US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you need to read what you posted, they lasted from post ww2 to glasnost and were controversial

And I choose the infographics because they reflect my research and understanding of the world at large.
rabbi schneerson never said any of those quotes. They quote a fascist newspaper called Славянин that claims he made these remarks but no other source can confirm.
 
You know here is a good question to ponder, if you have a piece of media that is meant to satarize or make fun off a certain group of people, but those said groups being made fun odd instead embrace the piece of media, then does that mean you failed at making satire?

Look at something like at how certain people describe warhammer 40k. They will claim it is a parody or satire of fascism or authoritarianism but when you actually dig into the lore and stories of 40k you come to realize that EVERYTHING the impurium does has not only a good explanation behind it but also good justification. The reason why the impurium kills 1000 psykers everyday is because if they don't, then the emporer will die and thus making warp travel impossible and segregating the impurium, everything the impurium does it does so not out of intended crulty but out of a cruel necessity.

And this applies to other series and franchises as well, star wars, starship troopers (movie), helldivers, etc. In the end if you intend to starize people do t make the people you're satirizing look cool.
View attachment 7610188
Wasn't it lib English professors who championed the whole death of the author thing? I know they didn't invent the concept but they promoted it in order to push whatever commie view of traditional literature they felt like that class.

Rather funny they're getting asshurt at rightoids doing the same thing and taking their own view of a character as more important than the authors intention with the character. Not so fun when people you don't like do it to work you like and respect, huh?
 
Why does supporting a journalist that is funded by a half Iranian half Pakistani who makes content that whitewashes third world regimes make someone MAGA? Tucker expressed support for Mamdani in the NYC mayoral election, something directly at odds with Trump's policy.
See the trouble with you types is you don't just see bait, you champ down on it like a fucking complete dipshit proving the point.
He didn’t express support for his election he just said on the Israel question during the debate he was most correct. A 5 second search disproves this you Dishonest lying kike
As said above but:
I served in the IDF as a conscript
I legit did not expect it'd twist all the way into you just straight the fuck up admitting something as hilariously self-owning as this, to be completely straight with you.

The problem with the Tucker question is that it's true. MIGA people fucking hate his existence and cannot, must not allow someone to say or mention that as an identifier unchallenged. I figured I'd just get angry stickers rather than a spergout. But my point stands, it's a statement that is both true and works to prove itself when made.
 
See the trouble with you types is you don't just see bait, you champ down on it like a fucking complete dipshit proving the point.
proving the point = having people like me point out how he consistently softballs questions and break down exactly how he caters to his interview subjects by asking questions that seem hard hitting but arent

I legit did not expect it'd twist all the way into you just straight the fuck up admitting something as hilariously self-owning as this, to be completely straight with you.
Why is this an own? I was conscripted. What should I have done instead, go to prison?
 
It's the same I've dealt with a long time on anti-gun left. They LOVE when a big shooting happens so they can rant and rave and go 'seee? TOLD YA' and they cum.
Bringing up Chicago is the fastest way to shut faggots like that up. Simply ask "why does Chicago have such a high gun crime numbers despite having the strictest gun control laws in the country?"

No answer they can give is adequate, they know (or realize) it, and they're eager to change the subject once they reach that point. Reason being you can provide the correct answer yourself -- criminals don't care about breaking the law. It's an obvious concept to us, but it's a cognitive dissonance thing for them and it makes them uncomfortable.

It's fun! Give it a try!
 
So what? One witness putting Fisch at the scene doesn't exonerate Hauptmann. A lot of evidence pointed solidly in his direction. Plus, don't you know that the latest/greatest conspiracy theory is that Lindbergh himself killed the baby in the course of a medical experiment? Get with the times, bro.
 
Dual citizenship was a mistake and Trump should EO it from being a thing.
A problem then arises when you have other nations such as Ghana and Israel offering ‘right of return’ citizenship, which makes those with that right de facto dual citizens, whether they have taken advantage of the right or not.

That EO would have to make every Jewish and Ghanaian-descended citizen of the US a non-citizen overnight, subject to immediate deportation to their ‘rightful’ home nations.

There’s a cheap joke in there about how much better off the US might be for deporting all its Jews and half its blacks but the economic and political impact would absolutely tear the US apart.
 
