"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

[ASeabear8952]

Unless Jim himself has defended loli or has been known to defend it I think the whole argument's a load of shit, and it's as I said earlier: People trying to find that "gotcha" moment, that one soundbite that they can play over and over to taunt the Jim orbiters with forever. What Kirsche says or does is irrelevant, you can't say people are guilty by association or half the internet would be a guilty party to this kinda shit. And if the best admission you can get outta him is a sarcastic remark I think you oughta get checked for autism, not understanding sarcasm is one of the many traits associated with autists.

Exactly, he was clearly being sarcastic but I do think it was very poor sarcasm. And it will absolutely be Jim's "gotcha" until the end of time unfortunately.

 

[Butwhythough2]

Until I hear Jim genuinely say "I love lolis" or any similar sentiment, I'm gonna say innocent. Yeah optically, it's a bad idea to pander to anime gooners or associate with those who do, but guilty by association is retarded.

 

[Buzz Killington]

It's not about being naive, it's about tolerance and principles. Sorry if I didn't find the "people who watch vtubers are basically pedophiles" joke particularly funny. As a professional Jim watcher for like 10 years at this point (I watched his original gamergate video when it was released on IA), I do not rank it among the best of his biting satirical comedy. His standards have slipped. This is natural as you age, but commenting about how normalized anime pedophilia has become without any sort of castigation whatsoever, is not exactly what I envisioned for Jim in 2025.

Because he's not making the joke for your approval, or anyone else's for that matter. A joke like that comes natural, it's not concocted and manufactured, especially live on stream. It's something you do in casual conversation (note I'm not specifically saying you joke about pedophilia in casual conversation, I'm speaking broadly about jokes in general). It's also not "normalizing" it either, it's the reality of it. Would you rather he pretended that nobody who watches anime is a pedophile? Of course not, that'd be even worse. I'm just saying that if we held everyone to account for sarcastic comments, then we might as well be the people that the mainstream media describes us as, being internet terrorists, white supremacists, etc.

 

[Artaius]

Here I'll post it again for the intentionally obtuse:
View attachment 7544288

Bit of a reach. So let me get this straight:

Metokur can't say anything tongue-in-cheek about the lolicons that inhabit these Vtuber spaces? The blood gods above who watch and judge cannot condone Jimbo joking about exploiting the overpriced sugar water racket with his own large breasted loli OC named "Jimithea" is that right?

And to even make this joke at all is paramount if not worse than anything Ralph has ever done?

 

[Dick Lickieta]

I mean at least during that stream, I appreciated that he was going all in on calling mersh a complete and total faggot. That's why I subscribed to him.

The only reason it sticks out for me as the worst is I remember there was a lot of other funny shit going on at the time and instead of covering that he decided to divulge his medical records to own a literal who, which was largely pointless as it did nothing to quell the cry of "yurrr faking your canceraids Medicare bish" from his detractors.

 

[Ghost of Guntmas Past]

Until I hear Jim genuinely say "I love lolis" or any similar sentiment, I'm gonna say innocent. Yeah optically, it's a bad idea to pander to anime gooners or associate with those who do, but guilty by association is retarded.

No one is saying that Jim is a pedophile. But he knows that many of the vtubers are, and even those who aren't, are baiting and profiting from their pedophile audience who are into lolicon.

 

[Dick Lickieta]

No one is saying that Jim is a pedophile

tell that to @Cyraxian Horror and @Julius Caesar The 187th

 

[Buzz Killington]

Bit of a reach. So let me get this straight:

Metokur can't say anything tongue-in-cheek about the lolicons that inhabit these Vtuber spaces? The blood gods above who watch and judge cannot condone Jimbo joking about exploiting the overpriced sugar water racket with his own large breasted loli OC named "Jimithea" is that right?

And to even make this joke at all is paramount if not worse than anything Ralph has ever done?

No, the guy known for being the internet funnyman can't make jokes that aren't at someone else's expense. He has to attack these people, because... he just does ok??

The problem with lolicon cows is quite often their lolicon tendencies are secondary to their true lulz (Flamenco, Gator, etc.). Very few find humor specifically in knowing they're into loli, it's about specifically what other fetishes/tendencies they have that make them cows. Lolicon is just the cherry on top of the degenerate sundae many of them inhabit.

 

[Preacher ✝]

But old Jim definitely would not have taken that stance. His unwavering support for v-tubers seems like a direct contradiction to the kind of content he got famous for making.

