Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Kujo Jotaro]

Let me tell you a story about women and books.

I went to Barnes and Noble to buy the new Nick Cutter novel and while I was there I glanced through some of the other horror books. I picked up a random normal looking book called like Killing Moon or some shit and was treated to an incredibly graphic scene of a lesbian werewolf having to suck snake venom out of another lesbian werewolfs clit.

This wasn't in the romance section or labeled as smut it was right the fuck next to the Stephen King books.

Also werewolves don't shave their pussies, the book made that very clear.

Fucking women.

They call it smut, and they're very proud of it, they think because they're reading it's somehow edifying.

 

[Universal Balance]

IDK what to tell you man, the genetic evidence is that there are about 2 females for every 1 male successfully reproducing in human history.

Yes, but a family tree will have equal numbers male and female by necessity.

Unlesss one fella decides he wants to go full Lot

 

[Hooked on phobics]

People just realizing this?

I mean I WANTED to think it was just fags but....I guess the whole yaoi trope is far truer than we want to believe.

Kinda shit, I know men are similar with lesbians but at least they are far more forthcoming about that. Asking a woman to be so honest is a different matter.

 

[Big Shot]

They call it smut, and they're very proud of it, they think because they're reading it's somehow edifying.

The real reason wimmin hate porn is not because of muh objectification or stuff, it's because they get extremely jealous of men paying attention to other hoes.

Also women have zero inherent morals, whatever makes them feel good is "good" to them. That's why they flaunt their erotica books in front of their family, coworkers and the larger public.

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole 2]

They call it smut, and they're very proud of it, they think because they're reading it's somehow edifying.

To paraphrase the black chick from 21 Jump Street "when guys consume it is porn, when women consume it is erotica"

Anyways, the cat ladies over at the other place should read this UN report, then crunch the numbers and stop being so uppity.

 

[Kujo Jotaro]

To paraphrase the black chick from 21 Jump Street "when guys consume it is porn, when women consume it is erotica"

Anyways, the cat ladies over at the other place should read this UN report, then crunch the numbers and stop being so uppity.
View attachment 7582580

No way there's 50 million catholic priests in the world bruh. Last time I checked there was a priest shortage.

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole 2]

No way there's 50 million catholic priests in the world bruh. Last time I checked there was a priest shortage.

A lot of them might be jobless because of age and/or gayness.

 

[Dawdler]

To paraphrase the black chick from 21 Jump Street "when guys consume it is porn, when women consume it is erotica"

Anyways, the cat ladies over at the other place should read this UN report, then crunch the numbers and stop being so uppity.
View attachment 7582580

I don't think these numbers are correct

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole 2]

I don't think these numbers are correct

It's just compound statistics broken down into sets and elements, at first glance it might not look like it adds up.

 

[Dawdler]

It's just compound statistics broken down into sets and elements, at first glance it might not look like it adds up.

Well yes, but 2 bill men only? I doubt

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole 2]

Well yes, but 2 bill men only? I doubt

The UN is cow towing to the trans thing, that affects the numbers a bit. So me and the boys got together and got the UN to accept that cucks, male feminists & anime fans should be counted as women because they're so lame and stupid.

 

[The Ugly One]

Yes, but a family tree will have equal numbers male and female by necessity.

No, it likely won't, due to inbreeding and polygyny. Your grandparents and great-grandparents are probably all unique, but go back enough generations, and your family tree starts intersecting itself.

Simple example with polygynist great-grandparents and first cousin parents.



Because his great-grandparents were polygynists, and his parents were first cousins, he has four great-grandmothers and two great-grandfathers. I used first cousins solely due to space constraints. Something similar could obviously be constructed with more intervening generations between the cousins.

Second cousin marriage was fairly common in the past, first cousin marriage wasn't unheard of, and nobody even bothered to track third and fourth cousins. In little medieval villages where nobody had ever gone more than 100 miles from home, you're going to have a lot of intersections.

 

[Wilson The Ball]

No, it likely won't, due to inbreeding and polygyny. Your grandparents and great-grandparents are probably all unique, but go back enough generations, and your family tree starts intersecting itself.

Simple example with polygynist great-grandparents and first cousin parents.

View attachment 7583105

Because his great-grandparents were polygynists, and his parents were first cousins, he has four great-grandmothers and two great-grandfathers. I used first cousins solely due to space constraints. Something similar could obviously be constructed with more intervening generations between the cousins.

Second cousin marriage was fairly common in the past, first cousin marriage wasn't unheard of, and nobody even bothered to track third and fourth cousins.,

Wasn't it the Church who tried banning cousin marriage? Damn, these White Boys be gross as hell at the family reunion nigga

 

[Universal Balance]

No, it likely won't, due to inbreeding and polygyny. Your grandparents and great-grandparents are probably all unique, but go back enough generations, and your family tree starts intersecting itself.

