If the contractor I hired turned up on a bike I'd tell them I've chosen to go with someone else's services.
Yup. Which by the way, in over-regulated bughive cities like New York, to be a plumber (or other licensed tradesman) you have to have a New York driver's license. This doesn't
mean you have to drive a van, but why wouldn't you? You're not saving money by riding a bicycle, so you're both wasting your own time (especially as a big van can hold a bunch of various other stuff you might need) and money. The typical urbanist
doesn't have a driver's license, because getting a license means you actually have to drive and do stuff, and perhaps realize that cars aren't bad after all. (Performative urbanists like Jason have cars, but I'm not sure if most do--for example, the "Threads Urbanist", American Footsniffer or whatever his name was, had his wife do all the actual driving.)
That's the most annoying as most can generally agree but their maximalist bullshit along with sneaking in bughive nonsense is what will torpedo anything they want
Maximalist bullshit is right. Parking minimums are one of their bugaboos when it comes to urbanism (faux libertarianism) but that gets undermined by demanding that tax code gets changed to price out downtown parking lots, wants street parking to disappear (for bike lanes, of course), and even advocate for parking maximums. Freeway widening--they genuinely think that more cars would just materialize if you did so. (They don't).
They'll counter your point by showing someone in Finland cycling in the winter as a gotcha rather than viewing it as an anomaly.
Oh, it goes deeper than that. A while back American Foodslut recorded some chap on a bicycle in the rain (see
this post), the boomer cyclist grinned and waved at him, but the retard genuinely thought that he was happy to be out cycling in the rain.