Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

Ayana Otonashi said:
I guarantee if lolifags shut up on Twitter, 85% of them wouldn't be here
Click to expand...
If loliniggers were smart enough to keep to themselves in their isolated groups 90% of the hate for their kind would not be there. Most people were happy to ignore these faggots for decades. I myself was happy to just go "well, it's not real so what's the harm" and only just recently they've (just like trannies) have taken it upon themselves to become their worst enemies by constantly annoying everyone and being unhinged freaks. If they weren't such fucking pests I would not have taken the time to look deeper into them, so I guess we have to thank them for being retarded.
 
FuluFuckwit said:
The videogame comparison is stupid. Most people don't get sexual gratification from violence, and the people that do should be treated like the lolicons
Click to expand...
This argument is not only ASTRONOMICALLY wrong and biased, it's used as a gotcha too.

As a psychology student, here, I'll be a nice person and break it down for all the kiddie fappers seething over this thread on why those arguments are not comparable in anyway.

Explanation 1; Different hormones

When an individual plays a "violent" video game (COD/DOOM/Postal/Hatred, whatever shooting game) , they release dopamine. The person could find playing these games relaxing/entertaining after a hard day at school/work.

When an individual shoots or kills a real person, they release a SHIT of adrenaline. Not dopamine, and I assure you they are NOT relaxed post-realization (also a reason why most modern school shooters kill themselves after 1-2 victims. They get an enormous amount of adrenaline/stress and also realize the consequences, get panicked and result to off themselves.).

-

When somebody masturbates to fictional pornography(whether it be 2D/3D), they release oxytocin, and other similar sex hormones. Their brain identifies sexual arousal to specific preferences or characters.

However, when somebody masturbates to REAL pornography, with real human beings, SAME HORMONES AND SAME BRAIN AREA ACTIVATE. There is no difference between jerking off to real material or fictional one, because in both situations the brain gets the same type of sexual arousal.

When somebody has intercourse with someone, they also release oxytocin hormones, and again, same arousal typology. (Same for rape, although it is usually one sided, that being the preparator.).

Comparing video games to fap material is obnoxious since they release different type of hormones, vidoe games in fictional case AND real case, while fap material releases the same hormones in all contexts.

Explanation 2: Different way of developing

Sex crimes develop differently from homicidal crimes.
While in both cases there is a process of desensitization, they operate different. All sex offenders had a history of watching pornography. ALL. And in more modern times, they are also into fictional one.
However, you don't need to play shooting games or watch gore to become a homicide criminal, because:
1. The crime can be motivated by various reasons (revenge, hatred, prejudice, propaganda, etc.)
2. The crime can be forced by somebody on someone (ex: cartels forcing new members to shot men as a sign of loyalty.)

Doing a comparison between two processes who do NOT have the same/similar development is retarded.

Side note: Violent games to not turn you into a sexually frustrated person who is aggressive towards anybody who does not agree with their porn addiction. Unhealthy amount of deviant sexual material, on the other hand, DOES turns you into a violent and aggressive person, especially towards the group you are sexually attracted.

Explanation 3: Community approach

Ask yourself these questions:
1. Do people who play violent games make terms such as "anti" or "tourist" to people who do not play violent games/do not like or enjoy violent games?
2. Do people who play violent games make weird slangs about killing people?
3. Do people who play violent games "uoooh" when they see their favorite characters online?
4. Do people who play violent games make communities dedicated to ONLY KILLING NPCS? And are toxic towards anybody who is critical of them?
5. Do people who play violent games name themselves on Xitter.com as "NPC pussy rapist killer"?
6. Do people who play violent games are hypocritical Epstein Hitler particles who blame all their problems on Jewish people, POC, women?
7. Do people who play violent questions have a heart attack when you criticize the country where said violent game is from?

If you answered to the following with " NO", congrats! You realized that people who play violent video games are NOT the same as lolicons.

Conclusion:
If they were "just pixels/lines/fiction", you wouldn't cum to it.
 
There is something to be said that a sizable, non-indiscriminate portion of people are making Twitch women rich and wealthy because they have a child-like PNG that moves, or panders outright by saying they shleek it to kids. I'm not sure what that something is, but there you go.
 
Yesterday a twitter account called Hancxck (who I think is a hoodweeb) got suspended after he made a post criticizing Saba /gura gura.
IMG_2253.webpIMG_2254.webp

After his suspension, many lolicons and loli supports posted tweets in celebration.
tweet (A)
IMG_2252.webp
Tweet/A
IMG_2262.webp
Tweet/A
IMG_2263.webp

The community note makes it seem like Hancxck is a pedophile. Now is that true?
I would say there’s nothing that points in that direction.

