US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hypothetical question: You can release Episten files and cause of murder, but you lose all your blackmail material. Do you:
A). Release it so people on the internet can make fun of bong royalty and call Hawking a crippled pedo faggot on the internet.
B). Use it to threaten to make bongs do whatever you want for the rest of time and tell Israel to cool it on the friendly fire?
Neat, but neither of those things are happening.
 
Hypothetical question: You can release Episten files and cause of murder, but you lose all your blackmail material. Do you:
A). Release it so people on the internet can make fun of bong royalty and call Hawking a crippled pedo faggot on the internet.
B). Use it to threaten to make bongs do whatever you want for the rest of time and tell Israel to cool it on the friendly fire?
A. If we were a serious country and not a shambling corpse puppeteered by corrupt retards, we could make the UK and Israel do whatever we wanted the old fashioned way. There's no reason we can't just purge the senate, the House, the FBI, the CIA, and start acting like an actual superpower. The only thing holding us back is our childish desire to keep VOOOOOOTing.
 
Bass announced Tuesday that the city will be joining a private class action civil lawsuit against the Trump administration over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids.
Why are they going down the same "class action" route that SCOTUS has already slapped down? It's not going to work, or even delay anything this time.

Kinda reminds me of the "BAKE THE CAKE!" case in Colorado where it went all the way to SCOTUS, the bakery prevailed, and the fucking assholes just sued them again for the same fucking thing anyway. It took an appellate court judge to finally hit the brakes on that bullshit.
 
They could've ignored Epstein right up until '28 and nobody would've raised a big stink about it. But now the case has a big ass spotlight on it and nobody knows how to sweep it in a way the public will believe.
Exactly why they will lose all three branches of government to Democrats in 2028 and it will be all their fault.
 
I can live with that.

View attachment 7632639

Plus business leaders that illegal labor, deserve to be executed for treason.
I think they can differentiate between someone getting the 17 year old with fake ID switcharoo on them for blackmail since everybody already defended one of those (Matt Gaetz) and a regular customer to the island knowing full well what's going on there like Prince Andrew.
Pam Bondi coming out with the CP statement made my jaw drop. Like no shit we don't want to see that, you don't need to show us sex videos. If you're going to release media just release regular pictures like this or something. If they're sitting next to a trafficking victim or blackmail victim (the innocents they're most likely referring to) in a normal social setting like this, black them out.

0_PAY-Stephen-Hawking-on-Jeffrey.webp
 
This Sunday will be the one year anniversary that Shinzo Abe went "doink" and saved Trump's life.

241210-donald-trump-assassination-attempt-se-311p-445217.webp

I'm so glad this orange bastard won instead of Kamala Harris. Can you imagine how awful and grating it would be if she won? The 250th birthday of the country is going to be awesome. If Kamala won, it would be nothing but globohomo struggle sessions.
 
Last edited:
People saying things like "You are critiszizing Trump therefore you support the Democrats!" or the people going "MAGA is done for, Democrats will win 26 and 28" seem to not understand just how irrelevant the Democrats are as a legitimate political party. They aren't a political party, they are a terrorist group and they should be treated as such and talked about as such. No average American has any trust for the Democrats at all anymore and if everyone talked about them as the terrorists that they are then we can make them a figment of the past. Any talk about them winning anything or being a legitimate voice in US politics going forward is out of touch I think.
I think this is why people need to be more accepting of legitimate criticisms of Trump. Disliking Trump's actions doesn't mean supporting the Democrats, it's just an acknowledgement that he is in fact a human capable of doing things like covering up the Epstein files.
 
this is the biggest unforced error they could've made. They could've ignored Epstein right up until '28 and nobody would've raised a big stink about it. But now the case has a big ass spotlight on it and nobody knows how to sweep it in a way the public will believe.
It was originally announced via an internal memo that got leaked to Axios. This is why they're now going into overdrive trying to find leakers. They likely intended to ignore it like you suggested, but someone in the FBI or wherever decided to play Assange. The best part is that they likely only did it to hurt the Trump administration rather than out of any sense of nobility.
 
A. If we were a serious country and not a shambling corpse puppeteered by corrupt retards, we could make the UK and Israel do whatever we wanted the old fashioned way. There's no reason we can't just purge congress, the House, the FBI, the CIA, and start acting like an actual superpower. The only thing holding us back is our childish desire to keep VOOOOOOTing.
This. I don't give a fuck how these people are held to account, but I know based on all the Ukraine arming and Iran bombing that the Kikes and Eurotrash are not being brought to heel with strategic deployment of blackmail material, so I'm fine with moving forward with the risk of roving bands of maniacs from the internet crucifying or defenestrating these child rapist fucks and the people who associate with them.

They could have prosecuted the perps, thousands of videos, I refuse to believe they can't identify any of the monsters with their cock in a kid. President Trump and Billy Bagpipes and now Bondi have chosen not to. I have zero concern of what happens to the "'innocent" people on the list or the organizations or governments that they run, own or lead as a result.
 
I can live with that.

View attachment 7632639

Plus business leaders that illegal labor, deserve to be executed for treason.
Guess in this rotten house the roaches are structural lol

Little side note to the Cali pot farm raids: these were state licensed grow ops. Since weed was legalized in Cali, it's been a gripe among growers that only the most well-connected farms can muster the costs to cover all the environmental impact studies and whatnot required to get licensed. Gee I wonded if employing a bunch of illegals and child slaves does anything to the bottom line to help shoulder some of those costs.
California looks more and more like the Planter society of the American South, minus the chivalry and class.
 
so I'm fine with moving forward with the risk of roving bands of maniacs from the internet crucifying or defenestrating these child rapist fucks and the people who associate with them.
Would that even happen, though? Seems like the best riots you can get these days are illegals crying in already heavily blue cities about being deported.
A lot of people just can't be arsed to bother.
 
Why are they going down the same "class action" route that SCOTUS has already slapped down? It's not going to work, or even delay anything this time.
Unless there's been a new case I completely missed, they explicitly did not slap down class action cases like this but only nation wide injunctions. A couple of the conservative justices called out that the lower courts would switch to this tactic, but the ruling didn't disallow it.
 
Back