UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Where were you when the Chancellor of our great country was brought to fucking tears by her own job?

This is front page on the BBC, her sour face that looks like Dot Cotton licking piss off a nettle. Being brought to tears by your own job after a humiliating week of about 5 u-turns is incredible.

Of course, the Treasury put out a statement saying it was a "private matter". How on earth is this happening when they have such a huge majority of MPs? Incredible political incompetence on show here.

IMG_20250702_133630.webp

Full video, this needs to be archived:

Local archive of why women shouldn't be in these positions of intense power:
 
Last edited:
I really wish we had an equivalent version of "it's so Joever".

The chancellor, one of the most powerful people in government whose decisions affect literally everything, is in bits on the frontbench. Apparently a personal issue, of course anything could be considered a personal issue, even knowing the writing is on the wall for your job (which she shouldn't have anyway considering the CV shenanigans).

Starmer can't answer questions about tax rises from another party that is completely fucked, the conservatives. Serious question, why are the conservatives still sat across from the party in power? They aren't the opposition, even the Liberal Demotwats are in a better position. Why can't we have Farage sat across from Labour bringing the whole frontbench to tears?

I only started paying attention to politics at the end of Tony Blair's reign, but I can't remember any party being as thoroughly hated by everyone so early. There wasn't this much disarray and bullshit even when the conservatives were struggling on with DUP support. Labour have a decent majority yet Starmer can't stop spinning in circles trying to decide which way to go without upsetting people. Never known such a weak willed PM.
 
considering the CV shenanigans)
She lied about her past and her abilities, and now she's sat there in tears in front of millions of people in a video that will never be erased. I've done a year in a job I've hated before and I'm very glad she is suffering the consequences of her own actions. Especially when her and her job especially affects whether my grandmother can afford to heat her home this winter.

Labour have a decent majority yet Starmer
I believe they have a larger or equivalent majority as Tony Blair. From now on, all MPs will just rebel to get what they want after two rounds of asking for concessions.

She'll be gone before the next Budget, resigning on "personal reasons", sending a gushing letter to Sir Keith (which was actually either written by ChatGPT or a PPS).
 
She could solve homelessness by allowing everyone to sleep under those eye-bags. I love watching PMqs everyone in that room is completely incompetent, so we just have to laugh.

Prediction: Next coming election (if there isn't a riot/something kicking off) Labour will form a coalition with the Liberal dems, SNP, Greens (take your fancy) in order to avoid a right-wing (Reform) taking control. This is similar to how Germany and other European countries have done it.
 
How on earth is this happening when they have such a huge majority of MPs?
It's likely because they have that huge majority. The PLP is fractured into opposing factions, who would be more cooperative (and easier to control) if Labour's majority were smaller. With this large majority, the factions within the party are large enough to function as pseudo-parties in their own right, which is why I've previously talked about Labour being three parties in a trenchcoat. The Starmer loyalists are a rump of a similar size to the Tories, or possibly even smaller. There's also a large contingent of Corbynite/Momentum loyalists, and a contingent that aligns broadly with gender-crit, anti-"woke", and anti-islam/immigrant positions, though that's a more nebulous group. There's some overlap between them, but the boundaries are fairly well defined, giving these two outsider groups significant leverage over the cabinet. The rebellion over the benefits reform bill came from the corbyn-aligned group, for instance.

I believe they have a larger or equivalent majority as Tony Blair.
They do, but the party was more unified under Blair. Starmer styles himself as an inheritor of Blair's legacy, but he has all the personality of a snot-stained handkerchief and none of Blair's preternatural ability to convince people to go along with his ideas (some of which was admittedly because he'd set Prescott on anyone who refused).
 
Which nog or paki are they going to put on it?
If I had to put money on it, I'd say a reference to Windrush would be the most likely, even if it isn't a person, as I don't think there were any noteworthy individuals from among the deportees, I can definitely see them sneaking the ship itself onto the design somewhere. For the actual portraits though, I actually think a queer is more likely to feature than an ethnic, at least for now.

However, while I don't think they'd be so bold as to do so now, one person who I'm convinced the Bank of England will try to get on a bank note at some point in the next few years is William Henry 'Abdullah' Quilliam. Who for those unaware was a wealthy Victorian man who converted to Islam in the 1880's, founded the UK's first mosque as well as the Association of British Muslims, and also attempted to undermine British foreign policy in Sudan and the Ottoman Empire, a trend among the British upper middle class that must seem all too familiar nowadays.
 
Last edited:
Where were you when the Chancellor of our great country was brought to fucking tears by her own job?
Could you imagine being given her job?

