Culture 'Not just smut': Why it's happily ever after for romance books


2025-06-20 23:10:43 UTC
Maia Davies

8f225d30-4dc7-11f0-a466-d54f65b60deb.jpg.webp

Inside London's first romance-only bookshop, Sarah Maxwell stands in the "smut hut" – a section dedicated to her store's more erotic titles.

Surrounded by shelves stacked with brightly coloured paperbacks – with titles including Just For the Summer, Swept Away and The Friendship Fling – young women are milling around, chatting and flicking through books.

Sarah says she wants to challenge the critics of romance fiction - often men - who diminish what she describes as "really high-quality writing" by saying "it's just smut".

"A lot of these books have strong world-building, amazing character development and a really good plot," Sarah says.

A surge in romance and fantasy sales last year pushed UK fiction revenue above £1bn for the first time, according to a report released last week.

As its popularity grows, some readers and industry experts say attitudes towards romance are changing for the better, but others believe sexism keeps the genre from the mainstream.

e0530660-4d08-11f0-8c47-237c2e4015f5.jpg.webp

Romance fiction spans a dizzying range of sub-genres and moods, all centred around heady love stories with a guaranteed happily ever after – or HEA to fans – lending the books a comforting, cosy atmosphere.

Romantasy – a blend of romance and fantasy – has become a reliable fixture on best-seller lists, largely due to the cult-like following it has gained among TikTok's reading community, BookTok.

Major series like Fourth Wing and A Court of Thorns and Roses see female protagonists enter high-stakes relationships set against magical, fantastic worlds.

Many readers pick what to read based on tropes such as "enemies to lovers" and "second-chance romance", with books marketed under these banners.

A book's "spice level" – or how much sex can be found between the covers – is also a major factor, often focused on female pleasure, power and emotional connection.

25e731d0-4dc5-11f0-86d5-3b52b53af158.jpg.webp

'Some people turn their nose up'​

"I'm into cowboys at the moment," says Sky, 23 from London – a reference to "cowboy romances", a growing sub-genre whose books take place in a western setting - often the American frontier.

Sky and another fan, Chantelle, 24 describe themselves as "very proud romance readers". They trace their love of the genre to reading fanfiction under their desks at school, and now get their recommendations through BookTok.

c7451ed0-4dc4-11f0-8c47-237c2e4015f5.jpg.webp
Sky and Chantelle

But Sky and Chantelle admit not everyone reacts positively when they talk about their favourite books.

"Some people do turn their nose up, roll their eyes sometimes," says Chantelle, "but I just don't really care".

Caroline, 29, admits she "sneered a bit" at romance in her early twenties.

"I used to read romances when I was a teenager," she recalls, "but I got away from it and started reading stuff I thought was really smart."

Then last year, Caroline picked up Emily Henry's bestseller Book Lovers - an "enemies to lovers" story about a literary agent and a book editor, set in a picturesque small town.

8ffa33b0-4dd4-11f0-a073-0b81b4478b62.jpg.webp
Caroline in the 'Smut Hut'

"I realised I hadn't consumed something guilt-free in my reading for a really long time," Caroline says, "and it was just really fun".

She's since devoured the entire series of A Court of Thorns and Roses, a stalwart of bestseller lists and many readers' first taste of romantasy.

"It's nice to feel all the feelings with something that's just going to really entertain you," Caroline says.

Victoria, 31, has long read both romance and fantasy for much-needed escapism: "Sometimes I think we all need a little bit of a happily ever after in life."

She says "chick-lit" stigma is still strong, but thinks attitudes are starting to change as people speak openly about their love of the genre online.

"We're talking about it in a different way," Victoria says. "Guilty pleasures? Do I need to feel guilty for loving something?"

'These are the Swifties'​

Both romance and fantasy saw record sales last year, according to data gathered from more than 7,000 UK booksellers.

Romance & Sagas, as they are officially categorised, increased from £62m in 2023 to £69m in 2024, while Science Fiction & Fantasy saw an even bigger bump - from £59m to £83m.