Accusation one: grooming
The only piece of evidence I can find to support is the archived link at the bottom of the proposed community note to Hancxck’s tweet - https://archive.ph/8gAn9
IMG_2255.webp
This is probably a joke biased of the intentionally little context given and the fact that he made jokes of this same nature in the past. L/A (Be aware before you click the link the first image in the tweet is extremely disgusting and is correctly describes as CSEM: images /videos that are a step below CSAM and are legal to have in your possession. I will go into more detail about this topic later, but TLDR is it’s poor evidence of pedophilia.)
IMG_2256.webpIMG_2257.webp


Accusation two: Spreading CSEM

L/A
IMG_2258.webp
This accusation carries a lot more weight. By searching ThamTvMaster tweets about Hancxck there is an image that repeatedly shows up, which I think is the image referred to as CSEM.
The image contains two fully clothed people, one an adult woman who is pretending to give oral sex to a young boy. This image is disgusting and I recommend avoiding look at the image even though it’s not illegal. I hope the woman who took that photo is currently rotting in prison or hell.
L/A
IMG_2259.webp
That being said this is terrible evidence of Hancxck being a pedophile. The text that proceeds the photo gives the idea that this photo was used as a reaction image for lack of better terms.
IMG_2260.webp
While I don’t know for sure, I assume that this is some conversation about making fun of someone for replying to e-whores. Given that natahrie (A) is one her herself, and Splaff is calling him a hypocrite.
IMG_2261.webp
This leads me to believe that the image was used to imply that he has bitches and therefore it’s not pathetic when he replies to e-whores.
While Hancxck deserves an ass beating for using that image, there is nothing that even hints at him having an attraction to minors. No matter what you think of Hancxck, lolicons have slandered him as a pedophile.
I would like to point out that this spits in the face of the lolicon talking point that calling someone a pedophile is a sacred thing a must be reserved for child touches and CSAM consumers. Remember these people don’t care about pedophilia it’s just a deflection.
Also one final note the ThamTvMaster (A) guy is a lolicon.
T/ no archive cause archive.is is giving me an over 1500 queue, so if some could add an archive when the queue shortens I would appreciate that.
IMG_2264.webp
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2254.webp
    IMG_2254.webp
    49 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:
Cheese_lad said:
The community note makes it seem like Hancxck is a pedophile. Now is that true?
Click to expand...
"Everybody who doesn't faps to lolis is a pedophile. The ones who fap to lolis are very educated gents who understand the artistic expression behind traced CSAM. Or something"
 
Slaughterhouse said:
This argument is not only ASTRONOMICALLY wrong and biased, it's used as a gotcha too.

As a psychology student, here, I'll be a nice person and break it down for all the kiddie fappers seething over this thread on why those arguments are not comparable in anyway.
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for going in-depth. I did this before on the VTuber thread, and pretty much did this, only in different terms:
  1. Mortal Kombat: The "objective" of the game isn't to destroy your enemy with a fatal blow. This is what makes it different. The core game is composed with fighting moves, and requires the player to use strategy and real time thinking in inputting the right controls into "getting good" compared to the other player or the computer. As well as a story that comes with it. The fatality is a novelty of the game.
  2. Grand Theft Auto/Red Dead Redemption: The Sandbox games get into hot water (the former more than the latter) due to being a parody of modern day America. And while it may seem like "shoot crowds and run away from law enforcement" in theory, that is the game punishing the player for doing so. The game is focused on the player taking the life of the criminal underworld, doing oddjobs for street gangs and mafia types and eventually rising up and becoming someone of renown in the location they are in. Red Dead is a revisionist western which has more gore and violence which paints a more critical view of the colonization and the land lost by the indigenous peoples (regardless what one may think about it) - and is more serious in tone. The objective isn't to kill and see bodies decomposing or look at horses' testicles, but be amazed at the realism.
  3. (Extra example)Chiller: The best example of a "equal to Pornography" game would be the 1986 arcade game Chiller, where you basically kill poor souls chained in a castle. That's it. No goal. Just kill people. You could say "Hatred", but a better example would be a game where you'd instantly be booted up to a victim you are about to butcher and it has real, blood curling screams, blood and that's all you do. Simply. Try saying to people that's the type of game you play - a game you torture victims and you're into it. They'll look at you funny and say you need treatment. "But what about Surgeon Simulator": You are simulating a surgery, you need to play it correctly. Torture != surgery. One has a goal, the other has not. No whataboutism.
Click to expand...
As you can see here, the game which would have equivalency would be a Chiller-like game; no plot, no structure.
Slaughterhouse said:
Ask yourself these questions:
1. Do people who play violent games make terms such as "anti" or "tourist" to people who do not play violent games/do not like or enjoy violent games?
2. Do people who play violent games make weird slangs about killing people?
3. Do people who play violent games "uoooh" when they see their favorite characters online?
4. Do people who play violent games make communities dedicated to ONLY KILLING NPCS? And are toxic towards anybody who is critical of them?
5. Do people who play violent games name themselves on Xitter.com as "NPC pussy rapist killer"?
6. Do people who play violent games are hypocritical Epstein Hitler particles who blame all their problems on Jewish people, POC, women?
7. Do people who play violent questions have a heart attack when you criticize the country where said violent game is from?

