Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 29 2.5%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 304 26.5%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 813 70.9%

  • Total voters
    1,146
Out of fucking nowhere I'm now getting "25yearsago" or 125yearsago" junk pushed into my feed. No I really don't need more gimmick accounts pushed in what I am trying to use for near real time news and reaction. I hate what he's done to Twitter it always was flawed but Elon just whored it out to slop and scams and fake news.

It's funny that when he first got involved with buying Twitter and then tried to nope out, his initial reasoning for backing out was that "Twitter was infested with bots". Then once he showed up with retarded kitchen sink, the site became Bot City. I nuked my account there because I was sick of scrolling through shit Temu ads I couldn't block between every other post, even though I blocked the Temu account itself and never used Temu in my life.
 
Internally a shitshow is brewing at NASA.
Little more about this: The acting admin at NASA (Janet Petro) has been going ahead with the Musk-driven OMB cuts/RIFs despite not being authorized to do so. At an all-hands today she directly stated she "reports to the President," which is a major slipup given that 1) she actually reports to Congress and 2) Congress is knives-out against the budget cuts to begin with. Very big no-no. This has set up a showdown where Petro wants to fire center directors (in fact this was the intent of the all-hands), but doing so would be just cause for Congress to shitcan her instead. Every center director called her bluff. It seems likely she'll either resign outright or be fired by Congress, which would be wholly unprecedented. Some speculation going around is that she's doing this because she was vying for being the next admin pick, but instead she's being shoved in a closet and was never under serious consideration. The White House is not actively backing up Petro.

Can't really overstate how close Musk was to total regulatory capture. All he really had to do was shut up after leaving the White House and let Isaacman's withdrawal go unanswered, but by falling into a ketamine-induced spergout over it the whole script has flipped.

It's rumored that the new admin choice will, in part, investigate SpaceX's current NASA contracts and some of them may come under the knife once they're confirmed. HLS is very much a prime target. No word on who that pick is yet, but we're about to have the sequel to the tardout of the century if that comes to pass. Keep watchin' the shitshow.
 
It's funny that when he first got involved with buying Twitter and then tried to nope out, his initial reasoning for backing out was that "Twitter was infested with bots". Then once he showed up with retarded kitchen sink, the site became Bot City. I nuked my account there because I was sick of scrolling through shit Temu ads I couldn't block between every other post, even though I blocked the Temu account itself and never used Temu in my life.
I used to use chrome just to browse twitter until it dropped support for my ad blocker and it made the site unbearable. Most of the ads were of course trying to sell something, but some were random stuff like this. The fuck even is this shit? I guess all you have to do is pay for a spot and that's good enough.
1750901938112.webp
 
I used to use chrome just to browse twitter until it dropped support for my ad blocker and it made the site unbearable. Most of the ads were of course trying to sell something, but some were random stuff like this. The fuck even is this shit? I guess all you have to do is pay for a spot and that's good enough.
View attachment 7557593
A skitzo Niggerian obsessed with feces and not letting witches share her food(?) Her account is the same oga booga religious vomit. Buying ads seems to be a way of circumventing blocks. Not sure what she is selling, though. Even running her posting through Grok was fruitless.
My current fav X skitzo.
 
I used to use chrome just to browse twitter until it dropped support for my ad blocker and it made the site unbearable. Most of the ads were of course trying to sell something, but some were random stuff like this. The fuck even is this shit? I guess all you have to do is pay for a spot and that's good enough.
View attachment 7557593
I could give a chimpanzee some LSD and a typewriter, and it would still produce anything more comprehensible than whatever THAT is.
 
All that to say that Musk the spergy fuck has singlehandedly taken a revolutionary company with incredible capabilities and gutted it just to fund his tardy Mars fixation, and a shrinking but virulent army of jannies keep running defense for him. The blind headlong rush is going to get people hurt or killed.
Musk thinks he's Tony Stark but he's actually Cave Johnson.
 
would the weight savings of not using cryogenic fuel be worth the reduced Isp?
Well, you're right in that tank mass correlates to prop bulk density (heavier props = comparatively lighter tanks) but the problem is that Starship's delta-v budget keeps getting stretched to ease the flight stresses on Superheavy. Starship's total delta-v budget (by itself, without the contributions from the first stage) for getting to LEO is like 7ish km/s with a 100 ton payload, and to get to Mars you're only looking at 4-5 km/s. All that "extra" propellant means that the tanks have to be, effectively, less mass efficient for each kilo of prop. So you're stuck either short-fueling the vehicle and lugging around deadweight or fully loading the vehicle and having surplus payload capacity that you didn't bring with you to orbit originally, which is just a waste.

The NRHO round trip is actually a bit over that LEO figure and the end result is that HLS's total payload is less than 20 tons. Also as-built the system's getting maybe 40-50 tons to orbit and not 100, which is why each new version keeps getting longer and longer. Both of these are feeding back into the amount of tanker flights needed. Could well cost over $2 billion to cover all of those even if Starship accomplishes crazy low launch costs for a vehicle of its size.

Like I said, even Blue Origin's HLS has a similar issue with demanding tanker flights, but those are baselined around a ~100-200 ton transporter against a vehicle that will eventually orbit 45 tons, and that's much more manageable than 1,200+ tons of prop against 50 tons per tanker or whatever they eventually freeze the design at. Rocket equation is not forgiving at all.
 
sounds like he needs an even more powerful first stage then
I'm sure they'd love to, but for reasons beyond comprehension the whole thrust assembly on the first stage was never upgraded to accommodate 33 engines from the original baseline of 29. Musk's tardy fixation with the number 42 (because he wants 42 engines on the whole stack) strikes again.

Yanking SpaceX's HLS contract is a discussion that's only increasing in intensity and fervor btw, now heard it from multiple different sources.
 
what the fuck
It's a theme with the whole fucking program. The tower catch was done largely because Musk thinks it would be cool, the nose cone is longer than it should be because Musk wants it to look pointier, he's autistically fixated on 100 tons to orbit even if the stack needs to be stretched and the engines need to be cranked to overdrive because it's a nice round number, etc. Pretty much every bad decision stems from Musk's mashed potato brains and absolutely bizarre ideas of useful metrics.

A while back Musk was talking about cost per ton of thrust on Raptor which is... just incomprehensible.
 
It's a theme with the whole fucking program. The tower catch was done largely because Musk thinks it would be cool, the nose cone is longer than it should be because Musk wants it to look pointier, he's autistically fixated on 100 tons to orbit even if the stack needs to be stretched and the engines need to be cranked to overdrive because it's a nice round number, etc. Pretty much every bad decision stems from Musk's mashed potato brains and absolutely bizarre ideas of useful metrics.

A while back Musk was talking about cost per ton of thrust on Raptor which is... just incomprehensible.
how did he become the richest man on earth? his father's fortune is nowhere near enough to get him to where he is

also the tower catch is overly complicated imo, if he kept the recovery process simpler and less flashy, it'd work more consistently, and reusing the rockets would be a lot cheaper and easier

also he shouldnt mess with the nose cone, that's the aerodynamicist's job, it was blunted for a reason dipshit

also also: more engines >>> stronger engines
this way if some of them fail, you still have barely enough thrust to get it done

the whole thing with rockets is that u gotta make it as consistent and reliable as possible, cuz everytbing that can go wrong, will go wrong, and since he is gonna re-use the launch vehicle, he can spend more money on it, cuz he's not gonna need to make a new one for every launch

wait? is he successfully re-using the launchers by now?
 
Back