Both categories have seen these numbers skyrocket since the pandemic, growing year-on-year - back in 2019, romance's sales sat at £24m, and fantasy at £29m.

Women under 35 years old make up more than half of romantasy purchases, figures show.

Literary agent Rebeka Finch, 28, says the "voracious" appetite among this demographic, largely driven by BookTok, reflects broader consumer habits.

She likens romance readers to Swifties - Taylor Swift fans - known for owning multiple copies of the same album and wanting to feel a tangible connection to their favourite artist.

"They are the people that are so obsessive about books that they will buy a Kindle edition, they will have a hard back edition, they will have a paperback edition.

"They will have so many different volumes of the same book because they love it so much."

303444b0-4dd5-11f0-8c47-237c2e4015f5.jpg.webp
Sarah Maxwell

Bookshop owner Sarah Maxwell says the demographic gave her the confidence to open Saucy Books in the middle of a high street downturn that has seen many independent bookshops suffer.

"People have this perception that it's not good business," Sarah says, but the community is "strong" and the authors prolific, providing plenty of stock.

"Millennial women have the most disposable income," she adds. "Romance is serious business."

Despite this commercial growth, Rebeka says broader attitudes remain derisive - particularly when it comes to "spicy" titles.

"'That's fairy porn' - the amount of times that I have heard that!" Rebeka exclaims.

"Part of me wants to be like, 'So what?' This industry has been made for the male gaze for so long.

"It's such a small percentage of the book and actually… it's largely portraying fairly healthy sexual relationships."

'It boils down to money'​

Within the publishing industry, attitudes are changing but mainly for commercial reasons, according to Katie Fraser, who writes for publishing magazine, The Bookseller.

Romance has been a "maligned genre" within the industry that "some people just didn't want to be associated with," she says. But as romance readers become an "economic force," publishers have had to take it more seriously and invest.

"Publishing is an industry, so that's what it ultimately boils down to," Katie says.

f29882f0-4dc6-11f0-8c47-237c2e4015f5.jpg.webp
Bea Fitzgerald

Author Bea Fitzgerald, 28, says she benefitted from this commercial shift, selling her young adult fantasy rom-com Girl Goddess Queen at the peak of the romance boom.

"That sort of space opening up is what allowed me to move into the market," she says.

Bea previously worked in publishing, and recalls seeing "a lot of books that could have been published as romance [instead] published in other literary genres because they think that it will not appeal to a certain type of audience".

The genre is nothing new, she quips, having long been "championed" by publishers such as Mills & Boon. The difference now is that young people "like things really unapologetically".

"They won't just read a romance, they'll go shout about it online, and then they'll go to a romance convention, and they'll talk to their friends about it."

While the community has grown, Bea thinks critical appraisal of the genre is still lacking.

"Do we see broadsheets reviewing romance books? No. And they are just as important, literary books."

Bea believes this is both because "the good majority" of the readers are women, and simply because the stories are happy.

"It goes in line with this sort of academic elitism that for something to be serious, it has to be a Shakespearean tragedy," she says. "Whereas if it's happy, it's not serious, it hasn't got literary merit. It obviously does - of course it does."

Photos by Emma lynch
 
Romance novels have existed for a long time. My mother, back in the 70s, used to chill out in a lawn chair outside and read Harlequin Romance books with shirtless men on the cover. Fabio (a cover model for many of these books) was even a popular celebrity at one point. The only thing that's changed is that we have the internet and social media now, and so we've been inundated by people who won't shut up about their smut hobby, and who, indeed, think they have a duty to normalize it and make it mainstream.

Imagine if groups of men had conventions and made noise about their porn addictions to the extent that these women do. They'd be seen as sad losers and perverts. Female "romantasy" fans need to feel this shame, too. My mother liked written softcore fantasy, but she never felt the desire to share it with anyone, because it just wasn't a thing you talked about in public. We need to bring back the Closet, not just for gays, but for women who won't shut up about their fetishes. Oversharing is not a victory for feminism, it's a sign that you are morally incontinent and need to spend a few minutes in the Community Ducking Stool.
 