I don't know about that. I've been watching Jim since he was the Internet Aristocrat. While he made fun of weird sex shit like Deviant Art and furries, I never got the impression he was against the people who got rich off of commissions. If anything it seemed like he pitied them for having to draw gross furry porn. Of course that doesnt apply to the artists who were also furries themselves but I mean the normal artists that just wanted to make a decent living.

If there was Vtuber who was into it as their own fetish and Jim still showed them unwavering support that would be one thing, but not when its a pragmatic business decision like it seems to be with Kirsche.

 

[Cyraxian Horror]

tell that to @Cyraxian Horror and @Julius Caesar The 187th

Those that joke about pedophilia tend to be. I don't make the rules.

 

[FlawlessCowboy]

I said it was only fans without the stripping, and it is. There’s nothing new or innovative about it, and that chick claiming it was an evolution of using an avatar was also disingenuous. People who use avatars aren’t centering the content around the avatar, vtubers have no content unless they have a avatar people like.

Wasn't it Jim claiming that it was innovative? Kirsche said that it was like PNGtubers of back in the day and her argument bleeds into yours based upon how many furry PNGtubers who got views based upon how gay their retarded furry avatar was. I don't view it innately as prostitution, but more just a monetization of parasocial relationships that already exist. The avatar just allows for an easily marketed character rather than an actual person.

To put it more plainly, the an idealized anime character is who people are lusting after rather than some Twitch thot. I don't know if that is worse or not, but at the end of the day I watch a fat man who Rekieta yelled at and she was an okay guest.

 

[Hojicha]

I don't know about that. I've been watching Jim since he was the Internet Aristocrat. While he made fun of weird sex shit like Deviant Art and furries, I never got the impression he was against the people who got rich off of commissions. If anything it seemed like he pitied them for having to draw gross furry porn. Of course that doesnt apply to the artists who were also furries themselves but I mean the normal artists that just wanted to make a decent living.

If there was Vtuber who was into it as their own fetish and Jim still showed them unwavering support that would be one thing, but not when its a pragmatic business decision like it seems to be with Kirsche.

Do you personally think even giving them the time of day, someone like Kirsche- Who profits off of the fence sitting, is okay for money? I think it's abhorrent to fence sit on lolicon because your fans are gooners and you want the money. That just ain't right

 

[Turkey Beef]

Or, and hear me out here, he's a lying fucking liar faggot that figured out other faggots with very low self-esteem will subsidize his life. He's not sick, he lies about everything, and he's not suffering at all

Does this make Jim a bad person? You decide for yourself.
Does all this make Jim a good liar? Definitely.
Does Jim deserve liver cancer and a horrifically painful death for his voice alone? HELL YES.

I politely disagree on the notion that Metocuck isn't sick.

Jim would be doing much better health wise if he stopped being terminally online, and sough actual hobbies and interests, and we all know that's never going to happen.

On Jim being a good liar, I also dunno about that; that's assuming he even has a grasp on abstract concept. His communication skills are so dreadful that he literally doesn't know how to vocalize anything without coming off as a smug 13-year old who just discovered porn on 4chan.

As for Jim's fanfucks, not much else to say on those creatures that hasn't already been said. They all treat him as a surrogate father, and the biological spambots will just continue to spam the same "Daddy Jim" parasocial fanfics until the end of their sad "lives."

 

[SandyCat]

This whole fucking stream IS THE SMOKING GUN.

The most proof of anything we have so far is that Jim has:
- Donated to Purity Sin after she was banned from some platform(s) for uploading lolicon apparently
- Associates with fat fox lady who is courting the loli crowd to at least some extent
- Jim asked Kirsche if she was a pedophile and asks about her lolicon model. Kirsche says it was just a joke bro, Jim takes it at face value and they move on from the topic

Does this prove Jim is a raging pedophile? Not really, its suspicious but nothing concrete. Is it odd hypocritical behavior for him to associate with these people and donate to purity sin? Yes. Did he know the full context of the purity sin situation when he donated? Maybe, I dunno. But on a scale of not a pedophile to raging pedophile i would put this in the "questionable" category

If you guys want something more definitive you should shoot the e-daddy a superberry on his next cancer stream to concisely ask him about these topics to to hopefully squeeze a more definitive answer out of him regarding whether or not he knows about why purity sin was banned and if he'd still donate if he did know the full context. If I wasn't a poorfag I'd donate to ask him myself

Until someone presses him more on the topic we'll just be left with autistic slapfights over uncertaintinies

 

[Cow-Chan]

Definitely not a pedophile.
View attachment 7543946

I have never watched a second of Metokur besides these 35 seconds and even with no context I can tell this is a joke.