"Cut spending and balance the budget, but also increase spending too whilst you're at it? Also, before you ask: no you can't touch benefits, make them harder to apply for, nor can we put a lid on immigration to lower the number of new applicants."
"Also you can't openly float the idea of raising taxes. Well, until we do so anyway last-minute to surprise everyone. You'll be shouldering most of the blame for that, if you don't mind."
"Also: increase investment and spending in our non-existent economy. No, we can't lower taxes or cut money from elsewhere; your plans must also exclude the richest and poorest from being affected. Try starting with people's savings?"
"Also could you find somewhere in the budget to house all illegals coming over on boats? The Conservatives had them in nice hotels, let's just continue that policy outright - wouldn't want to piss off the occupants after all. Deportations? You know we rely on their cousins for votes, we can do a silly thing like that just to lower costs over the long-term, you're thinking like an economist, not a politician silly billy. Speaking of which we need to install that fence around the Lords, feeling a tad unsafe as of late."
"Thanks, love."
1751462245178.webp
 
Twelve gazillion hours in Photoshop, by the way.

Didn't even need to touch up her eyes because they've already got their shit royally fucked up.

I'm amazed she didn't cry sooner after being made the personal scapegoat of:
- Killing thousands of pensioners due to the winter fuel payments
- Decimating the private business sector
- Driving up costs for every single person, including the people who verbally assault you whenever you show up to an MP's surgery
- Taking money away from the disabled

reevescry.webp
 
It's likely because they have that huge majority. The PLP is fractured into opposing factions, who would be more cooperative (and easier to control) if Labour's majority were smaller. With this large majority, the factions within the party are large enough to function as pseudo-parties in their own right, which is why I've previously talked about Labour being three parties in a trenchcoat. The Starmer loyalists are a rump of a similar size to the Tories, or possibly even smaller. There's also a large contingent of Corbynite/Momentum loyalists, and a contingent that aligns broadly with gender-crit, anti-"woke", and anti-islam/immigrant positions, though that's a more nebulous group. There's some overlap between them, but the boundaries are fairly well defined, giving these two outsider groups significant leverage over the cabinet. The rebellion over the benefits reform bill came from the corbyn-aligned group, for instance.
This is what a modern leftist government looks like. It's smaller weaker groups banding together to form a large group so they can take power. None of their goals align and most are in opposition of each other. The Anti-White Party has been elected and now they are breaking down because the war is over.

What changes to the benefits bill have been approved? The Lords still need to throw most of it out. The only good thing was enabling switching between benefits and work without automatically losing the benefits.

@Crunkie posted the thread in community happenings. Prepare for idiots.
 
Briton Ferry Labour councillor said 'what are we going to do about all the black people' coming to town:

Archive: https://archive.ph/8Dnrk

Dopey Diane Abbott brands IDF the ‘Jewish Defence Force’. There's now calls for Labour to remove whip from MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington for ‘the latest in her long line of anti-Jewish offences’:

Archive: https://archive.ph/Xtrgi
 
Dopey Diane Abbott brands IDF the ‘Jewish Defence Force’. There's now calls for Labour to remove whip from MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington for ‘the latest in her long line of anti-Jewish offences
I throw the word around a lot on the farms, but Diane Abbott is by far the dumbest nigger in British politics. All the stupid shit she does and has already done, she still somehow remains an MP. Is it because she is black? I can't imagine a white MP getting away with the same.
 
'She was crying over an unrelated personal matter.' Bollocks. If Reeves was upset about something else then there was plenty of opportunity to duck out of PMQs. The 'personal matter' is that she now knows she is fucked. She will not last beyond the Budget. Either she resigns before then or the fallout from what she will now have to announce will do it for her.

All the stupid shit she does and has already done, she still somehow remains an MP. Is it because she is black? I can't imagine a white MP getting away with the same.

That and longevity. Starmer tried to quietly ease her out of the door at the last election - she made a fuss and he had to relent otherwise she would have run as an independent and won her seat.
 
Prosecutors consider further charges against Letby

Prosecutors are considering bringing further charges against Lucy Letby following the deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at hospitals where she worked.
"As always, we will make that decision independently, based on the evidence and in line with our legal test."
Yet, they ignore:
Earlier this year her legal team, led by barrister Mark McDonald, submitted an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which has the power to refer cases back to the Court of Appeal for a full hearing.

The application contained a report from a panel of 14 international experts in neonatology and paediatric care.

After reviewing evidence heard at Letby's trial, panel members concluded that they believed no babies had been deliberately harmed.
Last month former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said Letby's case should be "urgently re-examined" due to what he called "serious and credible" questions raised by the expert panel.
Letby, originally from Hereford, has always maintained her innocence.

She has lost two separate bids to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal.
🤔
In an unrelated development, Cheshire Police on Tuesday announced that three former senior managers at the Countess of Chester Hospital had been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter.
Unrelated? It's just coincidence that new charges are looking at being applied to a woman who 14 international experts and 2 high-up government officials say is innocent.