If you answered to the following with " NO", congrats! You realized that people who play violent video games are NOT the same as lolicons.
Click to expand...
Another great point. It's pretty much imagining weed culture, and replacing it with a hypothetical "beer culture". It would be pathetic all the same. "Yeah, let's worship the malt and the milling process to turn the barley into our precious drink!!!".
In the same coin, imagine "fans of violent video games" went with this icon: 😡, followed by "Fuck yeah, let's get to killing!!!!". You'd think it's a parody, and that instead of making violent, video games makes people idiotic.
Cheese_lad said:
Yesterday a twitter account called Hancxck (who I think is a hoodweeb) got suspended after he made a post criticizing Saba /gura gura.
Click to expand...
While no saint, this guy "exposes" the criminal part of lolicons, and they can't have that. What do we have? Dogpile!
And in case he didn't do anything wrong, they would find a way to "manufacture evidence".
 
Outer Space Traveller said:
Thank you very much for going in-depth. I did this before on the VTuber thread, and pretty much did this, only in different terms:
Click to expand...
Your points are also very well articulated. Yes, it also depends on the objective of the games and the "message" they send.
The fact you don't even need to be some sort of professional licensed psychiatrist to understand the logic behind games vs lolicon, proves that one side (that being, this thread) , is more educated than the sex pests (lolicons).

Outer Space Traveller said:
Another great point. It's pretty much imagining weed culture, and replacing it with a hypothetical "beer culture". It would be pathetic all the same. "Yeah, let's worship the malt and the milling process to turn the barley into our precious drink!!!".
Click to expand...
Funny and correct comparison. For lolicons, it's called the " predator culture ".;)
 
Slaughterhouse said:
This argument is not only ASTRONOMICALLY wrong and biased, it's used as a gotcha too.

As a psychology student, here, I'll be a nice person and break it down for all the kiddie fappers seething over this thread on why those arguments are not comparable in anyway.
Click to expand...
I agree with you

But at the same time.... I like to cause mischief
472172170_10164409242946840_2773771562060713439_n.webp
 
Cheese_lad said:
Yesterday a twitter account called Hancxck (who I think is a hoodweeb) got suspended after he made a post criticizing Saba /gura gura.
Click to expand...
He sounds like a degenerate, but not a pedophile. Nero and Chibi gravedancing support that. Once again the Lolicons dogpile. Truly pathetic
 
FuluFuckwit said:
Most people that jerk to porn want to do the deed being shown, be the act drawn or not.
REMEMBER: THE SHIT EATERS LIKE SHIT PORN. DRAWN AND REAL.

"FALSE EQUIVALENCY!!!!"
No, it's an objective fact.
Click to expand...
If 2 characters are male and they are presented as having sex, that is homosexual pornography. If 2 characters, one male, one female, are presented having sex, that is heterosexual pornography. When two characters, one adult, one child are presented to have sex, that is _____
 
Cheese_lad said:
-Lolicons being slanderous faggots-
Click to expand...
It's amazing how these fuckers have to continuously lie or exaggerate the fuck ups of the people that oppose them to try and act like we're the real pedos. Which is hilarious because even if they were right, they'd still be fucked. If a pedo calls the shit you prop up pedo shit...then it's probably pedo shit lmaoooooo.
 
The Koral Hunter said:
It's amazing how these fuckers have to continuously lie or exaggerate the fuck ups of the people that oppose them to try and act like we're the real pedos. Which is hilarious because even if they were right, they'd still be fucked. If a pedo calls the shit you prop up pedo shit...then it's probably pedo shit lmaoooooo.
Click to expand...
In clinical fields we call that "projection"
Sometimes "schizophrenia", even.
 
Resident Knievel said:
Not hugely lolicon related but Nexusmods has announced today they’ll be implementing hash matching and other methods to detect CSAM (as ordered by the UK government). As expected the comments are rancid.
Click to expand...
>Nexusmods does something actually good (even if they were ordered to) for once
>"NOOOO MY CSAM AND GROOMING VICTIMS REEEEEEE"
Amazing how they don't even hide it.
Cheese_lad said:
L/A
Click to expand...
You didn't link the archive friend.
Cheese_lad said:
no archive cause archive.is is giving me an over 1500 queue, so if some could add an archive when the queue shortens I would appreciate that.
Click to expand...
Here you go. May Allah forgive me for looking at that image even for posterity.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom