Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Harvey Danger]

What happened to the "business meeting", Russ? In fact you said there were two business meetings in Winnemucca that day.

Weird it's an EMERGENCY motion to accommodate unavoidable business meetings when Russ thinks he can get something, but it gets downgraded to a "tiny motion" over personal affairs when he's getting held responsible for his actions.

 

[The Stranger]

My favourite part of that is his attempt at setting Tenth Circuit case precedent by citing the Second Circuit and asking the court to pretty please with a cherry on top apply it to this case because he's asking nicely.

I assume Hardin is going to find real cite where this was struck down in 10th, because he actually bothers to check his cites.

AFAIK the circuits are not supposed to disagree with each other. Obviously that doesn't mean every other circuit court is beholden to prior cases in another circuit, but I think they still do take their rulings into consideration.

 

[Sneed Force One]

He seems to think that opposing counsel in a lawsuit should not scrutinize him because he is a pro-se litigant, likely because the judge is supposed to show a pro-se litigant a bit more mercy?
I know that we already know he thinks that way but it's still amazing seeing it in writing.

Spittynigger, it is the moral responsibility of opposing counsel to nitpick your every action.

 

[StinkySnack]

"Plaintiff has been robbed of sleep by having to participate in the lawsuit that he himself initiated."

 

[Sneed Force One]

"Plaintiff has been robbed of sleep by having to participate in the lawsuit that he himself initiated."

You don't understand, the competence of the opposing counsel to not accept his bullshit willingly is causing Mr. Greee physical exhaustion, he will be suing Mr. Hardin for physical injury.

 

[Goofy Logic]

I'm starting to notice a pattern where this topic gets locked for off-topic sperging, only to be reopened almost immediately after because the docket gets updated.

Is... is Russ watching this tread and trying to keep it alive as proof Hardin is leaking stuff to the farms? Are we dancing for his amusement?

 

[The Un-Clit]

ECF 346; Greer wants to sanction the defense

I'm actually a little disappointed in our Magical Star Buddy.

I would have thought he was taking this time to build up the ultimate plightsperging filled motion of the entire trial so far, but instead we get a filing as limp as Greee's lower lip. Just an utterly toothless sanctions request for The Hardship doing what any good lawyer should do, the utmost to defend his client that is within the bounds of law.

His arguments are as pie in the sky as ever, and he clearly shows he doesn't understand why the extension request was denied, taking it simply to mean the judge was getting tired of Hardin's filings.

This is likely going to be hit with a fast DENIED either today or tomorrow, or else completely ignored until the date all the causes for dismissal are heard and ruled on, possibly making it moot.

Actually, I may be wrong on that. Do requests for sanctions still get considered even after a case is dismissed, @Useful_Mistake ?

ETA: it looks like it might not matter in this case if it was filed improperly without sufficient notice, but still curious in general.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Requires it to be presented to the offending party 21 days in advance

Come now, that's unfair. Greer wants to complain about things NOW.

NOW NOW NOW

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

I feel like this latest screed from Russ lacks a lot of his usual brave energy. He even ran out of energy for his last justification for sanctions and left practically a footnote of a section.

Just as stupid but not as enthusiastic. I wonder if he his cracking under the weight of realization that he is losing/lost a case the judge(s) keep/kept trying to win for him.

 

[DavidS877]

It's cute* he writes this like there's still a case to prosecute. He has no witnesses, he has no ebidance, the 2 alleged Does are out of the statute of limitations. This dead case is starting to rot and the court needs to just take it out and bury it before it stinks any more. But only after Mr. Hardin files another sanction request for Greee implying that he or Moonunit Josh is responsible for the postings to The Farms.

* Cute was shorter to write than abjectly fucking retarded.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Yet another "The mean nasty Kiwi's are being mean to me by pointing out my fraud and bad acts I demand you SANCTION THEM!" Filing. Complete with his cargo cult approach to law.

 

[Lapsus of the bepsus]

I feel like this latest screed from Russ lacks a lot of his usual brave energy. He even ran out of energy for his last justification for sanctions and left practically a footnote of a section.

Just as stupid but not as enthusiastic. I wonder if he his cracking under the weight of realization that he is losing/lost a case the judge(s) keep/kept trying to win for him.

wait till he hears that nulls legal crowdfund alone still has enough money in it to pay hardin to respond to and counter at least 50 plightspergs like this one
something something well oiled, long run

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Do requests for sanctions still get considered even after a case is dismissed, @Useful_Mistake ?

Pending sanctions might, but the judge can always go "case dismissed, all pending motions denied as moot"

 

[AnOminous]

Yet another "The mean nasty Kiwi's are being mean to me by pointing out my fraud and bad acts I demand you SANCTION THEM!" Filing. Complete with his cargo cult approach to law.

"Some random guy did something so sanction someone completely unrelated."

Neck, Greer.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

"Sanctions will be the only way to get defendants and their attorney to stop multiplying the case load", says Plaintiff Russell Greee in his filing of document number 346

 

[goblin enby]

If Greee wasn't making materially false claims of last minute "emergencies" to the court, or making financial claims about purchasing and running expensive brothel properties/businesses that raise suspicion of 'IPF' fraud then perhaps the defense wouldn't have reason to multiply the case load.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

I note with some irritation that it still says "Defendant" on the docket instead of "Plaintiff," sigh.

It's hilarious and terrifying to think Russell's successfully Buggs Bunnyed the court into thinking Null owes him sanctions

I wonder if he his cracking under the weight of realization that he is losing/lost a case the judge(s) keep/kept trying to win for him.

Judge Barlow literally broke the law for Russell, who didn't appreciate it and asked instead for 10 peecent bond while he appeals.

It's like this is a football game, the two referees have Null and Hardin bound and gagged, and they're BEGGING Russell "Please, just make ONE goal so we can say you win!" But Russell just keeps proudly kicking the ball in his own goal while the refs cry

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So, Russ wants to punish Mr. Hardin under 28 USC § 1927, does he? Well, let's see what Judges think of it.

"§ 1927 represents an extreme standard, and fees should be awarded only in instances evidencing a serious and standard disregard for the orderly process of justice, lest the Court dampen the legitimate zeal of an attorney in representing his client." - Smith v. WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC, March 27, 2025.

Oh...well that doesn't sound all that good for Russ.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

Just starting the motion with an outright lie, huh?

he had inadvertently scheduled personal affairs on the same day that he could not reschedule

the City (the other meeting) would not reschedule

It could've been addressed in his absence and it is a monthly meeting anyway. Not to mention there was a secret 3rd meeting that was definitely the important inflexible business meeting that meant the court hearing had to move. It definitely wasn't the whore summit.

Firstly, Mr. Matthew Hardin has multiplied the proceedings in this case. As of July 1st, 2025 (the date of the last filing), the ECF file count is now at 345. Except for his renewed motion to dismiss, none of those ECF files have to do with defending copyright infringement.

Ah, somebody doesn't understand what "multiplied" means. Merely adding to the docket is not "multiplication," you shit-lipped retard. As you are the one who has effectively barred Mr Hardin from discussing the copyright matter, you have also rescinded your right to plightsperge about that. While discovery is stayed, Mr Hardin is free to pick holes in your flimsy-ass stories as he pleases.

Hardin’s complaining about supposed IPF fraud was unreasonable because he never even saw the original application because it was a SEALED DOCUMENT. Mr. Hardin has ASSUMED and by assuming, he has caused delay.

Mr Hardin has inferred, based on the narrative that you have provided. If you don't qualify for IFP now (yes, it's IFP, not IPF), and you were wealthier at the time you applied for it, you did not qualify for it then either. Non-developmentally-disabled people call that "fraud".

It appears the Court has been catching on to Defendants’ constant delays by denying their motion for extension

Even if the actions weren’t of ill-intent, to excuse objectively unreasonable conduct by an attorney would be to state that one who acts with `an empty head and a pure heart' is not responsible for the consequences."

Ah, he's doing the CWC thing where he repeats something that was intelligent and reasonable in its original context. Cute.

Plaintiff has incurred costs of putting aside limited time to answer Mr. Hardin’s excessive motions. Plaintiff has been robbed of sleep by having to answer the motions of Mr. Hardin. Mr. Hardin has caused stress by contacting people connected to plaintiff for his frivolous investigations.

Shitlips. Don't start what you can't finish. Just like The Olive Garden Date.

Plaintiff seeks $2,000 in fees for the considerable vexation he has endured

How the fuck have you come to that number? Is that what the flavour of the month working girl is charging?

RE: May 6th, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Winnemucca City Council

That's a nice exhibit you've got there, Shitlips. Would be a shame if it shattered the whole "immovable" argument. Regardless, trying to foist whores on Winnemucca does not take priority over your case hearing.

Better not be avoiding that sanctions payment, boy!

 

[RodgerDodger]

Hardin's response will likely point out that this is yet another transparent vexatious and hollow attempt by the plaintiff to zero out or negate the Sanctions that have already been dropped on him that he still refuses to pay. It's a scam.

This of course goes hand in hand with pointing out that the ongoing litigation is the result of the plaintiff refusing to provide discovery, refusing to comply with repeated court orders, repeatedly lying to the court with practically every filing. Etc. "Oh and BTW Judge Shitlips also gave Florida a fake address too. Something this court has failed to correct or address for years". By every conceivable metric the plaintiff has failed to properly litigate his case.