The hospital Letby worked at was Countess of Chester Hospital.
From the Wiki

From 2015 to 2016 the trust cancelled urgent operations 37 times – the highest number of any NHS trust in England.
The same time that Letby was allegedly(?) murdering kids.
On 15 June 2022, the BBC published an article stating that the Care Quality Commission inspection found that the maternity unit was unsafe with problems in adequately trained staff and suitable equipment they also found that in 2021 there five patients had major haemorrhages after giving birth at the hospital, resulting in a need for unplanned hysterectomies.<a
The problems still haven't been fixed.

Former head of nursing says she believes Letby is innocent

A former top nurse at the trust where Lucy Letby carried out her crimes has said she believes the former neonatal nurse is innocent.
Ms Rees, in October 2024, told the Thirlwall Inquiry that she initially felt that consultants who raised the alarm about Letby were doing so because of a “personal issue”.
“The one person that knows her nursing team is the manager or the unit manager — not a consultant that visits a couple of times a week,” Ms Rees said.
Ms Rees made a public statement in August 2023, when she said Letby was “convincing”, “calculated” and that she had deceived her.

Asked about this statement by the Sunday Times, Ms Rees said she made it on the advice of her lawyers, and that she regretted doing so.
Is this nurse clout chasing? Possibly. But why did lawyers tell her to say Letby was guilty?



Since Letby, The CoCH has been through several CEO's, including one who was bullied out of her position and is currently suing them for a lot of money.


Here is the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health report from 2016 - Letby says this report proves her innocence. In the report, which was commissioned due to high child mortality rates, it states that two of the clusters of unexplained deaths were under-reported. That 10 of the 13 deaths weren't input into the DATIX incident reporting software that the NHS use to log near misses and deaths, because the trust said they were "expected deaths". The report admits that it never received a definition for what "expected deaths" were and assumed the definition.

There's a rabbit hole here that extends beyond Letby. The current board that runs CoCH is made up of members from Liverpool Heart and Chest. The consultants names hired to investigate the deaths in 2016, and the consultants names who accused Letby of killing kids, hasn't been disclosed. If it has, I can't find it, and I would be interested in seeing if they're the same name or team.

Here's some observations

Jeremy Hunt was Health secretary during these deaths - he was hated for his cuts to the NHS and refusal to give pay rises, while lambasting Donald Trump for having privatised healthcare and not an NHS style system. Why would a career snake like Hunt, who is responsible for those deaths, say Letby is innocent, at the risk of taking on responsibility for those deaths? Wouldn't it be beneficial to keep quiet or lay the blame on Letby?

Capita owned 3 of the major agencies recruiting for under-staffed wards, of which, CoCH was one of them. According to the report, the top echelons were not understaffed, and paid £125k+ a year, yet the lower ranks were.

Those who worked with Letby say she didn't have the emotional capacity to harm, as she was too soft when anyone was hurt. With one ex manager told to purger herself as advised by her lawyer.

Neonatal deaths were classed as "expected deaths" to keep the number of deaths low, until they got too large and external consultants were brought in to investigate what was going on.

Here's what I think happened:

The top managers were fully staffed and purposely kept the Tier 1 and Tier 2 positions understaffed. They then called in Capita, who charged 49% higher for the costs of agency workers than hiring other nurses. Some of that extra profit was bunged the way of the managers. Unfortunately, the agency workers, who are predominantly brownoid, started killing kids due to lack of hygiene, ability or because they don't care.
Rather than losing the contract for the entire NHS, causing a political shit storm of immigrants killing kids, every one kept quiet, hiding deaths and fudging numbers until it became too obvious. At that point, a scapegoat was required; Letby. Consultants were paid to come in and blame the nurse who would be easy to blame - without making them brownoid, and possibly to cover-up for their report in 2016 that wasn't acted upon.
CEOs were shuffled out and as one grew a conscience - or found out by mistake, what had happened, she went to blow the whistle, only to be fired, dragged over the coals and financially ruined.

I would post this in the Letby thread, but I can't be arsed with 100 posts of "hur dur, en aych ess bad" by some fat, retarded yank.
 
What
Where were you when the Chancellor of our great country was brought to fucking tears by her own job?

This is front page on the BBC, her sour face that looks like Dot Cotton licking piss off a nettle. Being brought to tears by your own job after a humiliating week of about 5 u-turns is incredible.

Of course, the Treasury put out a statement saying it was a "private matter". How on earth is this happening when they have such a huge majority of MPs? Incredible political incompetence on show here.

View attachment 7588482

Full video, this needs to be archived:

Local archive of why women shouldn't be in these positions of intense power:
View attachment 7588522
What an utter joke of a fucking country, you could get a more ordered, respectable conversation in a brothel's basement.

Also
>WHEN
>A
>BLACK
>WOMAN
>SPEAKS!
 
If Reeves was upset about something else then there was plenty of opportunity to duck out of PMQs.
So they've now changed the question from: "Why is Reeves crying?" to "Why did you insist Reeves attend PMQs when she had a serious personal matter?".

Politicians are like children, just accept their lies and press for more and they slip up after no time at all.
 
Back