The comparison I made to Scramblers from the story Blindsight is still going strong I see.
try answering the question instead. What was wrong or incorrect about my breakdown of how tucker operates as described here:

I expect something like this:


Tucker asks a fake "hard hitting question" that normies wouldn't know like "Why are you hosting Hamas in your country?" and the PM responds explaining that the reason that Hamas is in Qatar is because the US asked Qatar to host Hamas for negotiations. The PM stresses that just because Hamas is being hosted in their country doesn't mean that they support Hamas.

Now to the average consumer, this is a great answer because it deflects responsiblity from Qatar to the US. However, people who know the dynamics of the region can instantly call bullshit. Qatar doesn't just host Hamas, they fund Hamas and the greater Muslim Brotherhood. They're openly claiming to not support Hamas while giving them 1.8 billion dollars since 2007.

Tucker doesn't call him out on this, he lets it slide.


he clearly doesn't like in the example I just cited.

Tucker's platform is mainly to slowly introduce anti American ideals. Look at his recent interview with MTG where she openly stated that Iran sponsored terrorism against the US and killed our military but "we never belonged there in the first place" removing all agency from Iran

View attachment 7609803

And why is my conscription a "self own"? Should I have chosen to go to prison?

Try actually engaging with people instead of smugly referring to obscure science fiction
 
Apparently Ron DeSantis and Marjorie Taylor Greene were also honored with voodoo dolls
This lady is unironically pretty talented. She should open an etsy if she hasn't already, she'd make a ton of money selling those knit politicians (especially if she took comissions). I'd totally put little plush Miller or Homan on my shelf.
 
What was wrong or incorrect about my breakdown of how tucker operates as described here:
That has literally nothing to do with my statement that you think this pertains to, retard.
And why is my conscription a "self own"?
Wow geez I wonder why admitting to being conscripted into the IDF might be a self-own? It's a real brain buckler.
Try actually engaging with people
I am, you don't seem to realize that my original statement and the one that followed it both aren't in any way related to what is essentially a non-sequitur.

Nothing about Tucker's personal character changes what I said nor what I said in relation to your spergout. This isn't hard to understand. It's like you think I, or literally anyone else for that matter, have to personally like him or approve of him for this:
A simple way to know if someone is MIGA rather than MAGA is by hatred of Tucker but 'support' of Trump.
statement to be correct. It doesn't depend on that. It categorically doesn't.
 
Wasn't it lib English professors who championed the whole death of the author thing?
It was a specific sort of French philosopher who's been condemned as dead white male racist colonial etc. by the entire American academy for several decades now.

Anyone who complains about postmodernism has never seen the inside of a "good school." I'm so old I look like the ghost of a rabbi and that shit was dead before I was a freshman.

"Media literacy," "poptimism," all the corporate-obedience ideas took over before this century even began.
 
I forgot this was even a thing, Any of you see these protests?
Oddly, I neither saw anything in the news nor saw anything from left-leaning associates who post about them. My guess is that the heatwave affecting a good chunk of the US led to many of these protestors opting to stay home because protesting in 90-some degree (32-38 Celsius for non-Americans) is too hard.
 
Wow geez I wonder why admitting to being conscripted into the IDF might be a self-own? It's a real brain buckler.
So explain it.

That has literally nothing to do with my statement that you think this pertains to, retard.
statement to be correct. It doesn't depend on that. It categorically doesn't.
You're arguing that anyone who dislikes a certain journalist but supports trump is MIGA. I gave you examples of how this journalist regularly softballs interviews with third worldists and advances a form of isolationism that third worldists benefit most from. You are not able to handle criticism of your edaddy and refuse to address any of my criticism.

How exactly does not supporting a journalist who simps for the third world make anyone prioritize Israel over America?

What ensued was a radical shift in U.S. foreign policy, which promoted a stance of isolationism that would last until World War II. Warren Harding won the 1920 presidential election on the promise of staying out of global affairs, and by arguing that the United States needed normalcy and a focus on internal problems

The US occupied Nicaragua from 1912 to 1933, occupied Haiti from 1915-1934, stationed troops in Shanghai during 1927 to 1941 to protect American interests in China, This is just direct military intervention, not counting diplomatic pressure.

hard to argue America was ever truly isolationist if they were doing this during the "isolationist" period
 
Back