Video Game Archival Autism / TCRF / Jul / Sonic Retro / And More - Harvest Troon: Friends of Byuu-Near-al town

Nitpick: If CC works like the GPL, he retains the copyright for his contributions, and to grossly oversimplify it, he may not be bound by the terms he licenses it under to others. (For example, he may choose to redistribute with a different license.) But your intuition might end up being right anyway; the wiki may count as a joint work, because individual edits aren't really separable. In that case:
I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong. It is a rather involved area. I hadn't considered it in terms of a joint work. My first instinct is to say it isn't but the more I think about it, it might be. You're correct - can't really separate out all the edits and it's all under one banner without clear separation of authorship. I feel that what I wrote earlier about violation of licence terms is still correct. And CC does work like GPL in that the author retains copyright, fwiw. In fact, that's the basis on which an author can licence things under it. But you can't revoke the licence. You can only force people to comply with the licence or not use the material. (N.b. some legal debators suggest you can revoke the licence but on something as big as that, trust me - it's not going to be the TCRF guy that brings the house of GPL/CC crashing down).

As to the money aspect, hadn't even occurred to me. I'm about Free Information (man), not filthy lucre. But... as you raise the topic, it's pretty interesting. He has a Patreon account which is bringing in just under $400 per month.

1751381180756.webp

It's under the TCRF website name and stated to be for purposes of running the site.
1751381225973.webp

So I'm certain that this guy has a separate bank account for it and proper accounting and none of the funds have ever gone into his personal expenses. Totally certain. But some back of the envelope calculations from me just for Devil's Advocate...

Total images and other media < 200GB based on the size of the compressed version on the Wiki archive page. Total CPU requirements for some basic PHP under low demand, probably 4 vCPUs would do it most days. Bandwidth harder to estimate but many hosting companies will just give you a combined package with a reasonable allowance and I highly doubt he's over such limits - it's mostly text with some medium to low resolution videos, ogg files, and images. Hell the very nature of the project means most of the media is old stuff that could be stuffed on a compact disc or RAM cartridge. He'll want a separate server for the database if he has any sense but that'll just be some basic MySQL/MariaDB and what do we reckon... 30,000 pages and their edit histories.... eh, I'm going to ballpark it and say 200GB tops again. The reason I don't care to exhaustively pick that apart is because I already realise that just eyeballing this stuff it's going to come to way less than the income from the Patreon. Could get something with 250GB storage and 8 vCPUs and 16GB RAM for < $30pm. Double that for the separate DB server (presuming he's set it up as a separate DB server which it's very possible he hasn't).

Honestly, if I were doing this I'd have it on Azure or AWS and be spinning resource up or down according to demand but he doesn't seem that tech savvy.

So that leaves us with a question: Where is the $200-300 spare going that doesn't cover hosting costs each month? Is it just piling up or is it going somewhere. So far as I can see he just runs this Patreon himself.

He said himself in the tweets that trying to block and ban people is the most active he's been in years. So where does that money go?

There's another problem with setting up the wiki, it's the space it takes. It should take up to 100 GB in memory and that could make hosting difficult. I know about Linode, Google Cloud and Dreamhost, are they any good and are they cheap for 100 GB? Obv it's a wiki so new content will be added, it would mean that 100 GB is the bare minimum, but ideally, we'd want the double of that.
Linode seem good though I've not used them professionally. Their solutions are far more rudimentary than AWS and Azure when I assessed them but for basic hosting or if you know your way around Kubernetes, they seem decent. Cheaper than AWS and Azure as well. They're advocated by the L1 Tech guys and Wendell would never let us down. Personally I would be using AWS or Azure but MediaWiki is a basic LAMP stack (Linux + Apache + MySQL + PHP). You can just stick it on any old traditional web hosting package.

Also, you've misspoken. It wont take up 100GB in memory. Nothing like that. You could run a large MediaWiki instance with 16GB of RAM. That impacts load (number and variety of requests) not total Wiki size. Now it'll take 100GB of disk space. More like 200 - 250GB by my rough estimates. But that's fine. I'm looking at a deal right now which offers 480GB SSD storage for $35 per month. That's enough to put the DB AND the binary files and the code all on one disk very probably. If it does go over that a bit, next tier up isn't much more.