Since ~2015, romance novels have really mostly been written by small groups of writers who are working to very specific formulas devised by machine learning algorithms using data from the previously successful ones.

Many of the "authors" of these novels that are put up for public consumption are just the public face of what's actually a 100% soulless publishing effort based on continuous analysis of reader trends. Within 2 or 3 years, if not already, they'll be plotting them in GPT and then having GPT write one little section at a time according to the plot. It'll take six hours to write one.
 
Imagine if groups of men had conventions and made noise about their porn addictions to the extent that these women do. They'd be seen as sad losers and perverts.
They do (anime conventions), and they are seen as sad losers and perverts! And the male analogue to the romance genre is the "isekai harem" genre.
 
Money talks, bullshit (man's man fiction) walks.

All this whining about nothing for men to read is old news. Romance has always been the profitable genre. Tom Wolfe wrote men's adventure back in the early 70s and didn't make a dime. His agent suggested he write a bodice-ripper. He chose the pen name Jennifer Wilde, wrote Love's Tender Fury and his career took off.

Word-of-mouth has always been how books sold. The only difference now is that word-of-mouth reaches the other side of the world in seconds. It's never going to stop.

Cry more.
 
Some years ago my daughter (then age 12) was trapped in a car on the way back from an event with a friend and her 300 lb mom who for some reason decided she needed to tell my daughter all about the Omegaverse. We only found out because the dad called us the next day to apologize for his wife because his daughter was mortified. Mine just wanted to block it out lol.

They are now divorced and the mom has published several series of fairly successful “erotic” romantasy books.
 
What are these women like in relationships? I imagine they'd be similar to male gooners in that it would interfere with their ability to maintain a healthy relationship, right? If they're addicted to the "falling in love" part, how do they expect to maintain the relationship after that phase?
 
Sarah says she wants to challenge the critics of romance fiction - often men - who diminish what she describes as "really high-quality writing" by saying "it's just smut".

"A lot of these books have strong world-building, amazing character development and a really good plot," Sarah says.
No, I pretty damn certain they do not. The women who are reading these books are reading them purely for the sex. They do not care about character development or world building and authors know this so they don’t put in too much effort. No one watches porn for character development or world building and it’s the same thing here. This article wants to dress up porn consumption as an intellectual pursuit.

Also, anyone who gets book recs from TikTok does not care about reading.
 
Last edited:
Surrounded by shelves stacked with brightly coloured paperbacks
They aren’t stacked though. They don’t even have enough books to fill a shelf - it’s face out, and filling the gaps with vases and stuff
A lot of these books have strong world-building, amazing character development and a really good plot," Sarah says.
And he just reads playboy for the articles, honest
Sky and Chantelle
Bras, ladies. Read all about ‘em.

I guess smut has a place, but it feels like what should be a small vaguely shameful niche has expanded to become the entirety of what’s aimed at readers. When did we stop encouraging girls to read widely, And start promoting this cack? If you want to read werewolf erotica, well, whatever, but can we have some books on the shelves that aren’t filler trash? I cant think of anything fiction published in the last few years that I’d like to read at all.
 
What are these women like in relationships? I imagine they'd be similar to male gooners in that it would interfere with their ability to maintain a healthy relationship, right? If they're addicted to the "falling in love" part, how do they expect to maintain the relationship after that phase?

I can only speak to my own experience with a couple different ones. Rather than being in a real relationship, they were trying to live out the fantasies that they were attached to. The man was expected to react and behave in ways that confirmed to the fantasy narrative she has. She probably picked you because you match up to some character in her goonerverse - at least in her mind at the start. And if you start being overly human or departing from the expectations of her narrative or your character sheet in her mind, they get frustrated and confused.

It was alot more of a romantic LARPing experience with women like that than a human interaction. And they are always the director of the LARP. You are just there to be a character in their gooner drama.
 
Romance fiction spans a dizzying range of sub-genres and moods, all centred around heady love stories with a guaranteed happily ever after – or HEA to fans – lending the books a comforting, cosy atmosphere.

