"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

Is James Augustine FUCKING DEAD?

  • Yes! Another Vtumour simp kicks the bucket.

    Votes: 132 37.9%
  • NO. Antis are just writing fan fiction 😭😭😭😭😭

    Votes: 216 62.1%

  • Total voters
    348
"They called me a pedophile sympathizer so much, I just decided to side with them! Now I'm pro pedophile!"
NIGGA WHAT??
No matter what we call her or say about her, if this bitch turns towards pedophiles SHE WAS ALREADY GOING TO, WE CANNOT INTERNET BULLY SOMEONE INTO IT
"our cause"???? The other side of the argument is not being a pedophile, is she in danger of becoming a fucking pedophile if we bully her hard enough???
You're not getting it.

We rightfully believe all lolis and lolicons are pedophile.

She has stated that she believes only the lolicons are pedophiles. The charitable reading of this is that she hasn't really taken it seriously enough to see the truth about the lolis too.

Maintaining a dialogue is the path towards helping her see the truth about the lolis, not freaking out and declaring her a pedophile over a semantic disconnect.
 
I didn't watch his stream last night, mostly because I didn't really care to know more about Kirsche's situation. I figured after all the stories about journalists trying to cancel someone, why would this be any different?

Also, I felt like a Patrick Tomlinson stream would've been way better than this.
 
some bitch who paid jim 20k to help clear her name
is that figure public or are we spitballing? I would think that Jim would charge a little more to start staining his legacy with vtuber ball washing and sweeping, damn.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PhoBingas
Is this the vtuber that has a clip of her showing off a literal child model of her vtuber character that she commissioned, while her chat spams "cunny" and other pedo lingo all the while? Or is that a different one?
Yeah, that's the one.
ALTHOUGH, she's not the only one.

Your logic doesn't follow either. With someone like Amos Yee, the logic is to show that... he always had a track record of weird noncery. There is context and purpose to the information. None of that applies to how either Pippa or Kirsche are depicted. The same thing happens every time; 'this person is a pedo, here are some random out of context pictures of them as children.'
Fine, it wasn't the best comparison, but that wasn't the point either.
What does posting a publicly available fully clothed photo of some pngtube slattern with vaguely rightoid opinions have to do with their nonce pandering? What are you trying to imply?
That those photos shouldn't be posted or?

au contraire, c'est très bien cuisiné
View attachment 7545257
Okay I take the beef part back, he is an Angloid. Angloids are disgusting.
 
What happened to being edgy on the Internet? I feel like I'm reading statements from 90's soccer moms.
Pedophiles are out, proud, and using "edgy internet humor" as their cover. There are far more pedophiles than I ever naively believed possible. I am done with it and so are a lot of other people. If someone wants to tell me they're a pedo, I'm going to believe them. If someone courts pedos, I'm going to believe they support pedophilia or are a pedo themselves.
 
Almost everyone's wearing a facade on the internet, though. I guarantee you 50% of the anti-lolicon people ITT still jack it to it when they log off this site, or have far darker skeletons in their closets. Same way that anti-gay politicians end up being outed having rentboys or hosting gay orgies. It's less to do with it being a cartoon, more to do with it being anime. I think everyone here should just be honest about that.
Ignore fediverse instances like pawoo being busted for having whole rings of people trading actual child porn, ignore gators crush saying she doesn't feel comfortable being around kids after bringing up toddlercon (and the fact that the loliconners used the same "its just a joke" lol vito the pedo argument to defend it), ignore giggly goonclown, ignore shadman tracing actual children, ignore uhohhh cunny coming from a tweet of a man saying CHILD BELLY EROTIC you get the point. You have to block out ALL of this to come to this conclusion above. You will not be able to hide behind its just a joke and room temperature semantics forever. I said it before and I will say it again.


Animes fear occams razor.
 
People are still getting their panties in a twist about this post, so I'll make one concession. My 50% hyperbole was too extreme, I'll admit that. But don't doubt that it's a sizable amount, I won't back down on that. I'm not denying that lolicons are pedophiles either, I don't know where people are getting this idea from my post. My point is, from anecdotal experience, some people who rail against it aren't always honest with other people or themselves. People are putting up facades on the internet is my main point. Honesty isn't required on the internet.
 
Vtuber fans are retarded, you can't fix stupid, they can only be exploited for cash.

1750684160720.webp

Oh hai everyone, Midge Fly Maria here. I just turned 12 hours old (legal in midge years) and I'm ready to tug on your midge weiner or whatever. Please send a $500 crypdono to ask my opinion on geopolitics!
 
I don't think kirsche is a pedophile, I don't think she's a lolicon, I don't think either of those things of metokur either.

Frankly a lot of you are borderline obsessive about anyone that just doesn't care about removing every lolicon from their audience or sphere or whatever.

Most people don't care about lolicon especially in anime circles for the same reason people into video games roll their eyes when you say something about violence in videogames.

If you showed either person a picture of someone wearing their merch while molesting a child they would probably be violently upset, if you showed them an image of a lolicon pfp called "littlegirlarmpitsuoh" wearing their merch they would laugh and call them a weirdo and make fun of them for a minute.

It would be the same way if metokurfan33 did a sick headshot in call of duty compared to if he gunned down 10 people at a supermarket

People have visceral reactions to visceral things. They don't take simulated things nearly as seriously and if you want them to you have to convince them.

If you don't try and convince them and instead call them pedophiles for just not caring about what you care about and try and force them to act on your beliefs they're going to treat you like a crazy person or Jack Thompson.
 
Back