I can't fully estimate costs without knowing expected number of users. Because that affects the processor and RAM power you need. But I can tell you it's not going to be that much. If someone laid down $40 per month I'd give pretty good odds that would be enough to cover the hosting and bandwidth costs.


Also hosting the wiki locally is doable, I even got a pen drive with 128 GB space, but I or anyone else would need to pay extra so that their ISP doesn't just tell you to fuck off when you've used a fuckton of bandwidth.
You can now get fibre to the home service which is symmetrical. There are probably multiple users on this forum that have something like 500Mbps up and down speed at home (lucky them). What you need is a fixed IP address. If you have that and the good upload speed yes, you probably could run it from home quite happily. You could throw up some cheap old box with a couple of SSDs in it and have plenty of resource for running it. This is presuming you weren't just running it in Docker on a box you already had for other purposes.

And as importantly, you would be able to move from your local system to a hosted solution quite easily just by exporting and re-importing the database and copying the files up. There would be a concern with DDoS attacks which you wouldn't have much defence against but maybe Null would kindly licence you KiwiFlare. Also, you probably wouldn't be dumb enough to incense a bunch of Sharties by banning people over your political views and therefore bring one down on you in the first place. :)
 
Last edited:
the licensing thing is retarded, like anyone is going to take anyone to court over a video game wiki lmao

but with a cc-by license, he's basically saying this is the shit i host on my website and this is how you can use it legally. the main focus on CC-BY is giving credit if you take the text. so xkrepper cant take you to court over taking wiki text or some shit if you credit.

but nothing is stopping him from blocking your ip or overall being an ass (at least by looking at the cc-by license). if you bypass the traps he setup, it's yours, no matter how much he seethes
 
Last edited:
That's a lot of words to say you're just gonna wipe account histories and ban them as an excuse for "no activity".
I hate to be devil's advocate, but to be fair in this case he's literally running a single script, and not much more. Unlike the IP ban shit he's actually handling this one pretty normally all things considered, the script being run is a generic mediawiki maintenance script. In fact he even made bsky post (A) making fun of this thread for this sort of claim. That said the timing is really suspicious, and I'm sure he wouldn't have gotten the idea without getting assfucked by the 'teens almost a month ago.

More CC-BY related seething from X:
Archived thread.


ALSO ALSO THIS FUCKER USES KF AND HE JUST CONFIRMED IT:
1751402678924.webp

X IF YOU THINK YOU'RE SO SMUG, SMART, AND RIGHT WHY DON'T YOU MAKE AN ACCOUNT AND PROVE US WRONG?
 
View attachment 7584918
If you’re so tired, X, then you can stop checking this thread any time you want. Take a break, man.
The lack of selfawareness is staggering, considering he's the only reason this thread gained 100+ pages and he got a thread of his own. All he had to do was "never mention this garbage again". But he loves the attention.
 
Here’s an idea: there’s a hoard of a bunch of video game prototypes on eBay. What if we chimes together, buy it, dump them BUT only give them to Null, and then destroy them all on camera?
Hoarding video game prototypes is nigger-tier shit and anyone who does that deserves to have someone pop their most prized WATA graded game with a pneumatic framing nail gun.
 
Something unrelated to the drama but that I would like to mention, was trying to download the unreleased game Return Fire for the Sega Saturn.

There's a page on the Hidden Palace with a download link for the game.
1751473602754.webp
I try to download it and.. I get a 404 Not Found error. Great site!
Luckily, it says the game as been dumped by the people at https://sega-saturn.net/, and I could successfully download the games without any issues.

I don't have much faith in them fixing their shit.
 
I try to download it and.. I get a 404 Not Found error. Great site!
Dumb question but have you looked on Archive.org for it too? Sometimes things like that get mirrored there by people trying to do the right thing thinking they are a reliable archive.
 
XYKeeper went and hid 47 different revisions to a user's page, as the page had personal info on it. At first, I figured maybe the account was a troll dumping janny dox, but the user wasn't blocked, so it's just some person who put too much personal info on his user page. Hit up archive.org to see what was hidden, found a few captures:


Also this came up when I tried to view the edit history of his userpage:
Screenshot_20250702_132831_Firefox.webp
Is this the case for all edit history pages across the wiki? Or is this XYKeeper getting the IA people to make it forbidden to make new snapshots of any TCRF links?
 