Romantasy – a blend of romance and fantasy – has become a reliable fixture on best-seller lists, largely due to the cult-like following it has gained among TikTok's reading community, BookTok.

Major series like Fourth Wing and A Court of Thorns and Roses see female protagonists enter high-stakes relationships set against magical, fantastic worlds.

Many readers pick what to read based on tropes such as "enemies to lovers" and "second-chance romance", with books marketed under these banners.

A book's "spice level" – or how much sex can be found between the covers – is also a major factor, often focused on female pleasure, power and emotional connection.
Bad news, dudes are never going to go for this. Not only are we almost completely visually-oriented when it comes to jerkov material, but we don’t experience the same type of lust or romantic emotions as women and can’t relate.

This results in the average man reading pornographic text, and being disgusted in a way he can’t quite explain.

I’ll try though: for me I involuntarily imagine the fujoshi-type author in the act of writing smut and I just go “Brother, euuugh. Euuuugh, brother. What is that?” (This is the same reason I can’t get through ASong of Ice and Fire.)

Imagine if groups of men had conventions and made noise about their porn addictions to the extent that these women do.
They do. They’re called porn and anime conventions…

(Ron Soye beat me to the punch here)
They'd be seen as sad losers and perverts
That’s a bingo!
 
Last edited:
What are these women like in relationships? I imagine they'd be similar to male gooners in that it would interfere with their ability to maintain a healthy relationship, right? If they're addicted to the "falling in love" part, how do they expect to maintain the relationship after that phase?
60% of divorces are initiated by the woman. Variations on "the passion is gone" and "I fell out of love" are among the top ten stated justifications for divorce. Does that help?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dante Alighieri
If you want to read your smut novels, fine. Whatever floats your book. Just stop trying to elevate it like it's some art form. It's just cheap written porn.

This is like when gamers kept trying to say games are art to give it legitimacy.
This is true. I used to be one of those fags but at some point I realized, or had it pointed out to me, whatever, that the top vidya games are still dumber and schlockier than most dumb schlock action movies.

Now that I read a lot (have for about six years) I see that most vidya stories aren't just bad as narratives, they actually go out of their way to be bad (like being bloated, meandering messes). It's a different medium, so different purposes, different techniques, but very little of this stuff is quality.
 
If this excerpt is anything to go by, the prose of these kind of romance novels is utterly dire. Note the cringey sub-90 IQ Zoomer brainrot slang ("unalive") the sudden shift of tense into the past continuous for no apparent reason "I was laughing", the autistic obsession with "trauma" and therapy, this looks like something a teenager would post on their Tumblr but apparently this is a New York Times bestseller.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2025-06-25-14-38-36-54_0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb.webp
    Screenshot_2025-06-25-14-38-36-54_0b2fce7a16bf2b728d6ffa28c8d60efb.webp
    375.8 KB · Views: 16
Sarah says she wants to challenge the critics of romance fiction - often men - who diminish what she describes as "really high-quality writing" by saying "it's just smut".

"A lot of these books have strong world-building, amazing character development and a really good plot," Sarah says.
Then seriously stop encouraging this shit:

A book's "spice level" – or how much sex can be found between the covers – is also a major factor, often focused on female pleasure, power and emotional connection.
But you won't stop this stupid shit because it's literally the only thing bringing in sales because of bored women.

Also write better sex scenes, I'm dead serious. The more degenerate is not the better, you need to treat sex as the life-changing event it is for the characters, and if it's doubling as a trauma, don't treat it lightly. If sex happens and it's not moving the plot along (as in aiding in character development), it's proof it was only added in because the author/publisher wanted to masturbate to their own work. Just fucking stop with the gratuitous sex scenes.

Or maybe women need to just learn how to write like men when it comes to sex scenes. No mushy-gushy lurve business, it's just blunt and straight to the point, which is going so balls-deep her heaving bosom is smacking his iron pecs as she squeals for more motion, more huffing, more man while he's preoccupied with figuring out his next killing at [insert masculine interest here].
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sexy Peach Emoji
Back