Simple example with polygynist great-grandparents and first cousin parents.

View attachment 7583105

Because his great-grandparents were polygynists, and his parents were first cousins, he has four great-grandmothers and two great-grandfathers. I used first cousins solely due to space constraints. Something similar could obviously be constructed with more intervening generations between the cousins.

Second cousin marriage was fairly common in the past, first cousin marriage wasn't unheard of, and nobody even bothered to track third and fourth cousins. In little medieval villages where nobody had ever gone more than 100 miles from home, you're going to have a lot of intersections.

That still doesnt make sense. Because the only way a family tree could have it’s balance tipped towards female is if there is intergenerational incest or if a man fucks two women and their offspring fuck each other. I know incest was common but intergenerational incest down a direct line was not.

If the tree intersects in other instances, even with incest and polygyny taken into account, the balance between men and women still would hold.

 

[Grub]

No the best part is if they syntribate in public and glare at you for glaring at them

My wife used to work with a chick that got fired for straight up openly looking at big cock porn on the work computer. The chick didn't even understand that she was doing something wrong and argued when the boss when he told her she couldn't be doing that. She just kept doing it and wouldn't stop.

 

[The Ugly One]

if a man fucks two women and their offspring fuck each other.

Given a large number of generations and a small population in which each successful man mates, on average, with two women, this becomes increasingly likely. Medieval villages, nomadic tribes, and the like had tiny populations. The typical medieval village, for example, was 50-200 people total, that includes children and the elderly. What reports we have from the time suggest that serf sexual behavior had more in common with dogs than strict Catholic teaching.

Also, just do the math. In any given century, you probably have around 4 generations of ancestors. 1000 AD, 10 centuries ago, is thus about 40 generations back. 2^40 is 1.1 billion. You do not have 1.1 billion unique ancestors in 1000 AD. There weren't even 1.1 billion people on the planet. The typical person's family tree has far more intersections than you think.

Genetic evidence is that about 2 women reproduced for every 1 man. If you draw a family tree of the entire human population, about 2/3s of the nodes will be female. It's just how it is.

 

[The Hardest R]

No the best part is if they syntribate in public and glare at you for glaring at them.

One of my wife’s former friends, a teacher, does this shit all the time. Her response was, as you point out, that it’s their fault if they have an issue and by the way it’s creepy that anyone would notice what she’s doing. As I’ve said ad nauseam here, women are the original coomers.

 

[umseriously]

Hot air, wind mills, feelings, competition to be “pretty” in a metaphysical sense of being instead of engaging in actions like basic fitness and activity?

Yeah it’s fucking retarded.

A plain woman with a good attitude and willingness to give back and meet halfway is light years ahead of the idiots, but is a “pick me”.

Because men aren’t going to pick the pretty bitches but they just end up with a man somehow?

And they’re the “owe me” types who are the table.

Meanwhile my identity is “fuck me” because fuck me this is retarded.

Women are competing for the 8/10 men and above. They're not competing for anything less. That's why women put so much effort into their makeup and anything similar. They're going for what Chad wants. Now, the real question is, what does Chad (think Jeremy Meeks) actually want?

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

Very well, so if women are equal to men, shouldn't a woman be just as capable as a man of producing a movie about men doing man things that don't center on relationships women that is enjoyed primarily by men? Where's the female-produced equivalent of Lawrence of Arabia or Lord of the Rings?

The Hurt Locker

Did this article get posted here already? I scrolled back a bit to check but I didn't see it.

To the author of the article, she is 54 and is still in the dating pool. So necessarily, the pool of men she will be dating is very different than the pool she would be dating when she was in her 20s and 30s.


So she is a pornographer, that mastered the ability to commodify sex and intimacy to extract money and attention from men. At no point in the article is there any reflection on how this shapes her own relationship with intimacy, nor what she potentially helped do to the destruction of men and their withdrawal from relationships.


This is the biggest problem with the article that I see. She is a strong, confident woman in her 50s. Yet, she refuses to pursue a man she is interested in. And I don't mean in a slavish way, she just 'opens the door' to a man, but doesn't actually pursue him. If she wants vulnerability from a man, why not show that vulnerability first?


Yes, you eroded the infrastructure of intimacy. Not women generally; you, the author, specifically, since you are a pornographer. No where does she take even a sliver of responsibility or self-reflection for this.


"Maybe no one taught you how to stay." Did you ever teach a man, or did you just expect them to know what you wanted them to do instinctively? Did you ever show a man how to be emotionally available and how to pursue their desire, or did you just figure out how to exploit them in your business as a pornographer?

 

[Wilson The Ball]

Now, the real question is, what does Chad (think Jeremy Meeks) actually want?

Chad wants the same thing you want. He just gets it