Dumb question but have you looked on Archive.org for it too? Sometimes things like that get mirrored there by people trying to do the right thing thinking they are a reliable archive.
I tried and it was unfortunately not backed up there. However the original source for the dumps still had the games on their site, so no big deal.
 
More CC-BY related seething from X:
View attachment 7584314
View attachment 7584315


I did.
View attachment 7584340
View attachment 7584341
Here’s the full legal code for CC-BY-3.0 (which those screenshots are taken from) in case anyone wants to read through it.

Got a genuine laugh out of this one. Mainly at the sheer hypocrisy of this guy. He's reading threads here on the Farms whilst simultaneously banning ordinary users for merely visiting here. Utter double-standard.

Further, what does he mean he didn't read the licence? If you publish material under a licence and didn't read that licence, that doesn't change anything. And he's going for two-scoops of hypocrisy today - when he says he's not providing content for others for free, said content is actually freely given to his site by its creators. And under licence terms that says anyone can copy and use it. Free for he but not for thee. Also, said licence prohibits the introduction of technical measures to prevent sharing. Guy is out and out admitting he's a parasite on the Creative Commons and Open Source movement - he'll use creators content on his site but "not free for others".

the licensing thing is retarded, like anyone is going to take anyone to court over a video game wiki lmao
Less than you think. It doesn't need to reach a court of law. There's merit in simply showing that he's violating the Creative Commons licence and it gives a legitimate basis for the creators of the content to tell him to knock it off. This is nothing to do with any DDoS. He's openly declared that his intent is to block archiving and sharing because he regards the content as his (it isn't. It's licenced to the site).

There's no moral defence of this. Completely against the spirit of Creative Commons movement and the good faith of contributors. He's an unstable individual who is creating a real risk of this content being lost and actively working against measures to secure it.

but with a cc-by license, he's basically saying this is the shit i host on my website and this is how you can use it legally. the main focus on CC-BY is giving credit if you take the text. so xkrepper cant take you to court over taking wiki text or some shit if you credit.
Possibly. But the content is licenced to the TCRF site under CC-BY. It's not content he produced. It could be argued as a joint work but that still wouldn't make him owner of it.

but nothing is stopping him from blocking your ip or overall being an ass (at least by looking at the cc-by license). if you bypass the traps he setup, it's yours, no matter how much he seethes
See my posts earlier. Actually there are clauses in the version of the licence he's used that forbid this. He's not blocking people for being an ass, he's doing so to prevent archiving and sharing of the information. Which the licence declares legitimate uses. He's trying to have it both ways by people contributing freely to the site under CC but also saying it's his and others can't have it for free (his own words). Whether or not it goes to court, he's shot himself in the foot for any moral high ground.

Also, again pretty funny that he's sharing screenshots from this site whilst banning others for coming here. Seriously, what kind of megalomaniac tries to police what websites his visitors may read?
 
>h-he's importing an incompatible license! lol, what a dummy!!
>oh and also he said not to import anything because he's making an archive (but just ignore that, here lemme inspect-element it out)

XKeeper, I don't see why you gotta paint me as the enemy. I'm literally doing you a favor! If there's an archive up of your stuff, no casual reader will ever complain about getting banned from your site again!
But I guess maybe you like it when people complain, since it makes you feel powerful. Let it be known, XKeeper- I have actual respect for you & your work. What I don't respect is your personality. You're a smug douchebag who does nothing but put others down whenever the opportunity presents itself. Totally unbecoming behavior of a moderator of a community oriented site. I'm not doing this because "TCRF le WOKE!!!" like you say (believe me, I don't give a shit, if that were the reason you'd have a legit reason to poke fun at me). YOU did this to YOURSELF. You have no right to complain about being bit in the ass by ANYONE after treating people the way you do.
Anyways, here's the progress report on the archive.


1751491870993.webp
Evidently, I still have a lot left to do. The images are ready, thanks to that torrent, I'm just still figuring out how to host them in a cost effective way.
I'm not throwing the site up just YET because I want it to at least be semi-readable.
 
Back