You are a gay retarded faggot. Do not pass go. Do not collect $3.

 

[Super Dilator Duel 3D]

He might as well be with all that talk about wanting a "six year old avatar with big tits."

>”Kiwi Farms kills innocent children!!!”
>did they say that?
>”no, but they might as well with all that talk about TTD!!!”
You’re essentially a cancel-culture Twitter tranny on the other side of the political spectrum and should kill yourself immediately.

Here I'll post it again for the intentionally obtuse:
View attachment 7544288

Holy shit, this is obviously a joke pointing out the absurd nature of vtuber shilling. How are you touting this as proof of sincere pedophilic intent? This isn’t Vito Gesualdi talking about how much he wants to rape kids with a “jk” at the end, it’s a joke with a clear message pointed at an absurd and easily mockable aspect of Internet culture.

The a in a-log stands for autism.

 

[Mouse Cop]

Do you personally think even giving them the time of day, someone like Kirsche- Who profits off of the fence sitting, is okay for money? I think it's abhorrent to fence sit on lolicon because your fans are gooners and you want the money. That just ain't right

I'm not going to say that he shouldn't platform Kirsche, because deplatforming is gay. But if he was going to have her on stream, he should have been ready and willing to press her on the subject of loli. This was just a glazing.

If you guys want something more definitive you should shoot the e-daddy a superberry on his next cancer stream and concisely ask him about these topics to to hopefully squeeze a more definitive answer out of him

I can 100% guarantee you that he would never seriously answer any question like that. You'd get a snarky comeback, so couched in irony and sarcasm that it could plausibly be true or it could plausibly be false. That's how he responded when his dox first came out: acknowledged it was true but did it so sarcastically that his fans could still call it a faildox - but he didn't actually lie. I don't hate Jim, but he definitely has the Lowtax hehe-haha-sillyman thing going on where he never appears to take anything seriously so that he doesn't have to get locked into a position.

 

[Preacher ✝]

Do you personally think even giving them the time of day, someone like Kirsche- Who profits off of the fence sitting, is okay for money? I think it's abhorrent to fence sit on lolicon because your fans are gooners and you want the money. That just ain't right

Thats a fair question, and one that has enough variables to warrant a case by case answer. Taking Kirsche as an example I think it is worth maintaining a dialogue because for the most part Kirsche seems alright enough, and enforcing a with us or against us hardline might risk pushing her off the wrong side of the fence. In general its unreasonable to expect a content creator to be responsible for the degeneracy of their fans.

While I don't agree with the separation of loli and lolicon, Kirsche claims to and based on her description of that separation she seems to be firmly anti-pedo which is good.

 

[None More Black]

Is Kirsche really "fence sitting" when she said if you're a lolicon she'd look at you side eyed and wouldn't let you around her children? This thread is full of so many retards. "I'm gonna take this half sentence to prove all these people are literally pedophiles!" You're all worse than fucking Rachel Maddow.

Not to mention all the faggots that are like "Wow guys, Jim likes anime. I can't believe it."

 

[Hojicha]

Thats a fair question, and one that has enough variables to warrant a case by case answer. Taking Kirsche as an example I think it is worth maintaining a dialogue because for the most part Kirsche seems alright enough, and enforcing a with us or against us hardline might risk pushing her off the wrong side of the fence. In general its unreasonable to expect a content creator to be responsible for the degeneracy of their fans.

While I don't agree with the separation of loli and lolicon, Kirsche claims to and based on her description of that separation she seems to be firmly anti-pedo which is good.

I mean, you kind of can blame a creator for the degeneracy of their fans based on what they create. (Case by case, but it sticks for most shit.)

The difference between loli and lolicon is..? The fine line between them is nonexistant, and the arguments presented about it being drawn vs real don't make her make her look too much better imo. Oh she was just flat chested, she's 300 years old, she just sounds like a little baby etc. But if someones gonna like creators like that, you can't really make a moral or emotional argument to them about why it's fucked up. They want it regardless.

If telling her en masse that lolicon is fucked up will send her to the "wrong side of the fence", then what the FUCK is wrong with her holy shit