiers getting hurt.

They want to invade Iran but they don't want any casualties. They don't care about American casualties since Jews don't enlist in the American military (and the few who do are rarely in combat arms). If Trump just told them no, there would be peace in a few weeks once they realize that they can't get someone else to do the dirty work for them.
 
No niggerfaggot, answer the fucking question. Are we at war with Yemen and the Houthi? We bombed them for 50 days, that fits your definition of war, does it not? So are we at war with them? Were we at war with them?
Look at this faggot try to cope about it TOTALLY wasn’t a war, despite the fact that a literal ceasefire was agreed with them.

Please name another instance where ceasefires are used besides… War.
 
Back